Author Topic: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology. (Read 939833 times)

TinselKoala · « **Reply #1575 on:** March 25, 2012, 02:14:52 PM »

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on March 25, 2012, 01:10:45 PM

1519 TK
. Advises Rosemary Ainslie to listen to him

Did I? Are you doing so?

Quote

. Is concerned that sheâ€™s money grabbing
. And out to CON forum owners of their over unity prizes

Rosemary you are claiming a monetary prize based on unverified claims. Claims that I and everyone else who has studied them believe is incorrect, false, in error, mendacious, and bogus. You refuse to prove your claims.

Quote

. Recommends that members, readers and Rosemary Ainslie study his work
. When he posted as Humbugger

I AM NOT HUMBUGGER YOU STUPID COW and Stefan knows it. Ask HIM, in a PM, he'll tell you, you stupid cow.

Quote

. Shows his ineptitudes with understanding the imposed frequency from a switch
. Compared to the self-resonating frequency of our oscillation
. Insists that he has outperformed Rosemary Ainslie
. Promises to prove this
. In the same way that he can prove heâ€™s 72 inches long
. Golly

What I said was that the TinselKoil WHEN MEASURED IN THE SAME MANNER AS ROSEMARY'S CIRCUIT HAS BEEN BY HER TEAM, it would appear to be much more massively overunity than her silly kludges, and if anyone doubts that I understand "frequency from a switch" I suggest they look at my TinselKoil videos. Golly. Properly SWITCHED mosfets can really do some great things with "frequencies". Too bad Rosemary doesn't get it.

Quote

1520 ROSEMARY AINSLIE
. Refers to cold fusion and nitinol technologies
. Suggests that they have already outperformed any claims in these forums

which is more bullshit... nothing has ever outperformed the CLAIMS in these forums

Quote

. Tries to point to the topic at hand
. Fails dismally
. Concludes by stating that TK is NOT BIG
. In any sense of the word

In other words, when rational argument fails her she falls back on the old standard: ad hominem abuse and LIES.

Quote

1521 ROSEMARY AINSLIE
. States that TKâ€™s intelligence is not as profound as Poyntyâ€™s
. Or for that matter MileHighâ€™s
. Or for that matter Steven Hawkingâ€™s
. Or for that matter the collective value of every clay brick in our courtyard
. Or she meant to
. Per brick â€“ which is here used as a â€˜multiplierâ€™
. Whatever next?

Funny. If your courtyard is ten meters by ten meters, and there are three hundred bricks, how many centimeters are covered PER brick? Please do this problem without using division.

You are an ignorant lying fool, Rosemary, and you don't even have the wit to drop a subject when you've been shown to be WRONG about it many times.

If a community garden has 5 acres, and there are three families, how much land PER family is available? 5 acres PER 3 families is 5/3 of an acre per family, you stupid ignorant fool. PER indicates a division operation. If you have a pot of tea that is 2 quarts, and there are 2 cups PER pint and 2 pints PER quart, how many cups of tea are in your pot? Idiot ignorant fool.

Shall we continue?

No. Screw you, Rosemary, and the horse you rode in on. You are a liar, and you need professional help.

IN NONE OF THE ABOVE RANTS AND USELESS POSTS FROM ROSEMARY has she addressed a single issue I've raised about her circuit.

And in none of the present entire discussion is there anything that wasn't already covered a year ago, without her constant nattering, on the OUR forum.

TinselKoala · « **Reply #1576 on:** March 25, 2012, 02:18:14 PM »

Her broomcloset unit, showing the single mosfet only, which then needed "repairs" which resulted in the addition of the "gang of four" MISWIRED mosfets in order to carry the current demanded by the 10 ohm heating element.

This instantiation, too, was alleged to demonstrate all of Ains-lie's claims. What of it now?

So we have the original Quantum circuit using a different arrangement, a "flyback diode" and a 555 timer.
Then we had several variants on that circuit using other 555 timer circuits and FGs. We went back and forth about whether or not an FG could even be used. First it had to be the 555, then a FG could be used, back and forth for a while. But let's just count this as 2 separate variants.
Then we have the single mosfet circuit shown in some diagrams and in the photo below.
Then we have the "5 in strict parallel" circuit diagram shown with narration in the video.
Then we have the actual circuit as wired that was in the video, with yet another circuit diagram.

All claimed to produce overunity behaviour. All tested at one time or another by multiple people with and without Rosemary's constant "cooperation" and discussion. All failed to produce overunity behaviour.

