Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.  (Read 847357 times)

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #285 on: January 24, 2012, 04:03:33 AM »
I'm going to try another slightly different approach.

I'm going to take your diagram from your paper, Fig. 1, and focus ONLY on the connections between the FG and Q2 for the moment. I am going to erase all of the components and connections (wires) except the FG and Q2, and the electrical connections between them. I am not going to draw any new lines in. See the changes below.

1) From the cleaned up diagram, which FG lead is connected to the Q2 Gate lead?

2) From the cleaned up diagram, which FG lead is connected to the Q2 Source lead?

There is still only one answer.  The probe from the signal generator is ALWAYS CONNECTED AS SHOWN in that '+'
The Ground of the probe from the signal generator is always connected as shown in that '-'.  WE DO NOT CHANGE THE POSITION OF THE PROBE. EVER. 

added - for clarity

Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3582
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #286 on: January 24, 2012, 04:10:20 AM »
There is still only one answer.  The probe is ALWAYS CONNECTED AS SHOWN in that '+'
The Ground of the probe is always connected as shown in that '-'.  WE DO NOT CHANGE THE POSITION OF THE PROBE. EVER.

I am not implying that the FG leads are ever moved. What I am asking is this: with reference to the cleaned up diagram as shown:

1) Which FG lead is connected to the Q2 Gate?

2) Which FG lead is connected to the Q2 Source?

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #287 on: January 24, 2012, 04:14:35 AM »
I am not implying that the FG leads are ever moved. What I am asking is this: with reference to the cleaned up diagram as shown:

1) Which FG lead is connected to the Q2 Gate?

2) Which FG lead is connected to the Q2 Source?

AS YOU'VE SHOWN THEM.  PLUS = signal generator's PROBE.  NEGATIVE = signal generator's probe's GROUND.  What IS the problem?  They're connected as they're shown - as you've shown them - that's how they're connected.  ALWAYS.

R
added for clarity

Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3582
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #288 on: January 24, 2012, 04:25:55 AM »
AS YOU'VE SHOWN THEM.  PLUS = signal generator's PROBE.  NEGATIVE = signal generator's probe's GROUND.  What IS the problem?  They're connected as they're shown - as you've shown them - that's how they're connected.  ALWAYS.

R
added for clarity

I am not asking about the association between the FG lead names of "+" and "probe", or "-" and "ground", what I am asking about is the connections between the FG and the Q2 MOSFET... specifically this:

1) Which FG lead is connected to the Q2 Gate lead?

2) Which FG lead is connected to the Q2 Source lead?

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #289 on: January 24, 2012, 04:30:48 AM »
I am not asking about the association between the FG lead names of "+" and "probe", or "-" and "ground", what I am asking about is the connections between the FG and the Q2 MOSFET... specifically this:

1) Which FG lead is connected to the Q2 Gate lead?

2) Which FG lead is connected to the Q2 Source lead?

GOOD HEAVENS.  AGAIN.  The PROBE signed as PLUS in that circuit LEADS TO THE Q2 Gate
THE GROUND signed in that schematic as NEGATIVE leads to the Source. 
EXACTLY AS YOU'VE SHOWN IT. 

I'm also not talking about arbitrary associations.  YOU asked WHICH LEADS?  I've told you.  AS YOU'VE SHOWN THEM.

FOR PERFECT CLARITY - HERE'S THAT DIAGRAM - AGAIN, 
THERE IT IS.  EXACTLY AS YOU'VE DRAWN IT.  EXACTLY AS WE PRESENTED IT IN OUR SCHEMATIC - excepting obviously that this is an extract from the original.

Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3582
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #290 on: January 24, 2012, 04:33:57 AM »
The PROBE signed as PLUS in that circuit LEADS TO THE Q2 Gate
THE GROUND signed in that schematic as NEGATIVE leads to the Source. 
:o

Are you sure?

Look at the diagram again, and explain how you see this?

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #291 on: January 24, 2012, 04:41:15 AM »
:o

Are you sure?

Look at the diagram again, and explain how you see this?

YES POYNT.  CAN YOU NOW EXPLAIN THE QUESTION?  SURELY THERE'S SOME REASON FOR THIS ALL THIS REPETITIVE EMPHASIS?

Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3582
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #292 on: January 24, 2012, 04:46:56 AM »
YES POYNT.  CAN YOU NOW EXPLAIN THE QUESTION?

What I see on that partial schematic is a wire going between the '-' and 'g', and a wire going between the '+' and 's'.

Are you saying that this is not what you see?

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #293 on: January 24, 2012, 04:52:04 AM »
What I see on that partial schematic is a wire going between the '-' and 'g', and a wire going between the '+' and 's'.

Are you saying that this is not what you see?

ME TOO.  CAN YOU NOW PLEASE EXPLAIN YOUR POINT.


Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3582
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #294 on: January 24, 2012, 04:54:50 AM »
ME TOO.  CAN YOU NOW PLEASE EXPLAIN YOUR POINT.

As per your schematic labeling:

1) What does the "g" stand for?
2) What does the "s" stand for?

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #295 on: January 24, 2012, 04:59:33 AM »
As per your schematic labeling:

1) What does the "g" stand for?
2) What does the "s" stand for?

This is getting absurd.  We do NOT USE 'g' or 's' ON OUR SCHEMATICS.  this is the last time I'm answering this question.  IF you're seeing something 'speak up.'  Else I'm done.

ACTUALLY we do.  Those are the legs of the TRANSISTOR.  Gate Source  Drain.

Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3582
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #296 on: January 24, 2012, 05:05:23 AM »
This is getting absurd.  We do NOT USE 'g' or 's' ON OUR SCHEMATICS.  this is the last time I'm answering this question.  IF you're seeing something 'speak up.'  Else I'm done.

Please look at your FIG. 1 in your paper. The schematic I used is taken directly from there, and I did not add the "g" nor "s". They are on your schematic labeled as such.

So what do the "g" and "s" stand for? I would think that they stand for "Gate" and "Source" respectively, and that would be correct by convention.

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #297 on: January 24, 2012, 05:22:54 AM »
Please look at your FIG. 1 in your paper. The schematic I used is taken directly from there, and I did not add the "g" nor "s". They are on your schematic labeled as such.

So what do the "g" and "s" stand for? I would think that they stand for "Gate" and "Source" respectively, and that would be correct by convention.

Please get to your point.

Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3582
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #298 on: January 24, 2012, 05:26:38 AM »
Almost there, possibly the LAST question.

Do you agree that in your diagram, the label "g" means "Gate" and the label "s" means "Source"?

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #299 on: January 24, 2012, 05:28:23 AM »
Almost there, possibly the LAST question.

Do you agree that in your diagram, the label "g" means "Gate" and the label "s" means Source?

YES.