Author Topic: Aether and what it is. (Read 65212 times)

jbignes5 · « **Reply #15 on:** July 29, 2011, 02:32:28 PM »

So what does a shard of this crystal look like and how does it work?

I am thinking these shards look like the same shape as the original just very very small. For lack of a decent drawing program I will use this |> as a side view of the crystal shards.

*|> *|> *|> *|> This is a string of shards with charges in tow.

By virtue of it's shape the shards get their ability to move in space. The shards are the Third biggest sub particles in the universe with the smallest being the medium it floats in. The * is actually organized sub set of the third being the second largest. This second set behaves in the same manner as the third but are not as mobile so they organize into stringed loops and sorta look like a ball of worms always in motion. These are the charges and the third size are the charges vehicle.

|> This part has some pretty amazing properties. Since it is the biggest part in the energy portion of this discussion it is what gives "energy" it's ability to move from point to point. These vehicles are the same as the much larger ones (Black Holes(Huge) or even matter(small)) in their properties. They are potential amplifiers. The surface area at the base is much larger then the surface area at the tip and through this action it raises the potential value and gives the tip much higher potential value from a reference point. Meaning it hasn't passed any charges yet. this is what causes the medium to flow twords the vehicle and cause small gentle hits along the vehicles sides. Just like in statics this creates more potential and gives the vehicle the ability to move when other vehicles are close. Once they line up it is easy to see where force comes from on our macro scale.

Not only do they pass electrical or static energy they have the ability to pass light as well for free since the vehicles are crystals. Light is merely charges in motion at a certain speed. But that motion is usually only one hop of the vehicle which works much like dominoes. Where as current is continuous flow of charges.

aromaz · « **Reply #16 on:** July 29, 2011, 02:58:55 PM »

Regardless of all the arguements about gravity, try this one:

Black holes are regions in space where polarity seize to exist. Ponder that for a little while.

If by some or other mechanism - Polarity is cancelled, what will remain?
Now, if you do have a spot in space where there is no polarity, that can also be seen as absolute vacuum.
As such the vacuum will suck matter into it - or rather to be correct - Matter will be pushed into it.

When such matter enters the region, all movement down to sub-atomic level seizes, that causes all polarity to seize;
light will seize - so you will remain with an substance that does not have polarity, energy, light or mass.
A substance that must exist, but can't be measured or observed; but it will stil have an infinite potential of energy,
if / when it can be polarized.

Would that not qualify as Aether?

PS: By polarity I mean that of electrical (+ and -) as well as magnetic (N + S)
In this theory of mine, the elecrical charge is the first polarity to come into existence, that later creates Magnetism.

jbignes5 · « **Reply #17 on:** July 29, 2011, 03:35:32 PM »

I am glad you are coming to this discussion. I greatly respect you and your theories.

So yes that could be one explanation but yet why do we see a direction then in the event horizon. That direction would seem to point twords a polarity.

I would like to mention Polarity a bit as well. To me and my views, this polarity is just a flow direction with only one valus assigned to it, +. We all know our experiments with Tesla and his unique understanding of the universe and flows. He learned a lot from working with fluids and it shows in his work. When Tesla realized that the Aether was merely one charge value in a medium he figured out that he could effect(wave) the medium with only one polarity, really it is only one polarity. Because if it wasn't he wouldn't have been able to do what he did and he couldn't have used one wire to transfer energy to a device.

Lets take the Tesla switch as an example. I believe Tesla did in fact make this device and it seems it was merely a proof to himself that you can run devices on just one polarity but with a difference of values of that one polarity. This allows a flow to happen and a direction to that flow making it compatible with our two wire devices. It is proof that there is no other value then positive and neutral (the absence of positive or vacuum, which in my opinion is the conductors or vehicles and the spacing of charges in those conductors). Lets say a string of the conductors spanning several miles with no charges is a vacuum. When something touches that conductor the charges within the object start to get sucked out and travel down the line twords the highest potential of that line. Although the object never could go down below it's base charge value it would seem to us to be dead and frozen. All of the universe is the same potential then but at differing potential values with the base value seeming to be inert. This is also where nature gets it's balancing from. Because when an object go to the ambient charge level it can go no further or it would be compensated by the environment to attain the ambient level.

