Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 897375
  • *Total Topics: 15812
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 2
  • *Guests: 16
  • *Total: 18

Author Topic: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.  (Read 770348 times)

Offline fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1680 on: April 05, 2012, 01:27:26 AM »
Thanks fuzzy, for the absolute proof that Ainslie is a liar with a poor memory to boot. But the internet never forgets.

The video was posted to YouTube on the 22nd of March 2011.  The video was mentioned by Rosemary and linked from Rosemary's own blog on the 22nd of March 2011.

And now she says she didn't post it, it has nothing to do with her claims, it was "rifled" from her photobucket account, etc.

Yes, Wilby, at this point it is safe to assume that EVERYTHING Rosemary says is a lie, until proven otherwise.

Hi Tk,

Not only did Rosemary forget the BLOG posting of hers ...... There's a nice and clear posting here at OU   :o

Rosemary's Quote -
Quote
http://www.overunity.com/10407/rosemary-ainslie-circuit-demonstration-on-saturday-march-12th-2011/msg278833/#msg278833    Reply #210 on: March 22, 2011, 05:19:17 AM

Guys, finally the video.  Apologies for the delays.

Kindest as ever,
Rosie


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyOmoGluMCc



Looks like "STRIKE THREE"  !!!!

FTC
 ;)
   

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3143
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1681 on: April 05, 2012, 01:37:58 AM »
I think I get it now.
no. you obviously don't. you don't think i should point out the fact that most of the "verbiage" is tinselkoala/alsetalokin's doing. and/or the reason for his "verbiage" is his obsession with rosemary. if you have a problem with people pointing out the facts of a matter under discussion then i care not what you think...

You are a troll.
typical lawyer... engaging in fallacious rhetoric instead of logic.

Offline eatenbyagrue

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 203
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1682 on: April 05, 2012, 01:49:16 AM »
typical lawyer... engaging in fallacious rhetoric instead of logic.

Nah, I just used evidence.  Taking a suggestion, I looked at your post history.  For the most part, you just pick fights with people for no apparent goal except to fight.  By that I mean that it is not even clear that you are disagreeing with the thrust of the person's post, you will just go on any tangent looking for conflict.

I suggest you stick to whatever your $125 per hour pissant job is.  Those are slave wages in my book.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1682 on: April 05, 2012, 01:49:16 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3143
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1683 on: April 05, 2012, 02:04:55 AM »
Nah, I just used evidence.  Taking a suggestion, I looked at your post history.  For the most part, you just pick fights with people for no apparent goal except to fight.  By that I mean that it is not even clear that you are disagreeing with the thrust of the person's post, you will just go on any tangent looking for conflict.
nice strawman. ::) no. you did not. your whole post to me was nothing more than a hodgepodge of logical fallacies... go count the number of posts by tinselkoala/alsetalokin since the thread has been re-opened and compare those to the amount by rosemary. see who the blame for the "verbiage" falls upon as evidenced by the record. but then facts about that matter don't really concern you do they counselor? tinselkoala/alsetalokin can make whatever sweeping generalizations he chooses to and engage in gross hyperbole along with all your favorite logical fallacies... and never mind the facts.

I suggest you stick to whatever your $125 per hour pissant job is.  Those are slave wages in my book.
no. they are not. you are no lawyer. that much is obvious.

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1684 on: April 05, 2012, 02:13:49 AM »
Just a little update to the circuit diagram.  Rosemary has alleged that the diagram below is a "gross misrepresentation" without backing up her claim.
I stand by this diagram and will state that I believe it to be correct.  I am challenging Rosemary to explain how the diagram is allegedly a "gross misrepresentation."
Again:  In negatively offset oscillation mode all of the NERD team's DSO measurements are junk - they are garbage data.
Hello MileHigh

I assure you that this circuit represents a gross misrepresentation of the NERD circuit that supports our claim.  But I realise why you rely on it. I just hope that everyone else does.  If you want to refer to the correct circuit then refer to our paper.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary 

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1684 on: April 05, 2012, 02:13:49 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7600
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1685 on: April 05, 2012, 02:35:32 AM »
Rosemary:

Quote
I assure you that this circuit represents a gross misrepresentation of the NERD circuit that supports our claim.  But I realise why you rely on it. I just hope that everyone else does.  If you want to refer to the correct circuit then refer to our paper.

