Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 83734
  • *Latest: rene30

  • *Total Posts: 517691
  • *Total Topics: 15434
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 5
  • *Guests: 11
  • *Total: 16

Author Topic: Testing the TK Tar Baby  (Read 1422973 times)

Offline Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5770
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5010 on: November 02, 2012, 04:14:51 AM »
And I am Buck Rogers.  ;D

Mags

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5010 on: November 02, 2012, 04:14:51 AM »

Offline gmeast

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 481
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5011 on: November 02, 2012, 04:38:33 AM »
Isnt it possible that you heard wrong? Or what you were told is wrong? ;)

Did you know that Rose is actually Barbara Streisand? :-*   

Mags


WOW! Ya know, I had a feeling she was ... something about ... oh whatever, I don't recall.  The way you put that verifies it.  Well, back to my fakery.


G

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5012 on: November 02, 2012, 05:00:18 AM »

Hi TK,


I'm intending absolutely NO disrespect here, but I was recently told that you and Bryan Little are one-in-the-same person? ??? ??


GME

Were you given any actual evidence for that? Of course not.

I've been telling the deluded ignoramus Rosemary Ainslie that I am in no way "little", that I am neither Scott Little nor this Brian or Bryan Little, ever since, months and months ago, she began calling me, in her vile manner, "little TK". I would LOVE to see upon what basis she has made her ridiculously erroneous identification.

I really REALLY DO want to bring all of this to Bryan, or Brian, Little's attention. Perhaps even Ainslie's imaginary lawyers would be interested in her libellous statements about Mr. Little, whoever he might be.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5012 on: November 02, 2012, 05:00:18 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline gmeast

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 481
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5013 on: November 02, 2012, 05:53:44 AM »
Were you given any actual evidence for that? Of course not.

I've been telling the deluded ignoramus Rosemary Ainslie that I am in no way "little", that I am neither Scott Little nor this Brian or Bryan Little, ever since, months and months ago, she began calling me, in her vile manner, "little TK". I would LOVE to see upon what basis she has made her ridiculously erroneous identification.

I really REALLY DO want to bring all of this to Bryan, or Brian, Little's attention. Perhaps even Ainslie's imaginary lawyers would be interested in her libellous statements about Mr. Little, whoever he might be.


WOE dude! You're going to have an aneurysm! Rosie was not the source.  I know NOTHING about "little TK" or Scott Little or anything she's said about you or any of that nonsense because I don't read it ... I skip over it and pay NO ATTENTION to it whatsoever.  The suggestion that 'you' were 'him' came in a PM from someone on another board ... someone I  don't even know and I don't  think has ever posted here.  Clearly you have gone "off the deep end" over this stuff.  Get a grip!


G

Offline Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5770
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5014 on: November 02, 2012, 06:47:41 AM »

WOW! Ya know, I had a feeling she was ... something about ... oh whatever, I don't recall.  The way you put that verifies it.  Well, back to my fakery.


G

Whats uP Faker? What are you faking now. Your the best faker. Your the fakiest. You fake.

You do nothing but come here to try and piss people off. You have no OU circuit you faker.

Truth is you got faked and now you have lost your mind. Heck theres nobody over there interesting to talk to, so you burn up some time over here acting all hot shot  when your just a faker. You have joined the faker club over there and have too much pride to admit that your with the Big Fake. The Fake Master. And you are her little Egor, the slave of fakery.

BAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA  faker. Why dont you go fake something. Hows the faking coming? Have you faked lately? You look a little faked. Are you faking it?

lol. You think your coming over here and doing some damage. Well if that was your intent, you must have faked it, cuz were ok fine.

Happy faking faker.

Mags

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5014 on: November 02, 2012, 06:47:41 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline mrsean2k

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 173
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5015 on: November 02, 2012, 09:00:15 AM »
ive had a search a few times and didnt find anyone called bryan little that was even a broad match for tk

Just another of RAs bloody stupid fantasies

Offline gmeast

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 481
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5016 on: November 02, 2012, 10:26:26 AM »
Whats uP Faker? What are you faking now. Your the best faker. Your the fakiest. You fake.

You do nothing but come here to try and piss people off. You have no OU circuit you faker.

Truth is you got faked and now you have lost your mind. Heck theres nobody over there interesting to talk to, so you burn up some time over here acting all hot shot  when your just a faker. You have joined the faker club over there and have too much pride to admit that your with the Big Fake. The Fake Master. And you are her little Egor, the slave of fakery.

BAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA  faker. Why dont you go fake something. Hows the faking coming? Have you faked lately? You look a little faked. Are you faking it?

lol. You think your coming over here and doing some damage. Well if that was your intent, you must have faked it, cuz were ok fine.

