Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.  (Read 849576 times)

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #885 on: March 12, 2012, 03:54:01 AM »
Wow those 3 readers are busy.  Over 1890 reads since last night.
Those busy little buggers.   ;]

Golly.  I'm not that good at math - but by my own rather shakey reckoning I'd say that 1890 is somewhat
more than 4.  And nota bene - one of those master mathematicians is challenging me on my own math.
That's a case of the 'pot calling the kettle black'.  What ever next?  They've got a lot of explaining to do.

 :o 8) :o 8)

Take care Mags. 
Rosie

Offline Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5886
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #886 on: March 12, 2012, 04:33:12 AM »
 ;)   Im waiting for the....

"And to all of the nearly 2000 readers per day....."

To show up.   :o

Mags

Offline AbbaRue

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 587
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #887 on: March 12, 2012, 05:16:22 AM »
                        @Rosemary:
Have you ever built and tested other variations of this circuit that also worked? 
If so, could you post a link to were I can find the circuit diagram of it. 


Offline fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #888 on: March 12, 2012, 06:53:29 AM »
Howdy reading members and guests,

The schematic of the proposed COP>INFINITY device has again been referenced multiple times that shows incorrectly connected Mosfets !!
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg314581/#msg314581    Reply #766 on: March 05, 2012, 05:56:37 AM

And guys,

Here's another schematic that may be of assistance.

Kindest as ever,
Rosie


1 circuit schema for Flux It and Schubert - per Poynty.png       (same as)     Simulation Schematic1.jpg

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://newlightondarkenergy.blogspot.com/2011/04/109-simulated-circuit.html        Simulation Schematic1.jpg

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A modified schematic of Simulation Schematic1.jpg showing the IRFPG50 Mosfet diagram including "internal body diodes" .......

RA_5_Mosfet_Switching_Circuit_Analysis_011_.JPG   (for Mosfet (D) drain (S) source (G) gate example only)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Excepted correctly shown as built schematic of the proposed  COP>INFINITY device .......

forMileEverSoHigh_fig1png_thumb.png
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________


These schematics provided by Rosemary below .....

1 circuit schema for Flux It and Schubert - per Poynty.png

Simulation Schematic1.jpg

Shows these incorrect Mosfet connections ....

Q1 (G) gate going to Q2-Q5 (S) source
Q1 (S) source going to + Function Generator

Q2-Q5 (G) gate going to + Function Generator
Q2-Q5 (S) source going to Q1 (G) gate and Rshunt +



FuzzyTomCat
 8)

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #889 on: March 12, 2012, 07:02:19 AM »
                        @Rosemary:
Have you ever built and tested other variations of this circuit that also worked? 
If so, could you post a link to were I can find the circuit diagram of it.

Hello AbbaRue.  Actually we've built many variations.  But if you want to know the 'penultimate' it's detailed in this paper on Glen Lettenmaeir's Scribd file. 

http://www.scribd.com/doc/23455916/Open-Source-Evaluation-of-Power-Transients-Generated-to-Improve-Performance-Coefficient-of-Resistive-Heating-Systems

Under normal circumstances I would have been able to post you to a more accurate paper on this on my own Scribd File - but Glen ALLEGED to the Scrbid authorities that this was EXCLUSIVELY HIS OWN WORK.  I was thereby subjected to the curious irony of being accused of 'plagiarism' of my own work.  And when I objected - their legal department resisted any kind of remedial action - and threatening - further - to ban me from using Scribd.  LOL.  Glen never wrote one sentence of that paper.  And through every subsequent banned thread he's been trying to aver that he never even did a replication.  Confusing - when that's what the paper states.  And more confusing still - in that IF Glen is claiming this as his OWN WORK - then he's also denying that its a replication.  It is my opinion that Glen planned to usurp ownership of that circuit and champion it as the 'discoverer'.  Not that I care one way or the other.  BUT.  He then went public denying that there was any benefit at all.  Now perhaps you understand the implications of all those 'hate posts' of his.  He does, indeed, wish me and the technology both - DEAD.

Surprisingly there's another thread there http://www.energeticforum.com/inductive-resistor/7463-dark-energy-new-scienced-rosemary-ainslie.html which I was not allowed to post on - that had pages and pages of work detailed where Glen Lettenmaier and Harvey Gramm both consistently denied any previously claimed benefits.  They ALLEGED that they'd MISTAKENLY assumed to have achieved any coefficient of performance greater than 1.  Those posts have ALL been deleted and it's now used exclusively as a 'hate' blog against me for Ashtweth Palise's, Cat Lady's and Glen's personal indulgence.  I'm not sure if the owners are aware of this corruption.  But if they are then they must not be surprised at the loss of readership on Energetic Forum.  It seems to be losing it's credibility with the public.  More's the pity because that's the safe harbour of Bedini's work - and it's my opinion that Bedini's contribution to OU has been significant.

