Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.  (Read 933320 times)

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1545 on: March 25, 2012, 06:28:55 AM »
Wow.. .you do go waaaay back don't you. The best I can manage is some old cassettes. But the white smoke is no problem.....   :o


Anyhow, the first of two new ones is up now:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMiXAgDWpbk


aaaannd.... Part 2:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U3TMCYc3LNQ

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1546 on: March 25, 2012, 07:27:56 AM »
Now here's what will likely happen next, when sleepyhead Rosemary wakes up and checks the forum. She will claim A) that her circuit NEVER produces ANY RF (without providing the least evidence that they have ruled out RF emissions) and that even if it DID it would be different than mine, and even if it was the SAME as mine.... er..... well, TK is as short as Hitler, so all his arguments are invalid anyway.

Who is it who is being silenced or suppressed? Certainly not Rosemary; I've asked her many questions (or rather the same small set of questions) that she declines to answer......  but she is actively trying to have me censored or banned.

They are just questions, Leon...er, Rosemary.

fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1547 on: March 25, 2012, 07:32:46 AM »
Howdy members and guests,

At this point we are going nowhere fast with Rosemary's  unreliable, limited, inaccurate and unwilling to supply any answers for the countless questions from Poynt99, TK, MileHigh and myself, that's been ignored and swept under the carpet buried or to be buried as soon as possible in front of everyone's faces.

I feel we need to talk to the only documented known professional that has some working knowledge of all the Rosemary Ainslie devices from the Quantum 2002 with claims of COP>17 referenced in Rosemary's EIT paper "COUNTER ELECTROMOTIVE FORCE ENABLES OVERUNITY RESULTS IN ELECTRIC SYSTEMS" to the newest NERD RAT device(s) with claims of COP>INFINITY referenced in Rosemary's paper "EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE OF A BREACH OF UNITY ON SWITCHED CIRCUIT APPARATUS", from what I've been told Donovan Martin at least has some type of engineering background whom is listed as a author in all the application papers wanting publishing by Rosemary which are listed below.

I do realize that Donovan Martin maybe busy, but it is the utmost importance that he help Rosemary explain all the questions now buried in this thread, and could easily be "BUMPED" back up front in one place to expedite the time process for answers. The fact is we all are busy and have other things to do ..... like make a living to have a place to eat and sleep, but this monumental COP>INFINITY ( COP greater than INFINITY ) claim mess far outweighs just being busy for a few minutes.



Fuzzy
 :)
______________________________________________________________________________________________


COUNTER ELECTROMOTIVE FORCE ENABLES OVERUNITY RESULTS IN ELECTRIC SYSTEMS     ( EIT PAPER )
Rosemary Ainslie, Donovan Martin       02 February 2009
( EIT_paper.pdf )

OPEN SOURCE EVALUATION OF POWER TRANSIENTS GENERATED TO IMPROVE PERFORMANCE COEFFICIENT OF RESISTIVE HEATING SYSTEMS
R.A Ainslie, H.W Gramm, G.A Lettenmaier, A.Palise, A. Gardiner, D Martin, S. Windisch        01 December 2009
( 23455916-Open-Source-Evaluation-of-Power-Transients-Generated-to-Improve-Performance-Coefficient-of-Resistive-Heating-Systems.pdf )

EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE OF A BREACH OF UNITY ON SWITCHED CIRCUIT APPARATUS
Rosemary Ainslie, Donovan Martin, Evan Robinson, Mario Human, Alan Macey, Riaan Theron      06 August 2011
( ROSSI-JOP-1-PDF.pdf )

PROPOSED VARIATION TO FARADAY'S LINES OF FORCE TO INCLUDE A MAGNETIC DIPOLE IN IT'S STRUCTURE
Rosemary Ainslie, Donovan Martin, Evan Robinson, Mario Human, Alan Macey, Riaan Theron      06 August 2011
( ROSSI-JOP-2- PDF.pdf )


TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1548 on: March 25, 2012, 07:49:52 AM »
Those poor kids. To have their names permanently associated with Rosemary Ains-lie's hand-waving conjectures. Well, I suppose that won't hurt their scientific careers much.... as long as they stick to cosmetology.

Is that Mr. Martin narrating her video? Or perhaps one of the other RATS members? Lying about the circuit being used, the battery voltage expected from the 5 12 volt batteries, the probe connections, the GREEN TRACE?

