Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

A-Ads

MN LiveCoach

Masternodes Live Coaching

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 83475
  • *Latest: cecvic

  • *Total Posts: 513275
  • *Total Topics: 15278
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 6
  • *Guests: 11
  • *Total: 17

Author Topic: Testing the TK Tar Baby  (Read 1342907 times)

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5025 on: November 03, 2012, 06:34:15 PM »
Hey, ROSEMARY AINSLIE, lying mendacious deluded troll....

I hereby give you, TO THE EXTENT WHICH I AM ABLE, full and unrestricted permission to publish, wherever and however you like, BRIAN (or Bryan) LITTLE's FULL CONTACT INFORMATION, identity, address, email, phone number, whatever you've got, concerning this BRYAN (or Brian) LITTLE person whom you hate so much.

PUBLISH THE INFORMATION, so that I can contact him.... and his lawyers..... with a heads-up warning that you are continuing to libel him without cause.

Will you do even THIS much to support your blatantly bogus contentions? Let's wait and see.....



Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5025 on: November 03, 2012, 06:34:15 PM »

Offline Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5772
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5026 on: November 03, 2012, 06:49:03 PM »
Hey, ROSEMARY AINSLIE, lying mendacious deluded troll....

I hereby give you, TO THE EXTENT WHICH I AM ABLE, full and unrestricted permission to publish, wherever and however you like, BRIAN (or Bryan) LITTLE's FULL CONTACT INFORMATION, identity, address, email, phone number, whatever you've got, concerning this BRYAN (or Brian) LITTLE person whom you hate so much.

PUBLISH THE INFORMATION, so that I can contact him.... and his lawyers..... with a heads-up warning that you are continuing to libel him without cause.

Will you do even THIS much to support your blatantly bogus contentions? Let's wait and see.....

Excellent argument. ;)

Mags

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5027 on: November 03, 2012, 07:05:56 PM »
Quote
Dear Little Bryan - aka TK, Tinsel Koala, The Pickle... and latterly - Little Chicken Licken,

I see that the sky has NOT yet fallen on your head.  But it has fallen on almost one third of your countrymen.  If I didn't know better I'd put the blame of this squarely on your own little feathered shoulders.  And you can share the weight of this burden of guilt with The Boss, Sean, Stefan Hartman and many others who waste their valuable time misdirecting the public.
That's right, gentle reader. The deluded troll, the liar, idiot Rosemary Ainslie is actually BLAMING "if she didn't know better" in one sentence then doing it straight out in the next.... blaming ME, The Boss, Sean and Stefan and others for the devastation caused by Hurricane Sandy on the east coast of the USA. This woman is sick in her head and needs psychiatric help. And as usual, her math is a bit off. There are about 360 million people in the USA. She seems to think that 120 million people are disastrously affected by Sandy. Here, where I am, in central USA, Sandy has brought marvellously clear skies from Canadian air, and unseasonably nice weather. The West coast isn't affected at all. Three or four States have been affected temporarily by Sandy... nowhere near "one third" of our population. But of course... South Africa has about 52 million people in it, 80 percent of whom have Black ancestry. No wonder she quails whenever "The Boss" makes a post. In Afrikaans that would be "BAAS" and she knows just exactly what it means.
Quote
Without the collective catastrophe of your direct interventions, I am entirely satisfied that the validity of our claims together with the validity of free energy - all over the place, would have been established some years back.
Collective catastrophe! Direct Interventions! She must mean our publication of all the ERRORS AND LIES in Ainslie's claims and manuscripts.
 This is a ridiculous accusation, just like all the rest of Ainslie's ridiculous accusations and claims. I AM ENTIRELY SATISFIED that if Ainslie or any other claimant ACTUALLY HAD what they claimed, there is nothing I could do... or would want to do.... to prevent it from entering the mainstream of the world's economy. I'm a poster on an internet site!! Yet AINSLIE... who claims not to go in for conspiracy theories.... in her delusion believes that I am at the center of a vast and powerful conspiracy to keep her "discovery" from the public, along with Cold Fusion and Mylow Motors and whatever else she happens to believe in today. What a loon she is!
Quote
And we would all by now, have moved over to the use of LENR technologies as well as our own small contribution of solid state switching... as required.  Sadly - you have all be way too effective.
Rather, AINSLIE and her sycophants have been WAY TOO EFFECTIVE in demonstrating that they have nothing of importance to contribute to any efforts of any kind, just more mendacity, prevarication, outright lies and NEVER SHOWING ANYTHING THAT SUPPORTS THEIR CLAIMS.
Quote
  And I say 'sadly' because the result of these efforts will certainly advance the Super Storms that have hit so many of you in America. 
And there it is again. According to the idiot liar ROSEMARY AINSLIE, I am responsible for Super Storms that have affected some of the east coast of the United States (just one of many countries in America). This idiot Ainslie wants to blame me... or BRYAN LITTLE... for her own inability to perform as she claims, and further, for any disaster at all. She is manifestly deluded to the point of losing contact with reality altogether. I hope her keepers don't let her out of her home without an escort. I think she's likely to be a danger to herself and others.
Quote
And ever sadder - because there is a vast global population who depend on America being both strong and effective.  This may not be sustainable if Sandy is simply the first of many more to come. 

