There's alot here, but I can see now why it's so hard to
understand where 'Free Energy' devices get their electrical power
from. The mainstream Electrodynamics model does not fit the new
discoveries and advances being made, and the 'status quo' are
reluctant to alter the model to fit the new discoveries.

I have been 'sitting on the fence' until recently, but I'm
now TOTALLY CONVINCED that John Searl's SEG and IVG are genuine machines.

It looks like ALL electricity comes from the Time Domain via
Scalar Electromagnetic Waves (including electricity from  the
power grid and AA batteries, and anything else  inbetween).

It's just that FE devices draw the energy more efficiently than
conventional devices. The source is still the same.

Tom Bearden's youtube videos will point you in the right
direction on this. A must see!

This is an interview with Tom, and he explains in easy
terms, why the mainstream Electromagnetic model does not
handle the operation of the SEG, or any other 'Free Energy'
device.

Applied Scalar Wave Technology Tom Bearden
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Applied+Scalar+Wave+Technolo
gy+Tom+Bearden&aq=f

As Tom says, "Energy does not come from matter - matter
comes from energy".

Here are some other links along these same lines:

This is a nice intro to Scalar Wave Technology, and suggest
you read this before Going to Tom Bearden's website.
http://www.prahlad.org/pub/bearden/scalar_wars.htm

This guy, Bill Beaty, also explains alot of stuff missing from physics lessons:

http://amasci.com/miscon/voltage.html

This is a very usefull look at various Free Energy devices,
and I'm using it for reference purposes. This is Version
18.1 of a large eBook of some 2,200 pages, with a file size
of about 32 Mb.

http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk/PJKBook.html

Here Don Kelly outlines the three types of free energy
devices:

YouTube - Rare Video - Free Energy Motors and Anomolous
Gravity Experiments Part 1/6
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNN_tsC4cA4&playnext=1&list=PL9D92A197FEF
68940

In this 8 part video series Stan Deyo explains what gravity is:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nP4zQ4R8vJg

And Tom Bearden's website is here at:
http://www.cheniere.org/mission.html

I'm also noticing similarities cropping up in different FE
devices, like:

Dipoles - (that's basically what all FE machines are)

Bi-filar coils

Pulsed DC current

Tuned Resonant Circuits and Coils

Hi voltage

Rotation of a Physical Mass

There are three invisible fields, which are:

Gravitational fields, Magnetic fields, Voltage fields (E-fields).

This would explain the connection between FE devices and
their Anti-Gravity properties.

A couple of more links on Free Energy, including some
background theory:

http://depalma.pair.com/

http://www.brucedepalma.com/n-machine/

http://www.brucedepalma.com/adam-trombly/

So it looks like the rollers in John's SEG may be operating
like individual N-Machines - each being a Dipole. Due to the
configuration these N-Machine dipoles are working together
in unison, and pulling in ALOT more energy - like a
Electromagnetic Twister maybe?

Scalar waves (longitudinal EM waves) are absolutely real , and were discovered by Tesla.  They have been suppressed by mainstream science , outside of black budget projects.  I suggest taking a look at my post over at OUR for more information...

Konstantin Meyl - Tesla Scalar Waves
http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=754.msg11722#msg11722

This is a very interesting topic but some have leveled pretty hard critique both regarding the theoretical background (http://www.scientificexploration.org/journal/jse_15_2_bruhn.pdf  or http://www.scientificexploration.org/journal/jse_16_3_bruhn.pdf) and the experimental setup offered by Meyl (http://www.gravitation.org/institute_of_gravity_research/Experiments/E-Abschlussbericht_Meyl-Experimentierset.pdf). I still cannot decide one way or the other about the veracity of these claims (there are so many other pressing things to do). So, someone who's really interested in this should really study he matter thoroughly and should come up with a conclusive statement about this matter.

Now, even a brief look at Bruhn's argument indicates that it cannot be conclusive despite the inherent claim that it is. The reason being, Bruhn's understanding (and that's the underlying thesis in his argument) that any claim in the area of electromagnetism should abide by Maxwell's equations. That should at once be considered unacceptable because Maxwell's equations cannot account, for instance, for the measured voltage in the unipolar (Faraday) generator. What is done as a palliative measure is to invoke the expression for the Lorentz force as a way to account for the observed voltage. Lorentz force, however, cannot be derived from Maxwell's equations and it should if those equations are to be considered descriptive of the electromagnetic phenomena. This is a serious flaw of Maxwell's equations to the extent of falsifying them. For now they are used just because it's the tradition to do so. Whether or not scalar wave theory or Weber's or maybe Hertz' theory can replace them (even Ampere's theory, available at the time when Maxwell's theory appeared, is more general than Maxwell's theory) remains to be seen. At this point electrodynamics is facing a dead-end and something urgently has to be done to get it back on the right and productive track.

Scalar waves (longitudinal EM waves) are absolutely real , and were discovered by Tesla.  They have been suppressed by mainstream science , outside of black budget projects.  I suggest taking a look at my post over at OUR for more information...

Konstantin Meyl - Tesla Scalar Waves
http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=754.msg11722#msg11722

That looks good Feynman. I'll get my head round that ASAP