Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011  (Read 741141 times)

poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3582
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1260 on: May 13, 2011, 09:22:03 PM »
I have slightly modified the diagram taken from my post here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=10407.msg283940#msg283940

Let us know if this is an accurate representation of both your circuit and the scope probe positions.

.99

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1261 on: May 13, 2011, 09:31:35 PM »
I have slightly modified the diagram taken from my post here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=10407.msg283940#msg283940

Let us know if this is an accurate representation of both your circuit and the scope probe positions.

.99

THANK YOU POYNTY POINT.  I think it's right.   Is the FG's ground on the gate of Q2?  Can't quite see where it goes.  I'll try again in better light in the morning.  But if that's how I listed in THEN it's certainly correct.  It's CERTAINLY correct for the position of the CSR and the probes.

How clever of you Poynty.  Many, many thanks indeed.

Kindest regards,
Rosie

fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1262 on: May 14, 2011, 03:45:20 AM »
Guys - for those who are doing replications as a simulation - here's the required layout.  Hope it helps.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary 

1  Negative terminal >
2 ground of the battery scope probe >
3 wire >
4 ground of the CSR scope probe >
5 CSR >
6 CSR scope probe >
7 wire >
8 ground of the functions generator to gate of Q2 >
9 Q2 - 3 legs source drain gate >
10 wire >
11 To Q1 - 3 legs gate drain source  (respectively) >
12 input from functions generator at Q1 >
13 wire >
14 resistor element  >
15 wire >
16 scope probe on the positive terminal of the battery. >
17 batteries

I'm going to try and download a schematic but note that there's a minor amendment at 8 - 13 that needs to be applied.

Stefan,

I was under the assumption that posting "FALSE" and "INACCURATE" information is against Overunity.com forum policy ?

Rosemary was told by you, Poynt, myself and many other members that the posted circuit diagram in her blog was incorrect since April 21, 2011.
http://newlightondarkenergy.blogspot.com/2011/04/109-simulated-circuit.html#links

Rosemary is now undeniably treating all the guests, members and replicators of the COP> INFINITY circuit as total retarded idiots, posting the "FALSE" and "INACCURATE" circuit diagram again here.
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=10407.msg286194#msg286194

From what I thought this forum is not a 3rd grade science fair and beyond high school electronics but every person posting in this thread that agree with her claimed "FINDINGS" of a COP> INFINITY say nothing of Rosemary's continued published error of a "FALSE" and "INACCURATE" circuit diagram .... and the posting members whom also claim knowledge and experimental experience say nothing ?

HELLO !!! ..... We are talking about the most simple electronic circuit ... with ten ( 10 ) parts .... ten ( 10 ) parts !!

1) IRFPG50 N Mosfet ( x5 )
2) 1 ohm resistor - CSR ( x4)
3) 9.9 ohm load inductor ( x1 )

THIS IS NOT A MOTHERBOARD FOR A COMPUTER !!!!

I don't understand "WHY" Rosemary claims over ten ( 10 ) years of working with this very small amount of parts can't get it right or even draw "HER" invention or claim ? Isn't it her and no one else job or responsibility to provide accurate information on her claim and not members ?


Please "REMOVE" posting http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=10407.msg286194#msg286194 the "FALSE" and "INACCURATE" circuit diagram.

This looks to me as a Rosemary LOL ... "IN YOU FACE" job giving all guests, members and replicators reading her blog and here at Over Unity the wrong construction circuit diagram again ....

Stefan also please consider reviewing Rosemary's material prior to anyone seeing it posted to be a accurate reflection of the circuit she claims has a COP> INFINITY now that the very basic first part a circuit diagram was purposely posted wrong to confuse everyone ... by design.



Glen
 :(

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1263 on: May 14, 2011, 05:04:12 AM »
Guys,

I'm not sure what actually happened.  I can access my blog to post again, but it seems that my 'water to boil' posts have indeed been removed off my blogsite.  If any of you have a blogspot and know how to report this then please advise.  I'm not finding my way around how to do this.

Many thanks
Rosemary

poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3582
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1264 on: May 14, 2011, 05:16:27 AM »
Guys,

I'm not sure what actually happened.  I can access my blog to post again, but it seems that my 'water to boil' posts have indeed been removed off my blogsite.  If any of you have a blogspot and know how to report this then please advise.  I'm not finding my way around how to do this.