If we understand this concept we can start to see how matter can seem to run forever. Matter in itself at the scale I'm talking about are merely flakes of matter that is attracted or sucked twords the charges. When the flakes envelop the charges it creates a barrier and creates a positive in that bottle. But it is not a perfect bottle and it has opening in between the flakes. This is what causes the suction. This event also oscillates as the flakes open and close like flaps giving matter a frequency. The frequency is controlled by the amount of charge inside of the particle and the size of the flakes surrounding that charge. This is also what gives particles their spin. As we are finding out the particles or atoms at that point also have standing waves in the form of shells. This we have take in error to be the electron but we have taken step to correct that error and are now calling them electron shells or clouds. The reason we could never find the electron spinning around the particle or atom is because it is a standing wave in the medium of the Aether and is created by the frequency of the particles flakes pulsing in and out.

This is how I see this operating with no consumption on the micro based world. It has been influenced by my observations and based on some of the observations of others as well. Some of this has also come from what I see in my head. Where it comes from I don't know but it feels right.

One of the observations of this standing wave and it's forms are the Cymatic experiments. If one took that example and made it work in 3d with no "gravity" then you would see that it resembles the atom perfectly.

forest · « **Reply #18 on:** July 30, 2011, 03:16:36 PM »

Ehmm.. what is that thing called "charge" ?

jbignes5 · « **Reply #19 on:** July 30, 2011, 05:11:36 PM »

Another excellent question!

A charge is merely the Aetheric conductors with binding smaller charges in between the conductors. The conductors are crystal shards much larger then the medium of fine conductors. This enables them to conduct across much larger spans of the medium. Much like how a needle can float on water and turn twords a magnetic field so does these conductors. The charges are merely smaller versions of the larger conductors with a smaller sub set of charges in between them. At some point the medium itself is all the same density of very very fine crystal conductors with the void of space in between them. But that is the ultimate dimension as far as we are considered.

So back to that charges.

Remember my explanation of the shape of these conductors? Well they would look like this:

*|> *|> *|> *|> *|> *

The * is charge sitting at the base of these shards. The shards themselves by virtue of it's shape concentrate the potential of the charge from behind. This gives the shard a bigger potential at the tip. This is proved by Tesla's experiments with conical shaped coils. It's the same effect. So this amplification of the potential of the base charge binds it to the charge in front of it by virtue of a difference in potential. The tip has a higher potential and this holds it to the next base charge. This is a string or line of force. A charge is a string in the form of a loop. The charge also at some point folds and look like a mass of worms. Constantly writhing and in constant motion and is held to the base of the conductor because of the shielding it provides from the medium it floats in. So the conductor is also the vehicle for the charge and it moves simply by the higher potential at the tip attracting small little tendrils that conduct that high potential and are in constant search for other potentials to connect to that are lower or higher then their own potential at the tip.

We must at some point understand that the medium of the Aether is in some kind of 3d grid network. Where there is little charges in between these lines they become bridges to charges where ever they may be. Even spanning light years or million of light years. Where there is little charges we can expect what we call the vacuum. The vacuum is just lines with very few charges. The power of the lines is based solely on the matter surrounding the network. Since matter like planets have a huge potential inside it, it literally sucks the matter to the lowest value of it's state. This is evident by the process an object goes through when it falls into this network. The charges that are in the object get leeched out of the object and it becomes frozen and lifeless. This is also what process that water goes through as it turns to snow. And this shows you how unique each inch of our space around our planet (Atmosphere) is. Matter makes that happen like gases and matter like that.

Charges that are much bigger can ride in between the networks and be accelerated to the fastest that the charge can go. This by the way is what we call Light. But that by no means is the ultimate speed. Because this charge does have a mass it is much slower then what the network is capable of going. These are invisible radiations we see in our world like gamma and beta radiation or even waves like infra red and ultraviolet. I have not worked out all the parameters of the different spectrum of light but I think the concept is sound.

I hope this helps.

