Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Archurians defeat Newtonians  (Read 12861 times)

The Eskimo Quinn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 614
    • Archurian
Archurians defeat Newtonians
« on: April 16, 2011, 07:34:11 AM »
Video uploaded email copies available

Newtonian laws of equal energy destroyed any 5 year old can test it at home, no money or equipment required.

I win

http://archurian.com/The_Key.html

Low-Q

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2847
Re: Archurians defeat Newtonians
« Reply #1 on: April 16, 2011, 04:26:26 PM »
Video uploaded email copies available

Newtonian laws of equal energy destroyed any 5 year old can test it at home, no money or equipment required.

I win

http://archurian.com/The_Key.html
The thermodynamics are perfectly preserved. Even though the air drag can run a wind turbine, he forget to lift the air inside the water tank when it is refilled. Same with the straw. Air are lifted up and out of the straw when it is put into the water. When you can pull out the straw, closed on top or not, the same amount of air will flow through it.

I think Mr. Newton did cover the most.

Vidar

truth

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 54
Re: Archurians defeat Newtonians
« Reply #2 on: April 16, 2011, 11:43:10 PM »
Video uploaded email copies available

Newtonian laws of equal energy destroyed any 5 year old can test it at home, no money or equipment required.

I win

http://archurian.com/The_Key.html

Just to save the next reader some time I am posting the fault with this whole idea.  Think about the compressibility and weight of water as compared to air.

Have a great day everyone.

protech

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 55
Re: Archurians defeat Newtonians
« Reply #3 on: April 17, 2011, 04:36:15 AM »
Hold on..... lets just wait for his actual working model and save all that mess in the kitchen..and the wife and kids asking .....are you doing drugs Dad

The Eskimo Quinn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 614
    • Archurian
Re: Archurians defeat Newtonians
« Reply #4 on: April 18, 2011, 05:30:48 AM »
I have posted a second video to show all others how stupid newtonians are and that they believe that no energy comes from objects that fall anticlockwise, the video shows in base physics why it works,to say the wheel example is not correct shows who they work for or how dumb they really are.

To say I am wrong requires them to say an object falling 95cm does not produce enough energy to lift an identical object 5 cm, there is no other counter argument, i am right or they truely believe that newtonian bullshit. that one video is the arch enemy of all newtonians, those who dispute it are your enemy and that is beyond doubt


http://archurian.com/The_Key.html

The Eskimo Quinn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 614
    • Archurian
Re: Archurians defeat Newtonians
« Reply #5 on: April 19, 2011, 02:21:27 AM »
a new video has been done to replace the other two so it can be watched in one run in the right order

http://archurian.com/The_Key.html

SkyWatcher123

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 844
Re: Archurians defeat Newtonians
« Reply #6 on: April 19, 2011, 05:41:00 AM »
Hi eskimo, thanks for sharing your thoughts.
would this apply to your thinking also.
A large vertical tank silo filled with water and a very heavy float at top.
This very heavy float at top has a latch mechanism so it hangs at top and a water turbine at bottom of water tank to either charge a battery or operate a water pump when valve at bottom is released to vertically pump the water into another holding tank beside the main water tank.

Now that all or most of the water is raised into the holding tank, the very heavy float connected to the top latch in main tank is released and this heavy float is attached to a pulley system to turn a generator.
When the heavy float reaches bottom of main tank, the water in holding tank is released into main tank and the very heavy float then rises back to the top to repeat the cycle.

So we acquire the excess energy from the very heavy float descending and turning a generator.
Now if the initial water draining from main tank is not enough to fill the holding tank, then part of the energy from the descending heavy float can make up the difference.
Seems that this could be a similar principle to what your describing.
peace love light
tyson

onthecuttingedge2010

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 88
Re: Archurians defeat Newtonians
« Reply #7 on: April 19, 2011, 05:41:49 AM »
a new video has been done to replace the other two so it can be watched in one run in the right order

http://archurian.com/The_Key.html

Newton spent his entire life proving what he found to be real, are you there to prove his theories wrong? if so I will support newton. classical mechanics breaks down at the quantum , newton knew nothing of quantum mechanics.
« Last Edit: April 19, 2011, 03:55:10 PM by onthecuttingedge2010 »

Airstriker

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 330
    • anonimowosc.org
Re: Archurians defeat Newtonians
« Reply #8 on: April 19, 2011, 10:32:27 AM »
Video uploaded email copies available

Newtonian laws of equal energy destroyed any 5 year old can test it at home, no money or equipment required.

