Author Topic: Confirming the Delayed Lenz Effect (Read 874094 times)

Magluvin · « **Reply #345 on:** October 20, 2011, 03:49:54 AM »

Quote from: CRANKYpants on October 20, 2011, 01:25:53 AM

YOU ARE ALL ON CRACK...!
IT'S NOT DELAYED LENZ AT ALL IT'S DIVERTED LENZ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lu0MDMDChSg
JUST KIDDING A BIT OF BOTH IS REQUIRED

CHEERS
T

Hey Cranky ;]

Was wondering what you think about these 2 pdfs.

Mags

CRANKYpants · « **Reply #346 on:** October 20, 2011, 05:03:14 AM »

Quote from: Magluvin on October 20, 2011, 03:49:54 AM

Hey Cranky ;]

Was wondering what you think about these 2 pdfs.

Mags

DEAR MAGS, IT'S THE SAME FOR EVERY IDEA $:-\$ CHEERS T

Magluvin · « **Reply #347 on:** October 20, 2011, 06:28:29 AM »

Hmm, well I was just wondering what you thought, as in whether you agree with what the pdfs say.

Thanks

Mags

gyulasun · « **Reply #348 on:** October 20, 2011, 12:49:14 PM »

Quote from: wings on October 18, 2011, 09:05:27 PM

this can be a solution?

Use of electrical power multiplication for power smoothing in power distribution James F. Corum

http://www.google.com/patents?id=kqiYAAAAEBAJ&printsec=abstract#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://www.energeticforum.com/attachments/renewable-energy/8622d1311265352-resonance-properties-rotating-ring-circuits-ring-circuits.pdf

Tesla everywhere

http://books.google.ch/books?id=ZNqo1zaZRTYC&lpg=PA215&ots=ZJXOJknmUP&dq=%22Resonance%20Properties%20of%20Ring%20Circuits%22&hl=it&pg=PA202#v=onepage&q=%22Resonance%20Properties%20of%20Ring%20Circuits%22&f=false

Hi Wings,

Thanks for the links. The Corum brothers have studied Tesla's work thoroughly and I assume their applications / patents were born from practical tests too. I mean several patent applications because the one from James Corum you refer to (US 20060190513) was preceeded by two on the same subject and the application numbers were US 20060190511 and US 20060190512.

So these applications need studying and testing, together with the Parametric power multiplication application US 2007132489 ( http://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/originalDocument?FT=D&date=20070614&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP&CC=US&NR=2007132489A1&KC=A1 )

Thanks, Gyula

CRANKYpants · « **Reply #349 on:** October 20, 2011, 02:18:43 PM »

Quote from: Magluvin on October 20, 2011, 06:28:29 AM

Hmm, well I was just wondering what you thought, as in whether you agree with what the pdfs say.
Thanks
Mags

DEAR MAGS,

I AGREE THAT ALOT OF WORK HAS GONE INTO THE PDFS BUT I AM SORRY I DON'T HAVE ANY SPECULATIVE OPINION ON WHAT WILL HAPPEN IN REAL LIFE... MAGNETISM HAS ITS OWN RULES AND MANY HAVE NOT EVEN BEEN ENCOUNTERED YET BY EXPLORERS. THE ONLY WAY TO FIND OUT IS TO BUILD IT AND GET SOME DATA. UNFORTUNATELY IF IT DOES ACTUALLY WORK THEY "WON'T COME" BUT WILL TRY TO IGNORE IT FOR AS LONG AS POSSIBLE.

CHEERS
T

CRANKYpants · « **Reply #350 on:** October 20, 2011, 03:07:00 PM »

JUST AN FYI FOR ALL YOU PERPETUAL LEARNERS OUT THERE...

PHASE SHIFTING TRANSFORMERS
http://www.esat.kuleuven.be/electa/publications/fulltexts/pub_1502.pdf

CHEERS
T

wings · « **Reply #351 on:** October 20, 2011, 05:13:35 PM »

Quote from: CRANKYpants on October 20, 2011, 03:07:00 PM

JUST AN FYI FOR ALL YOU PERPETUAL LEARNERS OUT THERE...

