Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: SMOT  (Read 90993 times)

PaulLowrance

  • Guest
Re: SMOT
« Reply #60 on: May 04, 2005, 08:10:34 PM »
Greg's test is riddled with problems.  Also I have searched through all the files at his forum and see no data for the second test which is measuring the ball falling from a SMOT without magnets.  In other words, I would also need to see the data of the ball falling from a ramp that has no magnets.

I know there are people here who have a smot and access to a video camera.  Could you please just do two simple tests ->

1. Of the ball being pulled up the ramp by the magnets and then falling at least 1 foot.
2. Of the ball at the top of the ramp without any magnets on the ramp and the ball falling at least 1 foot.

If this is OU or FE then don't you want to know?  I sure do.

Thanks,
Paul

billmehess

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 359
Re: SMOT
« Reply #61 on: May 12, 2005, 04:49:52 AM »
I have built a smot using a smaller size steel ball about 5mm in diameter. I have the ball travel inside a u shapped alum rod instead of on top of the edges. I use very strong magnets and can get the ball to go up the 8" ram at a 40% angle. This gives me a drop of about 2 inches.
I  drop the ball into a 1" ID clear plastic tube that has 3 levels each one slightly lower than the last so that the ball moves down hill to the start of the smot where it "drops" into the u channel. It pulls up to the top but because my magnets are so strong I have been unable so far to exit the end. In other words I can get 95% around and up the ramp. The tube is about 18" in diameter.
Forget the math and the theories build the damn thing it either works or it dosn't.
God I love this stuff!!!
Bill
« Last Edit: May 12, 2005, 05:01:00 AM by billmehess »

gyulasun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4117
Re: SMOT
« Reply #62 on: May 12, 2005, 03:34:54 PM »
Hi Bill,

I have yet to build a smot but I read (from Greg and others) some info on it in other forums as follows:

1) Make the upper part of the ramp shorter (about 0.5 -- 1.5cm less) than the length of the side magnets  and/or
2) Try holding a separate magnet with correct pole near the area where the steel ball is supposed to drop down (make sure the extra magnet would not catch the ball) and /or
3 Try using magnetic shunt at the upper part of the ramp to reduce magnetic strength at the very ends (such shunt is like an U shaped iron piece with nonmagnetic spacers to adjust the effectiveness of the shunt).
4) Maybe you can keep larger distance between the two side magnets to make magnetis field-strength less strong at the upper ends of the ramp.

regards

Gyula

PaulLowrance

  • Guest
Re: SMOT
« Reply #63 on: May 12, 2005, 04:13:40 PM »
Forget the math and the theories build the damn thing it either works or it dosn't.

Why?  There are nearly countless free energy machines.  The SMOT has one of the all time lowest possibilities of any OU or FE.   I would much rather spend my time with another machine such as Tom's MEG.


God I love this stuff!!!
Bill

Yes, I hear you.  For a lot of people it is like living a science fiction adventure movie.  There is nothing wrong with that, but it is also healthy to live in reality.  In other words, if a person is truly seeking FE or OU then chose your machine wisely.

Sincerely,
Paul

Kysmett

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 101
Re: SMOT
« Reply #64 on: May 13, 2005, 04:20:08 PM »
Paul,

Your oppinions on this device are more than noted.  I do not see anything constructive comming from your rants against SMOTs.  There are people pursuing this and that is as it should be.  Modify what doesn't work until it does.  If people dropped everything after the first few attempts, we wouldn't be anywhere close to where we are today. 

It occurs to me that you will not look further down this alley and you convictions lie elsewhere.  That is good.  We should, as a people, be pursuing diverse projects.  Apply your passion where it is strongest and you will make the most of your contribution to science.  To denegrate others for doing the same, merely because your pasisons do not match theirs is counter to this diversity.  When you, or someone else, makes a breakthrough then post that and the rest of us will take notice.  A few people who are passionate about finding something, anything, that works will follow on that success.  There will be others, though, whose conviction will be too strong to be led off of whatever project they are working on, thus maintaning the diversity of our research.

If you want to remind new-commers about your oppinion that this device does not work and will never work, then start a thread entitled "SMOT's suck" or something, or you can host a web page warning people away from research in that area.  Of course doing that will only lump you in to the group of many that claim that research into <insert field here> will never lead to anything new. 

