Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 525577
  • *Total Topics: 15645
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 0
  • *Guests: 7
  • *Total: 7

Author Topic: Testing the TK Tar Baby  (Read 1500651 times)

Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3143
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5265 on: December 14, 2012, 07:26:36 PM »
Kind of gets to you, doesn't it Steve, when people call you by some name that you don't want them to think is your own.

Don't forget, because I won't: YOU LIED TO ME, deliberately tricked me, by saying you would send me a mosfet when you had no intention of doing so. And in my naivete, I actually believed and trusted you. But you were only trolling, and you caught me that time, like a hapless billfish on your hook. You have no credibility here, you aren't helpful and you are exceedingly obnoxious. You probably wear socks with sandals, you are so soggy. Dogs want to sniff your fingers!

So go troll in some other waters, where your colors aren't quite so well known. Maybe you'll catch some other sucker to try to torture with your extra special halitosis-laden logorrhea. I'm surprised you can even type, since you are all thumbs.
brian, brian, brian... ::)  you're so asinine... ::)  i'm not steve. and you're still responding with red herrings... ::) CHANGING THE SUBJECT IS HARDLY A COGENT RESPONSE YOU GODTARD...

meanwhile you still cannot:
-refute any of the points i have made here concerning his logical fallacies, hypocrisy and misrepresentations;
-demonstrate how you were "tricked";
-respond cogently;
-provide ANY evidence at all that I am someone named steve or jibguy or any of it;


your hypocrisy nourishes me... ::)

oh by the way... speaking of dogs, i'll be in your vicinity in texas later this winter hog hunting. mind if i borrow your mutts? and that's not a threat of any kind even though your pathetic ass will try and paint it as one, it's just a simple question.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5265 on: December 14, 2012, 07:26:36 PM »

Offline mrsean2k

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 173
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5266 on: December 14, 2012, 07:42:29 PM »
@tk

I see his responses in your quotes and when I'm not logged in occasionally.

I understand he's been a very unpleasant annoyance in the past, but as his posts are devoid of any substantial points that are worth refuting, I'm genuinely baffled as to why you give the c u n t the time of day.

Your time of course.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5267 on: December 14, 2012, 09:15:33 PM »
@tk

I see his responses in your quotes and when I'm not logged in occasionally.

I understand he's been a very unpleasant annoyance in the past, but as his posts are devoid of any substantial points that are worth refuting, I'm genuinely baffled as to why you give the c u n t the time of day.

Your time of course.
It occasionally gives me the opportunity to bump this thread and keep it from falling off of the front page, and of course every post he makes against ME.... .while not making the same kinds of attacks against actual inanities and disinformation and outright lies like Ainslie and her sock puppets commit.... that just shows that he is a very discriminating troll and in fact is a stalker, lurking and waiting for me to post something that he thinks he can attack.
He follows me from thread to thread, and even seems to have a subscription to my YT channel in some username he's not going to reveal, as he combs through my videos, not daring to make a comment, but leaving his little droppings behind him in the form of thumbs-down votes. I find this very amusing, since I now have nearly four hundred videos showing my works in various contexts and areas..... while his actual contributions and actual exposure are essentially nil. He must be wasting more and more of his time, every day, looking for something of mine to attack.
In short, the person to whom we refer is a paper tiger, a stack of straw, with no real substance and a profound lack of anything resembling personal dignity or respect for others. He's got an agenda, and I'm it. He pretends to be a logician but he fails to perceive the beam in his own eye, while he attempts to criticize the motes in the eyes of others.... mostly me.
People have been banned and/or blocked from this forum for much less than what he's done and continues to do .... Mile High comes to mind, for example.... but for some reason Stefan tolerates this consummate troll and allows him safe harbour to sail about and attack at will.  The "future drunkard" seems to be a permanent fixture of this forum, like a water hazard that's really a stinking swamp on what otherwise might be a pleasant golf course. His actually helpful contributions to _anyone_ can be counted on one hand, without even using the thumb, in all the years I've been a member of this forum.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5267 on: December 14, 2012, 09:15:33 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline evolvingape

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 478
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5268 on: December 14, 2012, 11:18:14 PM »
People have been banned and/or blocked from this forum for much less than what he's done and continues to do .... Mile High comes to mind, for example.... but for some reason Stefan tolerates this consummate troll and allows him safe harbour to sail about and attack at will.

