Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 514829
  • *Total Topics: 15318
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 5
  • *Guests: 13
  • *Total: 18

Author Topic: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.  (Read 668222 times)

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #2175 on: April 12, 2012, 04:18:15 PM »
Any characterisation of me as some kind of paid minion of the Forces of Free Energy Suppression is, once again, another lie and libel on the part of RA.

THEN SUE ME.


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #2176 on: April 12, 2012, 04:33:33 PM »
(sound of crickets chirping)

I think we scared her off. Or maybe they finally found the unsecured computer she was using when she was supposed to be in art therapy sessions.

And YES.  INDEED.  You DID find my computer last night.  BUT. It was quickly and easily remedied.  Guys, one day I'll give you a detailed account of the number of times this computer is 'attacked'.  Luckily NO HARM DONE YET.  Thank you God.

Regards,
Rosemary

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #2177 on: April 12, 2012, 04:35:56 PM »
Look.... Rosemary actually managed to utter one true fact in all that rant above.

It should no longer be necessary to refute Ainslie's lies and mischaracterisations point by point. It is clear that she has severe cognitive difficulties, since she evidently cannot even comprehend what people say in written text or spoken word. She certainly cannot comprehend what an oscilloscope screen tells her.

What is the phase relationship between the battery oscillations and the shunt oscillations shown in this scope shot, Rosemary? Are you achieving heating of your load here, or not?
How is it different from the phase relationship I show from Tar Baby taken from the same points?  (Taken NOT as you mendaciously claim from some other location of your own imaginings.)

(It appears that the forum is playing games with attachments again. I am referring to Rosemary's Paper 2, Figure 8.)

And TK.  What you need to do is explain that absurd video number where you measure the load in conjunction with the switch.  WHY? 

LOL
Again, and always
Rosy

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #2177 on: April 12, 2012, 04:35:56 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline picowatt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1988
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #2178 on: April 12, 2012, 04:40:19 PM »
Rosemary,

I was planning on a replication when I began posting on this thread, which I believed you wanted others to do.  There were discussions with regard to the March demo video and you stated, in paraphrase, that the demo only "relates" to your claims and that our attention should be directed to your papers.  As you have said several times "read the papers", therefore, I have been "reading" your papers. 

As for your concerns regarding my use of the word "review", I was in no way implying that I was doing any sort of "official" review.  The only "review" I am performing is as would be required by anyone desiring to attempt an accurate replication.  As I await the arrival of the IRFPG50's, I am "reviewing" all availabe data so that I can plan and perform such a replication.  I do believe it was your intent to submit the papers for review at some point, but rather than argue over semantics,  I could have, as it pertains to me, used the word "read" as well.   

If replicators are not allowed to ask you what I considered a very simple question with regard to a replication of the circuit and the data provided in your papers, than I am indeed at a loss as to what you desire or expect of others regarding your technology.

When I joined in on this thread, I actually considered that we would be on the same side. 

Assuming the schematic is correct, if someone with a technical background can provide me a logical reason for the action of Q1 as demonstrated in your paper's 'scope captures, other than the two possibilities I have surmised, I will indeed graciously and wholeheartedly admit that I am in error regarding my observation. 

As I thought you were going to send .99's annotated 'scope capture to someone on your team for review, I hoped you could do the same regarding my question.   

PW



Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #2179 on: April 12, 2012, 05:00:26 PM »
And TK as for this...


I have NEVER posted a measurement taken "across the load resistor".
Unless you've removed the video from the link that I posted - or unless you've changed that video - YOU MOST CERTAINLY have been monitoring the load resistor.  Or so you said in that video.   And if you were monitoring the shunt - THEN WHY WERE YOU RELATING IT TO THE VOLTAGE ACROSS THE TRANSISTOR?  And WHY did you identify it as the load?  And WHY have you EVER taken voltages across the load?

The real joke is this.  You complained that we don't take voltages across the load.  Explain this.  IF YOU DARE.

Rosemary

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #2179 on: April 12, 2012, 05:00:26 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #2180 on: April 12, 2012, 05:01:55 PM »
And TK.  What you need to do is explain that absurd video number where you measure the load in conjunction with the switch.  WHY? 

