Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 522121
  • *Total Topics: 15554
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 4
  • *Guests: 11
  • *Total: 15

Author Topic: Testing the TK Tar Baby  (Read 1461198 times)

Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3143
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4860 on: September 17, 2012, 01:52:15 PM »
Your a fool !!!!  :o

FTC
 :P
you're...
your is possesive... ::) eg: is that your coat?
you're is a contraction of 'you are'. eg: you're an ignoramus fuzzytomcat.

there. now you are a little smarter... wait... let me re write that so you can understand it.
their. now your a little smarter. ;)


you really have trouble with basic english don't you...  you're a fool.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4860 on: September 17, 2012, 01:52:15 PM »

Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3585
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4861 on: September 18, 2012, 02:26:14 PM »
Dear Poynty

WHEN are you going to wake up to the damage that you do?  And do you even care?  I question your 'professionalism' in exposing the content of private emails - in posting in threads where you are not wanted - in imposing faulty equations - in coercing cooperation with arguments instead of simply arguing them - in posting over downloads that belong EXCLUSIVELY to this forum -  and in MANY MANY other ways.  But the whole exercise becomes one fraught with duress.  It is PRECISELY what makes open source so fragile. 

Regards
Rosie
Rose,

You've deleted my response to your post over there, so here it is again, for the record:

Rose, any damage done was promulgated by Greg himself. I simply acted as a mirror, reflecting back his own discourse in a different light, hopefully to make him think. He chose instead to lash out and keep his head buried in the proverbial sand.

Anyway, your response went pretty much as I expected, so I'll not be posting any further.

Chau for now.

Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3585
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4862 on: September 18, 2012, 06:01:43 PM »
An interesting (but not all that surprising) development folks; gmeast has 'returned' to Rose's playground, and of all things has taken over my "FG Anatomy" thread as moderator!  :o WTF over?

Can anyone decipher the rubbish he just posted there?

Guess he just couldn't help himself.  ::)

I see also that my example has been deleted. I guess they can't handle the truth.
 

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4862 on: September 18, 2012, 06:01:43 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline powercat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1091
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4863 on: September 18, 2012, 07:27:14 PM »
Rose's playground rules,
See no truth
Hear no truth
Speak no truth

Offline polln8r

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 81
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4864 on: September 19, 2012, 01:32:57 AM »
"Global power corrupts globally."

One can't blame gmeast in this case... he did, in fact, ask to have his moderator status revoked. As he predicted himself, he was led into temptation.


edited: deleted a quotation mark that meant nothing.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4864 on: September 19, 2012, 01:32:57 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3585
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4865 on: September 19, 2012, 02:07:22 AM »
Actually, he asked to be banned so he wouldn't be tempted to post. I knew Rose wouldn't comply.

It seems as though he's rather enjoying his new found power, and soiling my thread with his nonsensical intuitive insights.  ::)

 :D

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4866 on: September 19, 2012, 03:25:32 AM »
Well, all that is amusing. Looking around for points to probe that give him values more to his liking, I suppose. That's almost bordering upon the capital sin of oscilloscope abuse... which is mentioned right after onanism in the Bible, IIRC.

I'd like to see gmeast calculate the overunity in my latest switched mosfet resonant feedback oscillator project. I would be perfectly happy to accept his numbers.

Strangely, I've made the challenge before, that the NERDs use their exact "standard measurement protocols" to measure the COP of my TinselKoil 2.0. No takers, total rejection. What's good for the goose doesn't work for the koala, I guess.

But I'd like to make the same challenge again. Let gmeast construct and measure _this_ circuit in the same way he does his, using the same techniques and calculations, including the DC load heating comparisons.

Note that this is in fact a Tar Baby variant. Schematic for the driver attached below.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vBFopZNF5iM

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4866 on: September 19, 2012, 03:25:32 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4867 on: September 19, 2012, 08:05:28 AM »
Hi everyone,

Well as WillbyInebriated the huckleberry crusader  :-* would say "get along little doggies" .....