PHASE SHIFTING TRANSFORMERS
http://www.esat.kuleuven.be/electa/publications/fulltexts/pub_1502.pdf

CHEERS
T

.....
Magtech has developed a controllable inductance. It is controlled by a magnetic flux in a copper and iron coil. A small DC current changes the relative permeability in the iron, and makes the inductance continuously variable.

http://www.energyvcfair.com/download_05/FORUM_B/4_Magtech_Vol1.pdf

site:
http://www.magtech.no/

patents
7256678
7061356
7180206
7259544
6965291
Application number: 11/033,483
Application number: 10/700,349

CRANKYpants · « **Reply #352 on:** October 20, 2011, 06:41:09 PM »

Quote from: wings on October 20, 2011, 05:13:35 PM

.....
Magtech has developed a controllable inductance. It is controlled by a magnetic flux in a copper and iron coil. A small DC current changes the relative permeability in the iron, and makes the inductance continuously variable.

http://www.energyvcfair.com/download_05/FORUM_B/4_Magtech_Vol1.pdf

NICE!

I BET GOTOLUC WILL BE INTERESTED IN THIS:

Dynamics of Orthogonal Coil Conditioning http://www.intalek.com/Index/Projects/Research/VTA_Conditioning.pdf

CHEERS
T

DeepCut · « **Reply #353 on:** October 20, 2011, 09:03:31 PM »

Test results, 500g of 0.25mm, bifilar-wound, series-connected, laminated-core coil.

This coil/core combination overspeeds the rotor when shorted.

Rotor with no coil/core present.

Hz : 450
mA : 443

Rotor with coil/core present, open-circuit.

Hz : 450
mA : 438

Rotor with coil/core persent, short-circuit.

Hz : 455
mA 433

Video here :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=onvYaT-k7yk

Thanks for reading,

DC.

woopy · « **Reply #354 on:** October 20, 2011, 11:12:38 PM »

Hi All

After my experiment with the transformer (MOT) and other test as per Overunityguide and Luc , i decided to try a replication of the Overunityguide experiment in his video.
Until now i did not get any acceleration under load with all my different experiments. (Muller, Romero etc.. )

And thank's to Deepcut info i decided to test one of my old Bificoil ( not so much DC resistance ) and made a slight modif on a Monopole drum by adding a counter pole magnet between each older one.

So the result is very interesting and is confirming the Thane's experiment another time.

Youp

i will have hard sleeping these next days

Thank's to all for contribution, and do not hesitate to try .

Laurent

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrbEtXCsXiw

Kator01 · « **Reply #355 on:** October 21, 2011, 12:01:49 AM »

Hello wings,

what magtech presents here is very old stuff, goes way back to somewhere between 1898 to 1930 and is called "magnetic amplifier"
They ceased teaching this in germany at the technical universities in 1960. I was lucky to find a book in an east-germany university-library : Transductor-controlling technology, which is a very good and stable method to control hydroxy-cells.

I doubt it will be possible to patent this old technique.

Regards

Kator01

CRANKYpants · « **Reply #356 on:** October 21, 2011, 12:17:23 AM »

Quote from: woopy on October 20, 2011, 11:12:38 PM

Hi All

So the result is very interesting and is confirming the Thane's experiment another time.

Laurent

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrbEtXCsXiw

NICE WORK LAURENT,

I SUGGEST YOU TRY ANOTHER TEST AT 600 RPM AND I BET YOU WILL SEE DECELERATION EVEN WITH A SHORT.

OR CHANGE YOUR SERIES CONNECTED BI-FILAR TO PARALLEL CONNECTED BI-FILAR AND SEE MASSIVE BRAKING EFFECTS.

KIND REGARDS
Thane

CRANKYpants · « **Reply #357 on:** October 21, 2011, 01:58:48 AM »

generator [ËˆdÊ’É›nÉ™ËŒreÉªtÉ™]n
1. (Physics / General Physics) Physics
a. any device for converting mechanical energy into electrical energy by electromagnetic induction,

I HAVE SAID IT BEFORE AND I WILL SAY IT AGAIN...THE INPUT TO AN ELECTRIC GENERATOR IS:
THE MECHANICAL POWER IN THE DRIVE SHAFT WHICH = THE DRIVE SHAFT TORQUE x DRIVE SHAFT SPEED.