So - dear readers - in the unlikely event that our Little TK posts this letter on his thread - hear this.  I promise you all - by all that I hold holy - that Free Energy is a viable and proven technology.
Promise? By all that you hold HOLY? You utter and complete hypocrite. You cannot provide any evidence for your assertions and your own project is completely bogus, as has been demonstrated by your own data, your own "independent lab" of chemists in the USA, by me, by GMEAST, and by everyone else who has gotten involved with you on an actual level of building and testing.
Quote
And any further resistance to this truth is advanced to further the selfish objectives of those who OWN the standard and rather outmoded supplies of this - and who intend to retain that ownership even in the face of the disasters that it brings in its wake.

Kindest regards to you all and even to Little TK and his ilk - who ill deserve such courtesies.

Rosie

And yet another hypocritical close... "kindest regards" cancelled in the same sentence by YET ANOTHER of Ainslie's misidentifications and mendacious calumnies.

Ainslie, you overweeningly arrogant idiot, lying troll, false accuser and libeller .... you cannot provide a smidgen of proof or outside support for ANY of your ridiculous contentions. Let's see you provide some proof, for example, that I am this "BRYAN LITTLE" or "BRIAN LITTLE" who you keep on libelling in your forum.

You cannot.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5027 on: November 03, 2012, 07:05:56 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline gmeast

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5028 on: November 03, 2012, 10:30:52 PM »


Oh, that's a good one all right................................................................


WHO IS BRYAN LITTLE and how ........
[size=78%].................................................................................[/size]




Bryan Little is a former professional baseball player.  Your own comments are bordering on libellous as well.  And by the way, my question the other day about "who is B---- L-----" was asked in all honesty and pretending nothing.  My subsequent responses were fomented by one of your cult members Magluvin.  You will assume whatever fits your agenda ... as always.


G


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5772
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5029 on: November 04, 2012, 12:00:24 AM »

Bryan Little is a former professional baseball player.  Your own comments are bordering on libellous as well.  And by the way, my question the other day about "who is B---- L-----" was asked in all honesty and pretending nothing.  My subsequent responses were fomented by one of your cult members Magluvin.  You will assume whatever fits your agenda ... as always.


G

Lol Cult.  It is you and the Big Fake that are the cult. 2 nuts from the same shell.

Us? We are over here with people of many beliefs. And it seems that none of them agree with what your cult is all about.. It is you who are the odd balls, not us.  ;)

Look around. Look at each other. lol

Mags

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5029 on: November 04, 2012, 12:00:24 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline gmeast

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5030 on: November 04, 2012, 03:27:21 AM »
Lol Cult.  It is you and the Big Fake that are the cult. 2 nuts from the same shell.

Us? We are over here with people of many beliefs. And it seems that none of them agree with what your cult is all about.. It is you who are the odd balls, not us.  ;)

Look around. Look at each other. lol

Mags


Grrrrrrrr, but no teeth.


