Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.  (Read 933413 times)

Cloxxki

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1083
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #210 on: January 19, 2012, 08:17:01 PM »
I get lost within a few words, words start to dance in front of my eyes.


Your last post to me again explained a capacitor. A best, a situation where one person eating patato chips (very low input) is irritating the entire opera house, but won't get them to make noise (= work) or leave their seats (=work). You can measure the 1000 highly irritated people and get proof of their collective "negative energy", but it only exists inside that place and moment. You can't use their frustration to get to a person out on the street.



Remove the OU claims and the technology might be interesting to explain currently unknown laws and particles. With the OU claim attached though, I will call it nonsence unless attempted to loop.

Like sitting by the river, flowing violently. You stick in your hand and the river pulls. Wow, free energy! Yet totally useless. It's drained your body's energy soms by cooling you hand, and you were not to put the force to use. Stick in a waterwheel plus generator and you're in business.
Don't set the standards so low for yourself. If you observe the river, don't just measure it, tap into it. If you find the river stops flowing when you stick in the waterwheel, that gives you hints as to how that river works.


Is the chaotic heat really a byproduct or an intermediate phase of a repeating process? It is even conventional heat?


This may come across as disrespectful, but if you can't use a battery to charge the other one up and do some useful work, you've at best invented a new way to drain a battery. OU is alll about newly charged batteries, and better: work done. Water needs to be heated, on demand. Scalable. Weight need to be lifted. Not temporarily, but definitely. No counter-action.

SchubertReijiMaigo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 343
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #211 on: January 19, 2012, 08:54:57 PM »
@ Rosemary, sorry your heat is produced by the inductor !?  They have a core ? I hope you have not confounded with the hysteresis losses of a core ?

You have spoken that the circuit material DEPLETE, but problem any depleting source = Conventional energy transformation not FE...

After reading your text look like a nuclear reaction, maybe a new type but not FE...

I would like to know what is degrading ? The core, the wire, the MOSFET ?
Degrading, depleting is not good at all, I hope I have misunderstood your response...


SRM.

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #212 on: January 19, 2012, 08:55:23 PM »

Remove the OU claims and the technology might be interesting to explain currently unknown laws and particles. With the OU claim attached though, I will call it nonsence unless attempted to loop.
Well.  Cloxxki.  That's your prerogative to make of it what you will.  You're still insisting we loop this.  I assure you we can't.  We are NOT creating energy.  We're simply transferring it.   

Like sitting by the river, flowing violently. You stick in your hand and the river pulls. Wow, free energy! Yet totally useless. It's drained your body's energy soms by cooling you hand, and you were not to put the force to use. Stick in a waterwheel plus generator and you're in business.
Don't set the standards so low for yourself. If you observe the river, don't just measure it, tap into it. If you find the river stops flowing when you stick in the waterwheel, that gives you hints as to how that river works.
Low standards?  Golly.  That's rough.  I thought our standards of experimentation are rather high. And there's surely some value in resolving a lot questions related to our standard model?  In any event.  I get it you're not into theory. 

Is the chaotic heat really a byproduct or an intermediate phase of a repeating process? It is even conventional heat?
Just read that paper Cloxxki.  I think you may yet get a better sense of it.  And if English isn't your home tongue - then google can translate.  Not sure how well.

Thanks any way
Rosemary

This may come across as disrespectful, but if you can't use a battery to charge the other one up and do some useful work, you've at best invented a new way to drain a battery. OU is alll about newly charged batteries, and better: work done. Water needs to be heated, on demand. Scalable. Weight need to be lifted. Not temporarily, but definitely. No counter-action.
I missed this.  HOW DO WE DRAIN THAT BATTERY?  Not only have we NOT measured any loss of voltage over an entire year of continual use -  but our measurements show a zero discharge.  It's not disrespectful.  It's simply not scientific.  You're like so many others.  You've made up your mind about the evidence without evaluating that evidence.  How are we to progress anything at all when standard measurements are ignored? 

Again
Rosemary

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #213 on: January 19, 2012, 09:10:34 PM »
Rosemary, sorry your heat is produced by the inductor !?  They have a core ? I hope you have not confounded with the hysteresis losses of a core ?
We use an element that has a certain inductance in it's material.  We do NOT use any kind of standard transformer.

You have spoken that the circuit material DEPLETE, but problem any depleting source = Conventional energy transformation not FE...
No Schubert.  The degradation is to the bound state of the resistor material.  Over time.  For instance the filament in a light would break.  Too much energy and the resistor can catch fire.  Golly.  PLEASE read that paper.  It's all there.  I shouldn't have tried to answer Cloxxki.

After reading your text look like a nuclear reaction, maybe a new type but not FE
Indeed it's not FREE ENERGY.  I have NEVER subscribed to free energy.  In my humble opinion - there's no such thing. 

I would like to know what is degrading ? The core, the wire, the MOSFET ?
All I'm pointing to is that there are losses.  Much less than the depletion of a battery.  But still there are losses.  It is NEVER FREE ENERGY.

Degrading, depleting is not good at all, I hope I have misunderstood your response...
LOL.  NO.  You've only made it more extreme than I intended.

Take care Schubert.  And PLEASE.  Read that 2nd paper.  Surely it's understandable?   I've had REALLY prestigious academics commend it for it's CLARITY.  Surely it's not entirely incomprehensible to you guys?