I guess Rosemary used up all the miracles in her own builds of at least 5 different overunity circuits, so the other builders couldn't have any.

TinselKoala · « **Reply #1577 on:** March 25, 2012, 03:00:45 PM »

Now, it's easy to predict where this is going. No matter how precisely I reproduce Rosemary's circuit, parts selection, physical layout, raw data and other phenomena, my circuit will NEVER be an exact enough replication to test Rosemary's claim. Why? Because it shows NO overunity behavior. Of course when the exact same analysis that she uses is applied to my build, it DOES do everything she claims. But it will (probably, got to keep an open mind so the wind can get in) fail the battery rundown test, THEREFORE it cannot be an exact replication of her circuit.
This is the way she has reasoned in the past and this is the way she will reason in the future. This farce will NEVER STOP --- unlike the TEK display she's posted, where the scope, I think, IS stopped --- until she can no longer type, or until the Men In Black finally succeed in blocking her computer access totally. She will continue to claim that since her circuit hasn't been DISPROVED, it is proved.

And since nobody has been able to show battery charging, nobody has tested a precise replication of her circuit, therefore it has not been disproved.

She's the Red Queen of crone trolls.

Rosemary Ainslie · « **Reply #1578 on:** March 25, 2012, 04:59:43 PM »

Guys

It strikes me as extraordinary that TK now claims that he ever replicated our circuit.

Here's the thing TK. I absolutely do not want you to engage. Your best experimental efforts are appallingly inadequate. Your aptitudes for science are bereft. And you're BIAS is so blatant that you're disqualified as an impartial assessor from the get go. Not only that but your arguments are spurious, your evidence ridiculous, and your knowledge of what we're even talking about are all patently wanting. Your manner of address is combative, rude, abusive and utterly untenable. Your want of common decencies in stable discourse evidently lacking. And you seem to frolick around with a level of invective that would be the envy of your average criminal sociopath. And you seem to think this is warranted? And then you have the temerity propose that you're also a trained psychologist and that you're qualified to comment on my own mental stability when your obsession with me and my work, like that of Glen Lettenmaier, points to a severe pathology that REALLY needs attention.

And all you're doing is cluttering this thread with a blow by blow account of your passage through a ponderous learning curve while you rather clumsily attempt to assemble the circuit. And you thereby force the focus away from the required discussion related to our claim for that over unity prize. Then - to add yet more insult to this intrusion - you try to pretend that you're not Humbugger or Cheese burger - or whatever it is that you called yourself - when it is PATENTLY obvious to the most unsuspecting of any of us - that you most assuredly ARE. It's enough to make the toes curl. You're dealing with a considerably more sophisticated readership than may have followed you in the past. And you need to wise up. Because your credibility is plummeting to depths that only you and probably Beelzebub occupy.

What I want you to do is go away. Start your own thread. Do this in your own space. You're impinging on mine. I LOVE discussions with Poynty - because at least we're on the same page. I LOVE MileHigh's contributions - as irrelevant as they are. Yours - on the other hand - are entirely wanting in the finesse and entertainment AND relevance. And that's because you're a one dimensional thinker that has the added inconvenience of being somewhat slow of thought. IF I'm to promote anything at all - and IF i'm to do so 'against the tide of popular opinion' - then let me at least do so with those members who can challenge me. You don't. You're just not up to par. So. Go away TK. Go and start your own thread. Do your own thing. Just leave me alone.

And this little reference is significant.

Quote from: TinselKoala on March 25, 2012, 03:00:45 PM

This farce will NEVER STOP --- unlike the TEK display she's posted, where the scope, I think, IS stopped --- until she can no longer type, or until the Men In Black finally succeed in blocking her computer access totally. She will continue to claim that since her circuit hasn't been DISPROVED, it is proved.

I wondered who's been trying to crash in here. If not you and Glen Lettenmaier and Harvey Gramm. He's the only one who actually managed to do damage - courtesy an email from his wife. And I see you still trying to do your damnedest. And I know full well that you're not MIB. They'd need to employ competents. You're not. You're just that commoner garden variety troll - who's trying to draw attention to some assumed nascent genius. It doesn't take brains to take over a thread. It takes nothing more than an overriding gross self interest and entire lack of sensitivity that is associated with a reasonable intelligence. If I saw any kind of challenge in anything at all that you present I ASSURE you I'd be glad to engage. As it is you're a clumsy self serving rather rude opportunist with no interest other than to dominate this thread with your badly argued denials - and your rather disgusting manners.