Oh by the way a great man one day got a novel idea and it turns out he might have been seeing the same thing as me. Here is a peek at his novel idea:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sierpinski_pyramid.png

As you can see if you Zoom in on the picture you will see how these shard orient themselves to create much larger geometries of itself. If you were to flip the blue one and put them base to base you can see how one would contain more charges in the red one and how the blue one would contain less charges. Plus they all go the same direction then a constant flow would happen. One end (red) would be highly charged because it basically has unlimited storage and the blue one has more mass not being able to store much. This could be considered positive(red) and negative(blue). But these are not charges they are the structure of vehicles that will contain charges and are made up of larger crystal shards of the medium of Aether or conductors.

jbignes5 · « **Reply #20 on:** July 30, 2011, 06:53:57 PM »

Since I mentioned pyramidal shapes lets look at the biggest example of it in our natural world. Yes, the Great Pyramids were a monument to this secret. It was also a working device as is told by the bible that many hold sacred. The Ark of the covenant was indeed a great capacitor designed to hold a certain amount of potential and allow for the pyramid to be controlled. Water was used around the pyramid to provide storage and collection of charges and as a supply of the conductors(Aether) for it's operation. The bible tells about how the Ark was filled with the power of God and was used for two important reasons. The Ark was a device to allow the transport of any sized stone they needed to move due to it's great capacity for this energy the pyramids supplied and as a great weapon of protection for the Egyptians.

The pyramids were built in small steps. The smaller pyramids were used to build the larger ones. This is why there are several smaller pyramids around the larger one. These were merely charging stations for the arks when the larger pyramid was being built. It allowed them to float the great massive stones with the power of the earths own potential by using the Ark to contain an equal charge as the earth. Then just raise the Arks potential slightly by taps on the electrode on the top and they will float anything they wanted. Like a bubble in water it will rise.

Also if one reads about The Ark and the Philistine's who stole the ark you would see that there was a certain ritual one had to go through to even get close to the Ark. This was a process of oiling and smoking your body with incenses. Well basically making a suit of protection or barrier for the body. Much like the Philistine's who stole the Ark soon after were begging the christians to take it back since anyone who went near it was killed by radiations the Ark gave off from being charged. Now the only reason I bring the bible up or mention it is that the information about the Ark is very clear record of a people who stole the technology (Mosses). In actuality Mosses was an Egyptian who converted to Christianity and knew what the Ark was used for and it's power. He also knew that what was being done to the people was very wrong. All accounts of the Ark from that point on are spectacular to say the least. It floated on it's own following what I suspected was the internal lines of our planet for 40 years. When it discharged the people would wait for it to recharge because the ark settled into places of great conduction. When the Ark depleted itself it simply laid itself down and waited for itself to equalize with the potential of the earth. Remember that when like polarities equalize they push apart causing the Ark to levitate and follow the lines again.

Now what was the Pyramid for then and why did the Egyptian lands become fertile as they were? Well when you have that amount of energy being siphoned off of the Earth and being stored in water what do you think happened? The water became very energized and accelerated growth of both man and plant through the energy that the water contained. This was the third reason for the pyramid. A desert that came to life and supported life.

Now did the Egyptians come up with this technology? I highly doubt it. I think it was a leftover from a more advanced civilization that probably died off from self annihilation. Why do I think this well there are a great many clues that the elder races knew way more about the natural processes then we give em credit for. There are many many caches of very old texts that talk about these civilizations and even about the daily events of these peoples. The Vedas being the most notable.
So how did the Egyptians figure this stuff out. Well they were taught by the library they had access to at the time. It could be the reputed library of Alexander or even access to greek libraries. A lot of information was also stored there since this device was a very powerful device and the priests or technicians needed them for reference. If the device ran out of control it could be very dangerous and the priests were the controllers. After many years they kept the information in storage for safety and forgot what it was for and the Egyptian people turned it into mysticism for the parts that were left in view. After all the christians took the central component and ran with it(the Ark).
After awhile it became a natural process because the priests taught by word of mouth from what they remembered with only a very few that had access to the library. The longer the time went by the more they didn't understand the device anymore. And gods were born.

Have you ever thought if you could go back in time only armed with a bic lighter, what would happen when the cavemen saw you use it? How would they would view you? Maybe as the great fire god?

The shape of the pyramid is a great charge pump. What was it's intended purpose then? Well what problems are we having today? Our world is becoming what it used to be. Very Very Energetic planet! Why? Because over the 1000's of years the charge level in and around our planet has become 1000's of times larger creating a lot of chaos. If It doesn't get equalized it might rips us apart from the inside out! I really thing there is the same crystals inside our planet and they are growing more energetic because there is more to channel through them now.

Mark my words these energetic events we are seeing is only going to get worse unless we can draw off some of the built up charges in our center of mass. The pyramids true intentions was one of a planetary equalizer. Because there is only so much mass in the universe if the mass doesn't equal our charge level deep inside our planet then we have a major imbalance and things will get more forceful. Increased super storms and earth quakes are only the beginning unless we get back to what we used to know about us and our world.

