Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.  (Read 849105 times)

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1665 on: April 04, 2012, 05:33:17 PM »
Quote
Added to which he has not been able to correctly identify the displays on a sadly over exposed and incorrectly tabulated screen shot - in the hopes that you may all confuse him with some kind of consultative authority.  In one rather amusing example of this he presents the Tektronix as if it's the LeCroy and carefully edits out the boundaries of the instrument that you may confuse it with the LeCroy.  Trust me on this.  It's yet another shot of the Tektronix.

The two Tek screenshots that I have posted from the video and IDENTIFIED AS SUCH, and the one LeCroy shot posted, identified as such. Where has any "editing" or hiding of detail happened? Where is the corresponding explanation from AINSLIE about these salient points?
NOWHERE, that's where.

TRUST YOU on this? When it is plain and evident to anyone with eyeballs that you are LYING again?

(Note that at the very upper left corner of both the TEK shots, one can make out the blue "Tek" word. And in the LeCroy shot, in the bottom left corner one can see the words "LeCroy". Not very clever editing for someone who wanted to hide things, is it. Once again, Ainslie is DEMONSTRATED to be a liar.)

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1666 on: April 04, 2012, 06:50:37 PM »
And as to the claims of RA about my "debunking" and my own "claims"....

TinselKoala said,
Quote
Meanwhile, work continues, as I explain and demonstrate more features of the Tar Baby. Now, this is not a replication of the Ainslie NERD RAT device, is it. Even though it uses the same circuit diagram, the same component types and values, and makes the same oscillation and load heating (allowing for its lesser power, of course).... Tar Baby is NOT a NERD RAT device. You see, it's not on a white pegboard, so that disqualifies it totally.

Nevertheless, it performs exactly as that other device does, for some reason, and the various tests and demonstrations that I have shown here could just as well have been performed on that device..... and perhaps THEY SHOULD BE so performed, especially the drawdown test that I have illustrated, or the more complex ones that others have mentioned. But certainly.... if anyone is talking about claiming a prize, a monetary prize, their claims should be tested in a manner that would indeed hold up in a court of law.

My only claim about Tar Baby is that it performs just like the NERD RAT device in all significant respects. If they are allowed to analyze their data in the way that they have shown..... then so am I, and when that's done, Tar Baby is just as "overunity" as their device.  If I am required to perform a battery draw down test... then so are they.

Wait... I've already done that. Where is the NERD RAT test?

WHAT IS STOPPING ROSEMARY AINSLIE FROM PERFORMING AND SHOWING HER TESTS?

Certainly not I. The only one preventing Rosemary from performing and illustrating any test she likes is.... ROSEMARY HERSELF.

(And I'm not holding my breath waiting for Wilby's "replication" or testing of Ainslie's little farce, or even any refutation of the points I've made... because I know he won't be showing one... all he can do is be critical of the work of others, he cannot do any of his own. And amazingly, my JT video of my own work, not mirrored anywhere, has garnered over 180,000 views ( and less than 100,000 of those are from me looking.... ha ha). Too bad I'm not grubbing money through advertising... or I might be able to buy that Buick Rosemary is always talking about.)

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1667 on: April 04, 2012, 07:07:54 PM »
Over and over in my videos anyone can see and hear: I say "the F-43 is set to produce a negative-going pulse only..." and I show the knob setting, then I go to the scope and show its zero baseline, its timebase and vertical amp settings, and show the negative going squarewave pulse on the gate drive. Or, if I am using some other pulse like a POSITIVE OFFSET as she has done, I illustrate that and wiggle knobs so ANYONE who knows how to read an oscilloscope can see what I'm doing.

You are putting yourself in an untenable position with your lies, Rosemary, because MY results are repeatable by anyone with a scope, a signal generator, and a handful of metal-oxide semiconductor field effect transistors. I show enough detail in my demonstrations that ANYONE with the kit can duplicate what I show in a matter of minutes, without any "mistaken diagrams" or uninterpretable scope shots. Well-lit or not, steadycam or not, the detail is there and it's in the form of RAW, LIVE data that anyone can reproduce for themselves, not static scopeshots without explanation and bogus math. (Your "math trace" doesn't even account for the 0.25 Ohm CVR !!)