LOL
Again, and always
Rosy

I have tried and tried to explain things to you but it's impossible. You do not know how to communicate. For example....
Quote
you measure the load in conjunction with the switch
What are you talking about? The only SWITCH I have ever shown was the one used to switch in and out a brown inductor on a stack of LEDs. The only "load" in that video was the LEDs and the only source was the Function Generator. And you clearly didn't understand it.... so no amount of talk is going to remedy that.... it would be like trying to explain...er.... calculus to a high school dropout.


YOU NEED TO EXPLAIN the answer to PW's question. And YOU NEED TO EXPLAIN why you keep saying things that are clearly wrong, like your assertions about "phase shift". What is the phase relationship shown between the battery trace and the current viewing resistor trace in your Figure 8, Paper 2, which I give as evidence that you are once again..... ignorant of your subject. ANSWER THE SIMPLE QUESTION, and simply stop making these lying assertions without references or support.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #2181 on: April 12, 2012, 05:11:12 PM »
And TK as for this...
Unless you've removed the video from the link that I posted - or unless you've changed that video - YOU MOST CERTAINLY have been monitoring the load resistor.  Or so you said in that video.   And if you were monitoring the shunt - THEN WHY WERE YOU RELATING IT TO THE VOLTAGE ACROSS THE TRANSISTOR?  And WHY did you identify it as the load?  And WHY have you EVER taken voltages across the load?

The real joke is this.  You complained that we don't take voltages across the load.  Explain this.  IF YOU DARE.

Rosemary

You are wrong, and I have changed no videos. You can provide a direct link to any second in any video you know. Why don't you support your claims with links and references? My monitoring locations are indicated in the diagrams below, and are the same as yours, and NEVER have I stated otherwise. YOU, on the other hand, have made many errors in your monitor positions. Just watch your video again for examples.
I have never complained that you don't take voltages across the load. I have frequently stated that the common drain voltage is an important bit of information that you omit from your papers... but you DO show it in the video. The common drain voltage is NOT "across the load".
Again, you distort and misrepresent and outright LIE about me and my videos and my work. And you have the idiocy to imply that I might have hacked into your computer. I assure you... had I done so OR IF ANYONE HAD DONE SO you would not be posting here today.

NOTE that the point marked "F" in the figure below is the MOSFET COMMON DRAIN and is the point that you don't like in my data. But.... your objection is invalid anyway because that's not the point I used for the "power " comparisons.... I used the same points as you did-- the points indicated by "A" and "D" in your diagram, and by "CH1" and "CH2" in my diagram.... the SAME POINTS.
« Last Edit: April 12, 2012, 06:24:41 PM by TinselKoala »

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #2181 on: April 12, 2012, 05:11:12 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #2182 on: April 12, 2012, 06:22:49 PM »
Guys,

That last post of TK's relies on the association of prior claims that were, presumably, not proved.  I have NEVER made any claims about the battery being recharged as a result of that circuit configuration. On the contrary.  We do NOT need that to prove the anomaly of a negative wattage.  Again.  This value is that absurd that it has no meaning at all within any standard paradigms.  However.  I was more than ready to show this to Poynty Point and/or Stefan and/or Professor Steven E Jones.  And right now I'm making sure that we can all evaluate the battery performance in a wholly public demonstration - AS WELL.  Then I, like you, will learn if there is any value at all in that computed 'negative' number.  I simply do not know.  None of us do.  And we'll also be able to test our earlier claim related to COP>17.  And we're more than ready to do this from a 555 signal as from a function generator.  And we intend using both and testing batteries against a control - on both.  That's the first point.

Secondly - I am NOT in a position to evaluate Mylow's claims.  But what I know from my colleagues is that they were never convinced by TK's debunk.  Their opinion was that the 'wire' was superimposed on the film.  I don't know.  I suspect that they both gave up because they were being attacked.  I have NO idea if anyone was there to help Mylow.  But I have LOTS of it.  I have the encouragement of many of you in emails and in personal messages.  And I have my colleagues who are equally committed to these results and to finding explanations for the real and repeated evidence of anomalies.  And I also know that IF I were one fraction weaker than I actually am - the effect of this combined onslaught from these self-appointed commentators - which is just a polite use of the word - would most certainly have dissuaded me from continuing.  Of course it gets me down.  And my family have often requested that I leave this well alone.  But I cannot.  I am compelled to share with you all the REALITIES of these numbers.  And I share that commitment with my colleagues.  These results matter.  They matter in a way that is more important than my health, wealth and happiness.  And I will NOT stop until I manage to prove it.  I would be glad to do a demonstration - provided only that it is publicly and fairly arbitrated.  And frankly if that needs to be shown in a court of law or under the harsh light of a video then I'll do it - either option - AS REQUIRED.

