Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: LaFonte Group Pseudo Solid Tri Power System, videos & drawings of basic aspects  (Read 5707 times)

gammarayburst

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 462
We have tested all aspects of this system, but need to build a working demo device for the public. We will make a 3D animation also so it can be better understood. It is the only time I can recall that two magnets working attraction to each other while being "pushed" by repulsion at the same time. This is a basic demo of aspects of its basic operation and a practicle machine will be developed from the basic principle. I will update with operation principle through the night. Here are links to review and drawings to help understand the principle. We are looking for 3D animation source at this time for this project. The power is staggering in this design. The work comes from the magnets working in attraction while also being pushed together in repulsion. The Pseudo Solid bars reset system works with a slight overunity it appears at this point. That makes for three positive power modes and hense the name Pseudo Solid Tri Power System. Will keep you posted with every aspect of progress. See links and attached drawings. Note: The bar assembly stops at each pair of magnets and they are then separated with ease as shown in the video. The repulsion comes from the magnets in the roles of seperated magnets being in a repulsion mode to the magnet beside it and they are also moving to the opposite role in an attraction mode. Notice in the video that the pull of the magnets when they are together is stronger than when they are seperated. The Pseudo Solid Bar moves from open magnets to closed magnets during reset!
Thanks,
Butch LaFonte
Leeds, Alabama
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pDDPHJY0s90&list=UUV6BqQ_hToPob2lfymlIYLg&index=17&feature=plcp
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhOdH36LWxs&feature=related
 
 

gammarayburst

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 462
Corrected drawing
« Reply #1 on: January 13, 2012, 12:38:18 AM »
This is a correction for drawing 14.33
Sorry,
Butch
See attached

broli

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2245
Hey butch, it would be better if you actually drew, or perhaps in your case sketched on paper actual engineerable designs. We have come at a point of time that we know these concepts hold a lot of promise but we need to build machines based on them. It would be more constructive if we swap design ideas in order to come up with an affordable parts list that can be machined by someone or in a machine shop. I'm a very bad engineering but that's what I've been concentrating on lately.

gammarayburst

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 462
Reply to broli
« Reply #3 on: January 13, 2012, 04:49:50 PM »
Hey butch, it would be better if you actually drew, or perhaps in your case sketched on paper actual engineerable designs. We have come at a point of time that we know these concepts hold a lot of promise but we need to build machines based on them. It would be more constructive if we swap design ideas in order to come up with an affordable parts list that can be machined by someone or in a machine shop. I'm a very bad engineering but that's what I've been concentrating on lately.
Broli,
Mark can build a nuclear submarine if we had the funding. I know this design will work. If we can build a proof of concept then I feel someone will fund it. We are down to using past test machines for steel to build with but have all but use that resource up. I can design a running machine and make parts lists but with no funding we can't build it. The reason I post these ultra basic operation drawings is so people might build one just to replicate proof of the basic principle and then the funding will come I'm sure. I will make a drawing that people can build from for this proof of theory layout.
Our weakest point right now is 3D animations so people can see the basic operation and then maybe they might could build from that using their own skills.
This design has so much potential, it's so simple to see the power in it and our video shows the proof of the basics it works on.
Butch
 

broli

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2245
Re: Reply to broli
« Reply #4 on: January 13, 2012, 05:38:32 PM »
Broli,
Mark can build a nuclear submarine if we had the funding. I know this design will work. If we can build a proof of concept then I feel someone will fund it. We are down to using past test machines for steel to build with but have all but use that resource up. I can design a running machine and make parts lists but with no funding we can't build it. The reason I post these ultra basic operation drawings is so people might build one just to replicate proof of the basic principle and then the funding will come I'm sure. I will make a drawing that people can build from for this proof of theory layout.
Our weakest point right now is 3D animations so people can see the basic operation and then maybe they might could build from that using their own skills.
This design has so much potential, it's so simple to see the power in it and our video shows the proof of the basics it works on.
Butch

Butch, for how long have you been posting concept after concept and how many of these "people" you speak of have actually took a couple of magnets and at least tested some of these themselves. I would say less than a handful, at least the ones that made it known. Because that's what I see when I go on youtube and find no other videos besides yours. There are all kind of skilled people here, people who have access to the right resources to realize them but for some reason there's a serious lack of attention not funding.

The funding issue is your personal issue, even for around 1000€/$ you should be able to build a prototype, after you have posted the design and CAD drawings you could have it crowd funded through these communities. Or even get someone on a CNC forum to do it "for a good cause" kind of price. There are many skilled people online, some don't have the same interest but the needed skills and would just like to help others, some don't have the needed skills but still would like to help for those giving money away is the simplest/only thing they can do to help.

Stick with one concept you're really confident about, that is easy to build, that (if it works) would run continuously effortlessly. And then do all you can to realize that one machine. In such efforts I'm really willing to help and MANY others too as there's a very clear set goal to attain. This is what I'm currently doing with the simple generator concept, my goal is a machine EVEN if it doesn't work. Because at this phase I don't care about that, I'll do whatever I can to have it built, assembled and spinning on my desk on an extremely tight budget.