Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 83885
  • *Latest: geovat

  • *Total Posts: 522991
  • *Total Topics: 15573
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 2
  • *Guests: 14
  • *Total: 16

Author Topic: Testing the TK Tar Baby  (Read 1468327 times)

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4260 on: July 22, 2012, 12:11:15 AM »

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4260 on: July 22, 2012, 12:11:15 AM »

Offline picowatt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2036
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4261 on: July 22, 2012, 12:29:51 AM »
A little present for TK

http://www.energy-shiftingparadigms.com/index.php/topic,2305.msg2740.html#msg2740

Rosie Pose

So, how about we let .99 act as arbitrator and resolve the Q1 not functioning properly in FIG3,6, and 7 issue?

I present my case, you present yours... we accept his conclusion...


Offline MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7600
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4262 on: July 22, 2012, 12:39:09 AM »
Rosemary:

Quote
This riddle's for our little TK.

By rights your age needs must be told
Take heart and be a little bold

I know the place where you reside
And who you live with by your side

I know your school I know your major
I know your phone but not your pager

So rest assured my little pickle
Your name will not be worth a nickle.

When I am done then all that tar
Will rub on you and who you are.

And here's a point that makes me laugh
I even have your photograph

Don't you dare.  I had to wash the blood off the stairs of my sister's house so her young children and my mother would not see it.  She was murdered in a rage killing just like Nicole Brown Simpson.  I know what MURDER feels like you stupid bitch and don't you dare cross that line.  Fuck you with your bullshit and shut your fucking TRASH MOUTH.

Is that sinking in?

MileHigh

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4262 on: July 22, 2012, 12:39:09 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline The Boss

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 52
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4263 on: July 22, 2012, 01:02:27 AM »
    This horrible diseased woman will pay for that last comment.  

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4264 on: July 22, 2012, 01:04:56 AM »
My dear MileHigh

I have ABSOLUTELY no need to make that disclosure public.   If I intended to I would have done so already.  What I intend doing is advising sundry authorities about internet theft and internet abuse and then let them do what is required. In fact - it's precisely one branch of your own authorities who have advised me about TK's details.

MEANWHILE - your speech - your address to me - is doing what?  Don't you think that such UNBRIDLED HATRED is likely to enrage your sympathisers against ME?  Have you considered that every time you apply those disgusting epithets to my good name - that there's some weak minded person - likely to see every need to get rid of ME?  And in my efforts to stop this escalating malice - you then CONTINUE with that parade of hatred?  It is you - unfortunately - who are as much a cause of this confrontation as picowatt - Sean - that idiot who calls himself 'the boss' ... PLEASE 8) - Mookie (whose identity I also know) and the rest - who are corrupting the fine and EXCELLENT intentions of open source - precisely by avoiding accountability.

This has left you with the idea that you are free to trash who or what you wish - with no reasonable application of decent dialogue and discourse - and in defiance of good manners, human decency - good taste - all those things that still matter in a civilized world.  And for what?  That I have a claim that is supported unequivocally by 5 highly qualified engineers and a host of independent examiners.  But you all quarrel with that assessment?  It makes NO SENSE.

Rosemary

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4264 on: July 22, 2012, 01:04:56 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4265 on: July 22, 2012, 01:11:02 AM »
    This horrible diseased woman will pay for that last comment.

BRING IT ON  - YOU COWARD. 

Rosie Pose

Offline MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7600
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4266 on: July 22, 2012, 01:16:29 AM »
Rosemary:

You know what makes no sense?  You are just as guilty of disgusting epithets and escalating malice as anybody else here.

You STOP your threats because these forums are rife with unbalanced people.  Unbalanced people around here would be one-thousand times more likely to try to kill someone like TK or myself as compared to you because of what we post.

You made a mistake by using your real name there is nothing I can do about it.

You SHUT YOUR MOUTH and STOP IT.  You STOP YOUR THREATS and STFU.

Beyond that, technically you have nothing and you are an insult to science and engineering.  That is a fact.

You don't know what you can cause and I have lived it.  Shut your trash mouth.

MileHigh

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4266 on: July 22, 2012, 01:16:29 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline picowatt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2036
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4267 on: July 22, 2012, 01:22:20 AM »
My dear MileHigh

I have ABSOLUTELY no need to make that disclosure public.   If I intended to I would have done so already.  What I intend doing is advising sundry authorities about internet theft and internet abuse and then let them do what is required. In fact - it's precisely one branch of your own authorities who have advised me about TK's details.