To the best of my recollection you are completely incorrect.   What I seem to recall is that the circuit diagram presented in your paper is itself a gross misrepresentation.  That because you believed that your accidental miswiring of the Q2-Q5 MOSFETs was "something special" and you wanted to keep that a "secret."

Then Poynt carefully watched your clip and reverse-engineered the circuit and discovered that you were not showing the correct diagram in your paper and as a result the "secret was revealed."  You then confessed and admitted that the diagram in your paper was false.

That is the reason why Poynt drew up a new diagram to properly reflect the actual circuit that you tested for the paper and for your demo video clip.

That is the reason when Poynt made that circuit diagram he put a label on the current sensing resistor that stated, "Position of the CSR as per the "as-built" apparatus shown in the demonstration video."

Someone please correct me if I am wrong.  Rosemary, I don't believe you could possibly forget this big event that transpired within a few weeks of your releasing the paper and the associated video.  Will you please come back to reality and at least show some integrity?

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1686 on: April 05, 2012, 03:04:00 AM »
Guys

I was going to take the trouble to answer these posts.  It's too tediously repetitive and frankly I haven't got the stomach.  I have FINALLY seen that the video was indeed available.  Sadly.  Equally sadly it was the ONLY thing that TK would use as he knows it referenced the wrong circuit.  And he was relying on exposing that fact.  I was also wrong about that tektronix reference.  I see that now.  I couldn't work out how he showed the shunt trace without the negative voltage - but I get it.  The example was related to the point we stressed in the second test of the first part of our 2 part paper where the integrated values show a negative wattage notwithstanding the positive sum of the voltages across the shunt.

I will not be able to encourage any academic to engage while TK is allowed to post on my thread.  They will not want their involvement associated with that level of engagement.  He is ill mannered and utterly unprofessional.  His science is appalling and his arguments represented with such a dire want of clarity that it is impossible to understand let alone refute.  And he relies on this - somewhat transparently.  And that's not even mentioning the rather sad and persistent claims by Glen Lettenmaier who is still clinging on for dear life to the hope that he can claim his replication as his own independent discovery.  TK's engagement here is most certainly funded - eatenbyagrue.  He is required to prevent this test reaching its fruition.  I will not engage in that definitive test without the full endorsement of the results and the applied protocols.  That will, inevitably require the involvement of academics.  TK's mission here was to ensure that they would never engage.  If you are inclined to believe it's anything else than I've grossly overestimated your perspicacity.  He has presented this thread address with an embarrassment of riches in slander and invective.  And such is hardly the grounds for academic involvement.  He's well aware of that.  And it appears that Harti is not about to apply the required editing or moderation to correct this.

And that you describe his and Glen's motives as 'good' and 'ultruistic' and 'self funded' - is further proof to me that even you are fooled.  And therefore this mission is not likely to succeed.  Which is a shame.  Because it's actually public interest that is being compromised. 

Regards,
Rosemary 

 



Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1686 on: April 05, 2012, 03:04:00 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1687 on: April 05, 2012, 03:36:36 AM »
And guys, just as a reminder.

TK has been very careful to NOT reference our actual claim as detailed in our papers that Poynty made available to us all.  Instead he must have done some extensive search to find any evidence of that film on our demonstration - and then made THAT the theme of his so called 'debunk' - where - to date he as STILL not shown us his results. 

