Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.  (Read 933187 times)

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1455 on: March 23, 2012, 04:11:24 PM »
so Guys,

This is how these threads of mine trend.  For some reason Tinsel Koala, Powercat, MileHigh, Glen Lettenmaier - and sundry - are free to entirely misrepresent our circuit - our claim - our waveforms - anything they choose, without any kind of accountability at all.  If TK were obliged to show his identity then he would be considerably more cautious as he would then know he could be held accountable.  Glen I'm not concerned with.  He is - self-evidently - utterly unprincipled and - by rights - should not be allowed on any self respecting forum.  His flagrant breach of confidential information and the level of his sad attempts at traducement are that excessive that they're positively vulgar.  But please note.  Harti is positively encouraging this.  And that is something that I cannot wrap my mind around.  One would have thought he'd allow any claim a fair chance.  As it is I would be grossly embarrassed to refer any academic to this thread - where I'm soliciting their involvement.  I suspect that Harti's fully aware of this.  And I'm inclined to suspect that's precisely why he allows this.

I'm afraid that Harti will be obliged to lock this thread and I suspect that is precisely why he's encouraged this troll attack.  You must all of you draw what conclusions you may.  Bear in mind that he took Glen Lettenmaier off moderation precisely to encourage this.  And strangely - he also then invited MileHigh to join in.  Both have long been antagonists of this technology.  This is all way past acceptable.  I can only conclude that they'll persist in this abuse in order to get this thread locked.  And all this in order to prevent our definitive draw down test.  Then in due course I'll be invited back.  And the same will occur.  What they cannot tolerate is to give a fair chance for some really interesting technology to ever see the light of day. 

SO.  For the record.  We are more than happy to engage in a definitive draw down test that will conclusively prove the anomalies related to our circuit.  And we strongly anticipate that the evidence will conform to the measurements over our circuit as detailed in both our papers.  And unless I am given some reasonable chance to do that demonstration - then our trolls have won.  And that with Harti's active assistance.  Go figger.

What these trolls are attempting - with some considerable efficiency - is to prevent that demonstration from being held on these forums.  It will be way too definitive for their comfort - where the obvious intention is to frustrate experimental proof and rely on allegation, allusion, insinuation, or just plain traducement to win their argument.  Which goes to show.  Over unity is not to be defeated by intelligent argument - or even by experimental proof - but simply by sheer force of opinion.  What is particularly galling is that everyone will then assume - as ever - that over unity has not been proved.  It most certainly has been.  It's just that Harti seems anxious to keep that knowledge away from this thread. Else why would he allow this flagrant abuse of forum guidelines.  I ask you?

Regards,
Rosemary

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1456 on: March 23, 2012, 04:35:40 PM »

Oh come on, what would be the fun in that?  You know how these tests go with overunity devices.  They never go well, and then it's over.  The joy is in the ride, not the destination, so give the circuit a little more time to smell the roses.

I would be happy to prove you wrong here eatenbyagrue.  Surely this is a challenge?  We've already held public demonstrations of this circuit and there was absolutely NO FAIL.  And we're more than willing to do so again - but this time to test the battery draw downs.  Surely it would be more politic to judge this after completion of that demonstration?  Not before?  I thought you were rather fair minded on the whole.  Was i wrong?

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7600
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1457 on: March 23, 2012, 04:48:15 PM »
Rosemary:

Quote
And we strongly anticipate that the evidence will conform to the measurements over our circuit as detailed in both our papers.

This is not true.  But all you do is DENY DENY DENY.  You are pigheaded and you refuse to listen to anybody else.

Bring on your draw-down test, I welcome it.  It's just not going to be that easy to do.

So your thread is nothing more than farcical comedy at this point for many people.  Since arguing with you is futile, why not just poke fun at the ridiculous charade it has all become.

When the draw-down test is a shocker for you, then do the other tests and see that they all show Mother Nature doing exactly what she is supposed to be doing - the perfect harmony and balance manifested when energy transforms from one form into another.

Every time your MOSFET switch opens some current flows through the switch such that current flows clockwise through your circuit and there is a voltage drop, electrical energy is converted into heat energy, and the batteries discharge.   That is the inescapable reality that you DENY DENY DENY because your DSO data capture sucked.

Your team of buffoons that you worked with had no idea that the current was flowing through the function generator itself.  Yes, I know, you DENY DENY DENY this fact even though you saw it running in a simulation.  You are a complete ignoramus when it comes to electronics yet you are sure that you know better than myself, Poynt, and other when it comes to the question of current flowing through the function generator.

