Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

A-Ads

MN LiveCoach

Masternodes Live Coaching

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 83475
  • *Latest: cecvic

  • *Total Posts: 513274
  • *Total Topics: 15278
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 1
  • *Guests: 12
  • *Total: 13

Author Topic: Testing the TK Tar Baby  (Read 1342902 times)

Offline PhiChaser

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 256
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5040 on: November 04, 2012, 06:12:50 PM »
Hey 'Guys',
Hope all is going well, still keeping up with this thread (and others) when I can.
I just wanted to say to Gmeast (Greg?) that TK and Poynt99 and Mags (and FTC and others) don't belong to a 'cult' with an 'agenda'. That is F**CKING RETARDED!! Come on, do you seriously believe that? If you do then how can you expect anyone to take you seriously? How much more 'open source' can you get?!?!?
Rosemary is a liar and a fraud (with textbook D-K syndrome), just ask her to do some math for you. Ask her how a mosfet works LMAO!!! Or go help her catch her zipons, it's your choice dude... No doubt she will be releasing some new data ANY DAY NOW to validate her 'claim' (ouch, I think I hemmoraged something laughing so hard...).
If you want to learn something or have 'help' with an experiment, these guys can help. Well, I'm not sure they would help you anymore at this point because you've been such a dumbass, but they've tried to help Rose (to no avail) several SEVERAL times over.
Take a look at TKs caliometry setups and tell me yours are even half as good? Have you even looked??
PLEASE, GREG (if that is your name...): Back up, do a little reading, do a little more reading, and WAKE UP!!! If there is any 'agenda' at all, it is RA wasting the time of people like TK and 99 who are actually understand electrical theory and are trying to discover new things. (BTW they tried to help 'her' understand for MONTHS and MONTHS and she is STILL clueless about how a mosfet works.) Did you miss that part???
Wicked DC 'flames' there TK... ;)
Happy experimenting all!
PC

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5040 on: November 04, 2012, 06:12:50 PM »

Offline The Boss

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 52
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5041 on: November 04, 2012, 06:49:22 PM »
... and it goes on and on. This is when there were concurrent threads here and on Energetic Forum concerning her claims..... and this is when Ainslie started in with her insults, disrespect, continuing lies and false claims, attacking the persons, competences, and equipment of anyone who pointed out the errors and inconsistencies in her claims.

Let me correct that for the record. For those of you around that may still remember, Ainslie actually started in on these forums almost 13 years ago. She earned that reputation long ago and forever labelled herself as described above.
 
She was no less a deluded psychotic then, than she is today. Nothing has changed.
As long as I am breathing, I will continue to remind the open source community of that
and no one, much less she, is going to stop me.
 
 

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5042 on: November 04, 2012, 08:53:46 PM »

Let me correct that for the record. For those of you around that may still remember, Ainslie actually started in on these forums almost 13 years ago. She earned that reputation long ago and forever labelled herself as described above.
 
She was no less a deluded psychotic then, than she is today. Nothing has changed.
As long as I am breathing, I will continue to remind the open source community of that
and no one, much less she, is going to stop me.

Thanks for that reminder. My own involvement began only in 2009, near the time of .99's linked post, thanks to a "heads up" from Ramset, IIRC. Before that I was blissfully unaware of Ainslie and her ridiculous claims.
BTW, the threads on Naked Scientists are still viewable, some of them, where she claimed to have a patent and was arguing with PWM and switchmode designers, who actually DID have granted patents, about the functioning of mosfets in general and her circuit claims in particular. Of course she got herself banned quickly there.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5042 on: November 04, 2012, 08:53:46 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5043 on: November 04, 2012, 09:27:28 PM »
In aid of anyone who wants to research Ainslie's past posts and her history and her claims, I'm compiling a list of her usernames and aliases. Please, everyone, help me with this list by letting me know of any I've missed.


witsend
dooziedont
aetherevarising
Rosemary Ainslie
Admin



(Why she doesn't just use "Maria Krebs" as her real name is beyond me. Maybe she's embarrassed about her history in Joburg.)


an abandoned blog:
http://rosemaryainslie.blogspot.com/
another blog:
http://rosemaryainslie-publicblog.blogspot.com/
her abandoned YT account:
http://www.youtube.com/user/dooziedont?feature=results_main (note the date of her upload of her video about which she later said "I DID NOT UPLOAD THAT VIDEO")
one of the Naked Scientists threads:
http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?PHPSESSID=8a7f1c7c086bf47801ccd57c8e3196c9&topic=23243.350

I'm not linking to the Energetic Forum because those threads have been heavily censored. Many comments have been deleted in the various Ainslie threads there by the site admins in an attempt to cover up important information and revealing comments.

If there are any other blog or forum links (besides the heavily censored EF forum) that anyone knows about that are or were controlled by Rosemary Ainslie, please let me know so I can publish them all in one convenient place. Some people charge by the split-second, so let's make it easy and fast for them to find all the inconsistencies, false claims and outright lies of Rosemary Ainslie in her various aliases over the years.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5044 on: November 04, 2012, 09:35:37 PM »
Back on the topic of Testing the TK Tar Baby:

In case there is any doubt, I am happy to send Tar Baby off to the same laboratory that Ainslie used some months ago as an excuse to postpone her own tests. Just let me know who they are and I'll contact them and do it immediately. I want independent evaluation, to illustrate that Tar Baby is functionally identical to Ainslie's circuit (or not as the case may be... ho ho ho). 