Our claim is wholly and entirely associated with our paper and NOTHING ELSE.  And when and if TK engages on a discussion of that and on the replication of those tests - then INDEED he may be able to assert that he's replicated anything at all.  He is on record here as dismissing our papers as a 'word salad' - which contradicts the rather meritorious assessment from more than one highly esteemed academic who commended it for it's clarity.  Perhaps TK prefers it that we present our proof with the entire want of clarity associated with his so called 'debunk' where he has not even given us a comprehensive report of any kind but rather a mishmash of badly filmed nonsense that imply and infer and suggest - all.  Which is in defiance of good science and good experimental practice. Hardly a 'standard' to be emulated.

So.  Go figger.  Why did he need to rustle through the internet to find any extant evidence of that video?  When the papers that describe our claim are so freely available?  One does not need Einstein's intellect to work that one out.

Regards again,
Rosemary

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1688 on: April 05, 2012, 03:48:23 AM »
And eatenbyagrue,

Just look again at Wilby's contributions.  The guy has NEVER come out in support of our claims.  What Wilby manages with unerring exactitude is to point out when posters get rather carried away with bombast or with patent and willful misrepresentations.  And he does this with remarkable skill.  Frankly his contributions are gold.  And he does not 'side' with anyone or 'anything' at all.  He simply tries to keep the record straight.  And that certainly does not make him a troll.  But again -  for the record - he does NOT side with me or with you or with anyone at all.  So why then should he replicate? 

Regards,
Rosemary

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1688 on: April 05, 2012, 03:48:23 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7600
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1689 on: April 05, 2012, 04:01:29 AM »
I think the "guys" are pretty much a figment of your imagination at this point in time Rosemary.  Seriously, it's become like one of those "world's thinnest books" jokes.

Anyone that is reasonably astute in electronics and has had some time to quality your circuit and you yourself in terms of your level of electronics knowledge and personality idiosyncrasies recognizes this for the ongoing farce it has been for a long time.

TK on the payroll to prevent your circuit from "going public?"  That merits a LOL.  There are 93,000 reads of this thread alone.  Such bondage!  If you only understood how you would be received outside the forum bubble Rosemary.  You claim academics have endorsed your paper?  You have to be either kidding or deluded or they were referred to you by Sterling Allen.

Offline fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1690 on: April 05, 2012, 04:07:35 AM »
And guys, just as a reminder.

TK has been very careful to NOT reference our actual claim as detailed in our papers that Poynty made available to us all.  Instead he must have done some extensive search to find any evidence of that film on our demonstration - and then made THAT the theme of his so called 'debunk' - where - to date he as STILL not shown us his results. 

Our claim is wholly and entirely associated with our paper and NOTHING ELSE.  And when and if TK engages on a discussion of that and on the replication of those tests - then INDEED he may be able to assert that he's replicated anything at all.  He is on record here as dismissing our papers as a 'word salad' - which contradicts the rather meritorious assessment from more than one highly esteemed academic who commended it for it's clarity.  Perhaps TK prefers it that we present our proof with the entire want of clarity associated with his so called 'debunk' where he has not even given us a comprehensive report of any kind but rather a mishmash of badly filmed nonsense that imply and infer and suggest - all.  Which is in defiance of good science and good experimental practice. Hardly a 'standard' to be emulated.

So.  Go figger.  Why did he need to rustle through the internet to find any extant evidence of that video?  When the papers that describe our claim are so freely available?  One does not need Einstein's intellect to work that one out.

Regards again,
Rosemary

Rosemary .....

Please see your own very own posting .....

http://www.overunity.com/10407/rosemary-ainslie-circuit-demonstration-on-saturday-march-12th-2011/msg278271/#msg278271            Reply #124 on: March 18, 2011, 10:56:29 AM

And see the device image you downloaded ..... "WITH A SINGLE MOSFET "NOT" FIVE (5)" as shown in your YouTube video dated 12 MARCH 2011 for the COP>INFINITY demonstration.


http://www.overunity.com/10407/rosemary-ainslie-circuit-demonstration-on-saturday-march-12th-2011/dlattach/attach/51552/     ( th_DSC00173-1.jpg )


Therefore SCOPE SHOTS and DATA DUMPS for your papers used for possible publishing in a accredited journal or magazine have mixed up device schematics ie: device schematic - one (1) mosfet, Q1 x5 (five) mosfets, Q1/ Q2-Q4 (five) mosfets .....