Happy faking faker.

Mags


This just keeps getting better and better.  A neighbor  of mine used to have a pet Beagle named Maggie but they always called her "Mags".  I think I'm witnessing a total melt down here.


Fantastic! "... cuz were ok fine."???  GOOD GOD MAN! goo goo dah dah.  It is "we're" not "were" ... it's a contraction ... gammmmmmar dude, grammar check.


I have never seen such obsession and hatred in my life.  I hope some psychologist is documenting this.  You guys are the poster children for adult immaturity. You claim to be adults, right?


You can dish it out but you can't take it.


I asked a question and  ... KA-BOOM! .... you guys 'go off' ... I guess proving my point.


"cuz were ok fine" ... yeah right.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5016 on: November 02, 2012, 10:26:26 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5770
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5017 on: November 02, 2012, 02:35:37 PM »

This just keeps getting better and better.  A neighbor  of mine used to have a pet Beagle named Maggie but they always called her "Mags".  I think I'm witnessing a total melt down here.


Fantastic! "... cuz were ok fine." ???  GOOD GOD MAN! goo goo dah dah.  It is "we're" not "were" ... it's a contraction ... gammmmmmar dude, grammar check.


I have never seen such obsession and hatred in my life.  I hope some psychologist is documenting this.  You guys are the poster children for adult immaturity. You claim to be adults, right?


You can dish it out but you can't take it.


I asked a question and  ... KA-BOOM! .... you guys 'go off' ... I guess proving my point.


"cuz were ok fine" ... yeah right.

Morning Faker  ;)   lol I can go back and read roses posts and they say just about the same things you say here. It must be a miracle. ::)

Ha!   Cant take what exactly?? hmm? Your posts are nill. Nothing. Nada.

Your 'question' had nothing to do with my post.

I just figured since you were 'imagining' that I called you a faker, and rubbing it in(to your self ;) )  that I would help you out with that, and make it feel like you really have something there. ::) ;)

Rose is your puppet master now. lol. She is taking the heat off of her by using here Gmule to come and play her game..

"Yeah Right"?  Another Rose card. Acting as if she has won a war or something. She has a big imagination. Too bad her circuits dont work. Too bad she lies all the time. Too bad you got suckered into the depths of her evil doings.

Oooo, you saw my great flaw, "were'.  Nice  try Rose.  From the fake herself. Ooo big attack.  Ah, I see. You plan to ruin us by pointing out our grammar errors. I have to tell ya, I never knew grammar was also spelled "gammmmmmar"  Oooo, I got ya faker. ::) Some hang time on that M key.

Ok, gota go to work Faker.  Keep up the good fakes!  ;) Keep on fakin on.  lol

Mags


Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5018 on: November 02, 2012, 07:17:16 PM »
And once again, GMEAST melts down while accusing others of melting down.

GMEAST, you asked, pretending not to intend disrespect, about the Brian Little thing. And I answered you in a quite reasonable manner.

And you resumed your disrespect and all the rest in your response.

So someone else on another forum, who just might be ROSEMARY AINSLIE HERSELF posting under yet another alias as she frequently does, told you I was Bryan or Brian Little? Did THEY give you any proof of that assertion? Of course not.

Like I said before, I would really like to know: the evidence used to "identify" me as Bryan Little;
and WHO IS BRIAN or BRYAN LITTLE and how do I contact him with a heads-up that his name is being sullied by a madwoman on the Internet?

Now. Let's see if you can absorb this:   I AM NOT BRIAN or BRYAN LITTLE. I am not related to anyone in any way with the name Little, other than (I hope) being able to call Scott and Marissa Little my somewhat distant friends. I've never even HEARD of anyone named Brian or Bryan Little until ROSEMARY AINSLIE, the ignorant arrogant idiot paranoid madwoman, started referring to me as "little TK" and then straight out as Brian or Bryan Little.
Every time she does so, she libels Little and sticks her own foot further down her mendacious wrinkled old throat.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5018 on: November 02, 2012, 07:17:16 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5019 on: November 02, 2012, 08:12:56 PM »
By the way.... you will have noted that I frequently refer to ROSEMARY AINSLIE as ignorant, an idiot, paranoid, delusional, mendacious, outright liar, and other descriptors.