So all I need is the name and address of this laboratory in the USA, and I'll contact them right away to arrange the Tar Baby testing.

If anyone from that laboratory happens to be reading here, for some strange reason..... please PM me with the contact information. I have always urged, offered and been ready for a side-by-side test, comparing Tar Baby and NERD, but of course that will never happen. So a test of Tar Baby by the same lab, without bothering with Ainslie's involvement at all, will have to do.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5044 on: November 04, 2012, 09:35:37 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3580
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5045 on: November 04, 2012, 09:48:44 PM »

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5046 on: November 04, 2012, 10:38:58 PM »
As clear as can be... :o


And she has the unmitigated gall to complain about my videos!

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5046 on: November 04, 2012, 10:38:58 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline The Boss

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 52
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5047 on: November 05, 2012, 12:16:47 AM »
In aid of anyone who wants to research Ainslie's past posts and her history and her claims, I'm compiling a list of her usernames and aliases. Please, everyone, help me with this list by letting me know of any I've missed.

Poynt,
 
With regard to the history of Ainslie's claims and her vicious personality, are you able to provide links to the 2 archived threads at the OUR Forum from the short period of time during which she was a member there?
     

Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3580
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5048 on: November 05, 2012, 12:56:23 AM »

Poynt,
 
With regard to the history of Ainslie's claims and her vicious personality, are you able to provide links to the 2 archived threads at the OUR Forum from the short period of time during which she was a member there?
There is this one: "The Rosemary Ainslie Circuit "
http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=13.0

What is the other one?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5048 on: November 05, 2012, 12:56:23 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline The Boss

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 52
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5049 on: November 05, 2012, 02:01:25 AM »
What is the other one?

Thank you for the link. I now clearly recall that the other one was deleted.
 
 

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5050 on: November 05, 2012, 03:01:13 AM »

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5050 on: November 05, 2012, 03:01:13 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3580
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5051 on: November 06, 2012, 02:29:47 AM »
We have a measured negative wattage that is supported with the use of sophisticated and calibrated equipment. 
So what?

I have two simulations with a measured "negative wattage", so what?

TK has two operating devices that also exhibit a measured "negative wattage", so what?

It means absolutely nothing in terms of proof that any of these circuits charge their batteries, or supply more heating energy in a load compared to what is supplied.

You simply refuse to acknowledge the truth Rosemary. The truth is that these measurements are erroneous and most certainly don't represent the actual power being used by the batteries. That I would bet my house on. Would you? No, I doubt very much you would.

Offline The Boss

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 52
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5052 on: November 06, 2012, 04:00:04 AM »
This technology cannot survive the attack that is currently being launched.  Not only is this an abuse of open source - but it we are also now being shown the risk associated in ignoring this information - as shown in the devastation wrought by Super Storm Sandy.

...the product of a diseased mind, completely disconnected from reality.

Offline orbut 3000

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 247
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5053 on: November 06, 2012, 06:16:29 AM »
Quote
Guys,

If any of you need proof of the 'conspiracy' - Poynty (poynt99) has published some private videos of mine that can ONLY have been accessed from the computer that was rifled from my premises. 

Sadly I now realise that Poynty is also part of TEAM TROLL.  I had rather hoped this was not the case.  But be warned.

Kindest regards
Rosie


Facepalm.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5054 on: November 06, 2012, 07:17:57 AM »
Quote
Guys,

If any of you need proof of the 'conspiracy' - Poynty (poynt99) has published some private videos of mine that can ONLY have been accessed from the computer that was rifled from my premises. 

Sadly I now realise that Poynty is also part of TEAM TROLL.  I had rather hoped this was not the case.  But be warned.

Kindest regards
Rosie

This is her response to .99's posting of that video of hers above? The woman is not only classically paranoid, but she's apparently also growing senile.
Remember when she shouted that she "DID NOT POST THAT VIDEO", talking about the video of the demo, where the mendacious circuit diagram and description are given? What an idiot. Now she's outright accusing .99 of burglary and theft and computer hacking to boot.

Ainslie has at least 2 YouTube accounts, both of which are moribund, likely because she has lost or forgotten her password.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aG_DtkoV8Wo&list=UUKCHRx4r_7Ozg5qZWN6dtsg&feature=plcp

http://www.youtube.com/user/aetherevarising?feature=watch
(last activity from her Sep 14, 2010)

http://www.youtube.com/user/dooziedont/videos?flow=grid&view=0
(last activity from her May  1, 2012)

Just as in the case of the collection of scopeshots, the names and numbers, and all the rest of the information she thinks was somehow stolen or "rifled" from her computers...... she posted all these pathetic videos herself, in public, right up front.... and since she's lost her passwords and is generally incompetent, she can't even log on and delete these embarrassing, foot-in-mouth videos that she herself posted, without any need for .99 to do any rifling at all.


 

OneLink