Do the independent work that you are inspired to do, but trust others to follow their own muse.  If something isn't working, then offer fixes, if you don't have any fixes, telling people to abandon their project entirely is not helpful and can actually be quite offensive. 

Thanks

Ed

PaulLowrance

  • Guest
Re: SMOT
« Reply #65 on: May 13, 2005, 05:19:48 PM »
Dear Ed,

It is true that you can't force people.  I understand that just because I can clearly see the probabilities don?t mean most others can see it.  I know this to be a fact because I've done it countless times my entire life; i.e., corrected the errors in others and their work so easily.  Very few people have a gift where they can walk into a laboritory of say scientists who've been pulling their hair out for months on a problem and the person may within a few moments find the answer to their solution.  I offer any facts people want to see.  I have already told the solution to SMOT.  What you are attempting is not achievable but only by G forces that extend into the 1000's.  If you want the see legitimate work done on such research then study the spinning ball experiments done by the late Bruce DePalma.


telling people to abandon their project entirely is not helpful and can actually be quite offensive. 

Yes, I know that society as brought up people to tippie toe around their delicate emotions.  I could write a book about this subject.  People say one thing for the sake of not hurting another's feelings when they are thinking another.  It is a very difficult thing for me to accept, as I rarely get hurt or emotional by the words of another.

Paul

wizkycho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 466
Re: SMOT
« Reply #66 on: June 21, 2005, 03:14:41 PM »
From this day knowone can say that Free Energy doesn't exist

created on stardate 21.06.2005 by Igor Knitel using 0.5% of his brain capacity.

http://starglider.netfirms.com/knitelssmot.htm

let's fly with a rythm

Igor Knitel

pinobot

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 73
Re: SMOT
« Reply #67 on: June 22, 2005, 02:02:38 AM »
Wizkycho, you've completely lost the plot.

wizkycho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 466
Re: SMOT
« Reply #68 on: June 22, 2005, 12:52:15 PM »
pinobot

pinobot, If You are not one of the ignorant liers, You will now
provide factual explanation to me and others why do you think that this is not
most advanced SMOT ever made.

thx in advance

wizkycho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 466
Re: SMOT
« Reply #69 on: June 22, 2005, 01:09:48 PM »
Hey guys what happened !

This is really the most advanced and 100% probability to work in OU SMOT that knowone on earth ever seen.
This is finally closed loop SMOT. Who will make it first probably SMOT will get his name.
only pinobot "replyed (hmm)"
Where are You all?

please comment it and stop this annoyng ball circulation (that can last for 2000 years minimum) with facts and nothing but facts
http://starglider.netfirms.com/knitelssmot.htm

igor Knitel

FreeEnergy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2014
    • The Freedom Cell Network
Re: SMOT
« Reply #70 on: June 22, 2005, 02:25:21 PM »

HardNor

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8
Re: SMOT
« Reply #71 on: June 22, 2005, 05:21:45 PM »
out topic:
why those people never see that real media files suck !?

@wizkycho: i think this smot circle work - i will try to test and improve it

pinobot

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 73
Re: SMOT
« Reply #72 on: June 22, 2005, 11:05:32 PM »
pinobot

pinobot, If You are not one of the ignorant liers, You will now
provide factual explanation to me and others why do you think that this is not
most advanced SMOT ever made.

thx in advance
There's nothing to explain, the amounth of power transfered between the balls i whats keeping the balls
from moving past the sticky spot in the first place, so its the same as
having 1 ball only worse because you can't use the full length of the ramp.

wizkycho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 466
Re: SMOT
« Reply #73 on: June 23, 2005, 08:48:58 AM »
http://jlnlabs.ifrance.com/jlnlabs

which part !?! in this SMOT setup Magnets ARE NOT positioned to make Ramp so ball doesn't have to climb but complete gained energy transferes to the other ball which will (there is no reason it wan't)
ROLLAWAY.....!!!!YupiiYaiYe!!!!!!!.to the next SMOT ........ and so the future begins now !

wizkycho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 466
Re: SMOT
« Reply #74 on: June 23, 2005, 08:50:53 AM »
http://jlnlabs.ifrance.com/jlnlabs

which part !?! in this SMOT setup Magnets ARE NOT positioned to make Ramp so ball doesn't have to climb but complete gained energy transferes to the other ball which will (there is no reason it wan't)
ROLLAWAY.....!!!!YupiiYaiYe!!!!!!!.to the next SMOT ........ and so the future begins now !