So, indeed, this thread is nothing but farcical comedy at this point in time.  Hopefully you will do the battery draw-down test properly and then you will have to face the fact that you have been chasing a pipe dream for the past year over a miswired MOSFET circuit that is simply useless.

It's all nothing more than a sad joke at this point in time.

MileHigh

powercat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1091
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1458 on: March 23, 2012, 05:05:06 PM »
so Guys,

But please note.  Harti is positively encouraging this.  And that is something that I cannot wrap my mind around.  One would have thought he'd allow any claim a fair chance.
What these trolls are attempting - with some considerable efficiency - is to prevent that demonstration from being held on these forums.

Regards,
Rosemary

How many years would you call a fair chance ? Stefan has given you three threads and still nobody can produce excess  energy from any of your circuits
 
Interesting how you're attacking the majority of people who post here and calling them trolls, when you are the one wasting everybody's time with your BS claims.
 
In all the years that you have been making these claims not one person has ever successfully matched your claims.

fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1459 on: March 23, 2012, 05:10:59 PM »
so Guys,

This is how these threads of mine trend.  For some reason Tinsel Koala, Powercat, MileHigh, Glen Lettenmaier - and sundry - are free to entirely misrepresent our circuit - our claim - our waveforms - anything they choose, without any kind of accountability at all.  If TK were obliged to show his identity then he would be considerably more cautious as he would then know he could be held accountable.  Glen I'm not concerned with.  He is - self-evidently - utterly unprincipled and - by rights - should not be allowed on any self respecting forum.  His flagrant breach of confidential information and the level of his sad attempts at traducement are that excessive that they're positively vulgar.  But please note.  Harti is positively encouraging this.  And that is something that I cannot wrap my mind around.  One would have thought he'd allow any claim a fair chance.  As it is I would be grossly embarrassed to refer any academic to this thread - where I'm soliciting their involvement.  I suspect that Harti's fully aware of this.  And I'm inclined to suspect that's precisely why he allows this.

I'm afraid that Harti will be obliged to lock this thread and I suspect that is precisely why he's encouraged this troll attack.  You must all of you draw what conclusions you may.  Bear in mind that he took Glen Lettenmaier off moderation precisely to encourage this.  And strangely - he also then invited MileHigh to join in.  Both have long been antagonists of this technology.  This is all way past acceptable.  I can only conclude that they'll persist in this abuse in order to get this thread locked.  And all this in order to prevent our definitive draw down test.  Then in due course I'll be invited back.  And the same will occur.  What they cannot tolerate is to give a fair chance for some really interesting technology to ever see the light of day. 

SO.  For the record.  We are more than happy to engage in a definitive draw down test that will conclusively prove the anomalies related to our circuit.  And we strongly anticipate that the evidence will conform to the measurements over our circuit as detailed in both our papers.  And unless I am given some reasonable chance to do that demonstration - then our trolls have won.  And that with Harti's active assistance.  Go figger.

What these trolls are attempting - with some considerable efficiency - is to prevent that demonstration from being held on these forums.  It will be way too definitive for their comfort - where the obvious intention is to frustrate experimental proof and rely on allegation, allusion, insinuation, or just plain traducement to win their argument.  Which goes to show.  Over unity is not to be defeated by intelligent argument - or even by experimental proof - but simply by sheer force of opinion.  What is particularly galling is that everyone will then assume - as ever - that over unity has not been proved.  It most certainly has been.  It's just that Harti seems anxious to keep that knowledge away from this thread. Else why would he allow this flagrant abuse of forum guidelines.  I ask you?

Regards,
Rosemary

Hi guests and members,

As you can see the delusional mind of Rosemary's so deranged, and disturbed not one person comes to her defense ..... NO ONE !!

There is not one academic, engineer or someone involved in any of her projects that's been around not one comes to her defense.

The only ones from here are those whom have never tried to make a "magical" Rosemary device ..... possibly even Rosemary posing as someone else here at OU as she did in a previous thread as "Doozie" from what I remember.

These threads go on and on with her BS for at least 120 pages or more and if everyone is tired of this like most of us here please e-mail Stefan the owner and moderator at  hartiberlin@googlemail.com



FuzzyTomCat
 ;)


added - Other members may want to add Stefan's e-mail address in the body of their posts ...... "stop the madness"
 
« Last Edit: March 23, 2012, 06:23:04 PM by fuzzytomcat »

eatenbyagrue

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 203
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1460 on: March 23, 2012, 06:49:20 PM »
I would be happy to prove you wrong here eatenbyagrue.  Surely this is a challenge?  We've already held public demonstrations of this circuit and there was absolutely NO FAIL.  And we're more than willing to do so again - but this time to test the battery draw downs.  Surely it would be more politic to judge this after completion of that demonstration?  Not before?  I thought you were rather fair minded on the whole.  Was i wrong?