G

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5031 on: November 04, 2012, 03:55:39 AM »

Bryan Little is a former professional baseball player. 
That tells me a lot. Doesn't it.
Quote
Your own comments are bordering on libellous as well.

I can prove the truth of all my comments, with quotations from Ainslie herself, combined with outside references to sources that anyone can check and that are irrefutable, like various dictionaries, physics texts, and so on. Truth is an absolute defense against allegations of libel. Ainslie, on the other hand, obviously cannot prove anything she says about Brian Little ... because I'm not he, and he has never posted anything in this thread !! In short, I will inform Brian (or Bryan) Little of Ainslie's libels as soon as I REALLY get to know who he is and how to contact him. Meanwhile.... go ahead, tell me which of my statements you think "border on libellous" and I will prove the truth of them, by reference to Ainslie's own comments and the other sources that I have mentioned. GO AHEAD!!
Quote
And by the way, my question the other day about "who is B---- L-----" was asked in all honesty and pretending nothing.  My subsequent responses were fomented by one of your cult members Magluvin.  You will assume whatever fits your agenda ... as always.


G
And I answered you in all honesty and pretending nothing. YOU immediately came back with insults, accusations and your usual whining. Just as you are doing now. Who has an agenda here? Read Ainslie's forum posts, for a change. You will see who has an agenda and what that agenda is.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5031 on: November 04, 2012, 03:55:39 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5772
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5032 on: November 04, 2012, 04:05:38 AM »

Grrrrrrrr, but no teeth.


G

Diarrhea of the mouth, but no truth.   ;)

M

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5033 on: November 04, 2012, 07:35:06 AM »
The idiot Ainslie is trolling again. Now she wants ME to "prove" that I'm NOT who she thinks I am!! What a deluded idiot she really is.

Look here, AINSLIE, you deluded troll. You make claims about me, YOU PROVE THEM. You think I'm Little.... YOU PROVE IT, you idiot. But you cannot.

Otherwise, it's just another of AINSLIE's many lying claims, without evidence, without proof, without support. Eventually your feet are going to get stuck in your mendacious throat, AINS-LIE, and your lies and libels will be coming back on you. You are a sad joke, a deluded old woman, full of bitter gall and mendacity.

Why don't you contact Brian Little, you ignoramus liar Ainslie, and ask him if he gives a flying fish about you or your idiotic claims. Or better yet... contact your imaginary lawyers and see what they think about your deluded fantasies and your sick perverted need to flaunt them all over the internet.




Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5033 on: November 04, 2012, 07:35:06 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline gmeast

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5034 on: November 04, 2012, 03:15:45 PM »
TK,


You are CORRECT!  I DO have an agenda. That agenda is:


... to keep investigating the possibility that 'sharp transient pulses' applied to an Inductive-Resistive heating element can produce excess thermal heating beyond the theoretical Joule heating allowed from the electrical energy applied to it.


That's it! That's my agenda. I never heard of Rosemary Ainslie or anyone else associated with that technology UNTIL I  viewed Aaron's videos on the subject over on Energetic Forum.


My efforts toward this end, though not receiving YOUR blessings (as if they are required) will continue unabated and with even more tenacity BECAUSE of the opposition to its very notion that has been expressed by an insignificant few like you and your cult followers.


You are obviously an intelligent person, but sad as it is, you are full of hate and disdain for the views and efforts of others.  You are a pitiable individual.








Offline Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5772
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5035 on: November 04, 2012, 03:23:03 PM »
"You have the sanctimonious and rather muddled mouthings of MaGsy the Mediocre"

Not so long ago, I was on your side. All of a sudden you flipped. After that is when I really had seen who and what you really are.

Like the beginning of your post, you talk of Sandy. You speak of it just to lay imaginary guilt on TK, not for the people that were in the storm. You are a user of their demise.

You lay claim that Tk is BL. And you keep on saying it, without a shred of evidence. And you lay it on TK to prove you wrong? lol  You are making the claim without facts or proof to back it up. That is the way you do things. And you think your little tricky ways are going to get TK to divvy up his real identity so that you can plaster your nonsense and lies about him all over the net and fill his emails with your sickness. Like you do Harvey.  You are a terrible person.

