Author Topic: SMOT (Read 91389 times)

Omnibus · « **Reply #135 on:** November 22, 2006, 11:29:48 AM »

@peter_schmalenbach,

Thanks again for the link. Unfortunately, it still appears that this quotation is just an urban legend used by internet enthusiasts to enhance their claims by associating them with a known name. Do you think that thought of Heisenberg can be found in some collected works of his, such as this:

http://libserv.aip.org:81/ipac20/ipac.jsp?uri=full=3100001~!13255~!0&profile=newcustom-aipnbl

sm0ky2 · « **Reply #136 on:** February 27, 2008, 08:09:58 PM »

Update on the SMOT?

Has anyone made a working replication of a Closed-Loop SMOT device?

hartiberlin · « **Reply #137 on:** April 07, 2008, 01:30:51 PM »

All,
have a look at this ramp design.

Also pretty neat for the SMOT:

http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,4428.0.html

You need these 90 degrees iron core pieces to guide the flux away at the ramp?s
end.
Also it helps inside the track to make it more asymmetrical.

Regards, Stefan.

Low-Q · « **Reply #138 on:** April 08, 2008, 03:31:11 PM »

Quote from: KSW on April 19, 2005, 03:04:32 PM

ken i think the reason why it isnt kept on the same plane is that, the ball uses the height of the drop to escape the magnetic field.

As i think otherwise if it was just on a flat plane then the ball would roll past the ends and then get pulled back in.

Kane

when the ball doesn't go upwards, it will have greater speed at the end, and still be able to escape the magnets. The reason why the ball escape at all, is just because the ball is at first released on a spot that is not in balance between attraction of the tracks inside and outside. The escape is therfor already applied by the hand in advance. What a trick

br.

Vidar

Low-Q · « **Reply #139 on:** April 08, 2008, 03:36:45 PM »

Quote from: hartiberlin on April 07, 2008, 01:30:51 PM

All,
have a look at this ramp design.

Also pretty neat for the SMOT:

http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,4428.0.html

You need these 90 degrees iron core pieces to guide the flux away at the ramp?s
end.
Also it helps inside the track to make it more asymmetrical.

Regards, Stefan.

Iron does sure lead the magnetism in another path. That just results in a weaker attraction where it suppose to be an attraction. The result is therfor again at square one.

Br.

Vidar

infringer · « **Reply #140 on:** April 09, 2008, 05:55:25 AM »

you want a magnetic motor I will give you a hint of an idea or epiphany that I had think of a stirling engine or the concept of its power generation then apply that to a magnetic motor if done right bingo magnetic motor untested but in my mind it works while a little dissimalar from stirling in concept it is the same but it would need an inital start and maybe a means to disconnect at a certain speed and let spin perfectly timed think on the order of merry go round if you give it a little tap at the right time in keeps gaining speed untill your hand gets sore, your buddy pukes, or your kid wets his pants

It should work give it thought the more I read the more ideas I get... I may elaborate on the idea a bit further if people are interested in testing but will do so in a separate post cause I dont wanna hijack the whole thread.

And no I'm not trying to be cryptic I simply am sickly and need to conserve some brain power for reading or possibly posting on other subjects gotta love them colds!

Low-Q · « **Reply #141 on:** April 09, 2008, 06:18:26 AM »

A motor works because of the magnetic aligments, whitch also alter in a revolution. To alter magnetism mechanicly repuires the same energy as it take to rotate. So the result of a magnetic setup is allways trivial at most.

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: SMOT (Read 91389 times)

Omnibus

Re: SMOT

sm0ky2

Re: SMOT

hartiberlin

Re: SMOT

Low-Q

Re: SMOT

Low-Q

Re: SMOT

infringer

Re: SMOT

Low-Q

Re: SMOT