Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.  (Read 808690 times)

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1710 on: April 05, 2012, 12:08:38 PM »
I posted this scopeshot and asked, "Where did this come from, I wonder." This is Rosie Poser's reply:

You ASK?  You found it after an extensive search because you are rather reluctant to reference our official claim - detailed as it is in our paper.  Our claim is ONLY associated with our paper.  NOT with that video.  Surely you know that?  Or has this fact entirely eluded you TK?  In which case it seems that your language competence is as compromised as Glen Lettenmaier's.  I'll see if I can use simple words in future.

Rosie Pose

OH REALLY !!!

So this scope shot.... which you say I "found after an extensive search because you" (meaning TK) "are rather reluctant to reference our official claim - detailed as it is in our paper " represents your actual claim, then, does it?

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1711 on: April 05, 2012, 12:31:37 PM »
I'm sorry, but this is getting to be too much like poking sticks through the bars of the cage of some poor trapped animal. Rosemary cannot get away from her "thesis" and her device because she's pathologically attached to it. It's like a cage that she can't escape. Within the cage she's the mistress, she can bite or claw at you, spit and hiss, piss on herself in frenzy like she did over the video,which of course contains her claim and her circuit and her methodology. But she can't get out of the cage, can't get away to "kill two birds with one stone" as she says.
Every poke draws a little blood, she gets more frantic and continues to thrash and flail about. But after a while it gets boring and even seems a little cruel, to be taking advantage of her captivity this way. Besides, the noise from her caterwauling starts to grate; her snide remarks and hypocrisy are like the vile odors rising from piss-soaked fur, coupled with the stench of mendacity as she tries to wheedle and wiggle out of the glare of the light and reach of the stick.

Test? TEST?? With TROLLS around? Never. And anybody who dares question her is, by definition, a TROLL.

There will never be any real testing from Rosemary (and we've all known this from the beginning) ..... because she herself knows how the test will turn out, and then it will really be all over. She cannot face that! And this must be the last forum available to her for discussion. She's used them all up, and any new ones in this field will surely know about good old OU dot com and Rosemary's history.

(Notice how the replicators are coming out of the woodwork NOT ... here's a device which, if one could only locate the actual proper circuit diagram, can be built with less than 50 dollars worth of parts (or 20 if you don't believe in magic mosfets and can use the 830a instead) and is guaranteed by the poser to produce COP INFINITY. Yet all these people on this site are building Besseler Wheels and MEGs and one-coil motors and things like that when they could have a COP INFINITY device put together on their workbench in half an hour and start testing it and charging their batteries and making oxtail soup. Why doesn't anybody else build and test Rosemary's device?

Why do you think I call it the Tar Baby?)



Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1712 on: April 05, 2012, 04:38:30 PM »
Compare the two circuit diagrams shown below. The one "without" the pretty blue border is the one that Rosemary has had us discussing for most of this thread, ever since .99 and others analyzed the video. This is the circuit diagram that is used in Tar Baby, and makes no sense for a couple of reasons.
The one WITH the pretty blue border is copy-pasted directly from the "paper" that Rosie Poser says contains her claims. I added the blue background and the captions, nothing else.

Note the difference. This subtle difference removes one of the reasons that "makes no sense", in that it puts the HEAVY LOAD onto the stack of 4 mosfets instead of having it carried by the single Q1 during the "high heat" mode where the circuit is carrying several amps of current. The blue border diagram finally manages to share this load among the Gang of Four.

And this is why the "paper's" circuit can be said to be "different" from the one in the video.

In other words..... it is again an example of obfuscation, error, and mendacity on the part of RA, who is supposed to have an OPEN SOURCE, shared information project going on here.

Fine. This is an easy modification for the experimenters and replicators to make.  For Tar Baby it just involves pulling the mosfets... sorry, MOSFETs out of their sockets, turning them all around, and adding a bit of wire length to the Q1 leads, since the existing ones are very short. Will it make a difference in performance? Yes.... the Q1 mosfet will be less likely to fail, since now it will "never" really be loaded: in the low heat mode it will just oscillate, passing minuscule current, and in the high heat mode it is out of the circuit entirely and could just as well be removed. Will it turn Tar Baby into a NERD? We shall see.

Had they used THIS circuit in the video instead of the one that they actually accidentally did use, they could have used the full 60 or maybe even 72 volts for the high heat mode, and that would have been much more impressive than the unexplained removal of one battery to lower the voltage (and thus the current through the lone mosfet) to safe levels.
« Last Edit: April 05, 2012, 05:46:15 PM by TinselKoala »

Offline fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1713 on: April 05, 2012, 06:35:13 PM »
Compare the two circuit diagrams shown below. The one "without" the pretty blue border is the one that Rosemary has had us discussing for most of this thread, ever since .99 and others analyzed the video. This is the circuit diagram that is used in Tar Baby, and makes no sense for a couple of reasons.
The one WITH the pretty blue border is copy-pasted directly from the "paper" that Rosie Poser says contains her claims. I added the blue background and the captions, nothing else.