If you cannot prove TK is BL then what is your point?  Just like your circuits. You talk talk talk, send it to a lab, they tell you the battery is draining, and soon after you still claim the batteries dont drain, and even worse, still claim that they recharge from the circuit.

You have no 'technology'.

You ask TK for proof that he is not BL, yet you are the accuser with no case. How would that go down in a court of law?
" Your honor, I say TK is Brian Little. I rest my case." lol   And all with not a shred of evidence to prove any of what you claim on your table.  Do you not think the Judge would ask you for some proof of your claim?  Case dismissed.  Against your evidence, of which you have none, All TK has to prove is that you have lied many times, not prove he is not BL. That is your responsibility to the court. His evidence of your lies would be stacked high against your empty folder. Again, case dismissed.

His witnesses would be in much greater numbers than your GMeast, of which some of his quotes and statements would work against you. Case dismissed.

It is not up to TK to prove his real identity. In fact, he has put it to you to open your folder to show evidence that he 'is' BL, well knowing that if he is BL, the cat would be out of the bag. But you still have nothing. Case dismissed.

You have the sanctimonious and rather muddled mouthings of your self, and its mediocre. ;)

MaGs

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5035 on: November 04, 2012, 03:23:03 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3580
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5036 on: November 04, 2012, 03:41:41 PM »
I was going through some old posts looking for a particular username, and came across this one where I believe the flyback diode issue was first mentioned:

http://www.overunity.com/7620/claimed-ou-circuit-of-rosemary-ainslie/msg189605/#msg189605

Offline MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7617
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5037 on: November 04, 2012, 04:24:31 PM »
It's pretty ghastly that Rosemary has crossed that line and revealed someone's identity, even if she got it wrong.  I am just horrified and I warned her not to do it.  She even threatened to reveal someone else's identity.

Her circuit is a very unhealthy obsession for her and it apparently is not abating.  This is not a happy story at all and it would seem that there is no ending in sight.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5038 on: November 04, 2012, 04:43:29 PM »
TK,

You are CORRECT!  I DO have an agenda. That agenda is:

You are INCORRECT... because we weren't talking about YOUR agenda, which no one cares about except you.

It is AINSLIE who has the definite AGENDA and it's clear, or should be, or would be if YOU HAD DONE YOUR HOMEWORK just what that agenda of Ainslie's really is.

Quote
... to keep investigating the possibility that 'sharp transient pulses' applied to an Inductive-Resistive heating element can produce excess thermal heating beyond the theoretical Joule heating allowed from the electrical energy applied to it.

 As if that issue had not been investigated already, for YEARS, by expert designers of switchmode power supplies and PWM motor control systems and other systems, working in teams and individually, in graduate physics and EE departments in universities and in industry, all around the world. The basic circuit you are using can even be found in the application notes for many mosfets, as one of the mosfet performance parameter test circuits, as FuzzyTomCat has illustrated several times. Have you ever read the application notes for your mosfets? You should, you might learn something. But then again, we know your attitude towards homework and textual research.

Sure.... you, GMEAST, sitting there with a computer-card oscilloscope and a handful of other equipment, are going to be adding to the knowledge that has been gathered in this field for a hundred years or more. When you DO produce a paper that's accepted for publication in an electronics/physics journal.... then we'll know that your research has borne fruit. But do you know how many research papers are submitted WITH ERRORS that doom them.. from people who have complete laboratories, teams of grad students, and a long history of successful research? But of course YOU don't make errors. So when you discover something that isn't already in the books, YOUR paper will be published immediately without question. Right.

Quote
That's it! That's my agenda. I never heard of Rosemary Ainslie or anyone else associated with that technology UNTIL I  viewed Aaron's videos on the subject over on Energetic Forum.


My efforts toward this end, though not receiving YOUR blessings (as if they are required) will continue unabated and with even more tenacity BECAUSE of the opposition to its very notion that has been expressed by an insignificant few like you and your cult followers.


