Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Common Mistakes and Gotcha's in OU  (Read 18357 times)

CuriousChris

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 280
Common Mistakes and Gotcha's in OU
« on: August 20, 2011, 04:08:18 AM »

I thought it would be interesting to start a thread where people can list mistakes they often see when people are researching OU.

If you are aware of these mistakes. Then you can avoid spending a lot of time on a project which may not pan out.
You are also in a much better position to answer your critics. You will know ahead of time what accusations they are going to throw at you so can prepare a brilliant and witty response :)

So I'll start it off with one we see oh so often, and another I have never seen anyone mention but have often seen it

Please categorise (correct English spelling) each mistake. I will try and collate them for easy reference with a link to the person who proposed it.


Power measurements:

Mistake: Voltage = Power
Reason: Voltage or EMF does not equate to power. just because you achieve high voltage doesnt mean you achieve high power, Combing your hair can achieve high voltage. but results in very little power.

Similarly but not seen very often...
Mistake: Current = Power
Reason: Like voltage having a lot of it doesn't equate to power, for example within a superconductor you can induce huge current flows. but those current flows will not result in high output power, because they can also be stopped as easily as they started.


Magnet Motors:
This one I see and no one seems to be aware of it.

Mistake: Using Aluminium (correct English spelling) and thinking its not magnetic.
Reason: Aluminium is a conductor. If a magnetic field moves through it, current WILL flow. That current will produce a magnetic field opposing the magnetic field that caused the current to flow. This is how the levitation in bullet trains work. If you have an aluminium frame or something near your magnet motor it will cause efficiency losses.
Note: It could also be used to your advantage. Think SMOT!



Ok Guys if anyone wants to join me and add your own thoughts please do.

CC

onthecuttingedge2005

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1336
Re: Common Mistakes and Gotcha's in OU
« Reply #1 on: August 20, 2011, 05:52:58 AM »
I thought it would be interesting to start a thread where people can list mistakes they often see when people are researching OU.

If you are aware of these mistakes. Then you can avoid spending a lot of time on a project which may not pan out.
You are also in a much better position to answer your critics. You will know ahead of time what accusations they are going to throw at you so can prepare a brilliant and witty response :)

So I'll start it off with one we see oh so often, and another I have never seen anyone mention but have often seen it

Please categorise (correct English spelling) each mistake. I will try and collate them for easy reference with a link to the person who proposed it.


Power measurements:

Mistake: Voltage = Power
Reason: Voltage or EMF does not equate to power. just because you achieve high voltage doesnt mean you achieve high power, Combing your hair can achieve high voltage. but results in very little power.

Similarly but not seen very often...
Mistake: Current = Power
Reason: Like voltage having a lot of it doesn't equate to power, for example within a superconductor you can induce huge current flows. but those current flows will not result in high output power, because they can also be stopped as easily as they started.


Magnet Motors:
This one I see and no one seems to be aware of it.

Mistake: Using Aluminium (correct English spelling) and thinking its not magnetic.
Reason: Aluminium is a conductor. If a magnetic field moves through it, current WILL flow. That current will produce a magnetic field opposing the magnetic field that caused the current to flow. This is how the levitation in bullet trains work. If you have an aluminium frame or something near your magnet motor it will cause efficiency losses.
Note: It could also be used to your advantage. Think SMOT!



Ok Guys if anyone wants to join me and add your own thoughts please do.

CC
Pan out, your better off gold panning and selling it to U.S markets.

CuriousChris

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 280
Re: Common Mistakes and Gotcha's in OU
« Reply #2 on: August 20, 2011, 10:12:06 AM »
To start a thread that may give those that do not have the knowledge of the things they need to look at while looking at the things they are looking at is a very good idea, but unfortunately those that need it will not read, nor listen, and those that think they have the answer will tell all of their follies.
Perhaps you are right :(

To that I will add:

The core in an electric coil to magnetic condition is a catalyst, treat it correctly
Please explain, what do you mean by that statement?
The idea is to be instructional. by that I mean explain why its a mistake or gotcha. and if possible how it can be corrected.

@onthecuttingedge2005
I am not sure why you would quote everything I said, just to make a one line comment about the choice of two words. Dare I say rather wasteful?

CC

Hope

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 701
Re: Common Mistakes and Gotcha's in OU
« Reply #3 on: August 20, 2011, 12:29:31 PM »
Using taught Electrical Engineering Laws only to try to build an over unity device.  Since the early as 1920 we have had the true nature of energy suppressed by those who want to sell us energy.  See Walter Russell's, Tesla, Ed Leedskalin...etc. on this idea verses what we are now taught.