Experimental Evidence of a Breach of Unity on Switched Circuit Apparatus    ( ROSSI-JOP-1-PDF.pdf )

Fig #3    dated 03/02/11    50s    73.8v    (6 battery)
Fig #4    dated 03/02/11    1us    73.3v    (6 battery)
Fig #5    dated 02/09/11    500us    49.5v    (4 battery)
Fig #8    dated 02/16/11    500us    74.1v    (6 battery)

Proposed variation to Faraday’s Lines of Force to include a magnetic dipole in its structure   ( ROSSI-JOP-2- PDF.pdf )

Fig #2    dated 03/02/11    50s    73.8v    (6 battery)
Fig #3    dated 03/02/11    1us    73.3v    (6 battery)
Fig #8    dated 03/02/11    2us    62.9v    (5 battery)


Everything is mixed up in your papers, the complete compiled data for each paper ( device schematic ) isn't any good. CHECK ALL THE DATES !!  :o


FTC
 ;)

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1690 on: April 05, 2012, 04:07:35 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1691 on: April 05, 2012, 04:30:27 AM »
And guys,

Just take a good long look at this schematic.  You'll notice that it's been very well presented.  It takes some amount of work to manage this.  And then notice too that it is NOT our own schematic.  I assure you all that there is no part of this that has any reference whatsoever to our own NERD schematic in our paper.

So I ask you?  What actually motivates so much hard work - to misrepresent our circuit?  I put it to you that our claim is likely to threaten the established order of things with much more force than our energy suppliers require.  And unlike cold fusion - we have the thesis that supports our evidence.  That is the point at which our results represent a real danger to them.

Regards again
Rosemary

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1692 on: April 05, 2012, 04:43:05 AM »
Rosemary .....

Please see your own very own posting .....


My dear Glen Lettenmaier
It seems that you are fixated on this and still struggling with those intellectual constraints of yours.  I'll try and keep my language simple.  Then you'll be able to understand.  I hope.  Our first generation circuit produced COP>17.  Your replication of this produced COP>6. Our early intention in the references you make was to replicate our own COP>17.  Which we did.  Then we decided to test this on higher wattage outputs.  Therefore we intended to parallel our MOSFET's (not mosfets you note TK?).  I personally and wholly and completely misapplied that paralleling and through God's good Grace, found an entirely new waveform that resulted in COP Infinity.

I am sure that you would prefer it that we did not.  Because then you would be able to argue your 'discovery' more convincingly.  But there you go.  Experiments change - discoveries move on - life takes over - and behind it all will the forgotten efforts of yours to take ownership of this circuit.  Just live with it.

But while I may have your attention.  Where are those interdicts applied by your team of attorneys - as they work towards that class action that you promised us?

Rosie Pose

ADDED
And may I impose on you when you answer - to simply apply some full sentences in a verbal explanation.  Your reliance on 'links' is getting tedious and your need to fill the page with these sad protests - is somewhat transparent.


Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1693 on: April 05, 2012, 04:58:09 AM »
I think the "guys" are pretty much a figment of your imagination at this point in time Rosemary.  Seriously, it's become like one of those "world's thinnest books" jokes.

Anyone that is reasonably astute in electronics and has had some time to quality your circuit and you yourself in terms of your level of electronics knowledge and personality idiosyncrasies recognizes this for the ongoing farce it has been for a long time.

TK on the payroll to prevent your circuit from "going public?"  That merits a LOL.  There are 93,000 reads of this thread alone.  Such bondage!  If you only understood how you would be received outside the forum bubble Rosemary.  You claim academics have endorsed your paper?  You have to be either kidding or deluded or they were referred to you by Sterling Allen.