I win

http://archurian.com/The_Key.html

Put your archurian bullshit to your pocket and sit quite. Man this is pure basic physics you know nothing about ! When you let the apple free fall, at the bottom the Potential Energy is zero, but Kinetic Energy is not zero. Kinetic Energy at the bottom is equal Potential Energy (which the apple had at the starting point) minus Energy you spent on all the losses (air drag etc.). So in fact you don't gain energy. You loose energy on overcoming air drag.
And then starting at the bottom with your Kinetic Energy you can convert it back to Potential Energy (again loosing energy for all the drags). As this Potential Energy is less than the starting Potential Energy, the apple is getting at max 90% of the initial hight.
Can you tell me Mr super druper archurian, where Newton is wrong here ?????????!!!!!!!!! Go to primary school and learn stuff.
Sorry for being rude but I cannot stand it any more.

The Eskimo Quinn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 614
    • Archurian
Re: Archurians defeat Newtonians
« Reply #9 on: April 19, 2011, 11:13:20 PM »
Extract from key page

Many if not most of you wish you could make something that proves visually this is true, well you can, it will not help you though, the cost? nothing if you have a bicycle. The object is to show that the Newtonian theory of potential energy and the conservation of energy exists, we believe they have it wrong. The conservation of energy would be in line with the planet and the universe, so from the electron to the planets and everything in-between, what do we know is certain, not theory but certain? That they are all in a constant state of motion, not frozen or still waiting for some other force to make it move, So Archurian conservation of Reality is that everything has sufficient energy to continue moving or to derive movement from one to another. To show A Newtonian wrong is pointless, but we will do it 3 times. The first is to show the theory and math of potential energy is false. Take a set of scales or see saw or evenly balance lever, place 1 kilo (or any weight you have two of) now place one on one end, now when it is ready place the other on the opposing end, and the lever will rock before balancing, this rocking shows more energy than fall to lift, now because Newtonians cannot explain it, they say that is part of the potential energy. Horseshit, take one off now repeat with a one kilo bag of sugar pouring from the height you place the weight on, and it will come to balance without rocking, they will give some other horseshit story to try and explain where the rocking went, let them finish their lies, now repeat the last exercise and follow the lever down with the bag of sugar, so you change the math and potential energy, what happens, exactly the same thing with two completely different sets of math and potential energy stories.

Now we will show you 50 grams falling on the bicycle wheel and it going past twelve o’clock or more than a full rotation. Which according to Newtonians is impossible and yes we perfected the test so everyone in the world can now do it.



Airstriker

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 330
    • anonimowosc.org
Re: Archurians defeat Newtonians
« Reply #10 on: April 19, 2011, 11:36:39 PM »
bla bla bla. You should start a new church, religion or something, but definitely not teach physics. If you have something show us. Everybody is waiting. But don't record another stupid video teaching us physics.

The Eskimo Quinn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 614
    • Archurian
Re: Archurians defeat Newtonians
« Reply #11 on: April 20, 2011, 01:39:26 AM »
The rest of the extract

So you have seen twice that the same weight, does not have the same result, the last two are the best example, as math for two examples should equate to a different result yet they show the same result, which according to Newtonian math should never occur, In fact it is the same as saying 1 plus 2 equals 3 and 2 plus 7 equals 3 , the Newtonian math shows that they have no comprehension that a lesser energy of the last can still produce the same result as the second example, so too they cannot devise any devices as they cannot explain even their own math. This next example is the Newtonian coffin nail, because you can actually do it in real life. Every person on the planet can take 50 grams place it on a bicycle wheel and have the free energy of the “Slingshot effect” or “Gravity assist” make the wheel rotate more than 360 degrees, impossible in Newtonian law, yet NASA accept this is true in space, Archurians using the above experiment with the sugar having two different energy inputs having the same result, realised how to do it, not simply in math.

So there are a series of Newtonian questions you must first ask your physics teacher so there can be no back tracking, government people will never answer the first questions they will simply try to debunk the device, so if on a chat site only have conversations with impartial people who type the answers to the questions above their response, this will show who works for the government or who is simply a brainwashed Newtonian, as they will refuse to accept their own math.

X being the actual mathematical energy used or produced for 50 grams x 1 metre

1)    If 50 grams is lifted up in your hand  1 metre we accept the energy to lift it to that point is X yes or no?

2)    If we lift 50 grams in two separate weights eg 2x25gram weights at the same time the energy is still X yes or no?

3)    In short do 5 x 10 gram weights still equate to X being the energy required. Yes or no?

4)   If we release the 50 grams and let it fall is the energy produced equal to X yes or no?

5)    If we release the 2 x 25 gram weights is the energy still equal to X yes or no?

6)    If we release the 5 x 10 gram weights is the energy still equal to X yes or no?

7)    Now if we release one 25 gram weight is the energy equal to 50 percent of X yes or no?

8)    Is releasing both 25 gram weights separately still equal to X yes or no?

Newtonian math will have answered yes to all of those questions, Archurian math says No to the last two answers. Now we will prove it in real life.