I cannot talk about prior claims.  I only know our own.  And I look forward to showing this to you all.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

And TK - You seem to object to the number of words that I use in these protests of mine.  They are vastly outnumbered by yours.  And if I add those others by your 'co-conspirators' then they are a mere 'fraction' of your input.  Conservatively I'd say that as a group your contributions exceed mine by a factor of 6.  So.  Don't give me that about 'words'.  You're considerably more verbose.  And you have all of you occupied considerably more thread space than me. 

Rosie Pose
Taking the last ridiculous assertion first.... you are the champion of content-less verbiage, Rosmary, and many of my posts in this thread are, just like this one, refutations of your ridiculous assertions and lies about me. If YOU would stick to the topic of testing, this thread would be much shorter.... because you have only made a few posts on that topic.

Next.... your "colleagues" are the only ones on the planet who still believe in Mylow. HE EVEN ADMITTED ON MY YT VIDEO COMMENTS THAT I CAUGHT HIM IN THE ACT. And that comment from him is still there, if you want to go look for it.

And finally.... your first bogus point. You have claimed many times that the battery recharges or that something prevents it from discharging, which are nearly equivalent claims in this case. Take a look at the PESWiki article on you, maintained by your co-author, for just one example. It clearly states that your circuit recharges the battery. And of course that was EXACTLY the claim you made concerning the COP>17 circuit: battery recharging by the inductive spike. Which, by the way, I demonstrated and you did not. (I just didn't do it for the running battery, but an external one instead.)

"recharges the supply".......and the batteries are the supply, aren't they?

Offline fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #2183 on: April 12, 2012, 07:42:42 PM »
Howdy members and guests,

I am very upset with the administration or Stefan Hartman that gave Rosemary three options on April 5, 2012.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1) A specific time frame when Rosemary will do experiments without the function generator including battery draw down measurements and Stefan will give her a new thread at OU with moderation rights.

2) Stefan will lock the threads at OU and ban Rosemary from the forum then Rosemary chooses if Stefan deletes the threads and postings or everything can remain there intact.

3) Stefan locks the threads and post a message to go to Rosemary's BLOG site for all future discussion of Rosemary's circuits.

Her three (3) options he's tired of flame wars, no more on his forum .....

Rosemary lets him know by (?) 12 April how she decides.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This was to be done by April 12, 2012 and as you can see not a FUCKING thing has been done and Rosemary demeanor is the same avoiding questions, bloviating on her band of hiding juvenile expert collaborators, spitting in the faces of other reputable and knowledgeable Over Unity members with her vial explanations of electronic theory and the fraudulent incorrect cherry picked information supplied to the open source community.  >:(

To have the administrator "TURN AGAINST" every other member at Over Unity and to let Rosemary continue is beyond acceptable ..... and for what ?? To find the truth which has been done now countless times debunking Rosemary or is it visitor and member traffic on Stefans Forum to make money ??  :o

The option number one (1) given to Rosemary if any indication of the "PAST" testing and evaluation on the device with a past bogus video, wrong schematics, wrong information mixed with questionable in thousands of postings and authors names collaborators without input on the testing and evaluation done. We are all expected to take the information from the "SUPER TROLL" as correct without exception ...... RIGHT  >:(

Stefan Hartmann's e-mail address  hartiberlin@googlemail.com  what do you all think ?? Let it be known !!  >:(


FuzzyTomCat
 >:(

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #2183 on: April 12, 2012, 07:42:42 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline picowatt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1988
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #2184 on: April 12, 2012, 07:58:33 PM »
FTC,

I really don't see the need for the use of such language on this or any thread.  I also do not believe that it falls within acceptable guidelines for this fourm.

As MH stated several posts back, I too think everyone needs to cool off a bit.  All should be free to state their case or raise concerns and questions, but I see no need for emotional, angry, or vile disrespect towards anyone.

PW

 


Offline The Boss

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 52
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #2185 on: April 12, 2012, 08:05:35 PM »
 
Where is the test ?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #2185 on: April 12, 2012, 08:05:35 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #2186 on: April 12, 2012, 08:17:51 PM »
FTC,

I really don't see the need for the use of such language on this or any thread.  I also do not believe that it falls within acceptable guidelines for this fourm.