MEANWHILE - your speech - your address to me - is doing what?  Don't you think that such UNBRIDLED HATRED is likely to enrage your sympathisers against ME?  Have you considered that every time you apply those disgusting epithets to my good name - that there's some weak minded person - likely to see every need to get rid of ME?  And in my efforts to stop this escalating malice - you then CONTINUE with that parade of hatred?  It is you - unfortunately - who are as much a cause of this confrontation as picowatt - Sean - that idiot who calls himself 'the boss' ... PLEASE 8) - Mookie (whose identity I also know) and the rest - who are corrupting the fine and EXCELLENT intentions of open source - precisely by avoiding accountability.

This has left you with the idea that you are free to trash who or what you wish - with no reasonable application of decent dialogue and discourse - and in defiance of good manners, human decency - good taste - all those things that still matter in a civilized world.  And for what?  That I have a claim that is supported unequivocally by 5 highly qualified engineers and a host of independent examiners.  But you all quarrel with that assessment?  It makes NO SENSE.

Rosemary

And you, of course, never make snide comments or denigrate other's abilities...  Reread your locked thread...   

So how about dealing with the Q1 issue? 

Feel like letting .99 arbitrate?

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4268 on: July 22, 2012, 01:24:29 AM »
Rosemary:

You know what makes no sense?  You are just as guilty of disgusting epithets and escalating malice as anybody else here.

You STOP your threats because these forums are rife with unbalanced people.  Unbalanced people around here would be one-thousand times more likely to try to kill someone like TK or myself as compared to you because of what we post.

You made a mistake by using your real name there is nothing I can do about it.

You SHUT YOUR MOUTH and STOP IT.  You STOP YOUR THREATS and STFU.

Beyond that, technically you have nothing and you are an insult to science and engineering.  That is a fact.

You don't know what you can cause and I have lived it.  Shut your trash mouth.

MileHigh

My dear MileHigh

I have single handedly fended off the attack from no less than 8 of you - and I've done it with, I believe, a commendable constraint.  It is a sorry truth that you and TK and your 'friends' are somewhat lacking in any kind of human decency.  I am guilty of NOTHING other than attempting to advance some unequivocally anomalous measurements and some equally confrontational results in a prior claim - and on a forum that purports to be interested in such.  And it has evoked an attack that makes no sense at all.  And that attack is considerably less than legally permissible.

Rosemary

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4268 on: July 22, 2012, 01:24:29 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7600
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4269 on: July 22, 2012, 01:28:25 AM »
Rosemary:

Just shut up and stick to playing with your pulsing coils and your zipon fantasies.

MileHigh

Offline picowatt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2036
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4270 on: July 22, 2012, 01:31:06 AM »
My dear MileHigh

I have single handedly fended off the attack from no less than 8 of you - and I've done it with, I believe, a commendable constraint.  It is a sorry truth that you and TK and your 'friends' are somewhat lacking in any kind of human decency.  I am guilty of NOTHING other than attempting to advance some unequivocally anomalous measurements and some equally confrontational results in a prior claim - and on a forum that purports to be interested in such.  And it has evoked an attack that makes no sense at all.  And that attack is considerably less than legally permissible.

Rosemary

That's a crock.  I asked a simple question back in the locked thread and instead of an answer you fired off as many snide and denigrating comments at me as you could, rather than deal with the issue ethically and scientifically.  Reread your locked thread, its all there.

And yes, I lost all respect for you after your repeated threats.

So, you reap what you sow, from me at least.

How about .99 arbitrating the Q1 issue?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4270 on: July 22, 2012, 01:31:06 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4271 on: July 22, 2012, 01:31:33 AM »

****** BUMP ******

You cant even supply one (1) complete set of test data for a single claimed COP>INFINITY device test and haven't produced anything new in over a year just bloviating and baiting for fights wasting everyone's time.

Not actually.  I both can and have.

Rosie Pose


RIGHT Rosemary .... slime your way out of these two questions, I'm sure the "Open Source Community" would like to see answers without your constant bloviating

1) Where is your publically available posted link with the downloadable complete set thats all in one place of the LeCroy scope shots and all the accompanying data dump spreadsheet files, including the device schematic and any photographs located "specifically" for Test #3 referenced in your "Experimental Evidence of a Breach of Unity on Switched Circuit Apparatus" ( ROSSI-JOP-1-PDF.pdf [attached file] ) that was used for your conclusions and claim(s) of the COP>INFINITY operation ??

2) Where is your publically available posted link with the downloadable complete set thats all in one place of the LeCroy scope shots and all the accompanying data dump spreadsheet files, including the device schematic and any photographs located for "ANY" test using a 555 timer replacing the functions generator that was used for your conclusions and claim(s) of the COP>INFINITY operation ??

Hi Fuzzy

How's that 'class action' lawsuit coming on?  Do let us know.  I've told you where to present your papers.  And I know your address if you ever want a reply.