Just go away. Please. Start your own thread. Call it what you like. How to DEBUNK the NERD CLAIM. Whatever. Just let me get on with my work.

Rosemary

The Boss · « **Reply #1579 on:** March 25, 2012, 05:41:30 PM »

It appears that the question of qualified comment with regard to your mental stability has already been addressed according to recent postings elsewhere.

TinselKoala · « **Reply #1580 on:** March 25, 2012, 05:46:38 PM »

What "work" is it that you need to continue? Justifying WITHOUT TESTING your silly circuit and your nonsensical data analysis? Don't let me stop you. There is clearly no need for you to "engage" me, yet you continue to do so by lying about me and misrepresenting my posts.

THERE IS NOTHING I WOULD LIKE MORE THAN TO SEE YOU TEST YOUR CIRCUIT IN PUBLIC IN AN UNAMBIGUOUS MANNER.

So get on with it. I am just about ready to test MY build of your circuit in such a way ... yet again. Do you really want us to swap roles, where YOU get to debunk ME? Good luck, may the better man win.

(Oh, by the way... did you know that Rosemary Ains-lie is really a MAN? This is absolutely true, just as true as her claim that I am humbugger.)

Is 60 degrees Celsius twice as hot as 30 degrees Celsius? I need to know, Rosemary, to calculate the COP of MY circuit. Please TEACH ME and explain your answer.

It's nice that Rosemary thinks that MY circuit, following her published diagram with all values identical or very close, is NOT her circuit. Since I'm using the IRF830a mosfets, she's clearly correct in that assertion-- for as long as I have THOSE mosfets installed. That means if I apply for the OU prize with MY circuit, she won't be able to contest it at all.

So to be clear, let's call my circuit the TAR BABY circuit.... at least until I get my IRFPG50s to replace my mosfets, which should be in a couple of days. (If I've waited fourteen days already, and there are seven days PER week, how many weeks have I waited? Show your work.)

Now.... the TAR BABY circuit can reproduce ALL measurements that Rosemary and her "team" have shown coming from her NERD circuit. I intend to package it up with three 11.1 volt Lithium Polymer batteries so that it will fit within the stated size parameters of this forum's OverUnity Prize.

Does that worry you at all, Rosemary? Remember, I did the same for MyLOW, and Sterling Allen acknowledged that I was the first to replicate Mylow's motor but then refused to give me his award because MY replication, even though it was exact and everybody agreed.... wasn't an overunity device. I am still LOLing over that one....

So you needn't worry.... because as long as there's traffic and you don't threaten Stefan directly with legal issues, he will let you dig your own rabbit hole and go more and more deeply psychotic, right out in public.

Now watch... Rosemary will start saying that I've "admitted" that my circuit isn't the same as hers. But she won't be able to say how, other than the mosfet part number, it is different.

Cue Rosemary, for another insane rant...... in which he will probably claim that he is a woman, after all.... a claim for which there is NO PROOF AT ALL. Anybody can post a video of a crone pointing a camera at a mirror and claim it's them.

powercat · « **Reply #1581 on:** March 25, 2012, 05:50:19 PM »

Quote from: TinselKoala on March 25, 2012, 08:23:27 AM

Countless questions? From Moi? Surely you jest. Come, let us count them together.

1. She has finally admitted that her calculations of the "25.6 MegaJoules" is incorrect, and she falsely apologised to me, which is worth nothing. What is worth everything is for her to CORRECT her figures, do the calcs correctly, post the correction and most importantly CORRECT THE CONCLUSION resulting from the false calcs. To do otherwise, when the calcs are KNOWN and ADMITTED to be wrong... is a lie.

2. She has claimed that "PER" NEVER indicates a division operation. This has been refuted by me and several others, with copious references, yet she insulted me because of it and has not corrected or retracted her stance nor of course apologised to me.

3. She has claimed that the GREEN TRACE on the Tek scopeshots in her video is NOT the common mosfet drains and has nothing to do with them. I have asked her then to explain just what it is and what it represents and how to interpret it. Is that three or just one question? I count one. She has also insulted me over that issue and has not apologised or corrected her absurdity.

4. She has denigrated my analysis -- or rather, simple explanation -- of her entire scopeshot, without providing any evidence, references or explanations. She has insulted my competence over this issue. I asked, in return for her to explain 4 or 5 items on the trace, clearly and unambiguously. I count that as one question, you may not.

