Yes this would certainly help me , and yes I meant to say uf not mf. When I connect the two sets of modules together in series I get again around a 700 mv out put , but the total of the summation of all the individuals is around 1400 mv, voltage loss?
Anyway at 700 mv connected to the cap. and using a multimeter and starting with the cap reading 0.00 the cap will charge at the rate of about 180 mv/hour.
Now I have a way to increase the current output substanially to radically improve the amperage available.
Based on these figures could you calculate the power output.
The physical size of the 10 modules  is around 12" x 5" x 5" total for all 10. This can be scaled down greatly but that size is not really of concern to me at this point in the game.
Bill

I just re-read above the voltage on the cap after 1 hr is 280 mv not 180 mv.

OK --

I've checked my math and found it correct, to recap:

 53 MICROwatts for Bill's 10-module system (connecting the 6-modules with the 4-modules). 

 See below along with previous posts -- I have also checked from Bill's comments that the 280mV rise in the 4900 uF cap took one hour for "the two sets of modules together in series".

  But please correct me if my calculations are wrong, because, Bill and other friends,  this is a very VERY tiny effect:

1.  53 uW for 10 modules means about 5.3 microwatts/module (average)

2.  To reach just ONE watt would thus require about 189,000 modules.

3.  Earlier there was an indication that one could get the materials needed to build a module at a hardware store for less than $20.  OK, let's say just $10.

4.  Combining 2 and 3, we find that for ONE stinkin' watt it will cost roughly $1,890,000 -- nearly 2 million bucks ! 

5.  Let's take roughly 1 kW to run a house (a low estimate I believe) -- the cost for the modules (with present data) would be $1,890,000,000 or nearly $2 Billion bucks.  That's billion with a "B".
  I can't afford it.

5.  By comparison, solar panels are now available for about $1.50 per watt output, a factor of roughly a million CHEAPER than this device, at present.

Please correct me if I'm wrong.  I hope I'm wrong.  OR -- I hope the device can be SCALED up in output POWER by a factor of roughly a million without raising the price... Is this possible?

It never ceases to amaze me the level of paranoia some people have. There are not paid trolls looking at this or any other OU forum. We did land on the moon and no there are no alien towers on Mars.

So you are as safe as the rest of us. More danger from meteorites than the MIB.

The reason why we have never heard of a working ou device is because one has never successfully been made. We would have heard about it otherwise. we have heard of hundreds of failed devices and of plenty of fraud. OU comes with all the usual lowlives prepared to take others for a ride.

The reason why threads go silent is the 'inventor' suddenly realises he has made a mistake and it cannot be done. They go quiet mainly from pure embarrassment.

Some people will make claims like I know of twenty OU devices. But in fact they know of twenty youtube videos that they want to be true. that's it nothing else.

Jouleseeker is correct in his summation. It worries me when Bill say's that's his current setup, not the enhancements he is planning. In other words its not tested. 5.3 microwatts can be easily got from dissimilar metals as in a  thermocouple, a small piece of quarts crystal as in a piezo electric device. a magnet and a coil which vibrates when the wind rattles the house. Wire up a speaker and watch the voltage across is as people speak.

There a plenty of ways to develop this sort of voltage/current and mistakenly believe its an ou device.

Sorry Bill I do not mean to be disrespectful, but I am now seriously concerned.


CC