Note the difference. This subtle difference removes one of the reasons that "makes no sense", in that it puts the HEAVY LOAD onto the stack of 4 mosfets instead of having it carried by the single Q1 during the "high heat" mode where the circuit is carrying several amps of current. The blue border diagram finally manages to share this load among the Gang of Four.

And this is why the "paper's" circuit can be said to be "different" from the one in the video.

In other words..... it is again an example of obfuscation, error, and mendacity on the part of RA, who is supposed to have an OPEN SOURCE, shared information project going on here.

Fine. This is an easy modification for the experimenters and replicators to make.  For Tar Baby it just involves pulling the mosfets... sorry, MOSFETs out of their sockets, turning them all around, and adding a bit of wire length to the Q1 leads, since the existing ones are very short. Will it make a difference in performance? Yes.... the Q1 mosfet will be less likely to fail, since now it will "never" really be loaded: in the low heat mode it will just oscillate, passing minuscule current, and in the high heat mode it is out of the circuit entirely and could just as well be removed. Will it turn Tar Baby into a NERD? We shall see.

Had they used THIS circuit in the video instead of the one that they actually accidentally did use, they could have used the full 60 or maybe even 72 volts for the high heat mode, and that would have been much more impressive than the unexplained removal of one battery to lower the voltage (and thus the current through the lone mosfet) to safe levels.

Hey TK,

All the experimentalist, members and guests have been "DUPED" again .....

The papers that were sent out to accredited journals or magazines for possible peer review and publication by the NERD RAT team have two different device schematics ....

Experimental Evidence of a Breach of Unity on Switched Circuit Apparatus   ( ROSSI-JOP-1-PDF.pdf )
ROSSI-JOP-1-PDF_Q2_x4_Q1_.PNG

Proposed variation to Faraday’s Lines of Force to include a magnetic dipole in its structure   ( ROSSI-JOP-2- PDF.pdf )
ROSSI-JOP-2-PDF_Q1_Q2_x4_.PNG


As you can see Q1 / Q2 x4 is flip flopped or reversed in ROSSI-JOP-1-PDF_Q2_x4_Q1_.PNG .... and .... ROSSI-JOP-2-PDF_Q1_Q2_x4_.PNG  :o

WTF is going on here ?? Why have we been not informed by the NERD RAT team and or Rosemary Ann Ainslie of this "HUGE" difference in the device schematics ?? This is on the verge of being criminal !!  >:(

FTC
 ???
 
 

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1714 on: April 05, 2012, 06:45:21 PM »
Is stupidity criminal?

 :-*

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1715 on: April 05, 2012, 07:05:14 PM »
Re the use of the function generator: I say, LET HER USE IT. There is no need for a special 555 timer circuit that may make it difficult for her to achieve her desired oscillations. (No snide remarks about how long it might have been since she's achieved her desired oscillations, please.)

Simply require that the circuit be operated in the HIGH HEAT mode, sustaining the temperature of the custom 11.11 ohm load at 190 degrees C or more, for at least 48 hours, using the reduced battery pack of 36 volts, 60 Amp Hours. Since the circuit has been shown to draw somewhere between 1.5 and 2.5 amps in this mode, or maybe even more, a 48-hour run should, if Rosemary is right, not deplete the batteries at all. OTOH, if Rosemary is wrong, the run will use up all or most of the battery's capacity.

Then do the Dim Bulb test comparing the run batteries with the three set-aside batteries. Whichever set goes out first..... loses.



Anybody want to start a betting pool on the outcome? Guess the duration, buy a minute for ten dollars, closest guesser gets the pot.

I have already bought 0 minutes, and 1 minute.

Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1716 on: April 05, 2012, 09:05:13 PM »
Is stupidity criminal?

 :-*
if it was, they would have locked you away a long time ago for failing diffy equations 5? times...

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1717 on: April 05, 2012, 09:24:51 PM »
if it was, they would have locked you away a long time ago for failing diffy equations 5? times...
Get your facts straight, troll. I failed it twice, passed it the third time. Some would argue that that  makes me even more stupid than you... some might not. How many times did Rosemary Ainlsie take it before she passed? Oh... that's right... none, she didn't even pass algebra 1 in high school. One of the fails was because I ditched the final exam in order to complete a 500 km solo flight -- the so called "diamond distance" flight of the FAI -- in a sailplane. That's REAL free energy, solar powered all the way.

