Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.  (Read 833018 times)

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1170 on: March 19, 2012, 05:05:36 AM »
@eatenbyagrue: NOW do you see?

Quote
. In other words our utility supplier both measures and charges for us for a wattage that they compute at 2 200 watts
 . every second
 . for every minute
 . of each of those six hours
 . giving a staggering product of 2200 x 60 x 60 x 6 hours being 47 520 000 watts.
 . And not only that.  They can also PROVE that the current continued to flow during that entire cooking period.  Their bill is based on evidence.

Wouldn't you like to see Rosemary's electric bill, where she's charged for 47 MEGAWATTS during a six hour period? 47 megaWatts x 6 hours is a staggering 282 MEGAWATT HOURS.... and the price of electricity here is something like 13 cents per kiloWatt-hour, so Rosie's bill would be  0.13 x 282 x 1000 or over 36 thousand dollars.

Of course, the rates in South Africa may be substantially lower. 

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1171 on: March 19, 2012, 05:05:49 AM »
Poynty

You left this out.  Also per Wiki.

where N is the newton, m is the metre, kg is the kilogram, s is the second, Pa is the pascal, and W is the watt. One joule can also be defined as: The work required to move an electric charge of one coulomb through an electrical potential difference of one volt, or one '"coulomb volt" (C·V). This relationship can be used to define the volt.
The work required to produce one watt of power for one second, or one "watt second" (W·s) (compare kilowatt hour). This relationship can be used to define the watt.
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joule

Therefore 'time' is implicit.

Rosie

Offline Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5886
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1172 on: March 19, 2012, 05:09:07 AM »
Lol Rose  Love the story line with pictures.   8) :o 8)         ;) :o 8)

The courage is not too hard to come by. I have some knowledge of things. And most importantly, they have nothing on me.  ;)   Im clean, so I can spot dirty.  lol

So I dont have to spend time defending myself.

I need to focus on my project. Ill be around Rose. I think you can handle it from here. Just a lil dusting.  :-* 8) 8) 8) 8)

Mags

Offline fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1173 on: March 19, 2012, 05:10:41 AM »
Rosemary,

You have much, much bigger problems ...

We established "CUT OFF" dates for your NERD RAT published device schematics based on established 12 MARCH 2011 "VIDEO" evidence .....

------------------------------------------------------------------------------


http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg315729/#msg315729      Reply #1117 on: March 17, 2012, 12:45:43 AM



FROM_CONCEPTION_TO_12_MARCH_2011_Q1_x5_NERD_RAT_DEVICE.JPG  ( From DEVICE "Conception" to 12 MARCH 2011 Q1 x5 "NERD RAT" DEVICE SCHEMATIC )

12_MARCH_2011_and_On_Q1_Q2-Q4_NERD_RAT_DEVICE.png   ( COP>INFINITY DEMONSTRATION 12 MARCH 2011 and "ON" Q1 / Q2-Q4 "NERD RAT" DEVICE SCHEMATIC )

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rosemary your schematic in your "correct and completed" papers submitted for PEER REVIEW and possible publication show .....

ROSSI-JOP-1-PDF.pdf     ( Experimental Evidence of a Breach of Unity on Switched Circuit Apparatus )

ROSSI-JOP-2- PDF.pdf    ( Proposed variation to Faraday’s Lines of Force to include a magnetic dipole in its structure )

Both PDF schematics shown and referenced for PEER REVIEW is ....

12_MARCH_2011_and_On_Q1_Q2-Q4_NERD_RAT_DEVICE.png   ( COP>INFINITY DEMONSTRATION 12 MARCH 2011 and "ON" Q1 / Q2-Q4 "NERD RAT" DEVICE SCHEMATIC )

Therefore SCOPE SHOTS and DATA DUMPS for .....

ROSSI-JOP-1-PDF.pdf 

Fig #3    dated 03/02/11    50s    73.8v    (6 battery)
Fig #4    dated 03/02/11    1us    73.3v    (6 battery)
Fig #5    dated 02/09/11    500us    49.5v    (4 battery)
Fig #8    dated 02/16/11    500us    74.1v    (6 battery)

ROSSI-JOP-2- PDF.pdf

Fig #2    dated 03/02/11    50s    73.8v    (6 battery)
Fig #3    dated 03/02/11    1us    73.3v    (6 battery)
Fig #8    dated 03/02/11    2us    62.9v    (5 battery)

AND THIS IS THE CORRECT "NERD RAT COP>INFINITY" DEVICE SCHEMATIC .....