I have wondered about this myself makes no sense at all. There is a modus operandi in play... but what is it ?


Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3143
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5269 on: December 14, 2012, 11:34:53 PM »
I have wondered about this myself makes no sense at all. There is a modus operandi in play... but what is it ?
you trolls ever stop to think it MIGHT just be because... i speak the truth. your hero, the dancing bear knows it, and that's why he ALWAYS responds with a red herring or a strawman or his other favorite fallacy, ad hominem... because he can't refute anything i have said. all one has to do is look at the record to see this fact. which is what stephan does... and being the fair and impartial host that he is, he knows all i have ever done is to present the truth.

meanwhile sean and ape... you still cannot:
-refute any of the points i have made here concerning his logical fallacies, hypocrisy and misrepresentations;
-demonstrate how your hero was "tricked";
-respond cogently;
-provide ANY evidence at all that I am someone named 'steve' or 'jibguy' or 'windisch' or any of it...

while i on the other hand, back up what i say with quotes and images that demonstrate what i say to be true and factual.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5269 on: December 14, 2012, 11:34:53 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline happyfunball

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 405
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5270 on: December 14, 2012, 11:48:47 PM »
you trolls ever stop to think it MIGHT just be because... i speak the truth. your hero, the dancing bear knows it, and that's why he ALWAYS responds with a red herring or a strawman or his other favorite fallacy, ad hominem... because he can't refute anything i have said. all one has to do is look at the record to see this fact. which is what stephan does... and being the fair and impartial host that he is, he knows all i have ever done is to present the truth.

meanwhile sean and ape... you still cannot:
-refute any of the points i have made here concerning his logical fallacies, hypocrisy and misrepresentations;
-demonstrate how your hero was "tricked";
-respond cogently;
-provide ANY evidence at all that I am someone named 'steve' or 'jibguy' or 'windisch' or any of it...

while i on the other hand, back up what i say with quotes and images that demonstrate what i say to be true and factual.

Can't you choose another forum to have temper tantrums and waste bandwidth

Offline evolvingape

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 478
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5271 on: December 15, 2012, 02:34:36 AM »
you trolls ever stop to think it MIGHT just be because... i speak the truth. your hero, the dancing bear knows it, and that's why he ALWAYS responds with a red herring or a strawman or his other favorite fallacy, ad hominem... because he can't refute anything i have said. all one has to do is look at the record to see this fact. which is what stephan does... and being the fair and impartial host that he is, he knows all i have ever done is to present the truth.

I encourage everyone to log in and view all of Wilbyinebriated's 3,000+ posts to date and decide for yourself if they are "speaking the truth", also ask yourself what content is of scientific value to the community. I have never seen Wilbyinebriated present "truth" in respect to Rosemary Ainslie and her claims, only harass those that have.

meanwhile sean and ape... you still cannot:
-refute any of the points i have made here concerning his logical fallacies, hypocrisy and misrepresentations;
-demonstrate how your hero was "tricked";
-respond cogently;
-provide ANY evidence at all that I am someone named 'steve' or 'jibguy' or 'windisch' or any of it...

I check TK's facts myself, I certainly am not guided by your opinions!

You did not trick him ? Sure ?:

http://www.overunity.com/12182/testing-the-tk-tar-baby/msg323797/#msg323797

Remember this Steve ?

http://www.opednews.com/articles/Ad-Hominem-Attacks-by-Rady-Ananda-090106-173.html?show=votes#allcomments

The new debating paradign

You are so right in this Rady, kudos for bringing up this subject.

What we see now is that ad hominem's usually dominate debate. We see it on TV, and we especially hear it on talk radio. On neocon forum sites, that is virtually THE ONLY kind of arguments you can see (my God, go to one some time and be prepared to be angry for at least a week, lol) .

What is so disgusting about this, is that young people see this and believe that it is the proper way to debate. 

I believe that ad hominem's should be addressed directly whenever they appear; as well as the other forms of sophistic manipulation such as straw men and red herrings. This constant calling-out will strip the user of their "favorite" tactics, and help the audience to see the manipulations.

Debate arguments should always be made with facts, ideas, and reason.... Not sputim, acid, and smoke.

