Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: PLEASE READ THIS-MAJOR BREAK THRU FROM BILL MEHESS  (Read 179863 times)

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: PLEASE READ THIS-MAJOR BREAK THRU FROM BILL MEHESS
« Reply #255 on: September 11, 2011, 03:54:45 PM »
Bill
How are  things going?

Thanks
Chet

Mark69

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 277
Re: PLEASE READ THIS-MAJOR BREAK THRU FROM BILL MEHESS
« Reply #256 on: September 11, 2011, 04:55:59 PM »
Bill,

Any chance to just show your original device first before of spending loads into an upscale one?

Thanks,
Mark

Cloxxki

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1083
Re: PLEASE READ THIS-MAJOR BREAK THRU FROM BILL MEHESS
« Reply #257 on: September 12, 2011, 02:55:53 PM »
Billy baby.

Just a hint. Make 10 them in parallel, or 20 if they are so easy to do. That should put some meat on the buffet table at your demo.

Just jok'in man. I am not joking about the 10 or 20.

From where I see it you can either go bigger, or, more of the same, or, something different. More of the same is a logical choice to start with.

I know you will figure it out.

Good Luck.

wattsup

PS: But if one day you decide to just open source for some top notch help, we will understand.
Good suggestion. If if they cannot be linked for some reason, they need to all be able to work simultaniously while placed on the same table. To show that if there is input from the environment, it is not being limited to space volume or earth surface. Also, the table with measuring equipment might need to be picked up and placed on a roof, in a basement, next to a swimming pool, etc, to ensure environmental aspects are absent. Also, breathe at the device while running measurements :-)

Just tuning in, but passionately hoping Bill's got something real, and scalable.

mscoffman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1377
Re: PLEASE READ THIS-MAJOR BREAK THRU FROM BILL MEHESS
« Reply #258 on: September 12, 2011, 08:57:14 PM »
Good suggestion. If if they cannot be linked for some reason, they need to all be able to work simultaneously while placed on the same table. To show that if there is input from the environment, it is not being limited to space volume or earth surface. Also, the table with measuring equipment might need to be picked up and placed on a roof, in a basement, next to a swimming pool, etc, to ensure environmental aspects are absent. Also, breathe at the device while running measurements :-)

Just tuning in, but passionately hoping Bill's got something real, and scalable.

This is off topic and not particularly in reference to Bill's device...But
in general devices should not interact or "shadow" copies of themselves.
If they do, it doesn't decrease their standalone worth, but will need
to be taken into account in a product. Testakita machine have a
pseudo-random antenna key that can be changed to keep machines
from interacting as they interact with the environment - much.

:S:MarkSCoffman

MasterPlaster

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 530
Re: PLEASE READ THIS-MAJOR BREAK THRU FROM BILL MEHESS
« Reply #259 on: September 12, 2011, 10:57:48 PM »
All I can see here is words, words, words. No solid facts. Did I miss something?

Vidar

And you are not likely to! This thread is a waste of bandwidth.

billmehess

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 359
Re: PLEASE READ THIS-MAJOR BREAK THRU FROM BILL MEHESS
« Reply #260 on: September 13, 2011, 06:54:48 PM »
My prototype is completed. I am getting a steady 5.2 volts output. For the last week I have been getting some wide voltage outputs and spikes but I solved the problem and the output is steady.
I was able to use a Faraday cage at a local University and found that the output was not affected.
RF signals are not relevant.
I am going to start a 30 day test to check on voltage output and stability. Also at the end of the 30 days I will examine all the componets to check for any signs of desegregation.
I have access to a electron microscope at the University I am working through and I have examined the componets and have detailed pictures. I will compare these with pictures taken in 30 days.

Again this is what I am claiming:

No Input
No component desegregation
No heat
No toxic  or fumes of any kind
All solid state
No moving parts
Completely scaleable

As things progress I will keep you informed
Bill

vrstud

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 28
Re: PLEASE READ THIS-MAJOR BREAK THRU FROM BILL MEHESS
« Reply #261 on: September 13, 2011, 07:57:53 PM »
Hey Bill:

Good work.  Glad to hear that you are getting a steady output of 5.2V.  Were you able to measure the current coming out?  With that you would be able to know the power output, which is the real indicator.