You are the one pleading for open-source replication and "confirmation" of your claims. Yet, EVERYONE who has ever worked with your circuit has eventually come to the same conclusion. You have NO supporters among anyone who has actually built and tested your device for themselves. Not Glen, not Harvey, not Ashtweth, not Aaron, nobody, not a single one. And you've turned on them and attacked them and their work just as you have attacked me. You won't show the simplest tests, you won't answer questions, you won't support your claims with references and reproducible data. Not even Donovan Martin will surface in your support.

The only way that you can even try to redeem yourself is to SHOW YOUR BATTERY DRAWDOWN TESTS. Nobody is hindering you or trying to suppress you in the least. JUST DO IT. What are you so afraid of? The truth is like soap: it only hurts if you are totally unused to it.

Offline powercat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1091
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1668 on: April 04, 2012, 07:20:11 PM »
I have every intention of doing a battery draw down test.  I do not know whether I'll be able to conduct that test through this forum.  That's in Harti's hands.  And it's heavily dependent on certain editorial requirements related to this thread - and, indeed, to another thread here on this forum.

Rosie Posie

What is going on here, I thought we were going to see some new tests,Instead of the usual arguments that Rosemary seems to love having.
At least TK has done new tests and displayed his results for all to see.
Now it would appear from Rosemary's response that she is yet again moving the goalposts before she undertakes any new test.

Stefan can you clarify the situation on the tests that everyone is expecting from Rosemary,
or are we just going to continually have Rosemary attacking everyone and treating this forum like her blog

Hi All,
Rosemary Ainsley wanted to do some battery drawdown tests together with user
poynt99so I am opening up again this thread.

Regards, Stefan.

P.S: I am not opening this thread again because of the legal threat I received of
her lawyer, but maybe there will be coming some new evidence from these tests.

As I don´t like to be threaten by legal action I might pull the plug again, if this
thread goes nowhere again and close it again and make a backup as PDF and
post it in the Download archive and remove it from the forum completely.

Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1669 on: April 04, 2012, 07:28:38 PM »
but that is exactly why you are doing all this verbiage, to avoid TESTING.
LOLLING all over the floor!  how many times have you posted on this page alone? 6 already. in point of fact your obsession with rosemary is the reason for all this "verbiage". and the "verbiage" is mostly yours. the record demonstrates this fact. from rose's response to hartiberlin (#1593) about the thread being reopened to her next post (reply #1610) there were 16 SIXTEEN posts by you, fuzzy, milehigh, ebag and powercat. 8 EIGHT of those were yours...  ::)

Are you here accusing me of fakery?
i am... and i am sure others are thinking it too tinselkoala/alsetalokin.

Everything you say is a lie, Rosemary.
you are a liar tinselkoala/alsetalokin.

everything she says is a lie? EVERYTHING? well then do what you claimed you can do. support what you say (and you say EVERYTHING rosemary says is a lie) with facts, references, and WITNESSES.

Offline The Boss

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 52
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1670 on: April 04, 2012, 08:03:28 PM »
 
Where is the test ?

Offline eatenbyagrue

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 203
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1671 on: April 04, 2012, 09:20:18 PM »
LOLLING all over the floor!  how many times have you posted on this page alone? 6 already. in point of fact your obsession with rosemary is the reason for all this "verbiage". and the "verbiage" is mostly yours. the record demonstrates this fact. from rose's response to hartiberlin (#1593) about the thread being reopened to her next post (reply #1610) there were 16 SIXTEEN posts by you, fuzzy, milehigh, ebag and powercat. 8 EIGHT of those were yours...  ::)


Now, I am also a supporter of Rosemary, but I think there is no reason for this kind of talk.  These good men's purpose is noble.  Their goal is to validate Rosemary's findings so that she can legitimately claim the Overunity prize.  Without peer review and validation, I understand, it is difficult to conclusively establish things in the scientific community.

