Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.  (Read 933102 times)

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1425 on: March 23, 2012, 02:49:00 AM »
When you PROVE pigs fly Rosemary !!

 :P

I rest my case.  Glen Lettenmaier is on record.  He most assuredly attests to those COP>17 numbers on an official Scribd Publication.  He has subsequently charged through my multiple threads to deny this.  But unless he withdraws that scribd publication he is contradicting himself. 

I am afraid that he lacks professionalism on any level at all.  Which disqualifies him from ever being a reliable experimentalist.  More's the pity.

Kindest regards
Rosemary

And until he does withdraw that publication I am obliged to reference the fact that he most assuredly stands by his claim that he has replicated our COP>17 test.  How can I do otherwise?  If he denies this he is obliged to withdraw that publication.  And while he does not withdraw this then he is advertising a published account of his support of this.  He seems to think he can managed both statements and yet garner some credibility.  It just can't be done.

And please bear this in mind.  He advised Scribd authorities that the publication was exclusively his own work and that he had sole ownership of that paper.  Under all legal conditions a collaboration entitles any one of the authors to access and publish that work - provided only that they publish the names of all parties in that collaboration.  By rights he does not have exclusive ownership.  He shares that ownership with all parties to that paper.  And that he has alleged this ownership under oath, is a criminal misrepresentation and speaks to his intention to steal that work for his own account.  Confusingly he then assures me that he will sue me?  Not sure on what basis.  Perhaps it's because I've been in the happy position of proving his entire lack of principle.  That will be an interesting legal process - if it ever happens.  Because to compound these confusions - he then asks me to recommend an attorney for him.  And this in the face of his assurance that he consults a veritable team of attorneys in real time - while they prepare a class action against me.  Golly.  If I didn't know better I'd be impressed.

Sorry that's a rather long post script.
Again, regards,
Rosemary

fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1426 on: March 23, 2012, 03:07:05 AM »
I rest my case.  Glen Lettenmaier is on record.  He most assuredly attests to those COP>17 numbers on an official Scribd Publication.  He has subsequently charged through my multiple threads to deny this.  But unless he withdraws that scribd publication he is contradicting himself. 

I am afraid that he lacks professionalism on any level at all.  Which disqualifies him from ever being a reliable experimentalist.  More's the pity.

Kindest regards
Rosemary

PROFESSIONALISM !!!! YOU DARE !!!!

What do you call the person that is in the video showing a fraudulent device schematic that doesn't match the device in the video on your 12 MARCH 2011 COP>INFINITY demonstration ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyOmoGluMCc&context=C4df8c7fADvjVQa1PpcFNjv7s5ksC81rpZH0j2XS94whqfUO0S5ao=

1) a idiot
2) a chump
3) a payed school boy following a script
4) all of the above

And what does this make you  ROSEMARY AINSLIE misrepresenting and falsify the device to everyone viewing the video and the "LIVE" demonstration ...... HOW LOW WILL YOU GO ??


ALL FOR A THESIS !!!

 :P

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1427 on: March 23, 2012, 03:14:23 AM »
And guys, from hereon - I'll just go back to ignoring his posts.  Let him do his damnedest in those colourful posts of his that carry everything but originality, reasonable articulation, moderate and constrained use of language or even a trace of professionalism.  It is always a refreshing reminder of the caliber of the man which is nothing if not self-serving and utterly bereft of effective good sense or high principle.  I'll let you all know when we're in receipt of some communication from that 'team of attorneys' that he employs - to institute that 'class action'.  LOL

Regards again,
Rosemary

fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1428 on: March 23, 2012, 03:20:02 AM »
And guys, from hereon - I'll just go back to ignoring his posts.  Let him do his damnedest in those colourful posts of his that carry everything but originality, reasonable articulation, moderate and constrained use of language or even a trace of professionalism.  It is always a refreshing reminder of the caliber of the man which is nothing if not self-serving and utterly bereft of effective good sense or high principle.  I'll let you all know when we're in receipt of some communication from that 'team of attorneys' that he employs - to institute that 'class action'.  LOL

Regards again,
Rosemary

YOUR A   "FRAUD"   ROSEMARY AINSLIE !!!!   JUST AS I SAID and PROVED !!!

 :P


TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1429 on: March 23, 2012, 05:03:37 AM »
WHAT IS THE GREEN TRACE IN THAT VIDEO ROSEMARY?????

And your little pencilled sketch is nonsense, as you were told the first time you posted it.
You really should learn how to draw a mosfet symbol if you want to communicate effectively with PEOPLE WHO KNOW WHAT THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT.

You are like a little girl blabbering in her own made-up language, expecting someone to give you a treat. It's not happening.

WHAT IS THE GREEN TRACE IN THAT VIDEO? IF IT'S NOT THE COMMON DRAINS LIKE I SAID, and that you denied while insulting me and further lying >>> AND LIKE YOUR PRESENTER SAID >>>> then what is it?