In any event, AbbaRue.  It's possibly easier to set up this experiment.  If you google my name you'll see plenty of reference to those that replicated that waveform.  It was also a resonating number.  But less definitive than this new generation sample.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #890 on: March 12, 2012, 07:23:14 AM »
For some reason Glen first included then omitted - this sketched diagram showing the Q-array.  If anyone wants to check it out - this is the actual method of attachment for those resistors.  And I wonder if I could caution you all to discount the most of Glen's posts.  They dominate each page - intentionally - and yet are all designed to mislead you.  That is for those of you who are trying to set up your experiments here. 

Hopefully they'll download.  I've copied it off Groundloop's copy which was considerably more readable than my own.  Thanks again Groundloop.  I seriously regret that you're not around to guide us all out of this quagmire.  But I also respect your decisions.  And may I add that I'm well aware of your efforts into new research on OUR.com - and sorry to see that this has now stopped.  Perhaps one day you'll give us an update on this valuable work.  I, for one, am in awe of your expertise.

Kindest regards to you all
Rosemary. 

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #891 on: March 12, 2012, 07:29:16 AM »
And here's the second diagram.  Hopefully that helps.  And if any of you are clever enough to apply this to your own sims - then that would be a really quick and easy path to exploring that oscillation.  I'll try and explain more about the significance when I can squeeze in between Glen Lettenmaier's posts.  He's trying to take over this discussion.  And it's NOT to advance this study.  More's the pity.

Kindest again
Rosemary

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #892 on: March 12, 2012, 07:33:28 AM »
Is this RIGHT, Rosemary, or is it WRONG?

quoting Rosemary Ainslie:
Quote
NOW.  Let's look at your 'self-runner' demands.  We have never recharged those batteries - with one exception.  Two caught fire and BOTH were fully recharged.  We've had those batteries since January 2010.  We've been running them since August 2010.  I've now FINALLY checked their rated capacities.  They're 40 ampere hours each.  We've used 6 of them continually since that time.  According to this rating they are each able, theoretically to dissipate 12 volts x 40 amps x 60 seconds x 60 minutes x 1 hour x 6 batteries.  That gives a work potential - a total potential output of 10 368 000 JOULES.

According to what has been carefully established it takes 4.18 Joules to raise 1 gram of water by 1 degree centigrade.  We've taken a little under 900 grams of water to 82 degrees centigrade.  We ran that test for 90 minutes.  Then we upped the frequency and took that water up a further 20 degrees to 104.  We ran that part of the test for 10 minutes.  Ambient was at 16.  Joules = 1 watt per second.  So.  Do the math.  4.18 x 900 grams x (82 - 16) 66 degrees C = 248 292 joules per second x 90 minutes of the test period = 22 342 280 joules.  Then ADD the last 10 minutes where the water was taken to boil and now you have 4.18 x 900 grams x (104 - 16) 88 degrees C = 331 156 joules per second x 10 minutes = 3 310 560 Joules.  Then add those two values 22 342 280 + 3 310 560 = 25.6 Million Joules.  All 5 batteries maximum potential output - available for work - is 10.3 Million Joules. In that test alone the battery outperformed its watt hour rating.  And that was just one test.  Now.  Over the 10 month period that those batteries have been running at various outputs - which, when added to the output on just this one test - then I think its safe to say that the evidence is conclusive.  Those batteries have outperformed. They are still at OVER 12 volts EACH.  They are all of them still FULLY CHARGED.

Right, or Wrong?

Tell us, Rosemary. You made the claim, you cited the numbers and performed the calculations upon which your claim is based...... now tell us whether it's RIGHT OR WRONG.


Is a Joule really a Watt per Second??

"In that test alone the battery outperformed its watt hour rating." This is a FALSE CLAIM, based on your wrong calculations.






Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #893 on: March 12, 2012, 07:37:42 AM »
Is this RIGHT, Rosemary, or is it WRONG?

quoting Rosemary Ainslie:
Right, or Wrong?

Tell us, Rosemary. You made the claim, you cited the numbers and performed the calculations upon which your claim is based...... now tell us whether it's RIGHT OR WRONG.


Is a Joule really a Watt per Second??

"In that test alone the battery outperformed its watt hour rating." This is a FALSE CLAIM, based on your wrong calculations.