Another problem i often see with forum debate is that the participants tend to take the replies personally. This is of course "natural"; however a serious debater should always understand that both the replies and their own comments MUST be aimed at the audience at large.... Not the opponent specifically.

Understand that every well-made debate point is a challenge.. And another opportunity to give your own. This is how you win debates... It is often a battle of attrition.

And oddly enough it is also the way to silence trolls and shills: Once they realize that every vitrolic comment just brings back more calm, logical, well-crafted points in return... They will cut their losses and quit (the smarter ones, anyway lol).


Sure sounds like you doesn't it Wilby... err... Steve... err... RAT...

while i on the other hand, back up what i say with quotes and images that demonstrate what i say to be true and factual.

I do not remember a single incidence of you backing up with quotes, images or facts, the continual lies and obvious deceptions of Rosemary Ainslie forced upon this community for many years. I do however remember you attacking the people that have presented truth and facts in respect of Rosemary Ainslie.

I once again urge every member to log in and read all of Wilbyinebriated's posts and decide for yourself if they are of value to this forum community, backed up with quotes and images.

I also urge you to consider what possible motive Stephan could have for none intervention in this well documented and particular case of perpetual assault on the community.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5271 on: December 15, 2012, 02:34:36 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5272 on: December 15, 2012, 07:32:27 AM »
Maybe she really IS his grandmother.

That would explain a lot..... certain kinds of psychopathology have a strong genetic component, and after all.... blood is thicker than water.

Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3143
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5273 on: December 15, 2012, 08:49:47 AM »
You did not trick him ? Sure ?:

http://www.overunity.com/12182/testing-the-tk-tar-baby/msg323797/#msg323797
and exactly HOW is that me tricking him? ::)

Remember this Steve ?

http://www.opednews.com/articles/Ad-Hominem-Attacks-by-Rady-Ananda-090106-173.html?show=votes#allcomments

The new debating paradign

You are so right in this Rady, kudos for bringing up this subject.

What we see now is that ad hominem's usually dominate debate. We see it on TV, and we especially hear it on talk radio. On neocon forum sites, that is virtually THE ONLY kind of arguments you can see (my God, go to one some time and be prepared to be angry for at least a week, lol) .

What is so disgusting about this, is that young people see this and believe that it is the proper way to debate. 

I believe that ad hominem's should be addressed directly whenever they appear; as well as the other forms of sophistic manipulation such as straw men and red herrings. This constant calling-out will strip the user of their "favorite" tactics, and help the audience to see the manipulations.

Debate arguments should always be made with facts, ideas, and reason.... Not sputim, acid, and smoke.

Another problem i often see with forum debate is that the participants tend to take the replies personally. This is of course "natural"; however a serious debater should always understand that both the replies and their own comments MUST be aimed at the audience at large.... Not the opponent specifically.

Understand that every well-made debate point is a challenge.. And another opportunity to give your own. This is how you win debates... It is often a battle of attrition.

And oddly enough it is also the way to silence trolls and shills: Once they realize that every vitrolic comment just brings back more calm, logical, well-crafted points in return... They will cut their losses and quit (the smarter ones, anyway lol).


Sure sounds like you doesn't it Wilby... err... Steve... err... RAT...
so... by your logic (and i'm using that word VERY loosely here) i am also any and everyone on the internet who has spoken of logical fallacies... i'm wikipedia, i'm nizkor.org, i'm theskepticsguide.com, etc., etc...   do you have any idea how asinine that sounds? probably not... ::)

I do not remember a single incidence of you backing up with quotes, images or facts, the continual lies and obvious deceptions of Rosemary Ainslie forced upon this community for many years. I do however remember you attacking the people that have presented truth and facts in respect of Rosemary Ainslie.
monkeyboy... why are you changing the subject? we are talking about the dancing bear's youtube video FROM THREE YEARS AGO WHERE HE CLAIMS:
Quote from: TinselKoala
Rosemary, I strongly recommend that you drop this silly story and move on with your life. I have.
to which i asked:  HAS HE? come on monkey... do you think i won't call you on such a fallacy? again, don't be so asinine. ::) now then... looking at the dancing bear's last 500 posts i ask you AGAIN...   HAS HE?

I once again urge every member to log in and read all of Wilbyinebriated's posts and decide for yourself if they are of value to this forum community, backed up with quotes and images.

