Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: 1 coil 1 cap 1 magnet 1KW theory schematic device cheap tiny published openly  (Read 8972 times)

iflewmyown

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 124
This fellow has a track record for years with videos and results and peer review.

If you can't stand the theory go down to section 6.

http://philica.com/display_article.php?article_id=219

Yes, I know what this machine looks like but that guy didn't have the math to optimize it.

Garry

iflewmyown

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 124
 read to the end!

It clearly states    1.07 KW   ;D
« Last Edit: May 18, 2011, 11:16:55 PM by hartiberlin »

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Garry
Wow Seems like this should get a bit more attention!
Thanks for posting a very timely topic,which could definately
benifit from some more knowing eyes!
Thanks
Chet
PS
For the sake of Clarity,What previous machine are you refering to?

iflewmyown

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 124
This is a dead ringer for one of Joseph Newman's motor's that I tried about 20 years ago. The rotating magnet inside a single coil. Joe had one motor that weighed a ton but only put out about 80 watts usable extra energy. Since it would never pay out I tried new directions. This professor has always done what he said he was going to and always published the results.
Garry

iflewmyown

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 124
I have never been inside a bike generator. The coil and cap have to be resonant at the speed the shaft rotates. It would be nice to be done at 60hz  :)  Even though the output is not a perfect sine wave most things would never know.

kampen

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 132
[reviewer #2355unconfirmed user] added 14th May, 2011 at 10:00:19

The author obviously does not know much about theoretical physics.
As an example he does not know that classical physics is not self-consistent.
Peculiarly, the Gauss equation is not consistent with other classical concepts.
The author has just found another example of inconsistence, his analysis is a shame for the community.
The author should learn quantum mechanics.
A good starting point would be Feynman Lectures On Physics (the volumes on quantum mechanics), where the author shows another example of self-inconsistence of classical physics, peculiarly of magnetism equations.
As a conclusion, the author’s analysis is wrong.
He should withdraw its article from the site, so as not to spread FUD among non physicist.

[reviewer #2355unconfirmed user] added 14th May, 2011 at 10:00:19

nul-points

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 995
    • Doc Ringwood's Free Energy blog
hi guys

to balance up that report from a negative reviewer of the Turtur design...

it looks to me like the coil/ magnet arrangement is VERY similar to the concept which the physicist Leon Dragone reported in a paper of his

Dragone unfortunately died, so we can't find out more than is in his paper, but he does specifically say that he observed overunity behaviour in a diametric magnet rotating within an enclosing solenoid coil

i think this is even without a cap to resonate the coil

having seen Romero's device stick two fingers up to 'conventional science' i'd be quite interested to give the Turtur/Dragone idea a go, too

first things first - the Muller replication!

cheers
np


http://docsfreelunch.blogspot.com
 

triffid

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4263