As MH stated several posts back, I too think everyone needs to cool off a bit.  All should be free to state their case or raise concerns and questions, but I see no need for emotional, angry, or vile disrespect towards anyone.

PW

PW, check the OU search http://www.overunity.com/search/ you will find around eleven pages of the word I used here at OU

After two (2) years of the slanderous remarks made about me from theft to throwing testing and evaluation of the COP>17 experimental device modified replication of mine over and over again by Rosemary without exception she deserves no respect from me, nor will I give her any.

Plain and simple shes a "FRAUD" and proven as such in five other forums over 7000 postings of hers later she has been banned from .... this is the last one available for her crap she dishes out. 

I think you should be checking out the forum history starting in 2009.  :o

Here's my data from the COP>17 testing and evaluation done  https://skydrive.live.com/?cid=6b7817c40bb20460#cid=6B7817C40BB20460&id=6B7817C40BB20460!120  twenty two (22) verifiable tests .... you have any PW ??

** Maybe a few 5 hour non stop videos recorded "LIVE" on my streaming broadcast channel ??
http://www.livestream.com/opensourceresearchanddevelopment/video?clipId=pla_6d255c76-9e9a-42ae-a565-fbc698e0b6df
http://www.livestream.com/opensourceresearchanddevelopment/video?clipId=pla_12671fda-04e2-403e-8560-ab593683a646

FTC
 ???

** added
 

Offline picowatt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1988
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #2187 on: April 12, 2012, 10:57:39 PM »
Rosemary,

I read a bit more of your posts.  They are difficult for me to read, as I typically just ignore or gloss over all posts that are of such "tones" on this thread.

As to "endorsing" a video from TK, I can only recall doing so with regard to his video demonstrating the ringing that can occur dependent on wire length (I believe it was a green wire).  You immediately jumped on it as somehow fraudulent.  I saw no attempts at "trickery", indeed, I have seen similar actions when making measurements.  A wire is not always "just a wire".

Regarding an AC scope setting, I never stated or implied that setting the 'scope to AC coupled would in any way affect or damage the 'scope.  You would, however, lose all your DC data and all 'scope captures performed in AC coupled mode would be missing a lot of data that can currently be visually extracted from your DC captures.

Your explanations regarding how to use or read a 'scope are, frankly, totally wrong.  We are not talking about COP, particle physics, electrons or whatever.  This relates only to how to use and read a 'scope, which is fully documented by users manuals and well known by those who have used all manner of 'scopes for many years.

As to "demanding" an answer, I did no such thing.  I asked my questions more that once as I thought my questions were being lost in the ensuing fray.  Time zones or not, it seems the continuing battle with other posters was more worthy of a response than a legitimate queston regarding your papers.  Even now, I do not demand an answer.  If someone on your team has a logical explanation regarding my concerns that you care to share, it would be much appreciated.  If not, that is fine as well.   

If you feel it is appropriate to tell me how to ask my questions properly, then I as well can suggest that a simple "that's interesting, I do not know the answer and will have my team look into it" from you might just as well have been appropriate.     

If you do not want your data examined, your papers read, your circuit replicated, then just say so.  I would, however, be even moreso puzzled as to the purpose of this thread.

You should find solace in the fact that, in the future, I will be reading and posting here less, as it is just to difficult to deal with all the non-tech related emotionalism on this thread.  I find it all very non-productive.

PW




Offline hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7937
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #2188 on: April 13, 2012, 12:43:31 AM »
Okay,
Rosemary aggreed to do new tests on her circuit with the 555 timer being powered by the same battery pack
and will also do a battery charge status test.

Until then I will lock this thread and when she will come
back with her new data, I will open up a new thread for her.

As this thread went too controvers, it is just time to let new measurements speak fro themself.

So stay tuned.


Regards, Stefan.


Offline hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7937
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #2189 on: April 13, 2012, 08:00:38 PM »
Okay, Rosemary
agreed to do tests with such a circuit as attached.

She will also do battery charge tests before and after the experiment.

This will take some time and until then this thread remains closed.

P.S: This attached circuit diagramm was quickly hand drawn by me in a painting program and
just represents black boxes, surely the 555 timer circuit will have some pots
to control the settings..
and the L and C is just a lowpassfilter to filter out any spikes for the supply voltage
of the 555 timer, so the 555 timer gets a clean supply DC voltage of about 12 Volts.

Regards, Stefan.

 

OneLink