All of which has absolutely nothing to do with the issues at hand, does it Wilby troll. It is Rosemary's stupidity that is at issue here, not mine, or haven't you been following?

The original mistake in the COP>17 555 timer duty cycle
The mistake in wiring the current apparatus
The mistake in the several circuit diagrams
The calculation of 25.6 megaJoules
The mathematical meaning of PER
The provenance of the VIDEO and her disavowal of it
The statements she made about her scope shots I posted
The latest gaffe of the different YET AGAIN circuit diagrams
The "endorsements" of Glen, Powercat, and Prof. Kahn
The failure of ANYONE to replicate and support her claims

And last but not least, your own failure to contribute anything of value to the discussion of the topic:

WHY WON'T ROSEMARY PERFORM THE SIMPLE BATTERY TESTS THAT WE HAVE BEEN WAITING FOR for ten years or more?


Want to buy a minute? "infinite" is still available, I think......

Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1718 on: April 05, 2012, 09:40:22 PM »
is there enough detail in my videos for one skilled in the art to do it for themselves? Yes, there is. In Rosemary's? No, there is not.

Then Poynt carefully watched your clip and reverse-engineered the circuit and discovered that you were not showing the correct diagram in your paper and as a result the "secret was revealed."

am i the only one who sees the GLARING CONTRADICTION here? why is tinselkoala/alsetalokin accusing poynt99 of not being skilled in the art? why is he posting complete falsehoods?

will you please come back to reality and at least show some integrity?

Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1719 on: April 05, 2012, 09:42:56 PM »
All of which has absolutely nothing to do with the issues at hand, does it Wilby troll. It is Rosemary's stupidity that is at issue here, not mine, or haven't you been following?
then why did you bring it up?

WHY WON'T ROSEMARY PERFORM THE SIMPLE BATTERY TESTS THAT WE HAVE BEEN WAITING FOR for ten years or more?
probably for the same reasons you won't perform that simple public mea culpa you owe me...

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1720 on: April 05, 2012, 09:43:21 PM »
Idiot. It has taken a team of at least 4 different talented individuals a YEAR to figure out that circuit and its performance. Just TODAY another discrepancy has come to light, no thanks to Rosie Poser.

YOU are the one who needs to back up and take a look at the whole picture, troll.

And I owe you nothing. In fact I seem to recall that YOU promised to send ME something and didn't do it. But anyway, I've uploaded my "apology". Just press Alt-F4 to display it in this window.

Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1721 on: April 05, 2012, 09:46:11 PM »
Idiot. It has taken a team of at least 4 different talented individuals a YEAR to figure out that circuit and its performance. Just TODAY another discrepancy has come to light, no thanks to Rosie Poser.

YOU are the one who needs to back up and take a look at the whole picture, troll.
there you go trying to ride someone elses gravy train again. ::) poynt did that on his own... you didn't help him one iota. you had run off crying to your mommy... remember? i do.

will you please come back to reality and at least show some integrity?

Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1722 on: April 05, 2012, 09:50:28 PM »
And I owe you nothing. In fact I seem to recall that YOU promised to send ME something and didn't do it. But anyway, I've uploaded my "apology". Just press Alt-F4 to display it in this window.

editing without notation?  imagine that! ::) and it's another logical fallacy to boot! mr. ad hominem tu quo que... 

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1723 on: April 05, 2012, 09:51:31 PM »
there you go trying to ride someone elses gravy train again. ::) poynt did that on his own... you didn't help him one iota. you had run off crying to your mommy... remember? i do.

will you please come back to reality and at least show some integrity?
You are the one who is reality-challenged, wilbydrunkard. This thread is not about me. Are you saying that my actual circuit builds did not contribute to the knowledge we all now have about the circuit and Rosemary's behaviour? That is plainly untrue. And my "mommy" has been dead for twenty years, and I'll thank you, TROLL, not to mention her again. Especially not when you use the word "integrity" in the same post.

Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1724 on: April 05, 2012, 09:57:50 PM »
You are the one who is reality-challenged, wilbydrunkard. This thread is not about me. Are you saying that my actual circuit builds did not contribute to the knowledge we all now have about the circuit and Rosemary's behaviour? That is plainly untrue. And my "mommy" has been dead for twenty years, and I'll thank you, TROLL, not to mention her again. Especially not when you use the word "integrity" in the same post.
TU STULTUS ES!  i said and i quote: "poynt did that on his own... you didn't help him one iota."
are you saying you helped poynt reverse engineer that video? and if so, then why would you contradict that by saying and i quote:
is there enough detail in my videos for one skilled in the art to do it for themselves? Yes, there is. In Rosemary's? No, there is not.



english... do you speak it? or did you fail that 5 times too...