Hello MileHigh

I assure you that we have a level of support that is both surprising and welcome.  The only joke is the transparent efforts by you and TK to detract from this technology.  And my personal knowledge is more than sufficient for the purposes of explaining every aspect of this rather simple circuit which is detailed in the second part of our two part paper.  Your skills - unhappily - are not equal to this apparently.  As you have NOT been able to explain that positive half of each waveform during the period that the battery is disconnected.

Kindest regards MileHigh - you've need of it.

Rosie Posie

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1694 on: April 05, 2012, 05:00:56 AM »

@ Fuzzy.... now would be a great time to post your email from Professor Kahn, the academic who allowed Rosemary some broomcloset space for her experimentation. He has some interesting things to say about her and Donovan Martin, IIRC.

Better be careful, though.... Rosemary is cornered and she will strike out and claw and spit like a wild animal. It's already starting. Even when she finally ADMITS about the video, the scope shots, all of that stuff that she lied and argued about for days..... even when her face is rubbed directly in the proof of her lies, she will still manage to turn and twist it. You see... it is OUR fault that that video exists and was used as information.  SHE never tried to cover anything up or silence any discussion, did she now.


@ MileHigh... the reason she's balking at the circuit now is that 1) it explicitly includes that gate capacitance, and she has no clue about capacitors or capacitance, she probably thinks you mean an extra component or something,  and 2) that's the circuit I BUILT and that's the circuit DEMONSTRATED in the video, and she knows that there are problems with the video and the performance. I could tell her the sky is blue and overhead, and she'd claim it was green and underfoot, just because I said it.

But there's another important issue that I identified: what about that 48-volt battery pack for the second part of the Demo Video that Rosemary posted? Why was one 12-volt battery pulled out of the stack for that part of the demo? And a related question: What is the absolute maximum drain current of a single IRFPG50 power HEXfet metal-oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor?

She's not going to test, friends. We have known that from the beginning. My presence or absence has nothing to do with the matter. You can see her wiggling around and making impossible conditions from the very beginning, well before I arrived here. Just watch....

And another thing she's not going to do: she won't say just how Tar Baby is different from her device. And of course, the corollary to that is that she will continue lying about me and my work. Have I presented results? Of course I have, nearly fifteen pages of results and discussion of them, along with 20 or so YT videos including the DIM BULB TEST. So how is she able to claim that I haven't? It is because she is wilfully ignorant, arrogant, and NEVER INTENDS TO TEST her batteries at all, so she wants to divert attention from HER AND HER CIRCUIT to anything else.

TEST YOUR BATTERIES, Ainslie. Or just continue lying and bloviating, I don't really care. The video lies and the scopeshot lies were enough for me; that little episode shows your true colors completely. You are a fraud.  Now you are lying about "academics" praising your "paper". Let's see a statement from one, supporting that claim. Where is Donovan Martin, even?
Your "papers" wouldn't pass muster at a tenth-grade science fair. You simply do not know how to report experimental results, and you actually insult your audience by asking them seriously to consider your claims based on those papers.

How many of my statements about Ainslie and her circuit and demo and scope shots have been utterly borne out? The energy calculation BS... that took WEEKS before she finally admitted she was wrong and I was right, and she STILL hasn't retracted the bogus conclusion based on the bad math. Skipping over many...we come to the VIDEO. After so many firm denials and shouts and more lies, she finally is FORCED to admit and acknowledge that the video is hers, it is official, and she posted it. The SCOPESHOTS that I published and analyzed and that she so blatantly lied about... until once again her nose was rubbed in the incontrovertible proof that I was right and she was wrong. And it goes on and on. Examine every one of the claims she's made about me and TarBaby testing and you, dear reader, will see that I am right and she is wrong. She has been unable to refute me with facts and references A SINGLE TIME.

 

OneLink