So you should not be so critical of Tinsel Koala's work.  He is furthering science and helping Rosemary by streamlining and ironing out any minor issues that might be present in her calculations.  And her has selflessly put in tireless hours into this open source project, with no hope of ever monetarily recouping any of his labor.

I think what you could do is help Rosemary by replicating her circuit and getting it to self run.  My understanding is that a self running device is best for this sort of thing, as it is easy to demonstrate energy creation that way.

As it appears you are a long standing Rosemary supporter and her work, do you have a working replication of her circuit?  I would be most anxious to see a successful replication of the Ainslie circuit.  What were you able to do that Mr. Koala and his compatriots missed?  I would attempt one myself, but I fear my learning curve on these electronics would be too steep.

Offline fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1672 on: April 04, 2012, 11:34:23 PM »
Howdy members and guests,

There seem to be a issue that Rosemary says the YouTube video up-loaded by "dooziedont" ( http://www.youtube.com/user/dooziedont?ob=0&feature=results_main ) isn't her and lays no claim to it or the content in the video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyOmoGluMCc&feature=player_embedded "Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration 12 MARCH 2011"

This is very odd as Rosemary Ainslie posted it on her "BLOG" ..... Dark Energy New Science - By Rosemary Ainslie

http://newlightondarkenergy.blogspot.com/2011/03/dear-reader-finally-heres-our-video-on.html#links  :o


Who's trying to fool who here or lie to ?? :o

FTC
 :P


Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1673 on: April 04, 2012, 11:46:01 PM »
Wilby, I looked back over those post counts; and it sure looks to me like every post I made, UNTIL rosemary started lying about me again, were to do directly with the topic of TESTING HER CIRCUIT. Her posts, you may note, have nothing to do with the topic. The very FIRST post after reopening is hers and is completely off topic.

And before you accuse me of fakery, you really should try for yourself what I show. If you can refute me with facts and experiments of your own, do so. But we all know you cannot. The issues of lighting and speech dysfluencies have nothing to do with the real issues: is there enough detail in my videos for one skilled in the art to do it for themselves? Yes, there is. In Rosemary's? No, there is not.

And-- as far as "alsetalokin" is concerned.... he ALWAYS told everyone that asked that his motor was NOT overunity in any way. Unfortunately everyone who tried to "replicate" it didn't believe him and tried to build some kind of overunity device that behaved like what he showed-- and of course they failed. If they simply had TAKEN HIM AT HIS WORD and instead tried to reproduce the effects in an UNDERUNITY or normal way.... they would have been much more successful. Why, according to the information I have, this "alsetalokin" character even SENT PARTS FROM THE MOTOR HE USED, as well as specifying the exact motor part number and manufacturer, to people like Harvey and others. There was never any secrecy around that device, just a bunch of people who couldn't believe the truth and instead tried to fulfill their OWN fantasies.  People like you, I think.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1674 on: April 04, 2012, 11:51:48 PM »
Thanks fuzzy, for the absolute proof that Ainslie is a liar with a poor memory to boot. But the internet never forgets.

The video was posted to YouTube on the 22nd of March 2011.  The video was mentioned by Rosemary and linked from Rosemary's own blog on the 22nd of March 2011.

And now she says she didn't post it, it has nothing to do with her claims, it was "rifled" from her photobucket account, etc.

Yes, Wilby, at this point it is safe to assume that EVERYTHING Rosemary says is a lie, until proven otherwise.

Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1675 on: April 05, 2012, 12:05:37 AM »
Wilby, I looked back over those post counts; and it sure looks to me like every post I made, UNTIL rosemary started lying about me again, were to do directly with the topic of TESTING HER CIRCUIT. Her posts, you may note, have nothing to do with the topic. The very FIRST post after reopening is hers and is completely off topic.
irrelevant. the "verbiage" you spoke of is mostly yours. the record evidences this fact. your red herring is noted and rejected.