I also urge you to consider what possible motive Stephan could have for none intervention in this well documented and particular case of perpetual assault on the community.
did you read ALL of them?  ::)  your hero the dancing bear is simply getting what he gives... i'm his mirror, and if he is going to harass people OBSESSIVELY for what he believes to be a personal insult, then i am going to return the favor... since he did the same things (insults, libel, etc.) to me that he accuses rose of doing to him. and if it's 'personal' between him and rose, then it is 'personal' between he and i.

and finally, i haven't "assaulted the community"... ::) again... stop being so asinine, and stop vomiting such hyperbole. ::)

i think the real question is why has tinselkoala been allowed to continue his "assault"? rosemary is banned and most likely will continue to be banned. the dancing bear has made his point OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN... is there really a need to continue?


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5273 on: December 15, 2012, 08:49:47 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3143
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5274 on: December 15, 2012, 09:15:07 AM »
meanwhile monkeyboy... you still cannot:
-refute any of the points i have made here concerning his logical fallacies, hypocrisy and misrepresentations;
-demonstrate how your hero was "tricked";
-respond cogently;
-provide ANY evidence at all that I am someone named 'steve' or 'jibguy' or 'windisch' or any of it...

Offline happyfunball

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 405
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5275 on: December 15, 2012, 10:43:37 AM »
meanwhile monkeyboy... you still cannot:
-refute any of the points i have made here concerning his logical fallacies, hypocrisy and misrepresentations;
-demonstrate how your hero was "tricked";
-respond cogently;
-provide ANY evidence at all that I am someone named 'steve' or 'jibguy' or 'windisch' or any of it...

Give me your name and address, I promise to send you some mosfets.

If they never arrive please don't accuse me of tricking you into turning over your personal information.

No sane person could ever reach that conclusion.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5275 on: December 15, 2012, 10:43:37 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5276 on: December 15, 2012, 11:00:49 AM »
Why OVER AND OVER......? Here's why:
Quote
FOR BRYAN LITTLE

My sweet little pickle... Whatever next?  I read pages and pages of rather frantic reference to the fact that Wayne's work is not yet a closed system.  But I see nothing in there about your acknowledgement of having 'chased' him off OU.com with the persistent badgering that you seem to manage.  Wayne, thankfully, is showing you what happens when a technology is taken out of your firing line.  Other reputable scientists get involved.  They visit.  They contribute.  Everything is pro-active.  Hope abounds.  Science progresses.

Now.  It seems that you're still anxious to forward that ridiculous compendium of my work - as interpreted by 'ickle pickle'.   I would, myself, take the trouble to answer your multiple allegations and provide the necessary qualifications to all that nonsense.  But frankly it would take me way too much time.  And effort.  And it would lend to - rather than detract from - your absurd nonsense.  So.  Best left ignored - is the advices that I've been given and am following.  You also refer to our hit rate at '900'?  Not actually my sweet little pickle.  The actual average is FAR FAR higher. 

But I am - nonetheless - still as anxious as ever to re-assure you about your lack of height - substance - size.  That thing that keeps you up and awake at nights.  You really should NOT worry.  While everyone can still read your fabrications and insinuations and 'mendacity' ...?  I think is your preferred term? ... then they'll probably think that you're at least 72 GRE squared.  Which is something.  Or, it is better than nothing.  I'm not sure though that anyone can buy into that 1560 number.  Were you referring to your foot size?  The length of your moustache?  Something else?  Not at all sure.  You need to learn to be precise when you're referencing numbers.  Otherwise everyone is left as confused as you probably intended.

With an extensive lack of love and respect
Rosie Pose

Quote
Guys - just a little correspondence on a very LITTLE subject...

Dear *******,

We've been hit with a heat wave from hell.  I spent the most of yesterday trying and failing to keep cool.  And it took all my best efforts.  Else I'd have replied sooner.  Thankfully it's now early enough for the sun to be relatively tame.  Would that this cool could last.  But I see another day of clear sky likely to followed by more of those furnace blasts.  More's the pity.  I suffer from low blood pressure and this - combined with heat - is a lethargic if not lethal, cocktail.