5. She has compared me to Hitler, Mussolini, Savonarola, and the Devil himself, and has even called into question my vertical linear dimension. I have asked her to provide evidence and references for her assertions and claims; she has declined to do so. And yet, I've NEVER even once called her a silly old dried-up skinny titless ex-GILF with false teeth and a diaper... now have I.

6. She claims that several companies have vetted and endorsed her claims. I have asked her to produce ANY EVIDENCE that this has actually happened-- remembering her encounter with Powercat--- and she has failed to do so... for the several years I've been asking that one.

There are one or two other items I'd like her to clear up, but I can't be troubled to recall them right now, I've put in more than a full day's work here today.

Countless questions, or just a few that I keep asking over and over BECAUSE SHE REFUSES TO ANSWER THEM about this open-source, public domain, help-me-to-replicate little project of hers?
Here's where I get to call her a hypocrite, on top of all the other things she is: a willfully ignorant, uneducated, overweeningly arrogant lying hypocrite... who thinks that reading The Dancing Wu Li Masters is equivalent to earning a university degree in physics.

TK
Well done on the new videos,
even if you could get your hands on her own circuit the one that she claims produces excess energy and fully tested it with witnesses and web cams and everything else, she would still deny reality, That her circuit does not work as she claims.

With all these questions that she repeatedly fails to answer it begs the question why is she on this forum ? she already has a blog, not engaging with members questions is only going to results in them being asked again and again.

she keeps referring to (guys) all the time as if they are supportive of her, doesn't sound like these guys are the ones posting here, I wonder who they are ?

TinselKoala · « **Reply #1582 on:** March 25, 2012, 06:41:10 PM »

Hey, AINS-LIE, how's this for a rabid debunker's offer:

I will allow STEFAN HARTMANN himself, or anybody that he designates as an impartial judge with the necessary knowledge skill and kit, to test MY TAR BABY circuit , with IRFPG50s as well as IRF830as, SIDE BY SIDE with your apparatus, for comparison purposes. I will even pay the shipping for your device, as well as mine, to the designated test location. I, and YOU, will have nothing to say or do with regards to the comparison. And I don't need two "academics" to agree with me. I will accept the result of a SIDE BY SIDE TEST using the same protocols, instruments, and analyses on both our devices, by anybody who can read an oscilloscope trace quantitatively. I don't even care what the protocols are, exactly, as long as they are fairly applied to BOTH of our devices at the same time, side-by-side, and that they have the capability of potentially FALSIFYING your claims and mine -- as any scientific experiment should.

If YOUR Ains-lie NERD device... the exact one sitting in the video demonstration, or a duplicate your team builds --- IF it produces a genuine OVERUNITY result... and MY Tar Baby device does NOT, in side-by-side testing of the tester's choice........ then I will acknowledge your superiority and apologise profusely, and my credibility will be shattered forever.

IF... however, they BOTH produce an OVERUNITY RESULT.... then I will claim the prize, since my device will fit the parameters of size and weight and YOURS DOES NOT, and since I instigated the testing and you have shown nothing so far. And YOU will reimburse me immediately for my expenses regarding the shipping and etc pertaining to the impartial test.

And if neither yours nor mine is overunity.... you can then continue on to another forum and waste the time of some other honest researchers trying to verify your claims. And again, you will reimburse me immediately, as above, since YOUR device hasn't met its claimed performance -- and since my claim is only that my device behaves the same as yours..... then once again, I am correct and you are not.

And if MY device somehow DOES produce OU in the side-by-side test and yours does NOT.... then you will accuse the tester of being in my pay or thrall somehow. And you will weasel out, claiming it wasn't a fair test after all.

And I will laugh myself silly, once again.

(ETA: I note that he (Ains-lie) has not refuted my assertion that he is really a MAN. Therefore I can conclude that I am proven right on this point. AINS-LIE HAS ADMITTED THAT HE IS A MAN!! You saw it first right here.)

TinselKoala · « **Reply #1583 on:** March 25, 2012, 06:52:00 PM »

Quote from: powercat on March 25, 2012, 05:50:19 PM

TK
Well done on the new videos,
even if you could get your hands on her own circuit the one that she claims produces excess energy and fully tested it with witnesses and web cams and everything else, she would still deny reality, That her circuit does not work as she claims.

Thank you. I agree with you, there is no way that any circuit test I perform would have any validity in her eyes. That is why I suggested an independent SIDE BY SIDE comparison of our circuits. Of course she will never agree , but if she does, I am quite prepared to go through with my offer.