Explain, while you are at it, why one of the EDGE pins, not the center, of the one mosfet in the video is CLEARLY CONNECTED to the point marked with a BIG BLACK LETTER "F" on the  pegboard? Huh? That is either the gate or the source of that mosfet. Yet the diagram clearly shows point "F" , monitored by channel 4 THE GREEN TRACE, is the common drains of the mosfets.

You are a Dolt. A Willfully ignorant arrogant dolt. And my evidence for the truth of that insult is in the video above and in your response to my analysis of the trace shown.

hoptoad

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1009
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1430 on: March 23, 2012, 07:36:23 AM »
Perhaps I should just develop my own internet speak.
It's already done, its called voip or skype  :P

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1431 on: March 23, 2012, 08:24:00 AM »
It's already done, its called voip or skype  :P

Hello again hoptoad.  Always a pleasure to see you there.  I've actually being going through your posts which are vastly entertaining and impeccably succinct.  I think you set us all a good example.  Perhaps, given a few more years - I may also learn that art. I'm a notoriously slow learner.  Glad to see that you're keeping your comments appropriate.  I think any discussion would be vastly more relevant than the way the discussions on this thread are going.  And I know those links.  I have to reference them every time I read an acronym.  I fixate on alternatives that takes me ever more removes from reality.  And according to our trolls my own grasp of reality has always been somewhat tenuous.

The reason I went through your posts was that I seemed to recall you undertaking to do our circuit.  Did you get around to this?  If you've got the time or the interest - please let me know. 

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1432 on: March 23, 2012, 09:01:21 AM »
Guys, I think this is the reference TK's asking me about.  If so, then I've said all I intend to say about this.  I certainly won't indulge him a free lesson in the art of waveform analysis - albeit much required.  In fact I'm not sure that there's any point in answering any of his posts ever.  I think he's guilty of egregious violations - all over the place.  Puts me in mind of Hitler.  Or Savonarola.  They were both rather self-righteous - and it's tediously inappropriate to a science forum.


Yet more of those egregious violations.  LOL.  This trace has absolutely NOTHING to do with the drain signal.  Not even close.  It's a shame that so much presumption is also based on all that pretension.

Actually guys.  That's as far as I want to go with this nonsense.  I cannot tell you how much it irritates me.  A complete time waster.  Yet again TK is presuming to give rational explanations when he actually hasn't a clue how that machine operates or what the technology shows.  It's rather disheartening.  And if I continued with this post it may even give the impression that anything he says can be taken seriously.  I think I must just go back to ignoring his input.  I trust you'll do the same.  Or if you do read it - then PLEASE.  Take it with somewhat more than a grain of salt.  He's winging it and he's propagandising.  It has NOTHING to do with science.  And even less to do with our technology.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1433 on: March 23, 2012, 12:52:26 PM »
SO. Guys,

Back to the topic.  Not sure how long I'll be able to enjoy this.  Here again is the diagram showing the actual connections of that eccentric Q-array.  This to show you that it is not possible for the battery to deliver energy during the period when Q2 has the applied positive signal that would otherwise 'close' that circuit and allow some current flow from the battery supply.


TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1434 on: March 23, 2012, 01:04:31 PM »
Liar. More garbage scope shots and garbage diagrams. Learn to communicate effectively ROSEMARY and stop lying.

Quotes from the video:

1) 0:20- "The circuit diagram before you is a replication of what exists on the experimental setup".... FALSE or TRUE, Rosemary? Anyone else want to give their opinion here?

2) 0:30: "What we have is 5 mosfets mounted in parallel"  FALSE

3) (( 0:42 THE SMOKING GUN. ))

4) 1:59: "C represents the input to the gates of the mosfet" as he gestures to the board... where the function generator is seen to be connected to point F by the red alligator clip.

5) 2:05:  "F WOULD BE THE DRAIN, THE COMMON DRAIN..."  Here corroborating ME, refuting YOU, and indicating the type of trace one would expect from a mosfet drain. YOU ARE A LIAR, ROSEMARY AINS-LIE.

6) 3:09  (stuttering a bit and mumbling) "we can see the battery voltage mumble mumble roughly sixty two volts, BEARING IN MIND we have 5 twelve volt batteries so theoretically we should have'bout sixty volts but thats.... mumble."

That's another lie, is what he's trying to say.

Of course we know that a fully charged 12 volt battery of this type should measure well over 13 volts so the stack of five should be at about 65 volts if it were fully charged. The fact that the meter indicates 62 volts isn't as much of a mystery to me as it evidently is to the presenter.

7) 3:53:  "AND THE GREEN of course the actual drain, drainback (mumbles) .. the the drain voltage." Here corroborating ME, refuting YOU, and indicating the type of trace one would expect from a mosfet drain. YOU ARE A LIAR, ROSEMARY AINS-LIE.