And before you accuse me of fakery, you really should try for yourself what I show. If you can refute me with facts and experiments of your own, do so. But we all know you cannot. The issues of lighting and speech dysfluencies have nothing to do with the real issues: is there enough detail in my videos for one skilled in the art to do it for themselves? Yes, there is. In Rosemary's? No, there is not.
more misrepresentation from you... you're a faker and a hoaxer due to the behavior of your alter-ego known as alsetalokin. LOLZ. the constructive criticisms i posted to you about your videos, after you brought up the topic, of course have nothing to do with anything other than noting your amateur videographer skills and suggesting ways for improvement. your claim that i have suggested or implied that such constructive criticisms have anything "to do with the real issues" is an obvious non sequitur... and complete falsehood. i challenge you present a quote of where i said such a thing.

is there enough detail in my videos for one skilled in the art to do it for themselves? Yes, there is. In Rosemary's? No, there is not.
LOLZ you and your gang of sycophants have used rose's videos (and the information contained therein) over and over in various hypothetical explanations for the opertaion of the circuit. your 'tarbaby' non-replicaton uses data gleaned from her videos. so, either you are not skilled in the art or there is enough information in rosemary's videos... or you are just a liar.

And-- as far as "alsetalokin" is concerned.... he ALWAYS told everyone that asked that his motor was NOT overunity in any way. Unfortunately everyone who tried to "replicate" it didn't believe him and tried to build some kind of overunity device that behaved like what he showed-- and of course they failed. If they simply had TAKEN HIM AT HIS WORD and instead tried to reproduce the effects in an UNDERUNITY or normal way.... they would have been much more successful. Why, according to the information I have, this "alsetalokin" character even SENT PARTS FROM THE MOTOR HE USED, as well as specifying the exact motor part number and manufacturer, to people like Harvey and others. There was never any secrecy around that device, just a bunch of people who couldn't believe the truth and instead tried to fulfill their OWN fantasies.  People like you, I think.
as far as alsetalokin is concerned... alsetalokin is you. and -- for you to pretend otherwise is juvenile.

Yes, Wilby, at this point it is safe to assume that EVERYTHING Rosemary says is a lie, until proven otherwise.
your assumptions hold no weight with me. i thought you said you could support what you said (and you said EVERYTHING rosemary says is a lie) with facts, references, and WITNESSES. that was obviously just more of your lies...


@ebag... i don't care what you 'think'.

Offline powercat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1091
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1676 on: April 05, 2012, 12:26:05 AM »
@wilbyinebriated
In all the time that I have known you on this forum You spend most of your time attacking people,
if anyone doesn't believe me then just look back at all his previous post and see for yourself.
 
If you really want to support Rosemary them why don't you show us all your working circuit and prove her claim is true.
 
Don't bother,we all know you just attack attack,that's all you seem to do,what a shame
when you first joined this forum you seemed genuinely interested in trying to find the answers to free energy and now you just seem to want to fight with everyone
   
 

Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1677 on: April 05, 2012, 12:37:57 AM »
But the internet never forgets.
yeah. you know that better than anyone don't you. now where is that public mea culpa you owe me about the mosfet perfomance?

Offline MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7600
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1678 on: April 05, 2012, 12:51:02 AM »
Just a little update to the circuit diagram.  Rosemary has alleged that the diagram below is a "gross misrepresentation" without backing up her claim.

I stand by this diagram and will state that I believe it to be correct.  I am challenging Rosemary to explain how the diagram is allegedly a "gross misrepresentation."

Again:  In negatively offset oscillation mode all of the NERD team's DSO measurements are junk - they are garbage data.

Offline eatenbyagrue

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 203
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1679 on: April 05, 2012, 01:20:22 AM »
@ebag... i don't care what you 'think'.


I think I get it now.  You are a troll.