Quote

With all these questions that she repeatedly fails to answer it begs the question why is she on this forum ? she already has a blog, not engaging with members questions is only going to results in them being asked again and again.

She's here because she does have several "supporters" here. WilbyInebriated is her pet troll, and has been critical of a single minor point long superseded in my earlier testing of the COP>17 claim. He's stayed out of this thread, though... maybe he's blocked somehow. And of course the newcomers side with her for a while, until they "DO THE MATH" (tm Rosemary Ains-lie) and discover for themselves that they've stumbled into the psychotic ravings of the certified lunatic Rosemary Ains-lie.
She's (or rather HE's) not answering the questions because HE (Ains-lie) knows that he'd have to admit defeat on each of those minor points. I am stll LOLing over the GREEN TRACE on his scopeshots which he claims is NOT the common mosfet drains, when anybody with functioning eyeballs can see that it is.

And nobody bothers to respond to his silly blog full of nonsense and slander, so to get any kind of rise, like the troll he is, he has to post where there is some dialog happening.

Quote

she keeps referring to (guys) all the time as if they are supportive of her, doesn't sound like these guys are the ones posting here, I wonder who they are ?

Nobody. Ains-lie has no support from anybody with any credibility.

NOW... I really wish he would get along and agree with .99 on a test protocol for HIS (Ains-lie's) circuit and start testing. I'm getting tired of his page after page of personal attacks against me and the other people here while avoiding the real issues.

(What? Ainslie is NOT a man? But I'm Humbugger, and shorter than HITLER? WHAAAT?)

fuzzytomcat · « **Reply #1584 on:** March 25, 2012, 07:06:50 PM »

Howdy members and guests,

At this point we are going nowhere fast with Rosemary's unreliable, limited, inaccurate and unwilling to supply any answers for the countless questions from Poynt99, TK, MileHigh and myself, that's been ignored and swept under the carpet buried or to be buried as soon as possible in front of everyone's faces.

I feel we need to talk to the only documented known professional that has some working knowledge of all the Rosemary Ainslie devices from the Quantum 2002 with claims of COP>17 referenced in Rosemary's EIT paper "COUNTER ELECTROMOTIVE FORCE ENABLES OVERUNITY RESULTS IN ELECTRIC SYSTEMS" to the newest NERD RAT device(s) with claims of COP>INFINITY referenced in Rosemary's paper "EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE OF A BREACH OF UNITY ON SWITCHED CIRCUIT APPARATUS", from what I've been told Donovan Martin at least has some type of engineering background whom is listed as a author in all the application papers wanting publishing by Rosemary which are listed below.

I do realize that Donovan Martin maybe busy, but it is the utmost importance that he help Rosemary explain all the questions now buried in this thread, and could easily be "BUMPED" back up front in one place to expedite the time process for answers. The fact is we all are busy and have other things to do ..... like make a living to have a place to eat and sleep, but this monumental COP>INFINITY ( COP greater than INFINITY ) claim mess far outweighs just being busy for a few minutes.

Fuzzy

______________________________________________________________________________________________

COUNTER ELECTROMOTIVE FORCE ENABLES OVERUNITY RESULTS IN ELECTRIC SYSTEMS ( EIT PAPER )
Rosemary Ainslie, Donovan Martin 02 February 2009
( EIT_paper.pdf )

OPEN SOURCE EVALUATION OF POWER TRANSIENTS GENERATED TO IMPROVE PERFORMANCE COEFFICIENT OF RESISTIVE HEATING SYSTEMS
R.A Ainslie, H.W Gramm, G.A Lettenmaier, A.Palise, A. Gardiner, D Martin, S. Windisch 01 December 2009
( 23455916-Open-Source-Evaluation-of-Power-Transients-Generated-to-Improve-Performance-Coefficient-of-Resistive-Heating-Systems.pdf )

EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE OF A BREACH OF UNITY ON SWITCHED CIRCUIT APPARATUS
Rosemary Ainslie, Donovan Martin, Evan Robinson, Mario Human, Alan Macey, Riaan Theron 06 August 2011
( ROSSI-JOP-1-PDF.pdf )

PROPOSED VARIATION TO FARADAY'S LINES OF FORCE TO INCLUDE A MAGNETIC DIPOLE IN IT'S STRUCTURE
Rosemary Ainslie, Donovan Martin, Evan Robinson, Mario Human, Alan Macey, Riaan Theron 06 August 2011
( ROSSI-JOP-2- PDF.pdf )

TinselKoala · « **Reply #1585 on:** March 25, 2012, 07:18:39 PM »

Thanks, FTC, for posting that reminder. Do you have any idea who that is talking in the video? I mean the one standing there gesturing at the apparatus and then at the diagram, and who is describing the labelled points on her board, and who is telling us that the GREEN trace is the common drain trace? I'd like to ask him why he's lying to us, with Rosemary standing right behind him not correcting him. Is that Donovan himself? Or is that another one of her sterling hand-picked Team?

