Im cross posting this from the News forum where I initially placed it. I dont have a dog in this fight, cos it aint my theory, but I find it interesting for sure. I should further add that the author (Maurice Cotterell) has what may be perceived as some strange ideas in other areas, but then again ( according to "mainstream" thinking at least) , that should make him at home on a forum such as this;

 Overview;

 The Hydrogen atom and helium atom generate helically polarised electromagnetic radiation from polar regions, that bombards neighbouring atoms, drawing them towards the source of the radiation. Gravity radiation then causes the nucleus of the neighbouring atom to spin axially ( the motor effect), and at the same time synchronises the spin of the electrons in both atoms. The neighbouring atom in turn generates helically polarised electromagnetic energy ( the generator effect ). Both atoms spin axially in the same direction. Hence the Gravitational forces from both atoms pull in the same direction and the forces are additive. The gravitational constant G is shown to be the instantaneous alternating magnetic force between any two electron magnets in neighbouring atoms , and hence the gravitation force (F) is proportional to G x m x M ( where m and M represent the electron count of neighbouring atoms)

 Link to further explanation with diagrams ;

 http://mauricecotterell.com/gravity1a.html

 It could be nonsense for sure, but if it contains even an element of truth, it should be of interest to anyone interested in overunity.

Why would that light bend around that celestial body. Does Electromagnetism not bend light ?

  Einstein accounted for this. I believe it was proven in 1927 according to his Theory of Relativity published in 1906.
Einstein considered it to be the warping of space around dense stellar objects.
 
edited to add; it might have been his Special Theory of Relativity. As for what gravity is,
scientists have been trying to understand this.