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

I am not as smart in electronics as you and some of the others, but I remain cautiously optimistic about the circuit and think you deserve the full opportunity to prove it.  I think you are very close, but my layman math arrived at a slightly different formula.  But I am just a layman here, so I could be wrong.  I was just going by what I have studied on the internet.
So I hope to be pro en wrong and look forward to seeing your self running circuit.  Once you get it to self-power, all these people will shut up, I promise you.
 
I very much look forward to your finished product.

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1461 on: March 23, 2012, 06:55:45 PM »
Hey, Counselor.... ask her what the GREEN TRACE represents in the scope shot I've reproduced from her video.

I very much look forward to her explanation of that trace. If it's not the mosfet common drain, like the presenter and the diagram... and yours truly.... say it is.... then what is it? She says it's NOT the common drain and isn't relevant to her story. Yet she was standing right behind the presenter in the video when he says it IS.

And.. .is there anyone BESIDES ROSEMARY who finds my post detailing the details of the scope shot wrong or objectionable in any way? Anyone care to interpret it, differently or otherwise?

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1462 on: March 23, 2012, 09:29:12 PM »
Rosemary ..... whats required for MY lawsuit should not concern you other than when your receive it.

It will be factual and correct unlike anything you have done in your entire lifetime.

Do your ............ Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah.

I don't care ..... why don't you answer TK on your fraudulent video ???

MAKE YOUR GRAND CHILDREN  "PROUD" !!!!


 :P


Guys,
Just going over some of these posts.  This one is classic.  I've been rolling.  I'm afraid that poor Glen Lettenmaier just ran out of words.   ::) Not actually his thing.  One must make allowances.  :o   He's been challenged to stop that 'cut and paste' and show us the rare sight on an original post.  WELL.  He's managed it. And notwithstanding the difficulties he experiences with the written and spoken word.  You see here the indomitable spirit of the dedicated troll.  And there's no arguing it.  He actually DID manage an original post.  He just changed the text to put it in range of his competence. 

Anyway.  Always nice to find some reason to laugh.
Kindest as ever,
Rosie

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1463 on: March 23, 2012, 09:36:52 PM »
Hi guests and members,

As you can see the delusional mind of Rosemary's so deranged, and disturbed not one person comes to her defense ..... NO ONE !!

There is not one academic, engineer or someone involved in any of her projects that's been around not one comes to her defense.

The only ones from here are those whom have never tried to make a "magical" Rosemary device ..... possibly even Rosemary posing as someone else here at OU as she did in a previous thread as "Doozie" from what I remember.

These threads go on and on with her BS for at least 120 pages or more and if everyone is tired of this like most of us here please e-mail Stefan the owner and moderator at  hartiberlin@googlemail.com



FuzzyTomCat
 ;)


added - Other members may want to add Stefan's e-mail address in the body of their posts ...... "stop the madness"
 

And as for this.  I think Glen seriously believes he can encourage anyone to rally other than his faithful band of trolls.  But it intrigues me that he's so anxious to shut down this thread.  I think it's because he doesn't want continual reminders of that class action law suit he's alleging that his going to serve on me.  LOL. 

You need to get your legal team to rally Glen.  Not our poor members. 

Regards,
Rosie Pose

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1464 on: March 23, 2012, 09:49:17 PM »
Hi guests and members,

As you can see the delusional mind of Rosemary's so deranged, and disturbed not one person comes to her defense ..... NO ONE !!

There is not one academic, engineer or someone involved in any of her projects that's been around not one comes to her defense.

The only ones from here are those whom have never tried to make a "magical" Rosemary device ..... possibly even Rosemary posing as someone else here at OU as she did in a previous thread as "Doozie" from what I remember.

These threads go on and on with her BS for at least 120 pages or more and if everyone is tired of this like most of us here please e-mail Stefan the owner and moderator at  hartiberlin@googlemail.com
FuzzyTomCat
 ;)
added - Other members may want to add Stefan's e-mail address in the body of their posts ...... "stop the madness"
 


My Dear Glen Lettenmaier,
If you have found it difficult trying to read 120 pages or more - then stop trying.  I'm not sure that you're under any obligation.  You notice that the only people who tolerate you are TK and MileHigh.  And of course, Powercat.  And we all know to judge a man by his friends.