Regarding our Nikola Tesla 'wannabe'.  Yes.  It's known that this is an anagram.  His earlier version of this was alsetalokin. Sadly, our 'ickle pickle' lacks any social efficacy and relies on the internet to bolster his sense of purpose in life.  It's also the ONLY way he can earn a living.  For corporate efficacy one needs some level of charisma.  The poor sod has none and therefore any such reach would have been doomed to failure.  Compounded with which he's no longer young.  Frankly I feel rather sorry for him.  He's obliged  to fight a losing battle with all this good news about over unity.  And in about 4 years from now he'll be past his best - due to retire - and will be one of the single most despised internet personalities that have ever disgraced our forums. Him and Stefan Hartman - both.  They try to advance the ruse that they're anxious to promote clean green.  And they're both guilty of delaying the inevitable - which is PRECISELY how they earn their living.  Stefan has probably been the most pro-active in trying to silence me while retaining the full weight of TK's calumny - used to kill interest in our technology and our claims.  But they've not yet managed it.  On the contrary.  As mentioned - our readership is exploding.  And that would hardly be the result of a flagging interest which they were clearly hoping to advance.   

I'll be in touch again ...
Kindest and best as ever,
Rosie
   

Note that in that last one, she is talking to someone outside this forum or her own. If she knew and used my real name, which is not Bryan or Brian Little, this would indeed be an "actionable" libel.
The poor slapper just can't keep her delusions to herself. Meanwhile she cannot and will not ever be able to refute our points here, and most especially she will not be making those videos she promised us many months ago showing her duplication of the scopeshot shown in her mendacious manuscript... because she cannot.

Quote
Etymology 2 From sodomize, by shortening
  Noun sod (plural sods)
 
(UK, vulgar) Sodomite; bugger.
(UK, slang, mildly pejorative, formerly considered vulgar) A person, usually male; often qualified with an adjective. You mean old sod!poor sodunlucky sod
 

Offline evolvingape

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 478
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5277 on: December 15, 2012, 11:28:39 AM »
I see you are a great student of my work, sailor. Why have I retaken up the cause against Ainslie's perpetual lie machine? Because AINSLIE TRIED TO GAIN THREE MONETARY AWARDS at the start of the current nonsense, and spoke disparagingly of me and my work.... In other words, she lied and libelled me.  When I was given a stack of her correspondence to review by a person whose name you would recognize.... yes, it began again for me. What is it to you, troll? I'll spend my time as I like, and if I choose to come back onto some project, or leave it, I will do so at my own pleasure and nothing TROLLS can do will stop me.

Why don't you take a long walk off a short pier, you are all wet already.

TK has already answered you moron.

You have been around a long time haven't you Steve, never checked a word of that article before publishing it did you Steve, your scientific credibility is in the toilet isn't it Steve, you can be found in all the old Ainslie threads supporting her bogus claims can't you Steve, you sure sound like Steve to me... Steve.

http://www.opednews.com/articles/The-Strange-Case-of-the-Ro-by-Steve-Windisch-ji-091219-425.html


I have watched you hunt down people for years, stalking them thread to thread, using your logical fallacy weapon to wear them down until they lose it and quit, a war of attrition waged on this community, by you. I have had enough of it, so, I have sent Stephan a PM formally requesting that you be permanently banned from this forum for your behaviour and level of scientific contribution to this community. If Stephan has not banned you by 25th December 2012, 10 days time, I will formally request that he ban me permanently instead. Either way a decision must be made, he is going to lose one of us, it will be up to the community to decide if Stephan's choice is the correct one, or not.





Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3143
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5278 on: December 15, 2012, 12:05:42 PM »
Give me your name and address, I promise to send you some mosfets.

If they never arrive please don't accuse me of tricking you into turning over your personal information.

No sane person could ever reach that conclusion.
that's not what i said at all... ::) you LIAR. what i said was:

Quote from: TinselKoala
    Well, clearly you have the ability to order your own parts and build your own circuit, since you can use a web catalog. Oh, wait--using the catalog only requires a single finger for typing. Actually building something requires opposable thumbs.

    If you want to buy that from ebay and send it to me, I'll deduct the cost from the bill I send you for the consulting work.

    And the batteries cost "somebody" seventy-six dollars each. But I just had to walk around the building to get them.