Take a racing bicycle front wheel, place a 50 gram weight on the wheel at one second past twelve and release the wheel, it will not make 360 degrees, not because the energy is not there, simply that the slingshot effect is waiting to occur now going the opposite way, can we beat this in every house in the world ? YES, now take a 25 gram weight and place it at 12 o’clock (neo magnets work best as a weight for this test, now release the wheel and when the weight gets to the 7 o’clock mark place the other 25 gram weight one the wheel at the one o’clock mark "whilst the wheel is still running from slingshot momentum" and the wheel will run past 360 degrees rotation. Now we used 50 grams falling both times, yet with proof that you can get more energy out than in, the reason is the slingshot effect has the reverse slingshot beaten by the more powerful higher placed second component, there is not one bit more energy put into the device, the alteration is the application of time and weight, just like the sugar on the lever. The key is to make the device work the same way the space ship does by removing gravitation return. Now many will be able to build device that place and remove the weights during motion to effect continuous cycle. We only show you this that you may understand that the Archurian world will be a far better world, because we don’t simply produce faulty math, we can prove the point. If it goes past 360, the law is broken, how is irrelevant, if it can be done with no more energy, Newton is debunked.

Now the first questions always asked is, what is the best way to place and remove weights? forget rolling ball theory, centrifuge prevents the ball on the left rolling to the right because there is already another weight using the slingshot effect, the only way (we have designed) this can be used is with simple solenoid mechanisms. Firstly remember that it made 360 plus even pulling the first weight over the top, imagine the power without it? a solenoid is simply a steel cylinder that is pulled from one side to the other, often used in gas valves etc, and electromagnet pulls it open or closed, an electro magnet can push the weight rod out at 11.05 o’clock and push it in at 5 past one o’clock, as long as there is a rail at the rear that allows the cylinders to roll down to the gate on the opposing side ready to be fired in the it will run forever, naturally timing is not required simply have several rollers or weights on the rail so there is always one to fire in. The electricity is provided by the turning wheel, and needs very little for the short bursts because power is produced for the full rotation not simply the point of switching, the momentum or gravity assist slingshots energy provides far more than fall as you have already seen and know to be true for yourself.  To Mr. Newton (deceased) Now whose your daddy bitch?! These are only given to show you we can do it, these are the least impressive of what we bring to the Next world of Men. Download the leaflet and get it out there if you have had enough of this world of men.


The Eskimo Quinn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 614
    • Archurian
Re: Archurians defeat Newtonians
« Reply #12 on: April 20, 2011, 04:20:44 AM »
Havent bee reading the page but did notice a short blah blah and some reference to newton, Having the largest thread in history on the site still to this day. The Key page on the site proves the point beyond questions and can be tested by all at home. I leave you all with that one thing you requested, something simply everyone could do. That being said, I am still amazed that anyone speaks to those who quote Newton as correct, for one non Archurian reason, is this site not about overunity? Does newton not say this is impossible? So why other than to support the energy industry and government profits would you even be on this site? Accoriding to newton we are all crazy, so if i can suggest that overunity implies crazy to you, then we are all well aware of this and choose to believe otherwise, you telling us what we already know you believe is pointless. though it shows us who you are. No reason for me to return. Good luck, i have an enemy to get rid of and other myths to bust

conradelektro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1842
Re: Archurians defeat Newtonians
« Reply #13 on: April 20, 2011, 02:09:27 PM »
The Key page on the site proves the point beyond questions and can be tested by all at home. I leave you all with that one thing you requested, something simply everyone could do.

@Quinn:

Well, I can not do the "something simply" everyone could do. But it is not important what I can do or what I can not do.

The only important question (besides tons of theory or counter theory):

Will "The Eskimo Quinn" disclose/show a device clearly demonstrating OU?

It does not help that "The Eskimo Quinn" tells us how to build a OU device, will he himself show a OU device running longer than a few seconds without any energy input?

In other words: Has "The Eskimo Quinn" built a OU device that really works?

Theory is nice, but it has to be proven by a physical experiment (not only by a Gedankenexperiment). A physical experiment in the OU field would be a working OU device freely disclosed and working beyond doubt.

Greetings, Conrad

Airstriker

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 330
    • anonimowosc.org
Re: Archurians defeat Newtonians
« Reply #14 on: April 20, 2011, 11:58:11 PM »
Havent bee reading the page but did notice a short blah blah and some reference to newton, Having the largest thread in history on the site still to this day. The Key page on the site proves the point beyond questions and can be tested by all at home. I leave you all with that one thing you requested, something simply everyone could do. That being said, I am still amazed that anyone speaks to those who quote Newton as correct, for one non Archurian reason, is this site not about overunity? Does newton not say this is impossible? So why other than to support the energy industry and government profits would you even be on this site? Accoriding to newton we are all crazy, so if i can suggest that overunity implies crazy to you, then we are all well aware of this and choose to believe otherwise, you telling us what we already know you believe is pointless. though it shows us who you are. No reason for me to return. Good luck, i have an enemy to get rid of and other myths to bust
Insane people will never admit they are insane. Insane people hear only their own thoughts. Insane people start wars. Sad.
Sad, how many people follow the insane ones.