Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

A-Ads

MN LiveCoach

Masternodes Live Coaching

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 513375
  • *Total Topics: 15278
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 8
  • *Guests: 13
  • *Total: 21

Author Topic: Testing the TK Tar Baby  (Read 1343632 times)

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5085 on: November 10, 2012, 02:44:14 AM »
D'ya suppose he'll take _all_ the information to his "actually credentialled" persons, or just his "positive" results?
How many possible causes for his data has he _ruled out_, to show that there's no other way his data could have arisen _except_ by some kind of overunity performance of his apparatus?

Since he doesn't want to talk about his work here...  as he keeps telling us... there's no way that I can tell. But I don't actually recall him reporting on a single test of a null hypothesis when he _does_ talk about his work, here or there; he's just been demonstrating that he can get the data he gets. D'ya think he'll be reporting his tests of null hypotheses to his "actually credentialled" persons?

D'ya think he even understands what a null hypothesis is, how to test one, or the logic of hypothesis testing in general?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5085 on: November 10, 2012, 02:44:14 AM »

Offline gmeast

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5086 on: November 10, 2012, 03:19:54 AM »

Offline gmeast

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5087 on: November 10, 2012, 03:20:46 AM »
So why are you seagulling over here?

How robust can your results be if merely discussing them is a threat? Pure madness.


not worth discussing here

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5087 on: November 10, 2012, 03:20:46 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline gmeast

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5088 on: November 10, 2012, 03:22:17 AM »
D'ya suppose he'll take _all_ the information to his "actually credentialled" persons, or just his "positive" results?
How many possible causes for his data has he _ruled out_, to show that there's no other way his data could have arisen _except_ by some kind of overunity performance of his apparatus?

Since he doesn't want to talk about his work here...  as he keeps telling us... there's no way that I can tell. But I don't actually recall him reporting on a single test of a null hypothesis when he _does_ talk about his work, here or there; he's just been demonstrating that he can get the data he gets. D'ya think he'll be reporting his tests of null hypotheses to his "actually credentialled" persons?

D'ya think he even understands what a null hypothesis is, how to test one, or the logic of hypothesis testing in general?


I've shown everyone, that's worth anything, everything.  Which is why you haven't seen it all.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline gmeast

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5089 on: November 10, 2012, 03:23:22 AM »
Then don't. Make yourself scarce.


ban me then,  revoke my posting privileges.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5089 on: November 10, 2012, 03:23:22 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3580
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5090 on: November 10, 2012, 03:29:24 AM »

not worth discussing here
Indeed, I fully agree. Yet you keep coming back posting your insults.

ban me then,  revoke my posting privileges.
Ask Stefan to ban you, I'm not the admin.

Offline Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5772
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5091 on: November 10, 2012, 03:39:12 AM »

ban me then,  revoke my posting privileges.
Yes. We shall ban thee. For thou hath not taken heed in thine Advisors words. Now goeth out from the garden of OU, and yee shall go forth and faketh all men.  ;D

Gimme a break.  ::)

Mags

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5091 on: November 10, 2012, 03:39:12 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5092 on: November 10, 2012, 04:12:15 AM »
Yes. We shall ban thee. For thou hath not taken heed in thine Advisors words. Now goeth out from the garden of OU, and yee shall go forth and faketh all men.  ;D

Gimme a break.  ::)

Mags

 ;D

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5093 on: November 10, 2012, 05:02:07 AM »

I've shown everyone, that's worth anything, everything.  Which is why you haven't seen it all.

So that's three "NOs" then. You won't be showing _all_ the information, because you won't want your credentialed folks to see your earlier math errors and total blunders in calculations, and you have not done proper hypothesis testing to rule out all possible alternative causes for your data, and you don't actually understand what a null hypothesis is nor the logic of hypothesis testing, upon which all experimental science is based.

Odd that you call us worthless, and yet go to the trouble to log in here to do so -- only to be refuted in your every contention. Odd... but typical of your ilk. I believe it's called "trolling", when a person posts comments only to cause some kind of emotional reaction in others, rather than to participate in a real discussion.

Funny, too..... because certainly anyone who behaved as you do HERE, over THERE..... would get banned and censored right away.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5093 on: November 10, 2012, 05:02:07 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline gmeast

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5094 on: November 10, 2012, 08:12:02 AM »
So that's three "NOs" then. You won't be showing _all_ the information, because you won't want your credentialed folks to see your earlier math errors and total blunders in calculations, and you have not done proper hypothesis testing to rule out all possible alternative causes for your data, and you don't actually understand what a null hypothesis is nor the logic of hypothesis testing, upon which all experimental science is based.

Odd that you call us worthless, and yet go to the trouble to log in here to do so -- only to be refuted in your every contention. Odd... but typical of your ilk. I believe it's called "trolling", when a person posts comments only to cause some kind of emotional reaction in others, rather than to participate in a real discussion.

