Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Magnetic monopole  (Read 12868 times)

quantumtangles

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 140
Magnetic monopole
« on: May 13, 2011, 06:16:04 PM »
I posted a thought about using bismuth arrays and neodymium magnets in the solid state physics section.

The thread was met by a rip-roaring silence.

So here it is in the correct forum. Apologies for the repetition.

Bismuth is strongly diamagnetic (creating a magnetic field only in response to externally applied magnetic fields).

It occurred to me that if any configuration of Bismuth and neodymium can perform useful work (for example a bismuth/neodymium sandwich with or without a dielectric) this could possibly be because it constitutes or behaves like a magnetic monopole (that enigmatic theoretically impossible magnet with no back emf).

By way of example, consider a capacitor built to store magnetic force in Tesla rather than charge in coulombs.

Thin layers of neodymium separated by layers of bismuth 'dielectric', all rolled together into a cylinder.

External magnetic fields would then be applied to the 'poles' of the capacitor from a distance sufficient to prevent the external magnetic fields cancelling each other out.

Or conventional electric charge could be applied to the terminals of the magnetic capacitor.

Could such a device store magnetic energy in mono-polar (or indeed in any) form?

I thought I would throw the idea into the arena to see what you think.

Again apologies for the repetition from the solid state physics section.
« Last Edit: May 13, 2011, 06:46:57 PM by quantumtangles »

Low-Q

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2847
Re: Magnetic monopole
« Reply #1 on: May 16, 2011, 08:49:24 PM »
I posted a thought about using bismuth arrays and neodymium magnets in the solid state physics section.

The thread was met by a rip-roaring silence.

So here it is in the correct forum. Apologies for the repetition.

Bismuth is strongly diamagnetic (creating a magnetic field only in response to externally applied magnetic fields).

It occurred to me that if any configuration of Bismuth and neodymium can perform useful work (for example a bismuth/neodymium sandwich with or without a dielectric) this could possibly be because it constitutes or behaves like a magnetic monopole (that enigmatic theoretically impossible magnet with no back emf).

By way of example, consider a capacitor built to store magnetic force in Tesla rather than charge in coulombs.

Thin layers of neodymium separated by layers of bismuth 'dielectric', all rolled together into a cylinder.

External magnetic fields would then be applied to the 'poles' of the capacitor from a distance sufficient to prevent the external magnetic fields cancelling each other out.

Or conventional electric charge could be applied to the terminals of the magnetic capacitor.

Could such a device store magnetic energy in mono-polar (or indeed in any) form?

I thought I would throw the idea into the arena to see what you think.

Again apologies for the repetition from the solid state physics section.
This kind of metal is cool stuff. But it does only "reverse" magnetic polarity in itself when approaching a magnet. It will unfortunatly not make a monopole - just "mirroring" the external magnetic field.

Vidar

quantumtangles

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 140
Re: Magnetic monopole
« Reply #2 on: May 17, 2011, 04:39:33 PM »
Many thanks Vidar.

khabe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 525
Re: Magnetic monopole
« Reply #3 on: May 18, 2011, 03:14:33 PM »
Go to http://www.magnetricity.com/,
there is "Click to read"
find article: REAL Magentricity has been Discovered,
about "spin ice",
cheers,
khabe

Low-Q

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2847
Re: Magnetic monopole
« Reply #4 on: May 18, 2011, 06:51:40 PM »
Go to http://www.magnetricity.com/,
there is "Click to read"
find article: REAL Magentricity has been Discovered,
about "spin ice",
cheers,
khabe
The site is blocking IP addresses... Not working. All in Polish or something...

khabe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 525
Re: Magnetic monopole
« Reply #5 on: May 19, 2011, 08:02:12 AM »
The site is blocking IP addresses... Not working. All in Polish or something...

Yeah, there are problems now but page is in English where you can choice any language to read articles,
cheers,
khabe

Low-Q

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2847
Re: Magnetic monopole
« Reply #6 on: May 19, 2011, 05:31:34 PM »
Yeah, there are problems now but page is in English where you can choice any language to read articles,
cheers,
khabe
I found another interesting article about spin ice. It must however be cooled down to allmost 0 K (spending lots of energy to cool) in order to achieve the monopoles. Anyways, it is very interesting reading. Thanks for bringing this up :)

Vidar

gravityblock

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3287
    • Get Dish Now! Free Dish Network System from VMC Satellite
Re: Magnetic monopole
« Reply #7 on: June 04, 2011, 07:10:37 AM »
Here's a little known secret about monopoles.  Quarks are monopoles, they make up the neutrons and protons of an atom and they interact strongly with hard photons.

Eliyahu Comay, is an Israeli theoretical physicist, who published fundamental discoveries in the area of classical electrodynamics, quantum mechanics and particle physics. His main works contradict the Standard Model and did not receive worldwide acceptance.

Comay's model explains magnetic monopoles (quarks) using a basis which differs from Dirac's formulation, provides an alternative model for the strong force, has an alternative explanation of the Aharonov Bohm effect, explains the quantum states of Delta++ and Omega- without color force, explains the proton spin crisis, explains the hidden momentum, has mathematically shown how the higgs boson doesn't exist, easily explains many QCD contradictions, and has provided a proof that QCD has been constructed on an incorrect Basis.

Comay's website:  http://www.tau.ac.il/~elicomay/

Comay's model vs. Standard model:  http://nohiggs.wordpress.com/2010/06/28/comay-model-vs-the-standard-model/

Wiki - Eliyahu Comay:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eliyahu_Comay

List of all publications indexed by google on Comay's website:  http://www.google.com/search?q=filetype%3Apdf+site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.tau.ac.il%2F~elicomay%2F&hl=en&biw=1012&bih=570&num=10&lr=&ft=i&cr=&safe=off&tbs=

GB

eBay:    Oscilloscopes    Signal Generators    Magnets

« Last Edit: June 04, 2011, 11:34:25 AM by gravityblock »

quantumtangles

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 140
Re: Magnetic monopole
« Reply #8 on: June 16, 2011, 04:10:35 AM »
@ gravityblock

Very interesting. Thanks  ;D

jonifer

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 38
Re: Magnetic monopole
« Reply #9 on: June 17, 2011, 11:46:24 AM »
http://www.magf.px6.ru/magnet_1.htm
Magnetic shielding(russian lang)

z.monkey

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1660
    • Scientilosopher's Domain
Re: Magnetic monopole
« Reply #10 on: June 17, 2011, 07:23:45 PM »
By way of example, consider a capacitor built to store magnetic force in Tesla rather than charge in coulombs.
So you are trying to build a Flux Capacitor?  LOL!  Couldn't help myself...
You gotta remember that Magnetic Flux is kinetic, if you stop it and put it in a bottle all its force goes away...

quantumtangles

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 140
Re: Magnetic monopole
« Reply #11 on: June 20, 2011, 01:12:45 AM »
Yes. I suppose I was thinking of a flux capacitor  ;D