Ok enough of that. I had to bring that up because much has been hidden from our eyes. We are merely scratching the surface of the true potential we hold and truth must be one of those discoveries that we scratch.

aromaz · « **Reply #21 on:** July 31, 2011, 04:14:06 AM »

@jbignes5; I am mostly busy with practical experiments; thus not so much on the forums anymore.

Your post #17:
Direction at event horizon? In which direction does it go? Some people say inwards, some say outwards. It is like when you look at a bike wheel; sometimes the optical illusion make it look as if in wrong direction.

My opinion is that the event horizon it bi-directional. Matter goes inwards, re-charged ready-to-become-matter Aether goes outwards. I think we have a torus like vortex right there. Same as in any vortex anything that goes in must come out somewhere else.

By creating the one polarity (+) you automatically creates the other in opposition. Thus there can be neither alone. There CAN NOT be a monopole.

I disagree with the matter run forever. If there is no motion, matter will seize to exist. At all time matter must get recharged, even on atomic level. That recharge is by means of vibration, energy, light, sound - LIFE. You ever noticed in museums that objects even sealed in a perfect enclosure of glass, still has dust developing on and around them? That is the continues atomic disassociation - atoms that did not get charged and slowed down too far.

aromaz · « **Reply #22 on:** July 31, 2011, 04:17:20 AM »

@Forest; you are asking a question that no current accepted model can explain without breaking all their laws. That was one of the problems I got stuck with more than two years ago. Allow me to present you with another theory. I had to go right back to the beginning - The Origin of matter. for sake of explaning I will remain with current 'lables'.

The smallest unit of matter is the photon. A photon is neither positive nor negative, but in order to be a form of matter it MUST have both charges, in equal amounts. For sake of argement let us say a Photon has one unit of POS and one unit of NEG. Then these must be separated, else BOOM! and no photon. The separation is by means of what I call Sound-Light.

A few photon units will make an electron, a few electrons forms a proton, proton plus electron becomes neutron . . .

What is happening? Imagine a swirling ball of three colours: Red, Blue and White. (See sphere below) All three colours are swirling around and inter mixing - but not blending. The red wants to merge witht he blue - but the white keeps them separated. The Red is the positive charge, the Blue is the negative charge and the White is the Sound-Light barrier that keeps them apart. There are equal amounts of red and blue on the anterior and posterior; thus no charge.

Sometimes something can happen and the swirling gets separated into two layers. Now we have Red on outside and Blue on inside with a layer of white separating them. Imagine a tennis ball - green fur on outside, white reinforced rubber in middle with brown or black rubber on inside. We have the positive charge on outside - we measure and call it a positive charged particle. In truth, the outside is charge as we perceive, but the inside has exactly the same strength of opposite charge.

By nature the positive of one particle will be attracted to the negative of another - hence you can build the atom. Now, most atoms are only a single 'sphere' but there are a few that could manifest as binary atoms. Here we will have to imagine a 3D form of figure 8.

Take a strip of paper, say 30 cm long, Colour one side Blue and the other red. Now take in your two hands and twist the right point 180 degrees. Then bring the two points together to form the 8. On the one half circle you will have red on outside and blue inside, on the other half circle you will have the opposite.

What you hold in your hand is the only explanation of why some material can hold and move electrical current. It is also the only explanation of magnetism.

jbignes5 · « **Reply #23 on:** July 31, 2011, 02:20:17 PM »

Quote from: aromaz on July 31, 2011, 04:14:06 AM

@jbignes5; I am mostly busy with practical experiments; thus not so much on the forums anymore.

Your post #17:
Direction at event horizon? In which direction does it go? Some people say inwards, some say outwards. It is like when you look at a bike wheel; sometimes the optical illusion make it look as if in wrong direction.

My opinion is that the event horizon it bi-directional. Matter goes inwards, re-charged ready-to-become-matter Aether goes outwards. I think we have a torus like vortex right there. Same as in any vortex anything that goes in must come out somewhere else.

By creating the one polarity (+) you automatically creates the other in opposition. Thus there can be neither alone. There CAN NOT be a monopole.

I disagree with the matter run forever. If there is no motion, matter will seize to exist. At all time matter must get recharged, even on atomic level. That recharge is by means of vibration, energy, light, sound - LIFE. You ever noticed in museums that objects even sealed in a perfect enclosure of glass, still has dust developing on and around them? That is the continues atomic disassociation - atoms that did not get charged and slowed down too far.