BTW... I wonder what's happened to the Counselor. Hey eatenbyagrue... have you been eaten by a crone, devoured by your inbox yet, deluged with PMs from Rosemary Ains-lie, trying to get you to commit to her defense, either legally or on this forum? Have you deigned to research and answer my two earlier questions to you? Are you keeping up with current events here .... or are you spending time with your family as you should be doing?

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1549 on: March 25, 2012, 08:23:27 AM »
Countless questions? From Moi? Surely you jest. Come, let us count them together.

1. She has finally admitted that her calculations of the "25.6 MegaJoules" is incorrect, and she falsely apologised to me, which is worth nothing. What is worth everything is for her to CORRECT her figures, do the calcs correctly, post the correction and most importantly CORRECT THE CONCLUSION resulting from the false calcs. To do otherwise, when the calcs are KNOWN and ADMITTED to be wrong... is a lie.

2. She has claimed that "PER" NEVER indicates a division operation. This has been refuted by me and several others, with copious references, yet she insulted me because of it and has not corrected or retracted her stance nor of course apologised to me.

3. She has claimed that the GREEN TRACE on the Tek scopeshots in her video is NOT the common mosfet drains and has nothing to do with them. I have asked her then to explain just what it is and what it represents and how to interpret it. Is that three or just one question? I count one. She has also insulted me over that issue and has not apologised or corrected her absurdity.

4. She has denigrated my analysis -- or rather, simple explanation -- of her entire scopeshot, without providing any evidence, references or explanations. She has insulted my competence over this issue. I asked, in return for her to explain 4 or 5 items on the trace, clearly and unambiguously. I count that as one question, you may not.

5. She has compared me to Hitler, Mussolini, Savonarola, and the Devil himself, and has even called into question my vertical linear dimension. I have asked her to provide evidence and references for her assertions and claims; she has declined to do so. And yet, I've NEVER even once called her a silly old dried-up skinny titless ex-GILF with false teeth and a diaper... now have I.

6. She claims that several companies have vetted and endorsed her claims. I have asked her to produce ANY EVIDENCE that this has actually happened-- remembering her encounter with Powercat--- and she has failed to do so... for the several years I've been asking that one.

There are one or two other items I'd like her to clear up, but I can't be troubled to recall them right now, I've put in more than a full day's work here today.

Countless questions, or just a few that I keep asking over and over BECAUSE SHE REFUSES TO ANSWER THEM about this open-source, public domain, help-me-to-replicate little project of hers?
Here's where I get to call her a hypocrite, on top of all the other things she is: a willfully ignorant, uneducated, overweeningly arrogant lying hypocrite... who thinks that reading The Dancing Wu Li Masters is equivalent to earning a university degree in physics.

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1550 on: March 25, 2012, 09:33:14 AM »
Ahhh.... MH, remember this blast from the past, which you kindly linked on that other forum, exactly one year ago tomorrow?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWDfrzBIxoQ

It's deja vu all over again.

hoptoad

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1009
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1551 on: March 25, 2012, 09:36:00 AM »
@hoptoad:

You have some experience in these matters. I ask you to look at the construction of Rosemary Ains-lie's circuit in the images from their video that FTC and I have posted. Do you see that all the "gang of four" mosfets have their gates, drains and sources hooked up with long clipleads and ALLIGATOR CLIPS clipped to those long threaded rods? What do you think is the likely result of this construction technique?
..snip...

Hmmmm... One of my bosses (years ago) used to have a saying : If your workspace is a birds nest, then expect some bird droppings.

Even if the circuit was operating in a very low frequency range, stray inductance and capacitive leakage introduced by messy wiring configurations can become an issue.

Not only for measurement purpose but also with regard to the actual operation of the base circuit. Within the rf range, the issues of stray inductance and capacitance throughout the entire circuit (including the measurement probes) becomes more pronounced. Neatness, and minimalism are your two best friends.

Cheers
« Last Edit: March 25, 2012, 11:05:57 AM by hoptoad »

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1552 on: March 25, 2012, 01:05:29 PM »
Guys I've had to play catchup.  I thought I'd do a synopsis from post 1511 - for easy reading - enjoy.