CuriousChris

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 280
Re: Common Mistakes and Gotcha's in OU
« Reply #4 on: August 20, 2011, 04:21:14 PM »

Paranoia
Mistake: Believing there is a conspiracy to hide the true nature of energy.
Reason: Humans are human, If there is a dollar to be made they will find a way to make it. Even if some opposing company/country doesn't want you to let the cat out of the bag. The reason why popular science does not believe in OU is because so far no-one has been able to do it reproducibly. When we do it reproducibly then science may say, "Oh shit we made a mistake". Even if we do prove OU, for most everyday things it will not change anything. Most technology will go on just the way it is. Why? because it works. So why change it. There will just be a new branch of science to deal with it (OU). The old will give way to the new. That's the way it's always been, and always will be.


Tesla did not believe in OU. He experimented with it and then declared it couldn't be done. As brilliant as Tesla was he had his limits like we all do.

We shouldn't ignore "Taught Electrical Engineering" we should look for ways around it. Its taught because it works 99% of the time. The other 1% is discarded as outlyers.

CC

Hope

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 701
Re: Common Mistakes and Gotcha's in OU
« Reply #5 on: August 22, 2011, 06:41:08 AM »
It works only because it is 1/2 of the truth.  This is used because if they used the WHOLE truth we could have energy for free.  1/2 the path means the power company can keep selling you electricity, if it was allowed to travel its whole path it would recycle and not end.

fritznien

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 294
Re: Common Mistakes and Gotcha's in OU
« Reply #6 on: August 22, 2011, 07:17:23 AM »
It works only because it is 1/2 of the truth.  This is used because if they used the WHOLE truth we could have energy for free.  1/2 the path means the power company can keep selling you electricity, if it was allowed to travel its whole path it would recycle and not end.
you want to share with the rest of the class?
what works?
what truth?
what path?
how do you know this?
fritznien

Laurie

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 9
Re: Common Mistakes and Gotcha's in OU
« Reply #7 on: August 22, 2011, 07:24:53 AM »
It works only because it is 1/2 of the truth.  This is used because if they used the WHOLE truth we could have energy for free.  1/2 the path means the power company can keep selling you electricity, if it was allowed to travel its whole path it would recycle and not end.


There is just too much paranoia out there and some people always blaming things on the Men in Black.....

CuriousChris

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 280
Re: Common Mistakes and Gotcha's in OU
« Reply #8 on: August 22, 2011, 10:42:23 AM »
@Hope
Without a doubt there are corporate interests at work. Without a doubt the government is in cahoots with Corporate America, Without a doubt corporations buy up patents and shelve the projects. Back in the late 70's early 80's I investigated hundreds of fuel saving devices. the patents were almost all owned by one company. Shell Canada.

So I agree, greed is at play here, like anywhere else in the world. But the level of paranoia that surrounds OU is sometimes depressing. I watched a video by a poster here on OU where he stated "Some government man altered my video to make it look like I bumped it" he was talking about a smot. What a joke. If he has the original video that proves the one on youtube was doctored he should upload it here. He won't because he made it up. (Like his claims of OU).

This level of paranoia only sends the wrong message. No one is getting bumped off. no-one is being silenced. good ideas may be bought out, but that's about it.

You would have to consider the whole scientific community the world over is in on the sham. And that's simply not possible. The government has enough trouble keeping the smallest of secrets. To believe they could cover up OU for what now amounts to hundreds of years is delusional.

If OU was so easy then it would be with us now, It's not and the majority of science believes its impossible and therefore not worth any effort, Not because they are told to cover it up.

As fritznien implies. Where is your proof?


CC


EDIT:

Can you explain the existence of overunity.com and other sites like it? If the Gov was so good at covering up, surely these sites would not exist. Why take the risk of the "truth" getting out?

CC
« Last Edit: August 22, 2011, 11:06:17 AM by CuriousChris »

Hope

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 701
Re: Common Mistakes and Gotcha's in OU
« Reply #9 on: August 22, 2011, 04:24:13 PM »
It is this easy:


http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Perepiteia_Generator_by_Potential_Difference_Inc

And you may have changed your OU name to cover your negative comment history, but ChrisC a troll is a troll is a troll.

brian334

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 633
Re: Common Mistakes and Gotcha's in OU
« Reply #10 on: August 23, 2011, 12:56:43 AM »
CC
Will you post your definition of what O.U. is?

CuriousChris

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 280
Re: Common Mistakes and Gotcha's in OU
« Reply #11 on: August 23, 2011, 02:00:47 AM »
Sorry Hope you must have misinterpreted me or you are avoiding answering my question. The proof I require was that government forces are covering up the truth. not the possibility of OU. Was that a deliberate misinterpretation by you, a way to derail the question?

To answer the OU question put by Brian.
OU is overunity. more output power than input power such that the power taken out of the unit can be fed back into the unit to keep it running. All OU devices by their very nature are PMM's.