Well the direction is either in or out. There are two sides to the event horizon. Think of it like the surface to water in a tub. The event horizon is the surface of the water. When you pull the plug to the tub eventually there forms the swirling inlet. The other side of the event horizon is the drain or out. Lets look at this example:

http://www.geekosystem.com/furthest-largest-water/

The picture I want to concentrate on is the blue one with two plumes. If we look at it like one side is the in and the other is the out you can see a density change. Meaning one plume is characteristic of an inlet or the vortex and the other out is characteristic of a hose spraying or outlet. There is a density change between the two and they have characteristics that differentiate the two. We can also think of the black hole as a boundary layer. One side has the charges that act much like a pool of water and the other side is conductors with no charges. The event horizon then is the surface of these charges or pool and the plume that is more characteristic of a spray is the geyser. What sits between the two is a crystal that is shaped much like a pyramid. And that shape allows it to channel charges through it's structure and pressurize the charges and gives them force.

Also polarity in my opinion has always been just one sided. meaning there is only one polarity +. We have seen from Tesla's experiments and our own that you can in fact have this polarity mimic the negative or direction of negative by being lower then then ambient. In this case polarity is only a direction but it is still a positive potential on the whole. Because positive is the only attraction in the universe. For instance:

(***) <-3 units of charge (polarity >) (****) <-4 units of charge
(****) (polarity <) (***)

The flow in these cases are the polarity < >. Now the lesser charge would seem to be the negative and the higher the positive. Just like in the Tesla switch. And this works just like our regular electronics but there is no Negative per say. With the Tesla switch we see that there is a lesser draw on the source as well and this is what I suspect is the driving force behind all of nature. This is why it costs nature near nothing to run and is just a shifting game back and forth using the balance mechanism that is built into this process.

The "negative" is just the ability to hook between two potentials or the Aetheric medium. In the case of the Tesla switch the negatives are hooked together and form the common connection between the positives. It is the channel that provides the bridge between two points or two potentials. This connector is merely a conductor and it has no value for itself.

aromaz · « **Reply #24 on:** July 31, 2011, 03:34:48 PM »

Quote from: jbignes5 on July 31, 2011, 02:20:17 PM

.... The "negative" is just the ability to hook between two potentials or the Aetheric medium. In the case of the Tesla switch the negatives are hooked together and form the common connection between the positives. It is the channel that provides the bridge between two points or two potentials. This connector is merely a conductor and it has no value for itself.

If you ever studied the vortex, you will fail to understand why modern astonomy can't understand the pulses/energy from black holes. In reference to your water vortex, I will ask you one big question. In referernce for answer see Viktor Schauberger - 'How does the trout become able to swim upstream, even up a waterfall?. by the way, they do not 'jump' up.

In light of one of my current series of experiments - a vortex is NOT just like water flowing out a drain when you pull the plug. There is also a counter flow in opposite direction.

As for polarity - there is actually no positive or negative; North or South. Because of the wrong impression I nowadays understand why some older people prefered to use the terms of Male and Female. The one can't be without the other. In your viewpoint there is always 'negative'? Then negative must be monopole?

jbignes5 · « **Reply #25 on:** July 31, 2011, 04:22:28 PM »

Quote from: aromaz on July 31, 2011, 03:34:48 PM

If you ever studied the vortex, you will fail to understand why modern astonomy can't understand the pulses/energy from black holes. In reference to your water vortex, I will ask you one big question. In referernce for answer see Viktor Schauberger - 'How does the trout become able to swim upstream, even up a waterfall?. by the way, they do not 'jump' up.

In light of one of my current series of experiments - a vortex is NOT just like water flowing out a drain when you pull the plug. There is also a counter flow in opposite direction.

As for polarity - there is actually no positive or negative; North or South. Because of the wrong impression I nowadays understand why some older people prefered to use the terms of Male and Female. The one can't be without the other. In your viewpoint there is always 'negative'? Then negative must be monopole?

So you haven't seen the universe move like it is a fluid then?

Our space behaves much like water. what is below is the energy or charges that we float in. What is above is the "negative" or conductors of the positive. yes there is some of each on the bottom because they conduct positive charges or motion. The negative can be considered neutral if they don't have a charge in tow. They conduct the potential of the charge in tow and thats all the conductors do. They conduct over a much larger distance then the charges are capable of. This is how potentials are referenced: by a bridge (conductor). If that conductor was not present then all movement would seize because one charge would have no way to reference the other, even if they were right next to each other.

