New theories about free energy systems > The Aether
Extracting energy from the aether
volantis:
--- Quote from: mikestocks2006 on June 07, 2006, 07:04:47 PM ---Interesting, thanks.
So you do want to have the light effect and ability to capture those materialized photons in some kind of Faraday cage? and convert them to usable electricity. Will the usable electricity out be enough to power the device and leave some extra fo other uses?
--- End quote ---
Yes, we need some kind of Faraday cage, or antenna, to capture the photons and convert them to electrons. And yes, we need the light effect. However, the light can be in the non-visible spectrums as well.
--- Quote ---I was reading Tesla's development of the magnifying transmitter, and he actually tried to minimize the "light" effect as he thought it was resulting in loss of transmitive energy. However in your system the more light the better. Nice.
--- End quote ---
Actually, Tesla wanted to minimize the light surrounding the secondary and primary coils. This is corona, which also may be free energy, but this corona is caused by leakage from the coils. The leaking coils reduces the potential that can be generated at the top load. I don't believe Tesla ever tried to reduce light in a controlled plasma (such as a vacuum tube) or above the topload (such as reportedly occurred when Wardencliffe was started up that one night).
--- Quote ---Also regarding the Pierce Arrow power supply. According to all the account from back then, it appeared to be silent. Since the spark gap process does create a crackling / buzzing sound (frequency dependent?), is it fair to assume that his power supply in the car did not use a spark gap, and the 12 tubes were used mainly as collectors?
--- End quote ---
I'm working on the hypothesis that there was no spark gap except inside the vacuum tubes. There had to be a spark gap somewhere, as Tesla needed some kind of capacitive storage and sudden discharge to keep the electrical oscillation going. I further hypothesize the vacuum tubes have various purposes but were primarily components of an oscillator circuit.
--- Quote ---Maybe he had a magnifying transmitter (smaller version than the one destroyed) somewhere in the general geographical area and was taping into that?
--- End quote ---
I have heard this hypothesis before, including from (I believe) Tesla's last known assistant. It wouldn't make sense to me in the theory I'm working with. Although the magnifier Tesla talked about could transmit power, it could only do so by resonating the entire Earth's electrostatic field. A small magnifier couldn't do that.
--- Quote ---On the Zennek standing waves, what frequencies are you targeting?
The Aether Physics work is simply fascinating.
--- End quote ---
I'm going to try various frequencies, but I am definitely aiming for 7.8Hz, 60Hz, 400Hz, and 3600Hz. These represent the Schumann resonance, standard us power transmission in a house, and military power frequencies. These are all strong ground frequencies and may allow me to run the device without the second sphere. Also, I have AC motors that work at 60, 400, and 3600Hz. But I will also attempt to run a two-sphere setup, as Tesla's car apparently used.
etherize:
Regarding Tesla's Pierce Arrow the small device you described with the twelve tubes is a smaller, refined version of his magnifying transmitter. The magnifing transmitter itself works on the radiant energy principle put forth by Tesla in his research. Initaily high potential DC impules (capacitors) were used to create the radiant energy. It was nessesary to create something to convert this energy into a usable form. Enter the twelve tubes. I am guessing but I believe the copper spheres where used to "collect" "focus" the radiant energy into his system. You Should really read the work of Dr. Libermann I believe his name is. Regarding The Grey motor and its use of "cold electricity" which is converted radiant energy. This form of "cold Electricity" is exactly what Tesla was working with. According to Tesla this energy was very close to using pure ether without the trappings of electrons and other associated matter. It is a "higher" version of electricity, or more refined. As our current production of electricity is destructive ie. heat producing.
lancaIV:
How can you argument that the dielectric influence is less
destructive than the conventional electricity use ?
Could there not be the danger of a biogenetical transmutation
through the non-limited use of this kind of radiation ?
S
dL
p.s.:Less destructive like the N-bomb ?
etherize:
IancaIV,
I am not arguing, the term radiant energy is a description coined by Tesla to describe the ray-like projection of this energy. The nature (destructive or non-destructive) of any energy is determined by the primary impuse which creates it. In other words the universe uses this type of longitudial wave to promote creation and life. When we seek to create things like electricity we overlook the primary impulse which creates it. That is what makes "our" electricity destructive (Harmful). An interesting read is "The Energy Evolution" translated and edited by Callum Coats. It concerns the work of Viktor Schauberger. It will really blow your mind.
lancaIV:
Aether=microVortice/Vortex today also called plasma
Hello etherize,
Dr.Camus,Prof.Kanarev,P.Chambrin,S-Ormes et cetera....
-when something shall blow my mind then only "boring"maths,
not physical structures !
I emphaize that 100% of electricity is "water"/-derivates related,
and the biologic structure of us ,humans,is over 70% "water" !
I reed also about Victor Schauberger and his live-work,
something what today could be called "BIONIK-science",
but his kind of solutions differ from my targets !
S
dL
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version