  1511 TK
.  Anxious to advise readers that he really is 72 inches long
.  Asks Rosemary to teach him the significance of the ‘green trace’
.  Again.
.  Asks her to believe that PER signifies ‘division’
.  When it actually represents a base unit of measurement
.  That can be used in any mathematical context required
.  Including addition, subtraction and multiplication
.  Urgent appeal to be ‘PROVED WRONG’
.  Recommends that readers equate him to Steven Hawking
.  Somehow?
.  Not sure that’s possible.
.  Steven Hawking is a genius
.  Demands to be taught about a ‘green trace’
.  Assures readers that he’ll keep asking this until he DIES
.  Or alternatively…
.  Actually he offers no alternatives.
.  Stefan has undertaken NOT to lock this thread.
 
1512  Poynty Point
.  Tries to get TK to focus on the topic
.  Gives him another free lesson in the art of circuit analysis.
.  Which has the dubious value of being marginally topical
.  But says little about TK’s assumed knowledge of this
.  From that declared ENGROSSED STUDY
.  Of everything related to Rosemary Ainslie

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1553 on: March 25, 2012, 01:06:52 PM »
  1513 TK
.  Asks about the 5th resistor
.  Refers to his previous work on OUR.com.
.  When he posted there as HUMBUGGER
.  Insists that the work was relevant
.  Tries to pin the anomalies on inductance from wires
.  Claims that the NERD team never measured the inductance on wires
.  Claims they don’t have the collective competence
.  Complains that Rosemary Ainslie has no WIT
.  Tells readers NOT to think that he’s Humbugger
.  But why would they?
.  Humbugger was NOT 72 inches long
.  Clearly NOT the same person
.  Humbugger assured us his (sorry) correction, he was – no longer than a pickle.
 
1514  POYNTY POINT
.  Poynty concurs
.  Sort of
.  Here and there
 
1515  TK
.  More evidence that he’s not up to scratch
.  Has NO idea which circuit to use
.  Reminds all and sundry that this is HIS work
.  And that everyone’s distracting him
.  Or thoughts of Rosemary Ainslie are distracting him
.  Or both.
.  Claims Rosemary Ainslie is misleading him
.  Confusing him
.  Or both
.  Deliberately or otherwise
.  Appeals to her to teach him
.  Please
.  Please, please.  Said many times
.  Complains that he has to drive 300 miles
.  For some obscure reason
.  Asks a question about a frequency
.  Then tells the readers that he already knows the answer

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1554 on: March 25, 2012, 01:09:43 PM »
  1516 TK
.  Mentions again that Rosemary Ainslie knows how tall he is
.  Suggests that she’s confused him with?
.  Not sure who. 
.  He seems to think she cares
.  Rosemary Ainslie knows exactly who he is
.  Which is Humbugger
.  Because they’ve got that ‘length’ thing in common
.  Which is considerably less than 72 inches Per pickle
.  Divisible or otherwise
.  LOL
 
1517 ROSEMARY AINLSIE
.  Tries to get the subject topical
.  Fails dismally
 
1518  ROSEMARY AINSLIE
.  Compares TK to Hitler
.  Savonarola
.  Mussolini
.  Tries to wrest back ownership of her thread
.  Fails dismally
 

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1555 on: March 25, 2012, 01:10:45 PM »
  1519  TK
.  Advises Rosemary Ainslie to listen to him
.  Is concerned that she’s money grabbing
.  And out to CON forum owners of their over unity prizes
.  Recommends that members, readers and Rosemary Ainslie study his work
.  When he posted as Humbugger
.  Shows his ineptitudes with understanding the imposed frequency from a switch
.  Compared to the self-resonating frequency of our oscillation
.  Insists that he has outperformed Rosemary Ainslie
.  Promises to prove this
.  In the same way that he can prove he’s 72 inches long
.  Golly
 
1520  ROSEMARY AINSLIE
.  Refers to cold fusion and nitinol technologies
.  Suggests that they have already outperformed any claims in these forums
. Tries to point to the topic at hand
.  Fails dismally
.  Concludes by stating that TK is NOT BIG
.  In any sense of the word
 
1521  ROSEMARY AINSLIE
.  States that TK’s intelligence is not as profound as Poynty’s
.  Or for that matter MileHigh’s
.  Or for that matter Steven Hawking’s
.  Or for that matter the collective value of every clay brick in our courtyard
.  Or she meant to
.  Per brick – which is here used as a ‘multiplier’
.  Whatever next?

