Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 522943
  • *Total Topics: 15571
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 0
  • *Guests: 9
  • *Total: 9

Author Topic: Testing the TK Tar Baby  (Read 1466620 times)

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4275 on: July 22, 2012, 02:00:46 AM »
That's your fantasy but it's not the reality at all.  You have nothing but you are too stupid and pig-headed and obsessed to realize it and acknowledge it.
WRONG. IF it's a fantasy - then it's shared by many of us.
It will be a complete farce if you do any experimentation by yourself because you are clearly not capable of doing so.  If you hire a qualified person to help you then it will take said person about 30 minutes to realize that you are clueless and chances are the relationship will end within one working day.  If you hire someone that is clueless or a sycophant or someone that is just going to play you for the money then your experiments will be "successful" but in fact you will not have advanced your "cause" by a single iota.
WRONG. IF this were true then I would not have collaborators nor friends.
You will never get serious professional or academic consideration at a company or at a lab or at a university because if anyone has a technical discussion with you face-to-face it will take them a maximum of 30 minutes to realize that you are deluded and clueless.
WRONG.  Not only have academics engaged but there are those who will actively engage in the evaluation of those tests.  Required for full accountability.
There is no happy ending for your proposition, none.  You are so far from serious science that you simply don't stand a chance.  The only traction you will ever get is on the free energy forums.  And in fact even on the free energy forums, people that support you are like shooting stars, you only see one every few months and then they disappear.
WRONG. Support on these forums have been drowned out by the distasteful contributions of the likes of you.  When you are all finally SILENCED then I believe the full and healthy interest in this subject will be allowed to blossom.
That is your story - you are just going to spin your wheels on the free energy forums and no university, lab, or tech company is ever going to have anything to do with you or your proposition.
WRONG.  We already have undertakings regarding this.
And you are not going to put people in danger for this useless nonsense.
ABSOLUTELY RIGHT.  The ONLY person who has been put under considerable physical and emotional duress has been myself - by the bully tactics employed by the likes of you and The Boss and TK and the rest. If you are in DANGER as you put it - it is the danger of legal accountability.

Again,
Rosemary

added

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4275 on: July 22, 2012, 02:00:46 AM »

Offline MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7600
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4276 on: July 22, 2012, 02:06:04 AM »
Did you see the penguins on the spinning turntable caught in an infinite loop trying to fill their buckets with zipons?

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4277 on: July 22, 2012, 02:08:24 AM »
Did you see the penguins on the spinning turntable caught in an infinite loop trying to fill their buckets with zipons?

No.  Did you?

Rosie Pose

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4277 on: July 22, 2012, 02:08:24 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline picowatt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2036
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4278 on: July 22, 2012, 02:09:14 AM »
Do you see Q1 not functioning as per the schematic in FIG3, 6, and 7?

Offline MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7600
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4279 on: July 22, 2012, 02:09:47 AM »

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4279 on: July 22, 2012, 02:09:47 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4280 on: July 22, 2012, 02:11:14 AM »
I don't follow TK's work.  So I won't be watching any of his videos. 

Rosie Pose

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4281 on: July 22, 2012, 02:12:23 AM »
A little present for TK

http://www.energy-shiftingparadigms.com/index.php/topic,2305.msg2740.html#msg2740

Rosie Pose

Zodiac? BTK? Which little message-sender are you emulating here with your threats?  Son of Sam? Kazinski? Moses Sithole? I can't quite recognise the style.

Oh... .wait..... "Little".   And of course the obsession with the "pickle". Only Ainslie is quite stupid enough to leave such a blatant signature on her crimes.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4281 on: July 22, 2012, 02:12:23 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7600
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4282 on: July 22, 2012, 02:12:51 AM »
No, Rosie Posie, that's a metaphor for your work.  Zipons of the Absurd.

Offline picowatt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2036
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4283 on: July 22, 2012, 02:19:30 AM »
How about some super-scientific highly technical discussion?

Why is Q1 not functioning as per the schematic in FIG3, 6, and 7?

Just asking...

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4283 on: July 22, 2012, 02:19:30 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4284 on: July 22, 2012, 02:32:10 AM »
MileHigh said that Rosie's work is never up to standard
And that's because he speaks his mind
and always is most candid

And Rosie said that MileHigh is devoid of any kind of brain
It melted in the stratosphere
And fell to earth like rain.

Rosie Pose

edited.
Deleted two verses as they were repetitive.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4285 on: July 22, 2012, 02:32:18 AM »
You know she can't answer. She does not even comprehend the question.

She has never even checked on the applied signal voltage, because she didn't consider it relevant.

What do you make of that, then, picowatt? I certainly see it as further proof that she is an ignoramus, willfully ignorant and can neither read nor discuss schematics coherently, much less oscilloscope traces. She still has no conception of the linear conductance region of a mosfet's operation. She still believes that DC current flows across the mosfet gate, and that the drain-source channel is either at 0 ohms (sic) or that it's open, "disconnected" and cannot pass any current whatsoever, AC or DC. 

What, I wonder ... does Ainslie think the blue trace represents in all of her scopeshots?
Is there some _other_ applied signal voltage to be considered in the Ainslie apparatus? I don't think so.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4285 on: July 22, 2012, 02:32:18 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4286 on: July 22, 2012, 02:38:29 AM »
I don't follow TK's work.  So I won't be watching any of his videos. 

Rosie Pose

Why are you commenting here, then, you hypocrite? Not getting any traffic on your crazy forum? It has been a while since anyone has commented there besides you and your sock puppet chessnutcase.

You won't be watching my videos for the same reason an eight year old child won't watch a scary movie: you'd probably pee in your panties, from seeing so much that terrifies you and that you are just too immature to process.

How do Mosfets Work, Parts 2 and 3. Nine minutes and sixteen seconds of horror,  and think of the fun you will have pointing out just where and how I am wrong in what I show.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKstLQYayNA

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4287 on: July 22, 2012, 02:40:10 AM »

Rosie Pose

edited.
Deleted two verses as they were repetitive.


Deleted the rest, as they were idiotic and insulting.

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4288 on: July 22, 2012, 02:41:51 AM »
Quite right little TK.  I think I've overstayed my welcome. 

Rosie Pose

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4289 on: July 22, 2012, 02:47:26 AM »
Don't forget, Ainslie.... from March 22 2011 until April 18 2011, you deliberately lied and misled an entire community of researchers, including active workers like .99 and others, about the actual schematic and arrangement of your transistors. Over 400 forum posts discussing that schematic and that performance, with you, between those dates, are preserved in my database. Every one of them a deliberate, crafty lie... by your own admission. I have your own admission from just a few days ago that you FULLY INTENDED to continue with that fraudulent deception, even at a time when you were trying to get a manuscript published in a scientific journal and were applying for monetary prizes. I have documented proof that you engaged in this deliberate deception and intended to continue it for as long as possible... until .99 spoiled your evil plot.

Documented proof of your month of deception, a very serious thing, there, Ainslie. Don't forget that "little" episode, when you DO THE MATH. I'll be glad to share my proof of this fraud, this utter pseudoscientific misconduct, with your imaginary lawyers or "our" local authorities at any time.

I also have the documented threats that you have made against my physical safety. So just remember: People who live in glass houses shouldn't make oxtail soup.

 

OneLink