It looks like your presenter agrees with ME, not you, ROSEMARY, and since we can hear your voice in the background prompting him in several places.... we must wonder why you didn't correct his little "mistake" at that time.

I'll stop here but as anyone WHO LOOKS AND LISTENS can find out FOR THEMSELVES, there is much more that is objectionable in that video.


WHAT IS THE GREEN TRACE, ROSEMARY??? Either your presenter is lying and/or you are. I suspect both. The evidence is right there in YOUR OWN VIDEO and your statements here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyOmoGluMCc

and here's what Rosemary said about the green trace in response to my analysis:


Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on March 22, 2012, 01:55:41 PM<blockquote>
Quote

Yet more of those egregious violations.  LOL.  This trace has absolutely NOTHING to do with the drain signal.  Not even close.  It's a shame that so much presumption is also based on all that pretension.

Actually guys.  That's as far as I want to go with this nonsense.  I cannot tell you how much it irritates me.  A complete time waster.  Yet again TK is presuming to give rational explanations when he actually hasn't a clue how that machine operates or what the technology shows.  It's rather disheartening.  And if I continued with this post it may even give the impression that anything he says can be taken seriously.  I think I must just go back to ignoring his input.  I trust you'll do the same.  Or if you do read it - then PLEASE.  Take it with somewhat more than a grain of salt.  He's winging it and he's propagandising.  It has NOTHING to do with science.  And even less to do with our technology.
</blockquote>

What is it then,  if it's not the drain signal, ROSEMARY?

Now, these lies of yours have really got to stop. You need help. You are suffering a major disconnect from reality. Time after time you have been PROVEN to have made incorrect or frankly LYING statements about factual issues that are easily checkable. There are so many that I can't even begin to detail them. Your claim of all those companies who "endorsed" your earlier circuit--- and for which you have NEVER been able to provide ANY evidence--- are probably like your interpretation of Powercat's "endorsement" of your garbage BS earlier: they are all in your mind and exactly OPPOSITE of the true state.

"And even less to do with our technology." And yet .... it is what you claim PROVES your technology, it appears in a video DEMONSTRATING your technology as evidence for your claims, and you keep referring to these "scope traces" and you even publish another shot from the LeCroy-- a totally uninformative shot that YOU cannot even interpret.

You are a liar, and not even a very good one, because the EVIDENCE OF YOUR LIES is right under everybody's noses and you don't even have the wit to cover it up or correct it.

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1435 on: March 23, 2012, 01:17:48 PM »
Guys,  I think TK's referring to this post of mine but is rather reluctant to cut and paste it.  Not sure why.  Here it is again, in any event.  I'll try and get back on topic hereafter.  He seems rather anxious to prevent me pointing out certain facts about this circuit which I think speaks to his agenda.  The sad truth is he hardly understands the significance of these or any waveforms.  He doesn't have the insight of some other members here and certainly NOT of our readers.  What's particularly pathetic is that he seems to blame me for his own intellectual lack.  Not sure that I'm responsible.  The joke is that I'm meant to be the beginner here.  And the real joke is that I really am.  Doesn't say much about his abilities I'd have thought.  :o

Regards,
Rosemary

And as for this.  It seems that Powercat thinks that IGNORING Glen Lettenmaier's multiple half-page posts indicates some kind of obsession?  He's only ever captured my interest on the promise of taking action against me.  I welcome it and have ably assisted by giving him a service address.

And there are MANY who support our claim.  How can they not?  It's been demonstrated - widely.  Not only this new circuit but the previous.  I've listed the number.  And they include very substantial players, including BP, ABB Research, SASOL, SPESCOM - and on and on.  TK likes to deny this because I don't post their names or proof of this.  But I keep pointing out that Quantum would hardly have published without first checking that accreditation.  And if their accreditation was bogus, if reference to their accreditation -  constituted a misrepresentation then I'm reasonably satisfied that I'd have had to face a call to 'retract' or face Court proceedings.  I'm too old and too well bitten to flirt with any level of misrepresentation.  He also seems to think that Professor Gaunt could not POSSIBLY have rejected a bursary award from SASOL.  Well.  As difficult as it may be to believe - it's also the truth.  There are those players who are INTIMATELY aware of both the offer and the rejection.  Presumably if they need to deny this it would be better that they first check their facts.

Regards to you powercat.  Your contributions are invaluable.  It gives me opportunity to reference some lesser known facts.
Rosie Pose

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1436 on: March 23, 2012, 01:25:49 PM »
Guys, hopefully this is still on the same page.  Here's that path analysis again.  Which I'll elaborate on next - assuming I'm not side tracked by TK's rather desperate efforts to get this thread back OFF its topic.