FROM_CONCEPTION_TO_12_MARCH_2011_Q1_x5_NERD_RAT_DEVICE.JPG  ( From DEVICE "Conception" to 12 MARCH 2011 Q1 x5 "NERD RAT" DEVICE SCHEMATIC )


Your papers correct and completed papers submitted for PEER REVIEW and publication show the schematic is "incorrect" your scope shots and data dumps are wrong and the documents ......

ROSSI-JOP-1-PDF.pdf     ( Experimental Evidence of a Breach of Unity on Switched Circuit Apparatus )
ROSSI-JOP-2- PDF.pdf    ( Proposed variation to Faraday’s Lines of Force to include a magnetic dipole in its structure )

These PDF's and content should be withdrawn anywhere and everywhere they are, followed by a retraction by YOU of the mistakes made in your "correct and completed" papers submitted for PEER REVIEW .


Fuzzy
 8)

*meow*

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1174 on: March 19, 2012, 05:18:44 AM »
I've just done some early testing on that first circuit Fuzzy posted. I'm using a single IRFPG50 mosfet (that's all my supplier had in stock until next week) and a light bulb with 50 ohms cold resistance as a load, both with and without inductors in series. So far, the circuit switches just fine, but I've not been able to get it to oscillate. Even using IRF 530 and 2n7000 mosfets it does not oscillate. I am using a regulated power supply for the source voltage, though. I don't have a lot of batteries or inductors here right now... but that will change.

Note how Rosemary's description of the experimental test in question has changed. Even the numbers have changed.

Everything changes, and yet everything remains the same. Rosemary is the one making outrageous and ignorant claims.... and I am the one who is the villain.

I continue to ROFL out loud.

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1175 on: March 19, 2012, 05:20:15 AM »
Guys, in case you missed this.

The reason that Glen pasted this post - YET AGAIN - is because he's anxious to take the thread away from some rather telling posts.  It's his mandate.  He may post what he likes provided only that he forces the focus away from anything that's significant.  Hopefully you'll have the good sense to apply that scroll function on your computers.  Harti is rather depending on these kind of distractions.  Else why would he allow Glen to post?  It's not as if he ever has anything to say.  And he's trying very hard to ignore the fact that he claims a full on replication of an earlier test but - confusingly - tries to deny this.  What is doubly confusing is that he thinks it would take courage to access some live broadcast number that he's proposing.  He seems to think that I'd ever allow our work to be associated with his name - or lack of it.  Take your pick.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1176 on: March 19, 2012, 05:22:26 AM »
  You left this out.  Also per Wiki.

where N is the newton, m is the metre, kg is the kilogram, s is the second, Pa is the pascal, and W is the watt. One joule can also be defined as: The work required to move an electric charge of one coulomb through an electrical potential difference of one volt, or one '"coulomb volt" (C·V). This relationship can be used to define the volt.
The work required to produce one watt of power for one second, or one "watt second" (W·s) (compare kilowatt hour). This relationship can be used to define the watt.
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joule

Therefore 'time' is implicit.

Rosie

You are talking about things you don't understand. Go ahead, continue. It's really laughable. Show this thread to your "academics". They'll get a kick out of it, I'm sure, especially that part about your electric bill, and your 47.5 megaWatts.

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1177 on: March 19, 2012, 05:23:55 AM »
I've just done some early testing on that first circuit Fuzzy posted. I'm using a single IRFPG50 mosfet (that's all my supplier had in stock until next week) and a light bulb with 50 ohms cold resistance as a load, both with and without inductors in series. So far, the circuit switches just fine, but I've not been able to get it to oscillate. Even using IRF 530 and 2n7000 mosfets it does not oscillate. I am using a regulated power supply for the source voltage, though. I don't have a lot of batteries or inductors here right now... but that will change.

Note how Rosemary's description of the experimental test in question has changed. Even the numbers have changed.

Everything changes, and yet everything remains the same. Rosemary is the one making outrageous and ignorant claims.... and I am the one who is the villain.

I continue to ROFL out loud.

My dear Tinsel Koala,
We all know you for being the champion of the blindingly ignorant and we all appreciate how urgently the public must be prevented from seeing any conclusive battery draw down test that I may be trying to propose.  We therefore concede that if this is the measure of the man - then villain does not cut it as a description.  So.  In a rather roundabout way ... you're right.

