Thank God for Replicators
The Lutec people sound nice but I predict the first and only true free energy machine will come from someone who freely publishes the exact designs with parts list, where they bought the parts, of an easy to build, inexpensive, public domain, self running / smoking gun, free energy machine that will hopefully put out sufficient power.  Additionally they should provide details of the power and efficiency measurements.  How can we expect anything less?

I hope nobody gets discouraged by all the noise in the free energy community.  I see far too many people making claims without any evidence.  Sometimes they even publish their designs, and God Bless those who always take the time to replicate it.  My main concern is that when the real deal arrives, that everyone is not burnt out, discouraged, and skeptical!!!!!!!  When such a person provides the following, then I hope everyone builds it:


[/color]

By providing the above, anyone who knows how to measure efficiency can determine if you're machine is the real deal.  This can save a lot of time and money from legitimate researchers and people who take the time to replicate.  If they determine your machine is generating free energy, then they can build it.  If replicators have free time and are searching for a machine to replicate, and according to your efficiency measurements and design they think your machine has potential, then by all means please replicate.  Just please don't get discouraged if the machine turns out to be a noise generator; i.e., machines designed by people who just want to cause discouragement and noise in the free energy community.

Once you have verified your machine is generating free energy, then I believe time is of the essence.  It's vital that you get the information out to the public as quickly as possible.  The clock will be ticking.  Just please be absolutely certain you have the real deal.  You must have the Smoking Gun.  That is, a machine that recirculates enough energy back into itself so that it will run forever in addition to producing sufficient extra power.  I think a good demonstration is to burn florescent light bulbs.  If you have the smoking gun, then take the time to create a detailed paper how anyone would build such a machine.  Clearly state at the top your machine is freely published, that you have no intensions of scamming the public, no stocks for sell, nothing.  Be very specific.  Make as many Xerox copies as you can when the paper is complete.  You will want to hand out thousands.  Email the paper to the free energy forums and website admins.  Hit the road as soon as possible and demonstrate your machine to everyone while handing out your paper.  Make sure everyone knows you are not selling but rather freely publishing the designs.  Try your best to get media attention.  Demonstrate your machine to as many people as possible, but please don't break any laws and cause traffic jams, etc.  The police may see you as a quack and arrest you.  The idea is to hand out as many copies of your paper as possible.  If you can get enough people to replicate your machine then it will take off on its own.  Eventually, if you can afford, you'll want to build as many units as you can, within a reasonable amount of time.  Find scientists or teachers that you trust, someone who's around a lot of people.  You can lend them a copy of your machine.  Just imagine what an electronics teacher would think if you walked in his or her class with an open machine that's clearly generating a lot of free energy.  The idea is to generate a spark in the public-- to get enough people building your machine.  This may sound simple, but it's very possible you'll have to push your machine.  The public will be skeptical.  Don't waste your time trying to convince people.  There will always be people who will believe.  It's a numbers game.  If you get enough people replicating your machine then it will take off.  You'll increase your chances and speed up the process with more people replicating your machine.  You know the old saying, "You snooze you lose." 

Kind regards,
Paul

Dear Bruce,

You say that you're slowly releasing its functionality.  That implies that you are not yet finished releasing its functionality.

What you describe IMHO is not in the same class as what I'm describing.  I'm talking about a machine that anyone can build for under a few hundred dollars in a reasonable amount of time.  I'm talking about complete build instructions down to every detail including where the inventor purchased ever parts.  If anyone can order the parts and build it in a reasonable amount of time and if it generates at least a kilowatt of power then such a public domain machine will take off globally in a matter of weeks.

I wish that you would release everything.  Until then I cannot take anything you say seriously.

Sincerely,
Paul

I want the world to benefit from the diode array as soon as possible and expect it to quickly become a commodity where all producers have to race towards ever lower sales price and increasing production once it makes clearly noticable power. For the moment it has to be refined with expensive nanofabrication equipment. A lot of this equipment is in the heart of academia where a solid backbone of people accept the second law of thermodynamics and don't want to consider that 2LT fades on the nanometer scale. If (This is the scientific if) the diode array works then applied nanofabrication equipment should evolve with rapidy declining cost. The great break hasn't come yet - the concept has not been built on nanofabrication equipment so far. People can replicate the proof of principle prototype with stray microchips and some lab technique to see if more than 1/2 kTB can be obtained from heat with no bulk temperature difference. This replication is expensive and the output is small but the original experiments have encouraged me. The latest ray of hope is that a man from Honeywell contacted me after hearing me call in to Coast to Coast Weekend with Art Bell when Charles Ostgood, a nanotechnology expert was a guest. Let's get this massive show on the road.

Hi Charlie,

? ?Why not ask Stefan if he can post the info., & diagrams somewhere for all to see? If this is an original, then you've already got a great many witnesses that it was your baby, right? Your already well known in the energy circles and we can't afford to wait for corporation's to decide when to move on it, we all know thats for sure! Honeywell contracts heavily with the military besides, and it all goes back to the dark side if-you-will, lol. Let's keep this in the open Charlie, that way it's not likely to disappear into the shadows.

Cheers,

Bush WACKER

The evidence was obtained in 1993 by commissioning a lab that I lost track of to convert a microchip diode patch of ~5,600 2.3 micron dia Au anodes in SiO2 on N type GaAs from what is now Virginia Diodes Inc. into a diode array by applying conductive paste to its face and testing it. The tests showed ~25 kTB which is somewhat more than the 1/2 kTB theoretically possible from one perfect diode, demonstrating that Johnson Noise can be rectified and aggregated which means that the diode array works in principle. This is a strong challenge to 2LT. Replication of experiments would be appreciated. Moving on to a practical prototype be improving the performance many orders of magnitude by applying C60 buckyballs at a concentration of 10^11 / cm2 to the face of a micrometer thick N type InSb substrate would be bolder.  The world waits in desperate circumstances.

Aloha, Charlie

an idea is as strong as it's weakest link.

being a primadonna and sitting on a real idea has been shown to be a quick ticket to the morgue.
instead of being a sitting duck for all the big gun industerialist, give away 'a basic working system', then do as the brownbag software folks have done for years. when an idea or a system is proven in the real world of daily useage, the idea sells itself. when many different people have a real working system or item in hand, you can sell the 'upgrades for your profit'.(read this as 'delayed larger profit'.)
 
if an idea is really useful, such as new or novel software, the brownbag system of distribution is a viable way for distribution of those ideas and software and equipment. (and it has proven to keep honest folks out of the morgue)

i suggest this brownbag way of 'selling/profiting' may merit being investigated as a viable way to 'sell your ideas' without having to die for them..

dan

Yes but we're talking about giving the world free energy, not making an individual filthy rich.  I say to first publish.  Publishing only takes a matter of minutes on the internet.  I don't know much about patents but if it's that difficult then what about my suggestion for a quick self patent.  There are a lot of books on the self patent method.

Sincerely,
Paul

I work for two of the most recognised Intellectual Property authorities in the states (one of them around the world).--they have testified before the legilatures of the US, Japan, China, Indonesia, et al.   I can tell you that TM protection is different from Patent in that you trade mark names, slogans, and logos.  The function of the device is a non-issue.  If you wanted to protect a box that you claimed fairies lived in, you could.  If you called it the Fairy Palace, no one else would be able to use that name, also the graphic of how you present that name is protected.  TM is marketing protection, it is pretty strong, at that.  Branding(as it is called) is oftem more important than function or quality.  It is easier to get a TM registered, than a patent, and even similar names and logos can be prosecuted.