    Now, from your elevated pulpit, can you read me the gospel chapter on how the choice of any particular N-channel mosfet would make a likety-split of difference in the duty cycle issue? And why do you care so much anyway? Why don't you go attack her, there are a LOT more holes in her story than you will ever find in mine.
    Zipons! Hah!
Quote from: WilbyInebriated
well, you clearly have the ability to make BS up on the spot and then misdirect and obfuscate when called on it... i am assuming $4! is still "expensive" for you then? or is it that ebay is as difficult for you to use as google? or do you just like posting outright falsehoods as justification for doing it wrong?

send me your address and i will send you the part, you worthless bum.

building "something" may or may not require opposable thumbs. from your elevated pulpit do let us know when you get around to building it "right"...

now it's rather clear from that post AND FROM THE ONES PRECEDING IT WHERE I DEMONSTRATE TK's DEEP POCKETS (i show where he flashes 10 $100 dollar bills and makes a challenge to a certain someone) AND THE ONES WHERE I SHOW THAT A IRFPG50 IS A RATHER CHEAP PART AND HIS ASININE EXCUSES FOR NOT HAVING ONE ARE... WELL, ASININE... that i never intended to send him ANYTHING. to intimate that i did is simply delusional on your part and tk's... AND NO SANE PERSON COULD EVER REACH THAT CONCLUSION... ::)

i'll fetch those posts (they are in the first 11 pages of the original ainslie thread here on this forum:
http://www.overunity.com/7620/claimed-ou-circuit-of-rosemary-ainslie/
 and rub your face in them when i have a bit more time, but right now i don't have the time for yours and tinsel's ASININE, CHILDISH OBSESSIONS... monkey boy.



Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3143
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5279 on: December 15, 2012, 12:22:02 PM »
http://www.overunity.com/7620/claimed-ou-circuit-of-rosemary-ainslie/msg186469/#msg186469
Quote from: WilbyInebriated
any plan on doing it right? meaning getting proper components for the ones that you have that are not spec.
do you plan to use a calorimeter if/when you make the circuit to spec?

i am assuming you have a diode on the genny output? could you confirm?

http://www.overunity.com/7620/claimed-ou-circuit-of-rosemary-ainslie/msg188301/#msg188301
Quote from: WilbyInebriated
tk

i see you tossing the word 'exact' or 'exactly' out in a few of your posts. maybe you need a refresher?
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/exactly

did you drop the $10! for the correct fet yet? i should think after your $1000 U.S. equiv. offer to mylow? and your own admission that you spent $900 and 80hrs of your time on it (mylow's wheel) you wouldn't be so pompous as to expect us to think you can't cough up the $10! for the correct fet for this 'debunking'. i should also think you wouldn't want to leave this fet issue open for contention whatsoever. nice work as usual.

http://www.overunity.com/7620/claimed-ou-circuit-of-rosemary-ainslie/msg188398/#msg188398
Quote from: WilbyInebriated
i don't care what you did or said on who... it's not really EXACT or EXACTLY until you get the right fet, REGARDLESS OF THE SPECS SHEET OR KNOWN FET BEHAVIOR. why would you even leave it open for discussion or debate by 'believers' unless you're nothing but an internet 'tick' that feeds on such juvenile drama? why not get the right fet and put it all to rest. why use words like EXACTLY when IT'S NOT EXACT? i would expect better, even from you...

why do you always avoid the explicit point being made with some bullshit excuse?  i've asked you this before, are you mental?

once again, it seems one of our members here who thinks he runs in more 'erudite' circles, is making ee101 mistakes and bitching and crying about others not building, all the while talking about how his non-exact build is exact...

you're missing the point. i agree with you on the fet issue. THE POINT IS, (read slow and careful here so you can comprehend this) you can tell me whatever you want, just don't tell me it's exact until it is...
so at this point i would love to hear your explanation of how your circuit is exact.

stiffler isn't my hero. which is one of the reason i asked you to do one of your 'debunkings' on his circuit. if i recall, when i did ask you that, you went off on some tirade about stalkers and trolls, etc.
 then you made up some bullshit about how he was scared of you and so you couldn't put up a youtube video on your own channel 'debunking' him for some asinine reason...
i can find the posts if you need me to. i know you're really busy being a pompous ass that makes EE 101 mistakes like forgetting about the invert switch.  ::)

http://www.overunity.com/7620/claimed-ou-circuit-of-rosemary-ainslie/msg188400/#msg188400
Quote from: WilbyInebriated
if you're referring to the correct fet, about time...  ::)
was that so hard? and now you are 'bulletproof', barring anymore of those ee101 mistakes.  ;)

if you were not referring to acquiring the correct fet, all i can say is "damn, it's like pulling teeth or something."

