Saying that free energy machines won't be invented is not just an assumption like the world is flat.  How is saying that over-unity is possible is any different than saying that the world is flat?  There is overwhelming proof that the world is not flat and that over-unity is not possible.

I can agree with this. We all do work with numbers. As long 1 equals 1 there will be no overunity. If we can find that 1 is less or greater than 1, like comparing two apples of different size, they are 1 each but in different size. That is the kind of numbers we must look for. No one has found these numbers - yet.


We know that the earth is not flat, and we know by looking at OUR history that over unity is not possible. The history before that let us know that energy once occoured - energy is present now, so from where did it came from?


In order to create energy, we must create a potential difference - by applying energy = no point. Potential difference is the reason we have energy today, but the universe - the whole system - is so big and slow that we hardly notice that the potential is approaching equilibrium - into no energy. Humanity will most probably disappear long before the energy in the universe is gone. So fighting against physics in order to create more and new energy is no point when we can harvest the already existent energy for free the next 100 billion years or more.


Vidar

See attached,
Thanks,
Butch LaFonte

See attached