And so it goes guys.   :'( At least we now know who are the protagonists and who the activists in this drive to over unity.  Hopefully the day will come when these  'protagonists' for want of a more respectable title -  will be accountable for their well rehearsed skills at flaming these threads of mine.

Again, regards,
Rosemary

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #894 on: March 12, 2012, 07:45:36 AM »
An open letter to Stefan Hartmann:

Stefan: I have repeatedly shown how Rosemary Ainslie's claim is based on incorrect math and incorrect understanding of power and energy units and their relationships. I have cited her own words and shown specifically where and how her calculations have been done incorrectly. The correct calculations, based on her own data, show that the claim that she makes is FALSE. I have asked her to either justify her calculations and show that she is correct and I am wrong, or to correct her calculations and RETRACT her claim of overunity performance and her application for the various prizes that you and Prof. Jones are offering.
The fact that she refuses to do either of these things, yet allows the claim to stand uncorrected in spite of the manifest fatal errors, shows that she is engaging in wilful scientific misconduct. The fact that you are allowing this claim to stand, unchallenged and uncorrected, indicates a certain lack of rigor on your own part. I believe that you have sufficient understanding of mathematics and energy/power calculations to see for yourself, by reading carefully and performing your own calculations, that her claim is unsupported by her data.
I sincerely hope that you consider the effect on the FE community that results from allowing FALSE CLAIMS to stand without correction.
Regards--
TinselKoala

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #895 on: March 12, 2012, 07:48:10 AM »
And so it goes guys.   :'( At least we now know who are the protagonists and who the activists in this drive to over unity.  Hopefully the day will come when these  'protagonists' for want of a more respectable title -  will be accountable for their well rehearsed skills at flaming these threads of mine.

Again, regards,
Rosemary

Right, or wrong, Rosemary? ANSWER THE QUESTION. Go ahead..... make me look stupid by PROVING ME WRONG on this matter.

"Do the math." 

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #896 on: March 12, 2012, 07:50:34 AM »
Right, or wrong, Rosemary? ANSWER THE QUESTION. Go ahead..... make me look stupid by PROVING ME WRONG on this matter.

"Do the math."

I have REPEATEDLY answered this.  And I will not do so again.

Rosemary

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #897 on: March 12, 2012, 07:57:02 AM »
An open letter to Stefan Hartmann:

Stefan: I have repeatedly shown how Rosemary Ainslie's claim is based on incorrect math and incorrect understanding of power and energy units and their relationships. I have cited her own words and shown specifically where and how her calculations have been done incorrectly. The correct calculations, based on her own data, show that the claim that she makes is FALSE. I have asked her to either justify her calculations and show that she is correct and I am wrong, or to correct her calculations and RETRACT her claim of overunity performance and her application for the various prizes that you and Prof. Jones are offering.
The fact that she refuses to do either of these things, yet allows the claim to stand uncorrected in spite of the manifest fatal errors, shows that she is engaging in wilful scientific misconduct. The fact that you are allowing this claim to stand, unchallenged and uncorrected, indicates a certain lack of rigor on your own part. I believe that you have sufficient understanding of mathematics and energy/power calculations to see for yourself, by reading carefully and performing your own calculations, that her claim is unsupported by her data.
I sincerely hope that you consider the effect on the FE community that results from allowing FALSE CLAIMS to stand without correction.
Regards--
TinselKoala

And Guys,

When TK relies on an admitted 'miscalculation' to encourage Harti to ban me - then you know we're looking at a crisis of concern.  The 'trolling' is getting frantic.  Go figger. 

Again,
Rosemary

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #898 on: March 12, 2012, 07:57:06 AM »
I have REPEATEDLY answered this.  And I will not do so again.

Rosemary

Nowhere do I detect an answer to the questions I have asked about your calculations and your statement that a Joule is a Watt per Second. But presumably you mean to say this:

"YES, I stand by my claim and my calculations as presented in the quote. And a Joule is a Watt per Second."

Is that a fair statement of your position, or not?

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #899 on: March 12, 2012, 07:59:40 AM »
And Guys,

When TK relies on an admitted 'miscalculation' to encourage Harti to ban me - then you know we're looking at a crisis of concern.  The 'trolling' is getting frantic.  Go figger. 

Again,
Rosemary

Where did you "admit" to a miscalculation in the quote? Don't you realize that your "miscalculation", when corrected, INVALIDATES YOUR CLAIM? Are you admitting then, that your claim is invalid?

Good. We've finally gotten somewhere. I expect you to make a clear retraction, in so many words.

And where do I encourage Stefan to ban you? I want him to make you TELL THE TRUTH and ADMIT YOUR ERRORS, for a change. Banning you would be too easy.