Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Overbalancing wheel  (Read 165183 times)

onthecuttingedge2010

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 88
Re: Overbalancing wheel
« Reply #75 on: June 02, 2011, 05:30:22 AM »
something you didn't include in your calculations, the E.M force is many times more powerful in magnitude than Gravity. most of the gravitational forces you experience are E.M not Gravity. are you really such an idiot to believe gravity is stronger than E.M? when it was already proven to be such. Gravity is such a weak force compared to E.M.

SPANG

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 174
Re: Overbalancing wheel
« Reply #76 on: June 02, 2011, 05:45:32 AM »
onthcuttingedge,
                       This device does NOT use gravity.    And, what's more, I don't care if a spinning wheel
does resemble a giroscope --------- it isn't a giroscope, but it DOES display giriscopic tendancies.
Get it together pal.

SPANG.               (BILL.)

onthecuttingedge2010

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 88
Re: Overbalancing wheel
« Reply #77 on: June 02, 2011, 05:53:17 AM »
onthcuttingedge,
                       This device does NOT use gravity.    And, what's more, I don't care if a spinning wheel
does resemble a giroscope --------- it isn't a giroscope, but it DOES display giriscopic tendancies.
Get it together pal.

SPANG.               (BILL.)

Hi Spang.

I wish I could support you but I can't, I know you will fail, it would of been nice but you are totally wrong in your conclusions, build it, you will see, those rules you should follow are over 100 years old and still sticks today, unless you have something 'they' have not discovered in their life time.

which I doubt.

a wheel is just that, a gyro non the less and nothing more.
Gyro's have been studied till they are blue in the face, they are nothing more than stored energy systems, for the last hundred years these old geniuses are smarter than you even to this day. give up your shit with gravity, someone long ago would of found it long before you did.

Jerry 8)

SPANG

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 174
Re: Overbalancing wheel
« Reply #78 on: June 02, 2011, 06:05:33 AM »
RE; reply#88


Knit one, pearl two.

SPANG

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 174
Re: Overbalancing wheel
« Reply #79 on: June 02, 2011, 07:45:27 AM »
Do you know,
                  You can SHOW (e.g.) a person, a rotating wheel, or some other object, and they will
deny its existance!
What's wrong with these people --------- are they mentaly ill?

BILL.

fritznien

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 294
Re: Overbalancing wheel
« Reply #80 on: June 02, 2011, 08:54:12 AM »
bill they have too many claims and too little that works.
instead of arguing just build it. looks like a couple bicycle chains and sprockets
would do a proof of concept.
no i am not going to build because i have not a clue of how it would work.
fritznien

SPANG

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 174
Re: Overbalancing wheel
« Reply #81 on: June 02, 2011, 09:15:10 AM »
I'm not arguing --------------- just hoping to get
answers from sensible people! Are YOU sensible?
All I'm asking for, is a little help, and a little understanding.
I'm quite sure this device will be made soon -----------
with help from people who DO understand -------------
either BY them/him, or by me, with the help I may recieve!
It may, or may NOT work, time will tell.

SPANG.         (BILL.)

AB Hammer

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1253
Re: Overbalancing wheel
« Reply #82 on: June 02, 2011, 03:34:42 PM »
Bill

 I believe fritznien is a sensible person. There have been to many claims. I have several of my own that could claim from the design point of view but only the physical build will do and due to fraudsters, several will still have their doubts until proved beyond a reasonable doubt. This is one reason I don't make solid claims and I don't show prematurely. There are not that many builders and those of us who do build should be helpful to those who cant or don't for what ever reason. 

fritznien

I used leather belts and wooden disk for my first test for Bill. I believe those with a Lego collection should be able to do these first test. Even though it didn't work at that moment there still is some things to evaluate and work with. In value I believe it at least has a minimum of a secondary system. It is not always the goal but what you learn on the way.

Alan

Low-Q

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2847
Re: Overbalancing wheel
« Reply #83 on: June 02, 2011, 03:47:07 PM »
Bill,

Is the following drawing correct understood?

I could not understand what you wrote about the small wheels (green ones in the drawing below), so please repeat what it says down to the right in the original drawing.

hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8154
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: Overbalancing wheel
« Reply #84 on: June 02, 2011, 09:55:14 PM »
Is the red and the pink wheel fixed to each other ?

AB Hammer

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1253
Re: Overbalancing wheel
« Reply #85 on: June 03, 2011, 12:51:34 AM »
Vidar

 I believe you are correct.

_______

Stefan

 
Quote
Is the red and the pink wheel fixed to each other ?

As it is drawn, I believe they are. Will this be the final outcome? I doubt it.  The lower smaller wheels are an attempt to increase torque. I am not sure they will do what is needed. Stress lock up is the first and biggest conflict to break through. So the question is. How can we get the overdrive to become a positive driving unit without the possibility of stress lock up, or to much back torque. If we can achieve this? We may have a real possibility.
A gravity additive may be needed to achieve this.

Alan

 

SPANG

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 174
Re: Overbalancing wheel
« Reply #86 on: June 03, 2011, 08:19:15 AM »
Hi All,
       From the amount of 'feedback' I've been recieving about the role of the bottom-wheel, I feel
compelled to offer my explanation.

The role of the bottom-wheel, is to supply the top-wheel with what it needs.
The top-wheel needs two identical forces,  (10kgs each) delivered by chains ---------(e.g:),
1 at 1mph, and 1 at 2mph.These speeds are only estimates, and will (most probably), move at a
greater speed. But, the RATIO remains the same    2:1.
The 5 wheels, that ARE (colectively), the bottom-wheel,  at their different sizes, facilitate these
 speeds/forces.
Hope that helps?

Once again, I must stress, the weights (forces), and the chains' speeds, are only EXAMPLES!


SPANG.                (BILL.)
































 1 at 1mph, and 1 at 2mph.  The 5 wheels, the bottom-wheel set-up cosists of


SPANG

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 174
Re; An Ode To Tension
« Reply #87 on: June 04, 2011, 09:21:29 AM »
Hi All,
       I realy don't know where to 'post' this little 'ditty', so I've decided to 'post' it here.

                                         An Ode To Tension
                                         ________________


Tension weighs nothing.
Tension CAN produce a force that matches gravity ---- even betters it!
Tension has many advantages over gravity, one of them is; it can produce a 'gravity-like'
force in ANY direction ------------- gravity can't.
Tension can be 'turned off' ----- gravity can't.
A Tensioner added to a chain, can make that chain 'appear' as if it WAS a weight -------
but  isn't!
TENSION CAN WORK IN SPACE, GRAVITY CAN'T!
I think Tension, is more versatile than gravity.

I bet some of you 'out there', can think of even more ------------ let's hear them!


SPANG.              (BILL.)

     

SPANG

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 174
Re: Overbalancing wheel
« Reply #88 on: June 04, 2011, 02:34:10 PM »
Re; reply # 95


Stefan,
          Yes they ARE ------ SOLID!


SPANG.              (BILL.)

SPANG

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 174
Re: Overbalancing wheel
« Reply #89 on: June 19, 2011, 02:34:14 AM »
Hi All,
      I think that ALL o.u's, overbalancing wheels etc..,
will owe their functioning to the manipulation of KNOWN
physics ------- NOT new physics!
As far as I know, ALL types of o.u.  devices, use known
physics.

SPANG.         (BILL.)