Kindest again,
Rosemary

SchubertReijiMaigo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 343
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #214 on: January 19, 2012, 09:53:36 PM »
OK I will read this, can you give me a link it's on forum DDL section ?

Regards SRM.

poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3582
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #215 on: January 20, 2012, 01:10:19 AM »
So it seems Rose does not know the answer to the simple question pertaining to post #200, nor does she want to risk getting it wrong by guessing.

How unfortunate, I was going to oblige by answering ONE of her questions if she answered mine.

.99

poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3582
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #216 on: January 20, 2012, 03:10:06 AM »
I have no CLUE if anything that I write is even vaguely comprehensible.

Rest assured, it isn't.

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #217 on: January 20, 2012, 04:02:05 AM »
OK I will read this, can you give me a link it's on forum DDL section ?

Regards SRM.

Dear Schubert,

Golly, I see now why you couldn't find that link.  I had to scroll back 7 pages to find it.  Anyway - here it is.  If you have difficulty in opening it then email me.  My email address is ainslie@mweb.co.za.  I can send you the files directly.  That applies to anyone reading here.  It seems that many of you are having difficulties. 


http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=13.0;attach=6766

http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=13.0;attach=6767

It was made available to the public via Poynty Point's forum with the recommendation that it's read for it's comic value.  I don't mind on which basis it's read.  Just as long as it IS read.  That way there's still an outright chance that this can get some critical resuscitation.  Some airing. OXYGEN.  Much needed.

Take care Schubert.  Hopefully you'll get back to me with those questions.  And THANK YOU.  It is always a pleasure to find those brave souls who'll DEFY the abuses that our nay sayers apply - and simply make up their own minds - for themselves.  And it seems that this thesis of ours needs to be salvaged from a misrepresentation that has been catastrophically efficient.

Kindest and best regards,
Rosie

 

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #218 on: January 20, 2012, 04:07:49 AM »
And Poynty Point,

It seems that I must remind you to cough up.  You owe me your prize money.   :o

Alternatively you owe me a DETAILED DISCUSSION as to why you're rejecting our measurements?  And I wonder if I could impose on you to REFER to our papers in preference to your own.  That way we can avoid all further confusions related to your unfortunate attempts at rewriting the standard measurement protocols. 

Kindest regards,
Rosie Pose

And by the by.  Could I ask you to engage PhysicsProf? aka as Steven E Jones?  I keep trying to reach him.  And he keeps trying to ignore me.  It's a losing battle.  I have NO HOPE of claiming his prize offer if he's not going to acknowledge my communications.

Again,
Rosie Posie

poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3582
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #219 on: January 20, 2012, 04:31:37 AM »
I have NO HOPE of claiming his prize offer if he's not going to acknowledge my communications.

I'm afraid you have NO HOPE in claiming anyone's prize....and speaking of not acknowledging communications, I've left you with a clear and simple question to answer. How about it?

.99

poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3582
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #220 on: January 20, 2012, 05:43:25 AM »
Alternatively you owe me a DETAILED DISCUSSION as to why you're rejecting our measurements?  And I wonder if I could impose on you to REFER to our papers in preference to your own.

I'd be happy to tear your paper to shreds...errr give it a critique I mean  ;D . However, with your limited level of understanding in these matters, and resistance in adapting to modern accepted technical terms, coupled with your own twisted postulates of electric theory, I'm afraid we would be "discussing" the measurements in your paper for eons.

Perhaps if you choose ONE SPECIFIC question, I might (regrettably I suspect) oblige in giving it a go. In return, I'd ask you to provide an answer to my question in post #200, selecting one of the two choices given.

.99

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #221 on: January 20, 2012, 05:47:00 AM »
I'd be happy to tear your paper to shreds...errr give it a critique I mean  ;D . However, with your limited level of understanding in these matters, and resistance in adapting to modern accepted technical terms, coupled with your own twisted postulates of electric theory, I'm afraid we would be "discussing" the measurements in your paper for eons.

Perhaps if you choose ONE question, I might (regrettably I suspect) oblige in giving it a go. In return, I'd ask you to provide an answer to my question in post #200, selecting one of the two choices given.

.99

My dear Poynty

It's a comfort to see that you're acknowledging a need to answer my questions.  I'll pass on yours if you don't mind.  At least until you explain the relevance. 

Kindest regards,
Rosie Pose

poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3582
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #222 on: January 20, 2012, 05:54:59 AM »
I'll pass on yours also then, especially since most if not all the answers to your questions are contained within my analysis already.



Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #223 on: January 20, 2012, 06:11:15 AM »
I'll pass on yours also then, especially since most if not all the answers to your questions are contained within my analysis already.

Golly Poynty Point.   :o   I KNOW that it's already included in your analysis.  That's PRECISELY the problem.  Your analysis is not so much an analysis as it is a ROMP in the most curious mishmash of misapplied measurement protocols to EVER DISGRACE THESE FORUMS.

Good gracious.

Ever Rosy
Rosie Pose.

by the way.  Here's a convenient link to those arguments of yours.  It gets way too repetitive to keep repeating the original post.
http://newlightondarkenergy.blogspot.com/

GOLLY I put in the wrong link.  Whatever next?  :o

SchubertReijiMaigo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 343
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #224 on: January 20, 2012, 10:30:25 AM »
@Rosemary:


Thank you for the links: I will take a look.


SRM.