INPUT POWER = TORQUE x SPEED

THE INPUT POWER IS THEREFORE THE DRIVE SHAFT POWER PRIOR TO LOADING DIVIDED BY THE OUTPUT (WHICH IS THE ELECTRICAL LOADED POWER OUTPUT).

EFFICIENCY = ELECTRICAL OUTPUT/MECHANICAL INPUT x 100

IN A CONVENTIONAL SYSTEM THE MECHANICAL INPUT ALWAYS HAS TO BE INCREASED TO MAINTAIN THE LOAD (MORE TORQUE ADDED) AND THIS ADDED TORQUE x THE SPEED IS THE INPUT ENERGY VALUE.

IN THE ReGenX SCENARIO THE MECHANICAL OUTPUT IS GREATER AFTER LOADING THAN BEFORE LOADING SO THAT ALONE MAKES THE SYSTEM OVER 100% EFFICIENT (MECHANICAL OUTPUT IS GREATER THAN MECHANICAL INPUT BECAUSE TORQUE AND SPEED ARE BOTH HIGHER AFTER LOADING)

EFFICIENCY = MECHANICAL OUTPUT (GENERATOR LOADED) / MECHANICAL INPUT (GENERATOR UNLOADED) x 100

IF OUTPUT ELECTRICITY IS ALSO PRODUCED THE EFFICIENCY IS THEN:

EFFICIENCY = MECHANICAL OUTPUT (GENERATOR LOADED) + ELECTRICAL OUTPUT / MECHANICAL INPUT (GENERATOR UNLOADED) x 100

SO EVERYONE WHO HAS EVER BEEN ABLE TO PRODUCE ACCELERATION WHILE LOADING THEIR GENERATOR HAS SUCCEEDED IN PRODUCING AN OVERUNITY DEVICE!

CONGRATULATIONS!

I JUST WANT TO PUBLICLY ACKNOWLEDGE YOUR EFFORTS BECAUSE FEW PEOPLE WILL.

AND FEWER STILL WILL UNDERSTAND.

KIND REGARDS
Thane

Thane C. Heins
President
Potential +/- Difference Inc. R & D
"The Transition of Power"
thaneh@potentialdifference.ca
Linkedin http://linkd.in/iIZyXF

Qwert · « **Reply #358 on:** October 21, 2011, 03:16:40 AM »

Hi, all.
The subject of the "magnetic amplifier" raised here by woopy and Kator01, is described in page 97 (110 of 187) of the book "Practical-Transformer-Handbook" by Irving Gottlieb (187 pages in .pdf) and the link to it you can find here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=6763.msg302197#msg302197

there is also another publication on the Internet "magnetic amplifiers" by George Trinkaus:
http://www.themeasuringsystemofthegods.com/magnetic%20amplifiers.pdf

as well as "Magnetic Amplifier Control for Simple, Low-Cost, Secondary Regulation" by Bob Mammano:
http://www.ti.com/lit/ml/slup129/slup129.pdf

shimondoodkin · « **Reply #359 on:** October 21, 2011, 03:42:46 AM »

seems like the non-mechanical the coils only effect is generally understood,but
is there any beneficial overunity in coil only? (mechanical over unity i understand)

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: Confirming the Delayed Lenz Effect (Read 874094 times)

Magluvin

Re: Confirming the Delayed Lenz Effect

CRANKYpants

Re: Confirming the Delayed Lenz Effect

Magluvin

Re: Confirming the Delayed Lenz Effect

gyulasun

Re: Confirming the Delayed Lenz Effect

CRANKYpants

Re: Confirming the Delayed Lenz Effect

CRANKYpants

Re: Confirming the Delayed Lenz Effect

wings

Re: Confirming the Delayed Lenz Effect

CRANKYpants

Re: Confirming the Delayed Lenz Effect

DeepCut

Re: Confirming the Delayed Lenz Effect

woopy

Re: Confirming the Delayed Lenz Effect

Kator01

Re: Confirming the Delayed Lenz Effect

CRANKYpants

Re: Confirming the Delayed Lenz Effect

CRANKYpants

Re: Confirming the Delayed Lenz Effect

Qwert

Re: Confirming the Delayed Lenz Effect

shimondoodkin

Re: Confirming the Delayed Lenz Effect