This is an earlier exercise that I did to resolve the 'paths'.  If this is correct then it also tells us exactly what all this hidden energy is.  Again.  For those of you who can wrap there minds around this - this is the entire thesis - in a nutshell.  Which may seem insignificant.  But for those of you with insight into these matters this is huge.  I'm confident that TK will entirely miss the point here.  Which is why this conversation needs to move to POYNTY.  TK hasn't got the intellectual wherewith all to understand this.  Sadly.

Kindest regards
Rosemary


Which guys, means this.

To keep this readable - BV = battery voltage - BC = battery current. 
Conversely RV = resistor voltage - RC = resistor current.

1 BC is positive -  clockwise              -+  -+  -+  -+  -+  -+  -+  -+  -+  -+ like this >>>>> GREATER ZERO
. potential difference transferred to RV
. discharge of potential difference from BV

2 RC is negative - counterclockwise   +-  +-  +-  +-  +-  +-  +-  +-  +-  +- like this <<<<< LESS THAN ZERO
. potential difference transferred to BV
. discharge of potential difference from RV

3 RC is positive - clockwise               +-  +-  +-  +-  +-  +-  +-  +-  +-  +- like this >>>>>>GREATER THAN ZERO
 . potential difference transferred from RV
. recharge of potential difference at BV

This would resolve the problem.  Effectively we're proposing that the discharge of energy in that 3rd phase is coincident with the positive half of each oscillation.  And that it 'leads' with a negative charge.  Which would explain the path for that oscillation as the charge bias of the current would then be in synch with the polarity bias' of the MOSFETS.

In any event guys.  That's what we're proposing.  I hope that's clear.  Effectively all that has happened is that the element resistor becomes the supply source and it's voltages are the mirror opposite of the battery supply.  LOL  It's difficult to explain.  But it's just SO SIMPLE.

What I'm going to try and do hereafter is make this clearer - or at least give it my best shot.

fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1437 on: March 23, 2012, 01:32:33 PM »
Rosemary,

YOUR A FRAUD !!!

YOUR VIDEO IS A FRAUD !!!

YOUR ENTIRE DATA SUBMITTED IS FRAUDULENT !!!

GO AWAY !!! YOU HAVE NO SUPPORTERS HERE OR ANY WHERE !!!

IT'S ALL ABOUT A THESIS !!! YOUR FUCKING PATHETIC !!!



 :P




MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7600
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1438 on: March 23, 2012, 01:39:28 PM »
Rosemary:

Quote
Guys,  I think TK's referring to this post of mine but is rather reluctant to cut and paste it.  Not sure why.  Here it is again, in any event.  I'll try and get back on topic hereafter.  He seems rather anxious to prevent me pointing out certain facts about this circuit which I think speaks to his agenda.  The sad truth is he hardly understands the significance of these or any waveforms.  He doesn't have the insight of some other members here and certainly NOT of our readers.  What's particularly pathetic is that he seems to blame me for his own intellectual lack.  Not sure that I'm responsible.  The joke is that I'm meant to be the beginner here.  And the real joke is that I really am.  Doesn't say much about his abilities I'd have thought.

So you are in attack mode now.  Pretend that you are an intellectual powerhouse and the other people in the thread are halfwits and the majority of the readership is with you.

The sad truth is that it's you simply doesn't understand the significance of your waveforms and the limitations of your measurement methods.  It's truly pathetic that you refuse alternative ways of making measurements because a good scientist would welcome these proposals.  The LEDs of Doom have already indicated that your circuit is under unity.  Someone made reference to the fact that some capacitor tests were already done and they drained, showing again that your circuit is under unity.

Once in a while you make reference to Lawrence and call him a "poor soul" stating that he is deluded and we should all have pity on him.  You are the same or even worse than Lawrence Rosemary.  The two of you are sad peas in a deluded pod.

If you only could see how ridiculous and nonsensical this whole business is.  But alas, you are yet another poor deluded soul that ultimately we should all have pity on, clinging to your incorrect DSO measurements for life.

MileHigh

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1439 on: March 23, 2012, 01:50:39 PM »
Hello MileHigh,

I have never pretended anything at all - certainly not related to my intellect.  Golly.  I'm well aware of my limitations.  I'm just pointing out that my own limitations are patently and considerably less limited than TK's.  Or for that matter Glen Lettenmaier's.  I can't compare yours because I've never been exposed to a compelling argument.  When I am I'll let you know.  For the most part I skim your posts.  But I always appreciate your little contributions here MileHigh.  You're a dedicated kind of troll with the real merit of a really comfortable writing style which has marginally less abuse that TK and Glen indulge.  But all such helps the general cause. 

Take care of yourself
Rosie Pose.

Rosemary:

So you are in attack mode now.  Pretend that you are an intellectual powerhouse and the other people in the thread are halfwits and the majority of the readership is with you.