SO you are like the little kid, who, when advised not to jump out the window because it will hurt you, does it anyway, BECAUSE of the opposition. Not doing your homework to find that everyone who has done the same thing has broken an ankle......

Insignificant few? Rather, EVERYONE with the tech skill and knowledge who knows about your work has criticised it strongly..... except AINSLIE of course -- but she clearly doesn't have the knowledge to comment coherently. "No such animal as inductive reactance!!" What does THAT do to your "research", GMEAST, since whatever you think is "inductive reactance" must be, according to AINSLIE, something else entirely, involving Zipons at twice the speed of light?
 And based on her past record, an "endorsement" from her is a pretty sure sign that you are wasting your time. After all.... she believed MyLOW was genuine, she believes Rossi is genuine...... and the list goes on.

Quote
You are obviously an intelligent person, but sad as it is, you are full of hate and disdain for the views and efforts of others.  You are a pitiable individual.

I don't think anyone pities me, GMEAST, and I've never complained about my health, my lack of resources, my age, or anything else except the lies and mendacity from AINSLIE, and your own arrogant attitude when it's poynted out that you are wrong. Why should anyone pity me? They cannot PROVE ME WRONG, after all, so maybe they should pity themselves.

Once again, you do not consider the source of my disdain. DO YOUR HOMEWORK. The post linked by .99  above , going back to my 2009 research ON THE SAME CIRCUIT THAT YOU STARTED WITH, will show you where some of my "disdain" comes from , and why it's directed TOWARD ROSEMARY AINSLIE and those who blindly support her.

I do indeed have disdain for the efforts of others when it's clear that they are blind and will not take advice or learn from their peers and betters, and when they lie about their "research", even to the point of fabricating data or making absurd arithmetic mistakes and treating the results as fact. Like AINSLIE, and like you. I respond with anger and frustration to the ridiculous insane insults and lies and disrespect and accusations from the crazy old uneducated ignorant madwoman ROSEMARY AINSLIE, and after nearly FOUR YEARS of this utter unmitigated CRAP from her..... that's right, I do not consider Ainslie to be worthy of affection, that's for sure. Do I show hatred? Or do I simply give as good as I've been getting?

Remember this, GMEAST: I can PROVE all my assertions with facts, references and even demonstrations, and I'm ready and willing to do so AT ANY TIME. Where's the hatred in that? Is it an expression of hatred to point out the lies and false claims of others who are seeking monetary rewards and prizes based on their false claims, and to defend myself against the ridiculous accusations and libels of an insane person?

On the other hand, AINSLIE has been insulting me, disrespecting me and my work and my equipment, has been spewing nonsense for years, has incontrovertibly lied over and over, hasn't proven a single thing, and in fact has made MANY assertions and claims that CANNOT BE PROVEN AT ALL since they are simply false. I submit to you, GMEAST, that the person who is full of hatred, vitriol, disrespect, self-pity and ignorance around here, is in fact ROSEMARY AINSLIE herself.
You are managing to approach her record, though.

But your work does have some value in this context: Your work has disproven several of Ainslie's claims and assertions, YET AGAIN, about her claimed COP>17 circuit.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #5039 on: November 04, 2012, 05:02:00 PM »
I was going through some old posts looking for a particular username, and came across this one where I believe the flyback diode issue was first mentioned:

http://www.overunity.com/7620/claimed-ou-circuit-of-rosemary-ainslie/msg189605/#msg189605

Thanks for posting that. There is some interesting reading there, in the pages around that point. For example: Ainslie again publishes, or tries to publish, conflicting circuit diagrams that purport to be describing the same experiment; the published circuits do not make the correct duty cycle; the batteries are claimed to be 20 A-H when as we now know they were 60 A-H batteries........ and it goes on and on. This is when there were concurrent threads here and on Energetic Forum concerning her claims..... and this is when Ainslie started in with her insults, disrespect, continuing lies and false claims, attacking the persons, competences, and equipment of anyone who pointed out the errors and inconsistencies in her claims.


 

OneLink