Thanes Perepiteia is an exciting advance. but is it OU? I have yet to see any proof of it. It's exciting because it has unexplained properties. These properties may lead to ou if they have not achieved it already.

I have been reviewing the thread on BiTT over the last couple of days, no one in that thread has reported success in recreating Thanes device, though many have tried.

Calling someone a troll because they don't share your beliefs is in itself the work of a troll. its an attempt to illicit an argument from someone. Trolls don't respond with logic and care. They usually take something you say and twist it to another meaning.

Once again what proof do you have that government forces are trying to suppress knowledge? My proof they are not, is the very conversation you and I are having it would not be allowed in a totally repressive society!

CC

P.S. I am here because I believe OU is possible, No reason to be here otherwise. Especially when people attack you personally so readily. Say something they don't agree with and all of a sudden you are a cheat a liar and a troll. Probably many good people have just walked away because of the way they have been treated here. When logical argument is lacking, personal attacks take the forefront.

Hope

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 701
Re: Common Mistakes and Gotcha's in OU
« Reply #12 on: August 23, 2011, 07:23:15 AM »
I am certainly not here to educate you Chris on what you already know:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invention_Secrecy_Act

da!  AND if any of you new people think MIB don't suppress Over Unity devices do some research on other working but now MISSING OU devices. HUNDREDS!! There have been so many reported on, then suppressed then shelved then the inventors missing or nuts or dead or discredited.  Wake up and just look at THIS forums articles about it or other articles on other energy forums.   Understanding your lack of seeing for yourselves is part of media control we all were subjected to over the years.   Seek and ye shall find....out!   and Chris  that newbie account you just started to back yourself up is not fooling anyone willing to check out the real energy scene.

http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Perepiteia_Generator_by_Potential_Difference_Inc

This is one way to thwart energy companies that has PROVEN results.  As does the Gabriel device.

Chris where is your proof of ANY COP>1 device,  oh that's right your not allowed to really help us I bet.   We here believe in finding out what does and does not work and building upon that.   Learn and build.   Everyone click on CC's profile and look at all his comments to see what he is really doing here.

CuriousChris

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 280
Re: Common Mistakes and Gotcha's in OU
« Reply #13 on: August 23, 2011, 08:27:03 AM »

So your proof is there is no proof therefore it must have happened.

I know of the invention secrecy act. I am well aware of what it means. I am sure there are many weapons of warfare we aren't aware of 'yet'.

The missing inventions you speak of? where are they then. if you know of them they are not missing, are they?

Sadly people grow old and die for various reasons. To claim they have been murdered as part of a coverup is well sad. There is no proof of such claims just gossip and innuendo, If someone dies in the OU community, they must have been murdered! I mean really its obvious isn't it.

I come from a family of conspiratorialists, There is nothing you can say that would surprise me. Most of my life I have heard conspiracy theories. But I got wise and broke the cycle. Because in the end you just become like my father, 80 years old always so worried that something bad is being done he never enjoyed life. He was always looking for proof that the commies were coming or that world banking was about to collapse due to deliberate manipulation. In the end he has nothing but the worry. It killed my mother the stress of him always warning people of impending doom, so now he doesn't even have his wife (and his kids just tolerate him). I am not going to end up like that. You on the other hand are welcome to it.

On to Perepiteia...
Did you read this, or are you only interested in hearing the bits you want to believe?
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Talk:Directory:Perepiteia_Generator_by_Potential_Difference_Inc#Nothing_more_than_a_hysteresis_brake

Basically what its saying is the peripitea device is an inefficient induction motor. By adding the coil its efficiency increases and therefore it spins faster. had the device been designed properly to start with adding the coil would result in no net gain.

Now I am not going to say it doesn't work. But I am not going to say it does work because I see no proof, only claims and counter claims.
To prove it works all Thane needs to do is hookup the output to the input, disconnect any external sources and let it run.

I have yet to see a device do that. Please point me to one if you know of one, I would dearly love to replicate it. There is nothing I would love more than to prove the law of conservation of energy can be bypassed.

You are trying to drag this thread off topic. I started it in the vain attempt at helping people avoid common mistakes, so they can concentrate on what really might work. But it seems someone is intent on derailing that. They perhaps want to make sure that confusion continues, they want to make it sound like they support OU while at all times attempting to prevent any cohesion and logical progression, always nudging people in the wrong direction.

For my part I was only trying to help. But I guess some people have it all under control and don't want any help. Well that's OK I don't mind at all.

From now on I am only going to respond to on topic posts.

CC

brian334

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 633
Re: Common Mistakes and Gotcha's in OU
« Reply #14 on: August 23, 2011, 03:06:51 PM »
CC
I have a different definition of O.U.
My definition of O.U. is any work I can get done with out doing the work myself.
The biggest mistake is to use the wrong definition.