Here is another interesting document from Agilent. Of course, they don't know what they are talking about since Rosemary has proven THEM wrong too. And who ever heard of Agilent anyway. Bunch of pikers, they know nothing of the mighty Zipon, nor do they understand anything about the superlative INSTEK function generator.

Oh....and of course, in the second document below, we see a circuit consisting of 5 _ACTUALLY_ paralleled IRFPG50 mosfets and an analysis of their behavior in a circuit eerily similar to that claimed by Ains-lie to be her own "work". Of course... this one has the dreaded gate and source resistors, and so could NEVER be overunity in any way.... but note the common drains, the paralleled gates, and the other features of the circuit.

MileHigh · « **Reply #1586 on:** March 25, 2012, 07:44:10 PM »

TK:

It's a coincidence because I linked to the same Agilent measurement application note about adding DC offsets to a function generator's output to prove to Rosemaery that current can actually pass through a function generator.

Rosemary:

Now of course you conceded a while back that current can pass through the function generator. We are still stuck on the issue of you claiming that the resistance in that path is 1050 ohms, and not the actual resistance which is 50 ohms.

I am going to have to insist that you explain yourself completely. Recently you said, "Specifically that a current CAN bypass the fgâ€™s secondary winding" implying that I am omitting this. Presumably this is 1000 ohms. Now what in God's name are you talking about? You need to clearly and definitively explain what you mean because I don't know and Poynt doesn't know.

I have attached the image of the output stage of your signal generator compliments of Poynt. WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?

When you concede that you are wrong I am asking you to post admitting that you were wrong and then we can move forward. If you refuse to do this then you are back dealing with issues of moral bankruptcy.

For what it's worth, a month ago you clearly couldn't even understand the concept of "current flowing through the function generator." You are learning and you have to demonstrate that you have the moral fiber to admit that you are learning.

MileHigh

TinselKoala · « **Reply #1587 on:** March 25, 2012, 07:47:20 PM »

@MileHigh:

I'm kind of short on capacitors, but I dug up 4 ea. 10 000 microFarad, 80 WV electrolytics that I could put in parallel without too much wire length. Do you think that's enough capacity to perform your test, using my Tar Baby and my 12 V, 5 A-H batteries?

I note that your method uses a nice safe way to "precharge" and insert the cap into the battery pack. Someone who didn't know better might try to hook a big cap up directly to a big battery pack.... and that would be fun to watch.

hartiberlin · « **Reply #1588 on:** March 25, 2012, 07:50:35 PM »

I think this thread is going nowhere until Rosemary will do some new measurements without
the function generator and post new measurements results and a video showing
her new setup with the 555 timer...

So as I am getting too many private complains about her spamming now this thread,
I am closing this thread now.

Rosemary, when you will have a new experiment with the 555 timer , the battery tests and a new
video and measurement results , just contact me privately and then I can
open up the thread again. Until then , just work on your setup and make new videos
and document it only with the 555 timer and forget the function generator whiich puts energy
into the circuit.

Regards, Stefan.

hartiberlin · « **Reply #1589 on:** April 02, 2012, 11:58:53 PM »

Hi All,
Rosemary Ainsley wanted to do some battery drawdown tests together with user
poynt99so I am opening up again this thread.

Regards, Stefan.

P.S: I am not opening this thread again because of the legal threat I received of
her lawyer, but maybe there will be coming some new evidence from these tests.

As I donÂ´t like to be threaten by legal action I might pull the plug again, if this
thread goes nowhere again and close it again and make a backup as PDF and
post it in the Download archive and remove it from the forum completely.

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology. (Read 939833 times)

TinselKoala

Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

TinselKoala

Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

TinselKoala

Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

Rosemary Ainslie

Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

The Boss

Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

TinselKoala

Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

powercat

Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

TinselKoala

Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

TinselKoala

Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

fuzzytomcat

Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

TinselKoala

Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

MileHigh

Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

TinselKoala

Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

hartiberlin

Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

hartiberlin

Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.