Of course there is a counter flow to the vortex but in our case that counter flow is merely the conductors moving away from the attractive potential as it looses the charge it was sheltering. Even in a tub you can hear the gurgling and suction as the water goes down the drain. That is a reverse flow but in the case of black holes there is no matter to react with so we don't "hear" that or even sense it because you can not sense these conductors(Aetheric).

By virtue of the shape of this conductor or vehicle it is a monopole. The base is always less in potential then the tip. This makes a bigger potential on the tip as opposed to the base. This is by virtue of the shape of this conductor. The pyramid is such a conductor shape. As Tesla figured out with conical coil they focus the energy from the base to the tip. Because the base has more surface area on that plane then when compared to the tip it in effect makes more potential given the surface area. Meaning the same potential but in a smaller area. The shape also gives these conductors the ability to travel much faster then a normal charge without a vehicle shaped like such. If space moves like a fluid in mass (all of space) then it must follow the laws of fluid dynamics like Tesla suspected.

Have you ever seen plasma's in the electrical sense? They are much like water and I suspect they are the final phase of matter and energy on the whole. This is the last phase change that matter can have and it's potential is way more then any other phase of matter and energy. With solids being the lowest.

Can you argue anything otherwise about the Tesla references I have stated like the Tesla switch. That is proof positive that two + potentials when connected together creates a flow that is useful and that does not deplete the source.

We have to understand that our views of the universe and simplistic energy has been screwed up but the inventions we current hold fast to. The model only describes that system we have designed and not the universe and how it operates. Thats why physics can not accurately describe anything beyond that system. On the other hand it describes accurately the system for which it was designed on. Thats system will never show OU in the least bit. At best it will only attain a balance in the perfect sense. While the Universal physics is based on a much different concept. The balance ability of the Universe is only based on the teeter tawter effect. With the pivot being the ambient measurement. When you change the density of one side the teeter tawter adjusts based on the the conductor or board layed across the pivot. This is the balancing effect of the medium of the Aether. It tends to want to balance with the ambient. Anything else needs energy of movement to compensates that imbalance. Like osmosis. The lowest end will draw in charges to compensate for the lack of charges from the ambient till it can attain the balance and the high end will tend to reverse the osmosis and bleed charges to the ambient till the density lowers. <thats a concept not fully understood by our science.

The whole reason we have cycles is because of this balancing mechanics that nature provides vie these conductors. It is why we can see great distances and it is the reason we can transmit signals trough space. It is what waves are in the medium of the Aether and we have mistaken these mechanics for Magnetism. It is the whole reason magnetism works and it completely explains gravity by the flow of this network twords a higher potential then the ambient of space. The flow is merely an attraction of the potential to a higher one just like in the Tesla experiments. And the flow is controllable through these attraction of potential to a higher one.

If we take this to a new level then you might understand the concept better. Lets take water in our space around our planet. if we scoop out a cup of water it gets replaced very very quickly by the ambient level of the water. If we merely slap our hand on the surface it will start to oscillate and continue to do so till the balancing mechanism of water and tension reduce the waves to the ambient again. This is all due the the network of charges that are around our potential in our planet flowing twords that central spot. It is a pressure flowing inwards and out the poles of our planet. And it is the reason we have an equator as well. The equator is the balance point. Either the in or out point. I havent figured out yet which it is. The resulting flows interact with the matter of our atmosphere and create complex cycles. One reliant on the other and ultimately reliant on the base interaction of the Aether. Even the magnetic flows around our world is created from this flow and it is why they are even there in the first place.

jbignes5 · « **Reply #26 on:** July 31, 2011, 04:34:41 PM »

Here is a good redition of what I am talking about. Don't read the story stuff below it and only pay attention to the picture.

http://archives.realvail.com/RealRhetoric/382/Creationism-deadly-black-holes-911-conspiracies-global-warming-hoaxes-and-other-myths-Part-II.html

If we look at the surface of the "Water" and think of the plume going up as a spray on what the black mass floating in it is spraying up then gets attracted back down twords the sea of energy we and it float in. Thats what turns it back to the surface then gets cycled back to the accelerator. I believe that maybe there is two guns. One pointing up from the plane of energy and the other pointing down. One plays with energy or charges and the other is a reaction of these conductors after releasing the charges they carry. When referencing one to the other one will be very heavy in density with energy and the other is depleted of energy. They could be considered opposites but there is no negative per say. Just an absence of positive or just the neutral(conductor) I referenced earlier.

