Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: Testing the TK Tar Baby  (Read 1642274 times)

Offline Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5880
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4905 on: September 30, 2012, 11:56:33 PM »
Thats why I said GM seems to be able to use a calculator. It seems he is calculating some numbers and posting the figures as if they were readings. No rounding or range info ;]


MaGs

Offline polln8r

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 81
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4906 on: October 01, 2012, 03:59:44 AM »
...if my batteries are fully charged, my flashlight shines brightly. If the battery voltage drops below a certain point, the flashlight doesn't work as well.

no shit.

polln8r.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4907 on: October 02, 2012, 07:01:32 PM »
Depressing news. Gmeast has discovered that his battery-powered free energy device is powered by... the batteries. And, sadly, it only runs as long as the batteries are charged. And the batteries run down; they don't stay charged or increase their state of charge like they are supposed to. But they heat a resistor! A few tenths of a degree hotter than DC calculated power !!
At least, until they run down.

Do you think we will see a simple Dim Bulb test from GMeast? I don't.

Offline mrsean2k

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 173
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4908 on: October 02, 2012, 10:40:36 PM »
Pooped!

But great news; it was overunity right up to the point it had no more energy left.

Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3582
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4909 on: October 03, 2012, 02:36:22 AM »
Do you think we will see a simple Dim Bulb test from GMeast? I don't.
What do you mean he won't? He very clearly demonstrates a "dim bulb" with every post.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4910 on: October 03, 2012, 03:27:55 AM »
I wonder why he doesn't just build another identical unit and run the first one off the output of the second one. With COP > 17, you'd think that even moderate losses wouldn't hurt much.

Oh...wait.... I don't wonder, because there isn't anything like COP > 17 in real measurements of his circuit in the first place, and in the second place... Conservation of Energy.



But at least the Fundamental Principle of Electrical Overunity still applies: All electrical OU devices must have a battery.

Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3582
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4911 on: October 03, 2012, 03:52:22 AM »
Well TK, it comes down to this;

If Rose, and the likes of Greg could do anything correctly regarding these circuits and how to test them, we wouldn't be having this discussion and this thread wouldn't even exist.
 8)

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4912 on: October 03, 2012, 01:13:07 PM »
And what a tragic loss to humanity that would be. No gain.... no pain.    :'(    ;)

Still, I've learned a lot, especially from you and picowatt and MileHigh, from the experiences and analyses on this thread.
And as always, I've managed to branch out in other directions like the wireless inductive power transfer and the Sassy ClassE SSTC projects, both good learning experiences that aren't yet done with either.

It's too bad that I'm not as "well-compensated" as YKW believes......





Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3582
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4913 on: October 03, 2012, 02:09:34 PM »
Indeed it is paramount that threads like this DO exist, because many people learn from them, including the main participants.  :D

It's a shame though that the ones perpetrating the erroneous claims refuse to learn anything at all from them.  :-\

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4914 on: October 07, 2012, 02:38:12 AM »
Here are some pictures of my latest exhibition. Note carefully the pretty colored lines and the nice numbers. See all the tables of data, all the pictures and schematics of the apparatus. Neat, huh?

What's that you say? You cannot see anything? Oh... too bad, that's right, you have to be a member of my special club to see.  Too bad for you.

Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3582
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4915 on: October 07, 2012, 02:49:39 AM »
I doubt very much there is anything worth seeing there TK. I haven't logged on there since I left.

He seems to be having fun, even though he has to know he's essentially talking to himself.  :o

And after all his word salad write-ups, and erroneous techniques, what does he have to show? Where's the sausage?  ;D

Offline mrsean2k

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 173
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4916 on: October 07, 2012, 03:33:28 AM »
The sausage is now COP 1.06, for as long as it sizzles at > 25.1VDC

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4917 on: October 07, 2012, 04:29:37 AM »
The sausage is now COP 1.06, for as long as it sizzles at > 25.1VDC

Hey, six percent error is not bad considering the grade-school "calorimetry" and the false precision in calculation.


But.... wasn't that supposed to be a replication of Ainslie's much simpler and much more COP>17 circuit and experiment?

What happened to that? Too much bogosity in that project, even for Gmeast?

Offline mrsean2k

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 173
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4918 on: October 07, 2012, 07:48:29 PM »
Where indeed? We're on the edge of our seats...

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4919 on: October 08, 2012, 03:39:48 PM »
Shh! She's TESTING.

Here's an invisible link to her dreams, where the tests might be posted:






At last! Maybe somebody will finally get to see her reproduce the scopetrace that shows 72 volts battery voltage, 12 volts to the mosfet gate, and no current flow in the CVR.


Or.... maybe they won't.