http://www.overunity.com/7620/claimed-ou-circuit-of-rosemary-ainslie/msg189007/#msg189007
Quote from: WilbyInebriated
so i take it that is a no then. you still don't have the "exact" fet.

rosemarie did. then you did also.

as i said before, i agree with you about the duty cycle (only because you failed to get the fet into self oscillation...) and i don't care what you do on who, just don't tell me it's "exact", or you replicated it "exactly" here or on any other forum until it is "exact".

why are you bringing stiffler into it? did he help you pick out the wrong fet? did he put the words "exact" or "exactly" in your posts? misdirection and ad hominem...

http://www.overunity.com/7620/claimed-ou-circuit-of-rosemary-ainslie/msg189013/#msg189013
Quote from: WilbyInebriated
i dont care what stiffler did or didn't do, it's irrelevant.
no, nothing can be exact. obviously semiconductor components have a inherent variation even from the same batch, but for the love of zeus get the right fet before one calls it "exact". i should hope you can see this self evident truth and not have issue with that.
i asked TK a simple question at the beginning of this thread and all he has done is beat around the bush. if it's not exact don't use the word exact... and furthermore, if it's not exact don't be a pompous ass while using the word exact and expect not to get called on it, especially after someone asked you on page 1 of the thread if you planned on doing it "exactly".

PS i think TK does great work, he just never quite does it exactly ;)
PPS i agree with stiffler, stuffed animals are for children...

http://www.overunity.com/7620/claimed-ou-circuit-of-rosemary-ainslie/msg189014/#msg189014
Quote from: WilbyInebriated
it's not TK's madness that i have issue with, it's his method.

if TK is not willing to retract/correct his erroneous statement about his circuit being "exact" why should rosemary retract/correct her paper?

http://www.overunity.com/7620/claimed-ou-circuit-of-rosemary-ainslie/msg189030/#msg189030
Quote from: WilbyInebriated
thanks. as i said before, a couple times i think, that's really the only thing i had issue with. nice that you tried 4 others though  ;)
damn, it's like pulling teeth...

i meant the "jack of all trades" as a compliment tk... ie:polymath

"jack of all trades, master of none, though oft times better than master of one."
i thought you ran in erudite circles?  ;) all that jumping must keep you in good shape?

edit: offering bets? after i twice said i agree with you (mostly) about the duty cycle? i have to again ask, are you mental? what's with your reading comprehension?

http://www.overunity.com/7620/claimed-ou-circuit-of-rosemary-ainslie/msg189695/#msg189695
Quote from: WilbyInebriated
you get that $10 fet yet? or are you a hypocrite?

@poynt99
what fet did you use? the same as tk? or the right one?

http://www.overunity.com/7620/claimed-ou-circuit-of-rosemary-ainslie/msg189702/#msg189702
Quote from: WilbyInebriated
re: your first paragraph. ie:more tk BS
http://cgi.ebay.com/IRFPG50_W0QQitemZ370108354282QQcmdZViewItemQQptZLH_DefaultDomain_0?hash=item562c2d4eea&_trksid=p4634.c0.m14.l1262&_trkparms=%7C293%3A10%7C294%3A30
look, $4! gasp! and if you would learn to use the web for something other than being a tick, you might be able to find a single IRFPG50 fet for half of what you claim they cost.

re: your second paragraph. it was a rhetorical question, more of another poke at you to get the right one. obviously...

edit: i'm curious though, and feel free to jump to the conclusion that ainslie is my new hero. how much did you spend on those "brand new" 20ah batteries?

http://www.overunity.com/7620/claimed-ou-circuit-of-rosemary-ainslie/msg189752/#msg189752
Quote from: WilbyInebriated
well, you clearly have the ability to make BS up on the spot and then misdirect and obfuscate when called on it... i am assuming $4! is still "expensive" for you then? or is it that ebay is as difficult for you to use as google? or do you just like posting outright falsehoods as justification for doing it wrong?

send me your address and i will send you the part, you worthless bum.

building "something" may or may not require opposable thumbs. from your elevated pulpit do let us know when you get around to building it "right"...

 

OneLink