If we then look at geysers on our own planet we can see the same action.

jbignes5 · « **Reply #27 on:** July 31, 2011, 07:38:49 PM »

I wanted to talk more about Cymatics. Link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cymatics

When we have a super fine medium like salt or sand that has a specific geometry to it's particles That geometry can bleed through and effect the mass of these particles. In this case the particles are pyramidal in shape or even the double ended version the Tetrahedron. Well that is the 6 sided version. I am thinking that is the correct number. The number 3 is very sacred in the ancient beliefs. So a double ended version would be the Tetrahedron.

More later

supersam · « **Reply #28 on:** July 31, 2011, 09:41:58 PM »

@j
tetrhedrons refer to ten sided geometric objects. however, i agree that marco rodin's nine theories or threes as you might like to look at have alot of theoritical potential.

lol
sam
ps: keep the good work!

jbignes5 · « **Reply #29 on:** August 01, 2011, 02:11:03 PM »

Really?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetrahedron

Ok so if we look at the Sierpinski triangle That would be the 5 sided version with a square as a base and the 4 sided version which is a tetrahedron, we can see fractals come into the picture. We also see new rules from the Sierpinski triangle. These rules are based on curved verses sharp edges and how they align with other edges. This alignment is caused by the medium itself. The medium lines up with the much larger crystals allowing them to form bridges and apply force to keep those bridges aligned and together. This is because there is a potential difference between one base and another tip. With the edges being the nearest connection point when referenced to the base. It might be better to zoom into the picture of the square based pyramid(Sierpinski triangle, 3d version) to see how this would align.

I'm leaning on the 3 faced pyramid only because 3 and 6 are pretty important to the ancients. Almost every society has these as sacred. Even Christianity has the trinity or the 3 faces of God. And two would equal 6 or the double ended crystal. Remember that the double ended crystal has both the red and blue Sierpinski triangle (3d version).

Now is there any evidence in nature that this is exactly the numbers. Well yes...

Lets look at what I consider the condensed Aether(Conductor) water and how that works in nature when it freezes.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f2/Snowflake_-_Microphotograph_by_artgeek.jpg

Right here we have 6 conductors going twords the source junction. I believe this junction is 6 sided for only one reason. When a charge binds the two halves together the tips are generally the same polarity meaning they would self organize and the tips would push them away from each other. They both would have the same amount of charge from the source on the base because that area has nearly the same value. So the pyramids orient themselves with a 45 degree twist. If we then make a line around those bases you would see a Hexagon. The hexagon is made as the water gets attracted to the flow line approaching the network node of space. It rides this line much like water flowing down a thread. It beads up then slips down the thread or conductor line in a teardrop shape. When the water hits the nodes it sucks any charges out of the water and the water freezes in the shape we see in just about all snowflakes. Every picture we see of snowflakes have this geometry in the center with 6 radiating lines going out from there. I really think we are seeing a snapshot of this network when we look at snowflakes. because water is a low end phase changer it can and will take a picture of what is leeching these charges from the water.

If you are starting to think that water is the only proof then you are mistaken. Lets look at metals now. How about our favorite metal of choice when it comes to electronics. Copper:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Cu-Scheibe.JPG

This is a copper disk that was etched with acid after making it in that form and it clearly shows the six sided geometry in it as well! If you were to continue you would notice that anything that has been formed through a phase change has this pattern in it to some degree.

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: Aether and what it is. (Read 65212 times)

jbignes5

Re: Aether and what it is.

aromaz

Re: Aether and what it is.

jbignes5

Re: Aether and what it is.

forest

Re: Aether and what it is.

jbignes5

Re: Aether and what it is.

jbignes5

Re: Aether and what it is.

aromaz

Re: Aether and what it is.

aromaz

Re: Aether and what it is.

jbignes5

Re: Aether and what it is.

aromaz

Re: Aether and what it is.

jbignes5

Re: Aether and what it is.

jbignes5

Re: Aether and what it is.

jbignes5

Re: Aether and what it is.

supersam

Re: Aether and what it is.

jbignes5

Re: Aether and what it is.