Funny, too..... because certainly anyone who behaved as you do HERE, over THERE..... would get banned and censored right away.


math errors and all of that stuff is in the past.  but the past is what you keep bringing forward and continue to use in the here and now.  you have NO idea of what I'm doing, how I'm doing it, the results I've obtained, or who I'm talking to.  as far as behavior goes, I've only responded in kind to your unqualified judgments.  I've viewed your 'tar baby' videos and one of your Ainslie video showing the ground-loop detail (which was actually enlightening by the way ... I ignore the oscillations and tune for other characteristics) and I have to say you are arrogant, sarcastic, narcissistic and generally full of yourself.  you may be intelligent but that is overshadowed by ... read above.  I would hate to be you.

Offline mrsean2k

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 173
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5095 on: November 10, 2012, 09:50:05 AM »
Your calculation errors aren't in the past until you demonstrate that you understand why you were in error.

You haven't done that, you've just shoved it to one side in favour of a different method where you think you can't have made any errors.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5095 on: November 10, 2012, 09:50:05 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline mrsean2k

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 173
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5096 on: November 10, 2012, 10:30:46 AM »
"When I see omission of comments on my posts at OU.com I KNOW I've hit a home run"

You get virtually no comments on your posts because they are constant repetition of the same contentless shite.

And you've abandoned any attempt to maintain the fiction that you aren't ysw

Barefaced lies, you shameless fraud.

Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3580
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5097 on: November 10, 2012, 02:37:59 PM »
What would benefit the free energy community, and this forum in general, is if gmeast disappeared for good.

Unfortunately, he keeps coming back because he isn't getting enough attention from his imaginary team of "credentialed" individuals.

He should heed Rosemary's advice, and not "spar" with us "losers". I strongly second that advice.

Please bugger off gmeast. The likes of you only do a disservice to this community.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5098 on: November 10, 2012, 10:02:50 PM »
Ainslie once again admits how clueless she actually is. Unable actually to refute ONE SINGLE POINT in all the many videos I've made concerning her idiocy and mistakes, she decides to claim that one of my videos is even "decidedly pornographic".... and again she accuses without reference or citation that something is wrong somehow about some image I've posted. What a continuing and even progressing case of senile idiocy she presents. I certainly hope her doctors are continuing to evaluate her medication... it's possible she's having an adverse reaction, as her delusions are clearly out of control.

Go ahead, AINSLIE, if you dare. Take any one of my videos.... like the ones where I clearly refute your idiotic claims about Function Generators not being able to act as power supplies or to pass current from an external battery through them, or the ones where I show that capacitors do just what you claimed they could not do .... and dissect it, providing a transcript and point-by-point refutation, LIKE YOU PROMISED TO DO, many months ago. Hah.... you will not, because YOU CANNOT.

Even when I post the links for you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GuBWVmRmUtc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udAfK3WxMoo

Remember when you said THIS, AINSLIE?
Quote
"What you are trying to do is to get me to believe that a function generator is able to pass current from a battery supply source via its terminal to its probe. Since I KNOW that is is impossible I'm afraid I'm not receptive to you trying to teach me or anyone else.  So NO.  I spare me your 'lessons'. " (sic)

Funny, isn't it, how much of what you KNOW .... just isn't so.

And of course your misunderstanding of the behaviour of mosfets is so amazingly total that you cannot even believe what I show in the following videos, nor can your "zipon thesis" mishmash word salad account for it ... at all.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKstLQYayNA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbAGWkWFmxM


And as far as "pornography" is concerned.... one would be hard pressed to find anything in my videos even nearly as pornographic and in poor taste as THESE execrable wastes of pixels:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_LjNBdSvc8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAKwTeoqITU

Offline fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5099 on: November 12, 2012, 05:04:26 AM »
Howdy all,

Well gmeast for having all the excitement and approval ratings has seen a mandate to further his unscientific method of testing and evaluation over at Energetic Forum, posting in a Sub Forum called "INDUCTIVE RESISTORS" started by that Administration for my modified scientific replication of a COP>17 device after finding out the original circuit didn't work as specified by Rosemary Ainslie the author of a article in October 2002 Quantum Magazine "Transient Energy Enhances Energy Co-Efficients"

I hope he will remove his trash and deposit it into his own thread so that there is "NO" association to any work that has already been done in the thread he's presently posted in.

This will give greg (aka gmeast) a opportunity to place "ALL" his schematics, photographs, video films, testing and evaluation data in one place for review by members at Energetic Forum, being he refuses to do it here and has only shown limited details at Rosemary Ainslie's personal forum/blog. This also can and will be compared to what has already been published on greg's "variant" device claiming a COP>1 to a COP>2.

Best,
Fuzzy
 ;)

 

OneLink