These are not at all libellous descriptions because they are all TRUE and can be supported by evidence from Ainslie's own postings, which I have preserved in my database.
Anyone who doubts that can look up the dictionary definitions of those terms, post it here, and I will post a statement or set of statements from ROSEMARY AINSLIE herself that proves that she fits the definition.

ignorant: "there is no such animal as inductive reactance", etc.
an idiot: the Solstice (or Equinox) comes in Mid-July in South Africa, the 5.9 megaJoules in 90 minutes, the other bad math like confusing 0.8 with "one-eighth", etc.
paranoid: the constant accusations of "rifling" her computer or security lapses in her walled compound; her feeling that there is an organized conspiracy to silence her, etc.
delusional: the entire "thesis" that she pretends to expound in her papers; calling me "little TK" thinking that I am Brian Little (or Bryan, whatever), etc.
mendacious: the month-long deliberate deception about the schematics used in the demo video, the "bringing water to boil" claims, the nondischarge claims, etc.
outright liar: "I DID NOT POST THAT VIDEO" .... when she herself in her own blog announced its posting on her YT channel by her, the incorrect schematics posted, etc.

For just a few examples. I have screenshots of the original posts, not just saved text, so what I assert about Ainslie can be unequivocally proven to be true.
« Last Edit: November 03, 2012, 01:12:26 AM by TinselKoala »

Offline The Boss

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 52
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5020 on: November 02, 2012, 09:01:13 PM »
By the way.... you will have noted that I frequently refer to ROSEMARY AINSLIE as ignorant, an idiot, paranoid, delusional, mendacious, outright liar, and other descriptors.

This, in no way, can be considered an attack.  Ainslie has provided ample evidence of chronic clinical delusion over a 12 year period. All you are doing is simply stating fact,
which fortunately, most people are aware of.

Frequent reminders of this are quite appropriate for the awareness of new people joining various open source forums.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5020 on: November 02, 2012, 09:01:13 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3585
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5021 on: November 03, 2012, 12:09:23 AM »
Mags,

I don't think gmeast is Rose, just in case you were inferring that.

gmeast appears to actually have a grasp on basic electronics, although he definitely has some work yet to do before he understands power computations.

Offline Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5770
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5022 on: November 03, 2012, 12:52:23 AM »
Mags,

I don't think gmeast is Rose, just in case you were inferring that.

gmeast appears to actually have a grasp on basic electronics, although he definitely has some work yet to do before he understands power computations.

Yeah, I know that. But it sure smells quite familiar.  ;) When I say stuff that makes it sound like G is R, Im referring to what I read as if it were her. I feel a bit of coaching going on. ;) The similarities of a lot of his and her statements are fairly apparent. Not much from her lately, so the venting has to come from somewhere. ;) And you know she cant hold it in for long. ;) ;D

By the way, sorry for all that crap I put on you back then. I really didnt know. ;]

Im sure you saw how she turned on me for no apparent reason. And a bit before that she was saying, " I don't know what I did to deserve it" referring to my defending her.
She wasnt lying. ;)   Have to chalk that 'one' up on the board. Thing is, I didnt know why she deserved it, when I really think about it. I was fooled by a true faker.

Mags

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5023 on: November 03, 2012, 01:06:22 PM »
Oh, that's a good one all right.

ROSEMARY AINSLIE, the consummate idiot hypocrite, rams her own foot so far down her wrinkled old mendacious throat for all the world to see.

WHAT A BUNCH OF IDIOTS you are, Ainslie, and your sock puppets. Do you really think I have the powers you ascribe to me? Would that it were true.

And this continuing ridiculous misidentification of me with Bryan Little has just got to stop.

YOU LOT ARE WRONG, and every time Ainslie refers to Bryan Little, to me as "little TK" or whatever else she can come up with, she makes an EVEN GREATER FOOL of herself for everyone to see.

I find it very amusing.


WHO IS BRYAN LITTLE and how do I contact him to let him know how Ainslie and her sock puppets are libelling him?

When it is proven beyond any doubt that I am NOT this Brian or Bryan Little, what will Ainslie say then? Will she retract EVERY POST she's made using poor Little's name in vain? Will she stop insulting HIM in response to ME? Will she tuck her head in shame and shut up about her stupid mistakes and her ignorant mishmash of a "thesis"?

Of course not. She'll just continue on, find another website and a bunch of new people ... like GMEAST .... who aren't familiar with the full story, and she'll continue lying and insulting and faking and not fulfilling her promises, just as she's been doing for the past twelve years or more.


You think I'm BRYAN LITTLE?

PROVE IT, you bunch of idiots. You cannot..... because, just like your insane "thesis"..... it's a bunch of BS, without foundation in fact, without any empirical evidence, a delusional claim, yet another one, from the addled brain of the ancient troll Rosemary Ainslie.


Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3585
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5024 on: November 03, 2012, 02:40:36 PM »
No problem Mags, you were calling it as you saw it at the time.

It's a friendly reminder that folks in these circles need to be open-minded, both to the possibility of OU, and to the very real possibility that those making extraordinary claims without extraordinary evidence supporting them, may be mistaken, or worse, purposely-misleading.

 

OneLink