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1556 on: March 25, 2012, 01:12:09 PM »
  1522 MICROCONTROLLER
.  Recommends that Rosemary Ainslie put a sock in it
.  Claims that she’s a W H O R E
.  But did not define the acronym
.  Made a muddled reference to some circuitry that includes a capacitor
.  And assured the readers and members and Rosemary Ainslie
.  That he was onto something or the other FREAK
.  As he puts it
.  Golly
.  Clearly points to higher knowledge from lowly sources
 
1523  ROSEMARY AINSLIE
.  Suggests Microcontroller as a possible candidate for team troll
.  Fails dismally
 
1524 MICROCONTROLLER
.  Attempts to reach the outer limit of his invective
.  By calling Rosemary Ainslie ‘garbage’
.  Believes that this may be construed as an insult
.  And that it may be in keeping with the thread topic
.  Which is correct
.  Sadly

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1557 on: March 25, 2012, 01:13:06 PM »
  1525  TK
.  Overly concerned that the attention is taken from himself
.  Points out that his early work as ‘humbugger’ is the same as this new work
.  Which it is
.  But sadly as either Humbugger or TK – the work is still irrelevant
.  He has not duplicated the oscillation
.  In either attempt
.  He then fills the page with copious shots of his waveforms
.  In an effort to let our readers focus on his genius
.  As proof of something
.  I think
.  He makes no reference to WHAT he’s photographing
.  And omits PROOF of being 72 inches long
.  Which is more relevant than is work either Humbugger’ or as TK
.  The use of the term ‘work’ being loosely applied
.  And discussion of his length being much more arresting
.  As that level of exaggeration can only have been managed
.  BY ACCESSING FREE ENERGY
.  Whatever that means
 
1526  POWERCAT
.  Warns Rosemary Ainslie that he’ll tell the members and readers
.  That Rosemary Ainslie is the only one claiming that she’s got free energy
.  Which is confusing
.  Because Rosemary Ainslie does NOT claim that she’s got free energy

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1558 on: March 25, 2012, 01:14:18 PM »
  1527 MILEHIGH
.  Concerned that readers or members take cold fusion or nitinol claims seriously
.  Explains that they need to ‘chuckle’ about this
.  Like he does
.  Advises Rosemary Ainslie that there is no such thing as Free Energy
.   Which is somewhat redundant as Rosemary Ainslie concurs with this
.  And then promises to explain all
.  Specifically that a current CAN bypass the fg’s secondary winding
.  Which he’s promised to explain for some time now
.  Rosemary Ainslie is still waiting
.  As are the readers of this thread
.  Assuming there still are any
.  Which is doubtful
 
1528  TK
.  Claims Rosemary Ainslie cannot conduct a meaningful discussion
.  And pretends that he’s duplicated the NERD technology
.  Which he sees as a basis for discussion
.  DEMANDS that Rosemary Ainslie conduct tests
.  Detailed by team troll
.  Designed to disprove the NERD technology
.  Then offers to do this himself
.  Which is interesting
.  Rosemary Ainslie is MOST interested to see any meaningful test at all
.  For the record
.  LOL
.  Alternatively ‘Dear God’
.  Alternatively – ‘If only’
.  Something like that
.  He concludes that Harti can vouch for the fact that TK is NOT Hitler
.  Which is a comfort
.  Who would have thought?
.  Still no proof of his length is on offer
.  That 72 inches – courtesy free energy
.  LOL
 

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1559 on: March 25, 2012, 01:15:35 PM »
  1529 POYNTY POINT
.  Gives TK more guidance on his waveforms
.  Much needed
.  Despite TK’s self declared genius
.  LOL
.  Or better put
.  LOLOLOLOL
 
1530 TAK22
.  Tries to make sense of the thread
.  Fails dismally
.  Opts for assuming that it’s a farce
.  Probably on the money
 
1531  TK
.  Asks for more lessons from Poynty Point
.  Admits his equipment is substandard
.  Admits he has no clue what he’s doing
.  Asks for permission from Poytny to replace the fg with an optocoupler
.  Adds a sketch to lend gravitas to this new circuit variant
.  Asks Poynty to sim this first
.  Still no proof of that 72 inches claim
.  Can’t think why?