Can't really see whom the last sentence is directed at ..... my opinion it must be Rosemary  :-X

I think Rosemary has sent gmeast some of her premo "catnip", and they all may have been indulging heavily.  :o


FTC
 ::)

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4868 on: September 19, 2012, 10:02:09 AM »
Well. It seems to be rather difficult for Gmeast to retain his equilibrium, in the face of analyses that destroy his illusions of competency coming from one side, and the inane and frankly stupid questions/delusions coming from Ainslie herself on the other side.

I expect the smoke to start pouring from his ears at any moment. Too bad we won't be told of that phase of his meltdown-in-progress.

I can't see the images in question but from the description he posted earlier and her thinly disguised deformation of it, I am guessing that she is still making the Fundamental Mosfet Attribution Error: she is still not understanding that on the mosfet drain in this configuration, high voltage (the battery voltage) means the mosfet is off, and low voltage down near the ground or zero level-- a few volts above it..... means the mosfet is ON and conducting.


Does this mean that the promised tests.... promised and awaited for how long now?.... will be further postponed? It is nearly the EQUINOX....... the real autumnal equinox for us, vernal for her, and there is no sign of any further testing, just more claims and no results.

Oh.... wait..... I still have the NERD Test Preventer scalar frequency linecaster operating, don't I. And it is clearly still working perfectly. I use it as a nightlight, it's part of my ambient consciousness now.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4868 on: September 19, 2012, 10:02:09 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3585
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4869 on: September 19, 2012, 02:21:21 PM »
This is almost unbelievable, but Rose is trying to convince me that it was not Greg nor herself that managed all those post and thread deletions.  ???

Apparently it was the "bogey man" logging in as "Admin" and wreaking havoc all over the place.  ::)

Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3585
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4870 on: September 19, 2012, 03:20:37 PM »
The advice I've given Rose (she asked) was to demote the "bogey man" (gmeast) back to "Regular Member", and these "mysterious" deletions are guaranteed to cease.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4870 on: September 19, 2012, 03:20:37 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4871 on: September 19, 2012, 11:33:48 PM »
Why would you expect them to cease? They've happened in every thread that Ainslie has control over. They even happened in YouTube comments in the old days.... she would go back weeks sometimes and delete comments, since she couldn't edit those. Forum threads.... we all know that she's even engaged in collusion with forum owners and moderators, to have entire threads removed that she found objectionable. Now that she's got her own forum you can expect her editorial policy to continue.... unedited.

Meanwhile, her last two posts have me wondering. Is she attempting to apply the duty cycle twice, like gmeast has done? I can't tell if she is referring to the whole period or just the "on" time. This is one reason why I'd like to see their calculations applied to a different system. Like one of mine, for example.  Also, the talk about gmeast's recent scope trace makes no sense without being able to see the scope trace... duh.

Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3585
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4872 on: September 20, 2012, 12:27:53 AM »
OK, maybe not cease completely, but certainly the number would be reduced.

Rose claimed that "someone" was logging in as "Admin" and deleting posts...I wonder if Rose sleep walks? I'm certain she is the only one logging in as "Admin". I've seen her alternate between "Admin" and "Rosemary Ainslie" within minutes, as the latter login only has "Regular Member" privileges.

I wonder if Greg will be back, now that he's said bye and that he's done? ???

 :P

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4873 on: September 20, 2012, 06:09:34 AM »
There is at least one other Admin, isn't there?
"G".

Offline fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4874 on: September 20, 2012, 10:12:24 AM »
There is at least one other Admin, isn't there?
"G".

There is one more than "chessnyt" and thats a member called "Admin" ( Rosemary ) I've seen on the home/front page in the Users Online.

That would bring it to a grand total of three Administrators.   ???   The Stat area is now closed for guest viewing.  :-X

Fuzzy
 ;)

 

OneLink