Unlike you I don't need help in defending myself.  And when and if I get to need this - even then I wouldn't impose.  I'd rather my team stay away.  On the whole they prefer to deal with professionals and gentlemen.  I'm not sure how they'd manage the rampant excesses of sociopathic abuses.  I'm well able to fight my corner.  And I know better than to take any of you seriously.

Again,
Rosie Posie

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1465 on: March 23, 2012, 09:51:26 PM »
How many years would you call a fair chance ? Stefan has given you three threads and still nobody can produce excess  energy from any of your circuits
 
Interesting how you're attacking the majority of people who post here and calling them trolls, when you are the one wasting everybody's time with your BS claims.
 
In all the years that you have been making these claims not one person has ever successfully matched your claims.

My dear Powercat.  This is simply not true.  But if it helps you to think this then feel free.  I'm not sure that I care either way.

Rosie Pose

powercat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1091
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1466 on: March 23, 2012, 09:58:05 PM »
My dear Powercat.  This is simply not true.  But if it helps you to think this then feel free.  I'm not sure that I care either way.

Rosie Pose

Rosemary Ainslie you are a Delusional Fantasist

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1467 on: March 23, 2012, 10:27:29 PM »
Hello MileHigh,

I usually enjoy your posts.  But you're losing your touch a bit.  I detect the kind of repetition that I usually associate with senility. 
Rosemary:
This is not true.  But all you do is DENY DENY DENY.  You are pigheaded and you refuse to listen to anybody else.
Not at all.  I'm very attentive when I respect a person's opinion.  But then I needs must also respect that person's intelligence.  I find a dearth of it amongst you trolls.  Sadly.
Bring on your draw-down test, I welcome it. It's just not going to be that easy to do.
Thanks.  But I'm not sure that I need your permission.
So your thread is nothing more than farcical comedy at this point for many people.  Since arguing with you is futile, why not just poke fun at the ridiculous charade it has all become.
Indeed MileHigh.  How can it be anything BUT farcical.  It's dominated by troll contributions.
When the draw-down test is a shocker for you, then do the other tests and see that they all show Mother Nature doing exactly what she is supposed to be doing - the perfect harmony and balance manifested when energy transforms from one form into another.
Here's a case in point MilesUpThere.  You're losing your touch.  When the draw-down test is a shocker?  What?  You already know the outcome?  Or are you ASSUMING the outcome?  And then those inanities about Nature doing her thing?  Not your usual standard.
Every time your MOSFET switch opens some current flows through the switch such that current flows clockwise through your circuit and there is a voltage drop, electrical energy is converted into heat energy, and the batteries discharge.   That is the inescapable reality that you DENY DENY DENY because your DSO data capture sucked.
I can't tell you how disappointed I am.  I really expected better.  Actually I challenged you to come up with a full on analysis of the positive half of each waveform related to the required path.  And this is the best you can do?  Platitudes and generalisations.  I'm concerned about that mind of yours MileHigh.  Are you getting old?

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1468 on: March 23, 2012, 10:27:56 PM »
Your team of buffoons
Buffoons?  That's rich.  The only buffoons that I know are right here dominating this thread.
... that you worked with had no idea that the current was flowing through the function generator itself.  Yes, I know, you DENY DENY DENY this fact even though you saw it running in a simulation.  You are a complete ignoramus when it comes to electronics yet you are sure that you know better than myself, Poynt, and other when it comes to the question of current flowing through the function generator.
MilesSoVeryVeryHigh.  This is absolutely NOT your usual standard.  The more I read the more disappointed I am.  You need to do better.  One of you lot surely can get an argument together to explain that waveform.  Denial is NOT an argument.  Never has been.  And for that precise reason I don't use it.  But you seem to be relying on it rather heavily.  The challenge is to FIND the current path.  And the current path is NOT through the function generator.  That argument is now TIRED.  As I suspect you are.  This post is just not typical of you.  I actually hope you're Ok.  And I mean it.  Perhaps you'll bounce back tomorrow and give me something I can get my teeth into.  I'd hate to find that my favorite troll has really lost his teeth. 
 
 Kindest regards
 Rosie Pose.

fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1469 on: March 23, 2012, 11:02:52 PM »
Gee Wiz !!!

I come back and Rosemary's went bonkers !!

She must have packed her nose with "catnip" that's the only explanation .... the next thing she'll be rolling around slobbering all over or climbing up the walls and seeing things.  :o


 ???