Chris

JouleSeeker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 685
Re: PLEASE READ THIS-MAJOR BREAK THRU FROM BILL MEHESS
« Reply #262 on: September 13, 2011, 09:06:47 PM »
My prototype is completed. I am getting a steady 5.2 volts output. For the last week I have been getting some wide voltage outputs and spikes but I solved the problem and the output is steady.
I was able to use a Faraday cage at a local University and found that the output was not affected.
RF signals are not relevant.
I am going to start a 30 day test to check on voltage output and stability. Also at the end of the 30 days I will examine all the componets to check for any signs of desegregation.
I have access to a electron microscope at the University I am working through and I have examined the componets and have detailed pictures. I will compare these with pictures taken in 30 days.

Again this is what I am claiming:

No Input
No component desegregation
No heat
No toxic  or fumes of any kind
All solid state
No moving parts
Completely scaleable

As things progress I will keep you informed
Bill

Yes, good, Bill -- but how about the POWER output?    when you say "scaleable" == what power output do you actually have now?
Also, any update on WHEN you will announce what this device is?

e2matrix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1956
Re: PLEASE READ THIS-MAJOR BREAK THRU FROM BILL MEHESS
« Reply #263 on: September 13, 2011, 10:14:21 PM »
Congrats Bill.  Yep that's the biggy .... current on a load - inquiring minds want to know ;) .  Need to know actual power in watts being generated and then you or we can eventually guess what it may cost to build a unit with usable power.  Of course it will be a guess until all details can be worked out for a production scenario and hopefully it is one that is cheaper than solar or wind.  Of course if it can come in close in cost and runs 24/7 then it's a winner right there since neither solar or wind are 24/7.  Best of luck.

billmehess

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 359
Re: PLEASE READ THIS-MAJOR BREAK THRU FROM BILL MEHESS
« Reply #264 on: September 13, 2011, 11:13:09 PM »
Yes power is everything
Current numbers

I can charge a 1 farad cap to 1.2 volts in 60 seconds  e=1/2cv(2)
   (1f)(1.44)  /2 = .72 j.

.72 j/60 sec = .012 milliwatts


better than 150 micro watts.
Big improvements but still a long way to go.
Bill
« Last Edit: September 14, 2011, 03:25:39 AM by billmehess »

hoptoad

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1009
Re: PLEASE READ THIS-MAJOR BREAK THRU FROM BILL MEHESS
« Reply #265 on: September 14, 2011, 06:35:23 AM »
Yes power is everything
Current numbers

I can charge a 1 farad cap to 1.2 volts in 60 seconds  e=1/2cv(2)
   (1f)(1.44)  /2 = .72 j.

.72 j/60 sec = .012 milliwatts


better than 150 micro watts.
Big improvements but still a long way to go.
Bill

" .72 j/60 sec = .012 milliwatts better than 150 micro watts. Big improvements "  ???

Perhaps you meant .12 watts.  ???

After all, .012 milliwatts equals 12 microwatts which is less than .15 milliwatts (150 microwatts)
whereas .12 watts equals 120 milliwatts.

Cheers


nul-points

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 995
    • Doc Ringwood's Free Energy blog
Re: PLEASE READ THIS-MAJOR BREAK THRU FROM BILL MEHESS
« Reply #266 on: September 14, 2011, 08:15:38 AM »

" .72 j/60 sec = .012 milliwatts better than 150 micro watts. Big improvements "  ???

Perhaps you meant .12 watts.  ???
[...]


.72 J / 60 sec = 12 milliwatts
 

billmehess

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 359
Re: PLEASE READ THIS-MAJOR BREAK THRU FROM BILL MEHESS
« Reply #267 on: September 14, 2011, 08:23:59 AM »
I'm tired been working days in shop on this project
meant  .012 watts or 12 milliwatts
Bill

hoptoad

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1009
Re: PLEASE READ THIS-MAJOR BREAK THRU FROM BILL MEHESS
« Reply #268 on: September 14, 2011, 09:07:33 AM »

.72 J / 60 sec = 12 milliwatts

Still tiny power, but definitely an improvement on 150 microwatts.
P.S. Thanks for the power clarification. Knew there had to be a decimal point in the wrong place somewhere or a simple typo.

Cheers

powercat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1091
Re: PLEASE READ THIS-MAJOR BREAK THRU FROM BILL MEHESS
« Reply #269 on: September 14, 2011, 10:11:02 AM »
Hi Bill,
is this it  ;D
Quote
isnt this just an ambient termoelectric converter? the impurity in the paper plus the steel and magnet chould behave simmilar to a peltier element.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3mX8S767zT4&NR=1