Rosie Posie
Pudding and Pie

Offline Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5886
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1178 on: March 19, 2012, 05:28:23 AM »


I continue to ROFL out loud.

Could you roll on the floor again? I didnt hear it the first time.   ;D

Mags

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1179 on: March 19, 2012, 05:29:15 AM »
Lol Rose  Love the story line with pictures.   8) :o 8)         ;) :o 8)

The courage is not too hard to come by. I have some knowledge of things. And most importantly, they have nothing on me.  ;)   Im clean, so I can spot dirty.  lol

So I dont have to spend time defending myself.

I need to focus on my project. Ill be around Rose. I think you can handle it from here. Just a lil dusting.  :-* 8) 8) 8) 8)

Mags

So you've seen her recent posts with her explanation and her new example calculation. And presumably you endorse them as correct, since you haven't commented negatively about them.

I am ashamed for you. Go and work on your motor, but don't forget.... the BATTERY is the one part of all free energy devices that seems to be absolutely required. Darn it... none of them will run without a battery !!

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1180 on: March 19, 2012, 05:33:23 AM »
My dear Tinsel Koala,
We all know you for being the champion of the blindingly ignorant and we all appreciate how urgently the public must be prevented from seeing any conclusive battery draw down test that I may be trying to propose.  We therefore concede that if this is the measure of the man - then villain does not cut it as a description.  So.  In a rather roundabout way ... you're right.

Rosie Posie
Pudding and Pie

There you go again, liar. You know that I have proposed, over and over, a simple and easy and unequivocal drawdown test that even YOU could perform adequately within two weeks. You haven't said what you find objectionable about my easy and unequivocal test. But to claim that I am against testing of any kind is just another one of your lies. Anybody reading here can see that I have repeatedly encouraged people to BUILD AND TEST the circuit for themselves. Even you, Rosemary, although from your past performance I doubt if you could handle the measurements and computations. That is why I suggested a test that requires NO measurements and NO computations, but would  be a fair test of your battery charging claim nevertheless.

So stop complaining that I am trying to stop or delay testing. The truth is EXACTLY OPPOSITE from what you claim... as usual.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1181 on: March 19, 2012, 05:34:19 AM »
Could you roll on the floor again? I didnt hear it the first time.   ;D

Mags

25.6 MegaJoules.
47.5 MegaWatts in 6 hours, on her electric bill.

Can you hear it now?

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1182 on: March 19, 2012, 05:37:32 AM »
So you've seen her recent posts with her explanation and her new example calculation. And presumably you endorse them as correct, since you haven't commented negatively about them.

I am ashamed for you. Go and work on your motor, but don't forget.... the BATTERY is the one part of all free energy devices that seems to be absolutely required. Darn it... none of them will run without a battery !!

I would be most reluctant to call you a liar - so will only say that this statement of yours is NOT TRUE.  Our water to boil test measured absolutely NO energy coming from the battery supply.  It's explained in that second paper that you're anxious never to reference.  Which lack of reference is also a critical component to your argument.  LOL.  Better leave it buried behind yours and Glen Lettenmaier's pages and pages of traducement.

Take care of yourself TK.  The tide is turning.  And it may yet be that you'll not be able to retire to that little coastal village in Mexico.  God forbid.

And as ever,
Rosie Posie

Offline Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5886
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1183 on: March 19, 2012, 05:37:44 AM »
So you've seen her recent posts with her explanation and her new example calculation. And presumably you endorse them as correct, since you haven't commented negatively about them.

I am ashamed for you. Go and work on your motor, but don't forget.... the BATTERY is the one part of all free energy devices that seems to be absolutely required. Darn it... none of them will run without a battery !!

Ill present this advice to congress, and will implement those ideas when they are finished deliberating.    ;)    Should be soon.  ;)   Wudaya think?

Mags

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1184 on: March 19, 2012, 05:44:48 AM »
Harti,

I see that you're there.  May I please impose on you to halt the traducements on this thread.  We are anxious to thrash out the conditions required for a final proof of claim - related to battery draw downs.  And every time we attempt a discussion of this TK and Glen and, latterly even MileHigh - dominate the discussion - now in defense of TK.

May I ask you to consider allowing TK and his friends to work their counter arguments on an alternate thread?  That way Poynty and I and Mags can implement the conditions to that test that Mags proposed we run.  Else this will forever be prevented. And that's not in the interests of over unity research.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary