Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011  (Read 741119 times)

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1725 on: July 01, 2011, 05:52:07 AM »
I've dealt - ad nausea - with most of this 'repeat' post but this is a new one.

Ignoring the issue won't make it go away, since you have attacked me and called me a liar in previous posts I now consider this my duty, so that no one new to this forum will be misled into believing that you have a circuit that produces OU.
Rich.  Here's a synopsis of the argument.  Cat - 'Rose's claims are false.  Here are the video links that prove it. I will NOT reference anything that hints at a successful replication.  I simply deny it.  And I'll add insult to injury and advise you all that she is deliberately misleading you all.' Me...  'That's not true'.  Cat...'What - are you calling me a liar?  WELL THEN...'since you have attacked me and called me a liar...I now consider this my duty...'  LOL.

You can't tell me of any member on this forum that has produced OU with your circuit, because nobody has,they all failed.
Another HALF TRUTH.  Indeed.  No-one on this forum has produced OU with our circuit.  TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE NO-ONE ON THIS FORUM HAS TRIED TO REPLICATE OUR CIRCUIT. 

Do something different Here on This forum,and stop ignoring reasonable requests for tests. or stop claiming OU on This OverUnity Forum.
I AM NOT CLAIMING AN OVER UNITY RESULT.  What we're CLAIMING is INFINITE COP.  And I have most CERTAINLY NOT refused to do any REASONABLE requests for tests.

A big conspiracy, it would appear that anyone that says your circut doesn't work or or indicate's measuring error, is then part of that conspiracy.
INDEED.  Saying anything at all DOES NOT MAKE IT SO.  What's required is replication or some substantial argument.  OPINION has no part in science.

Many members have made reasonable requests that you ignore including Stefan,Mr Mag amongst others,but you ignore them and carry on regurgitating your same old arguments.
We have ASNWERED EVERY REASONABLE REQUEST MADE BY EVERY FORUM MEMBER. 

Go on Rosie proof that 99 is wrong in his analysis and makes something that runs and runs and put it on the Internet after all,
BY ALL MEANS CAT.  Just make that arduous exercise worth my while.  Write to those academics you know.  Find out which of them will go on record that the test you DEMAND will unequivocally constitute  PROOF and then I will do those tests.  Between you and NAG you should know enough experts - SURELY?  I only need 4 more and I'll do that test.

"All one needs are the the measurements and some reasonable account of the apparatus that produces those measurements".
QUITE.

You will pick on small detail and not address the main point, and you will also repeat what you said before ( this is not your blog) please interact with the reasonable requests made by members here for you to do new tests.
IT IS ALREADY NEW TESTS.  And BY ALL MEANS I'LL DO THOSE TESTS.  But I will NOT do them to satisfy your idle curiosity.

The fact still remains that no one here can reproduce your claims of OU,...
Also confusing and AT BEST only HALF TRUE.  On the old circuit some have replicated - and some haven't.  ON THE NEW CIRCUIT NO-ONE HAS TRIED. 

and you are not willing to do anything to change that deadlock, apart from use this forum as your soapbox and blog.
ALSO NOT TRUE.  I AM VERY HAPPY TO BREAK THE DEADLOCK AND DO THOSE TESTS.  AGAIN.  Make it worth our while.  Either PAY for those tests - OR, WHICH IS A FAR CHEAPER OPTION, just write to some academics and ASK THEM TO TESTIFY THAT THAT WOULD CONSTITUTE UNEQUIVOCAL PROOF. 

On this forum you are expected to interact to prove your claim, if you are claiming OU,I think that is reasonable.
So do I.  So?

Rosemary

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1726 on: July 01, 2011, 06:02:44 AM »
MrMag has been very helpful to me on this forum in sharing his knowledge.  He was especially helpful in my obtaining an O'scope from ebay a while back.  I have been supportive of Rose as well.  I calls them likes I sees them.

Bill

It seems that you do Bill.  But I now have a real problem with the way you're seeing this.

Rosemary

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1727 on: July 01, 2011, 06:20:11 AM »
Dear Magsy,

You have got to be the most generous spirited, bravest, kindest man on this forum.  Your posts are a delight.  They are entirely void of conceit.  If I had to nominate an exemplary contributor Magsy - it's you.  And if we had more people like you then this forum would be an ABSOLUTE pleasure.  I am reasonably satisfied that I don't deserve this intervention of yours.  But it is, nonetheless, gratefully accepted.

Magsy - there is a very real advantage to the caliber of posts that Cat and MaNag make.  It polarises opinion.  And that's so much better than hunkering down with like minds.  Not that supportive threads aren't a pleasure.  Of course they are.  And where there's support one can also progress to new insights and new knowledge.  But meanwhile there are members and readers here who SIMPLY DO NOT BELIEVE.  When they see that they share that opinion with the likes of Cat and MaNag - then they're not quite as cozy with that association.  And I have NO reputation to win or lose.  I ONLY have a mission to advance OU.  The plus side to their posts is that they're SO unreasonable, SO rude, SO self-serving - SO ridiculous - that the thinking members who read here SEE THIS.  That, surprisingly, swings opinion favour of OU.  And I'm ABSOLUTELY NOT out to win a popularity contest.  LOL.  It's like waitressing.  I'd be hopelessly under qualified.  And that there is no evident support - is not a problem.  I am a lot of things.  But I am NOT afraid to fight my corner.  And while I may well be a lot of things I'm certainly NOT a coward. 

But thank you Magsy.  Very much indeed.  It's nice to know that there are still some real MEN on this forum.  A lot of the problem is that most guys have NO respect for a female in the science world.  That's why so few post here.  Me?  I'm happy to rub their noses in their own nonsense.

Rosie

Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1728 on: July 01, 2011, 06:44:35 AM »
No Problem Rose. =]

I realize that the critic side can be of value. But most of it is not cordial in the least. 

I tell ya Rose, the big difference between you and them is you have it on the table, with vids and lots of data. They have scratch, sim data and a lot of bullying.  Case closed.

I had a next door neighbor that was beating up his girl one night. It was bad. I busted that door and got the guy in a choke hold(he was on top of her at the time, and dragged him out of the house. It may have been too late for police.   I didnt hurt him, but I believe I saved her. ;]

There is a right way and wrong ways to go about this all.
And there is much unnecessary wrong here. yep

Night Rose  ;]

Mags


Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1729 on: July 01, 2011, 07:00:44 AM »
Golly.  There's definitely something about the 'knight in shining armour' with you Mags.  That's an amazing rescue.  But there's also that analogy between your interventions there and here. LOL.  But these confrontations are an abuse of justice - intellect - emotion - popular opinion .. and on and on.  As you say.  Abuse is abuse.   

Count me among your many fans.  It's also a very real pleasure to read that you're widely appreciated.

Good night Magsy.  And sweet dreams.
Rosie

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1730 on: July 01, 2011, 07:35:38 AM »
And guys, the reason that Harti REFUSES to monitor this thread appropriately is simply because he's hoping that I'll just give up and die.  I will give up.  But ONLY when I die.  Or when he bans me.  But IF he bans me then it will be obvious that he's NOT advancing OU.  And then he'll need to change the name of this forum - at least. 

It is an ASTONISHING TRUTH that the facts of INFINITE COP and the data for it's proof - and the witnesses for accuracy of that data are all available.  EVERYTHING GIVEN AS IT SHOULD BE.  Poynty has tried to present some fictions related to a simulated replication but has over looked the MOST OBVIOUS PROOF OF ALL.  The battery voltage swings in perfect synchronicity with a current charge and recharge.  THIS SHOULD NOT BE POSSIBLE.  There is NOTHING in the circuit that can permit this FREE FLOW OF CURRENT IN EITHER DIRECTION.  That's it.  And when he can explain that then INDEED start quibbling about those measurements.  Because then he'll - at least - be making some appropriate comments.

Golly.
Rosemary
ADDED

Just for good measure - here's that PROOF.

MrMag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 754
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1731 on: July 01, 2011, 07:57:42 AM »
Mag, dude.  What is your problem?

Rose owes you not 1 thing.  You probably treat your mother this way also. I can imagine that.

You act like she took something from you and you are trying to get it back. Unreal

What have you done on this forum that is in any way productive?  Nota thing. You just come here each day, and you put on the gloves and have at it. Its like your daily amusement.

Do you think everyone is cheering you on? It is you who have no credibility. It is you that has nothing. It is your daily plan to come here to beat up on this woman. It seems to be your profile.

Get a life dude. 

Hi Rose.  ;]

Mags

Hey Mags,

Why don't you start back at my first post on this thread. I simply asked for her to do a simple test. She then attacks me with with stupid remarks. When I agreed with Poynt then all her crap started. She will not listen to anyone she just likes to put people down. It's like some kind of complex. Just tell her that you don't think that her circuit is OU and stand back. She is an ignorant old lady and anybody with any academic background at all will just laugh at her.


Don't you think that if she wants to come across as a credible person that maybe she should be a little more professional with her answers. She started with the name calling. She admits that she is an amateur yet when someone as capable as Poynt and some of the others here try to explain something to her she just calls them names. She doesn't know dick. She wouldn't know it if it slapped her on the face.

MrMag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 754
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1732 on: July 01, 2011, 08:03:40 AM »
MrMag has been very helpful to me on this forum in sharing his knowledge.  He was especially helpful in my obtaining an O'scope from ebay a while back.  I have been supportive of Rose as well.  I calls them likes I sees them.

Bill

Thanx Bill, I appreciate it. I usually don't go down to the same level that some of these ignorant testers do. But this old hag just keeps making rude remarks. She is a lost cause, she will never accept the truth so I guess I should just leave her alone.

MrMag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 754
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1733 on: July 01, 2011, 08:08:10 AM »
Dear Magsy,

You have got to be the most generous spirited, bravest, kindest man on this forum.  Your posts are a delight.  They are entirely void of conceit.  If I had to nominate an exemplary contributor Magsy - it's you.  And if we had more people like you then this forum would be an ABSOLUTE pleasure.  I am reasonably satisfied that I don't deserve this intervention of yours.  But it is, nonetheless, gratefully accepted.

Magsy - there is a very real advantage to the caliber of posts that Cat and MaNag make.  It polarises opinion.  And that's so much better than hunkering down with like minds.  Not that supportive threads aren't a pleasure.  Of course they are.  And where there's support one can also progress to new insights and new knowledge.  But meanwhile there are members and readers here who SIMPLY DO NOT BELIEVE.  When they see that they share that opinion with the likes of Cat and MaNag - then they're not quite as cozy with that association.  And I have NO reputation to win or lose.  I ONLY have a mission to advance OU.  The plus side to their posts is that they're SO unreasonable, SO rude, SO self-serving - SO ridiculous - that the thinking members who read here SEE THIS.  That, surprisingly, swings opinion favour of OU.  And I'm ABSOLUTELY NOT out to win a popularity contest.  LOL.  It's like waitressing.  I'd be hopelessly under qualified.  And that there is no evident support - is not a problem.  I am a lot of things.  But I am NOT afraid to fight my corner.  And while I may well be a lot of things I'm certainly NOT a coward. 

But thank you Magsy.  Very much indeed.  It's nice to know that there are still some real MEN on this forum.  A lot of the problem is that most guys have NO respect for a female in the science world.  That's why so few post here.  Me?  I'm happy to rub their noses in their own nonsense.

Rosie

Thank-you rose, I accept your apology.

MrMag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 754
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1734 on: July 01, 2011, 09:12:53 AM »
Mag, dude.  What is your problem?

Rose owes you not 1 thing.  You probably treat your mother this way also. I can imagine that.
Did I say that she owes me anything? Treat my Mother this way, yeah right. My Mother is open minded and not delusional.


You act like she took something from you and you are trying to get it back. Unreal
I just asked her to do a simple test. I don't know what you mean by she took something from me.


What have you done on this forum that is in any way productive?  Nota thing. You just come here each day, and you put on the gloves and have at it. Its like your daily amusement.

Well, first off, I asked her to do a simple test to prove her circuit. She is the one who is unproductive. Ask her what she has done in the last 10 years to improve her circuit so that it could be used. Yes, you are right. It is very amusing. She thinks she knows more then a lot of people here that have tried to set her straight.

Do you think everyone is cheering you on? It is you who have no credibility. It is you that has nothing. It is your daily plan to come here to beat up on this woman. It seems to be your profile.

Get a life dude. 
Golly, I hope nobody is cheering me on. I have no credibility when it comes to what? I never claimed to have anything. She is the one who is making the claims that has nothing. No, I come here to see if she has finally come to her senses.

Get a clue dude.

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1735 on: July 01, 2011, 09:18:33 AM »
You argue my case very well MaNag.   I've known parrots with a wider repertoire.  And your identity confusions are now getting catastrophic.  Magsy is Magluvin's nick name.  He's the best example of our forum members.  I don't think any of us would mind you trying to borrow his identity.  But then try and act like him.  That would help us all.

And MaNag - I'm OLD.  I'm not UGLY.  I am not a HAG.  Not yet anyway.  I'm still well able to turn the occasional head.  LOL.

Rosemary

ADDED
Btw I took the trouble to revisit that first post of yours.  If that's an example of fair minded reasonableness - then clearly we are reading different posts.
R

MrMag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 754
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1736 on: July 01, 2011, 09:25:08 AM »
You argue my case very well MaNag.   I've known parrots with a wider repertoire.  And your identity confusions are now getting catastrophic.  Magsy is Magluvin's nick name.  He's the best example of our forum members.  I don't think any of us would mind you trying to borrow his identity.  But then try and act like him.  That would help us all.

And MaNag - I'm OLD.  I'm not UGLY.  I am not a HAG.  Not yet anyway.  I'm still well able to turn the occasional head.  LOL.

Rosemary

Golly rosy,
You call me so many different things that I was sure that you were talking to me. But that's ok, I'll take it as an apology from you anyways.

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1737 on: July 01, 2011, 09:27:36 AM »
Golly rosy,
You call me so many different things that I was sure that you were talking to me. But that's ok, I'll take it as an apology from you anyways.

You're welcome Nag.  The more so if it'll encourage you to simply go away.

Rosie

powercat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1091
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1738 on: July 01, 2011, 09:32:56 AM »
Another HALF TRUTH.  Indeed.  No-one on this forum has produced OU with our circuit.  TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE NO-ONE ON THIS FORUM HAS TRIED TO REPLICATE OUR CIRCUIT. 
I AM NOT CLAIMING AN OVER UNITY RESULT.  What we're CLAIMING is INFINITE COP. 
Rosemary

Here are few videos for members on the forum, they are other members that didn't make videos who also failed in their attempts to match your claim of OU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XrwgEb5ac_w
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZM8BBa7_Zpc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4x0wQJrc9To
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-GBS3sKcB8g
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=trip8gjoxMQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpaP__5Kd38

If you don't want to call it OU that's fine we will call it excess energy, hopefully that will stop another pointless argument argument, however you want to dress it up and twist everything the fact remains that despite many people trying to reproduce your circuit none of them can match your results, and you do nothing to help them, and if they question why it is not working you generally attacked them, you keep coming up with arguments that have already been covered in previous posts, there is not one person on this forum who believes your circuit will produce any excess energy, and that is why your supporters can't make the circuit.

you have a good political way of getting your message across, but when most people look at the reality of the history of your circuit on this forum and you're refusal to do any new test.
it is clear to most of them that you are just using this forum for grandstanding and publicity.

powercat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1091
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1739 on: July 01, 2011, 10:12:26 AM »
MrMag has been very helpful to me on this forum in sharing his knowledge.  He was especially helpful in my obtaining an O'scope from ebay a while back.  I have been supportive of Rose as well.  I calls them likes I sees them.

Bill

Hi Bill

The main problem here is that Rosie keeps insisting that her circuit produces excess energy, many members on this forum replicated that circuit failed to get any excess energy, if they complain about the circuit not working properly Rosie generally attacks them.

If you are going to claim excess energy on this forum you are expected to interact with reasonable requests for new tests, I think that it's only reasonable when making such claims.

there are plenty of people out there claiming they have got a free energy circuit if we invited them all on here, and told them that they didn't have to interact with anyone who made requests for them to prove their case, this forum would lose all credibility.

Yes Rosie's work is very interesting and can be considered good research material,are but her attitude to members here that make reasonable requests or suggest that her circuit might not work,is appalling.

« Last Edit: July 01, 2011, 03:47:40 PM by powercat »