Rosie Pose

Rosemary you low life idiot slimeball .... again you change the subject because you cannot and never have made publically available posted links with the downloadable complete set thats all in one place of the LeCroy scope shots and all the accompanying data dump spreadsheet files, including the device schematic and any photographs located that was used for your conclusions and claim(s) of the COP>INFINITY device(s) operation.

You are a nothing but a toothless super troll giving information on devices you created that are "FRAUDULENT" having "NO" proof of their operation other than cherry picked data for a THESIS.



So Rosemary ..... when are you going to give us the open source community and myself the location of the documents I asked for June 29, 2012??  ???
You cant even supply one (1) complete set of test data for a single claimed COP>INFINITY device test and haven't produced anything new in over a year just bloviating and baiting for fights wasting everyone's time.
 


Your answer Rosemary given to me was ....   :P
Not actually.  I both can and have.


OK Rosemary .... so .... where are the scope shots and accompanying data dumps, 10 ohm resistor/inductor heating profile, photographs of the device setup, device schematic and components used including wire lengths and awg sizes and time duration on information collection of the test, "specifically" for Test #3 referenced in your "Experimental Evidence of a Breach of Unity on Switched Circuit Apparatus" ( ROSSI-JOP-1-PDF.pdf [attached file] ) that was used for your conclusions and claim(s) of the COP>INFINITY operation ?? ::)
 
WHERE ?? WHERE ARE THEY ??  ???

OR, THIS WHOLE CHINESE FIRE DRILL EXERCISE OF YOURS IS ONLY FOR A THESIS YOU CONCOCTED AND HOGGED PODGED UP AS "EVERYONE" THINKS ??  :o



Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4272 on: July 22, 2012, 01:34:01 AM »
Rosemary:

Just shut up and stick to playing with your pulsing coils and your zipon fantasies.

MileHigh

I will NOT be quiet on this issue. I am committed to finding out each and every player who has done this damage to our technology.  And it is my MISSION to ensure that this is addressed - on whatever basis is required.  You have all enjoyed a freedom from accountability that is now nearing its end.  And I am proud to do my bit in getting it to this point.  I do not PLAY with my technology.  It constitutes serious research - both on a theoretical and experimental basis - and it is your own flaunted disrespect of this work together with your 'gang' that has mitigated against its advancement. 

But that is soon likely to end.  Thank you God.

Rosemary

Offline picowatt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2036
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4273 on: July 22, 2012, 01:42:25 AM »
I will NOT be quiet on this issue. I am committed to finding out each and every player who has done this damage to our technology.  And it is my MISSION to ensure that this is addressed - on whatever basis is required.  You have all enjoyed a freedom from accountability that is now nearing its end.  And I am proud to do my bit in getting it to this point.  I do not PLAY with my technology.  It constitutes serious research - both on a theoretical and experimental basis - and it is your own flaunted disrespect of this work together with your 'gang' that has mitigated against its advancement. 

But that is soon likely to end.  Thank you God.

Rosemary

Exactly what damage have I done to your technology?  I did not publish papers with 'scope captures demonstrating errors in disagreement with the schematic and text therein.  YOU did that.

Again, I have only discussed the electronics involved in schematics and measurements/captures YOU provide.

As to the negative mean power measurement, I agree with .99's analysis.

As to any anomalous efficiency, I await some proper, error free data. 

So, how about accepting .99 as arbitrator of the Q1 not functioning properly in FIG3, 6, and 7 issue?


Offline MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7600
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4274 on: July 22, 2012, 01:50:31 AM »
Rosemary:

Quote
It constitutes serious research - both on a theoretical and experimental basis

That's your fantasy but it's not the reality at all.  You have nothing but you are too stupid and pig-headed and obsessed to realize it and acknowledge it.

It will be a complete farce if you do any experimentation by yourself because you are clearly not capable of doing so.  If you hire a qualified person to help you then it will take said person about 30 minutes to realize that you are clueless and chances are the relationship will end within one working day.  If you hire someone that is clueless or a sycophant or someone that is just going to play you for the money then your experiments will be "successful" but in fact you will not have advanced your "cause" by a single iota.

You will never get serious professional or academic consideration at a company or at a lab or at a university because if anyone has a technical discussion with you face-to-face it will take them a maximum of 30 minutes to realize that you are deluded and clueless.

There is no happy ending for your proposition, none.  You are so far from serious science that you simply don't stand a chance.  The only traction you will ever get is on the free energy forums.  And in fact even on the free energy forums, people that support you are like shooting stars, you only see one every few months and then they disappear.

That is your story - you are just going to spin your wheels on the free energy forums and no university, lab, or tech company is ever going to have anything to do with you or your proposition.

And you are not going to put people in danger for this useless nonsense.

MileHigh

 

OneLink