Many thanks
Rosemary

As an alternative for the time being, can you post them here?

.99

poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3582
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1265 on: May 14, 2011, 05:19:04 AM »
Rose,

Is Donny able to email you a picture of the simulation schematic he is now using?

It would be nice if you could post that here.

.99

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1266 on: May 14, 2011, 05:33:35 AM »
Rose,

Is Donny able to email you a picture of the simulation schematic he is now using?

It would be nice if you could post that here.

.99


Poynty - Donny is NOT working on this.  He's working on other things.  His time spent on this subject is very constrained.  He'll only be able to concentrate time on this subject when we get formal research funding.  He has a young family to support and works 24/7 on his own inventions that are absolutely cutting edge.  Mostly related to improvements on traditional energy savings and water savings.  But as in most  'new technologies' he has to forge all kinds of software and suchlike to get it all going.  But he absolutely CANNOT afford time on something as radical as our tests because they do not YET carry enough credibility to afford research funding.  When they do - then he'll come to the party full time.  It's his passion.  But he does not believe in the value of forums although he believes in Open Source.  Not many do believe in the value of forums.  And considering my own history - it's probably a fair concern.  I only stick to it because I believe dialogue has a way of getting to those fundamental issues as well as a means of spreading the word. 

Kindest again,
Rosie

BTW - those posts are here already.  I simply transposed them to the blogsite.  For some reason they've not been re-instated there.  I'll try and post a link.  Hang ten.  OK  I think it starts here.  My page 67.

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=10407.msg283810#msg283810

poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3582
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1267 on: May 14, 2011, 05:42:21 AM »
OK Rose.

I only asked as it was my impression that Donny did the original simulations you posted, and that he may also be working on the new configuration, as per your email to me.

Quote
I'm sending you a clearer schematic - from DONNY.  BUT NOTE you need to amend his schematic in line with this and 8 - 13 above.

.99

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1268 on: May 14, 2011, 05:53:05 AM »
OK Rose.

I only asked as it was my impression that Donny did the original simulations you posted, and that he may also be working on the new configuration, as per your email to me.

.99

He did do that sim and the schematic.  But it was only intended to show the 'waveforms' with that MOSFET setting.  It would have been added to the report if we got all those professors to attend. 

We BOTH want your work here Poynty.  It's guaranteed to be unbiased - in view of your history of dissention.   :)

poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3582
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1269 on: May 14, 2011, 05:59:32 AM »
He did do that sim and the schematic.  But it was only intended to show the 'waveforms' with that MOSFET setting.  It would have been added to the report if we got all those professors to attend. 

We BOTH want your work here Poynty.  It's guaranteed to be unbiased - in view of your history of dissention.   :)

You are welcome to use any of my simulations.

Be aware however, that all my posted simulations have been based on the original "as-built" configuration as shown in the demonstration video.

.99

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1270 on: May 14, 2011, 06:08:51 AM »
You are welcome to use any of my simulations.

Be aware however, that all my posted simulations have been based on the original "as-built" configuration as shown in the video demonstration.

.99

No Poynty.  We need the corrected version.  But we'll wait.  There's no hurry.  Enjoy your sunshine.

 ;D 

ADDED.  And in any event I still have to post over those video shots and so forth.  I should get my computer back on Monday or Tuesday at the latest.

Take care,
Kindest regards,
Rosie

poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3582
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1271 on: May 14, 2011, 06:14:59 AM »
No Poynty.  We need the corrected version.  But we'll wait.  There's no hurry.  Enjoy your sunshine.

 ;D

Well, that brings us right back to getting commitment to a circuit diagram, which I have been striving for for some time now.

If the diagram IS per the one I posted above, then as I have already mentioned some time ago, I have NOT been able to get that circuit to oscillate.

So, if there are several folks working on this in the background (as you have indicated), and they have all had success with the simulation as per the new updated circuit, then you apparently don't need my work.

.99

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1272 on: May 14, 2011, 06:26:19 AM »
Well, that brings us right back to getting commitment to a circuit diagram, which I have been striving for for some time now.

If the diagram IS per the one I posted above, then as I have already mentioned some time ago, I have NOT been able to get that circuit to oscillate.

So, if there are several folks working on this in the background (as you have indicated), and they have all had success with the simulation as per the new updated circuit, then you apparently don't need my work.

.99

Poynty.  We have a problem of timing.  I cannot view the schematic until I can see it.  I can't see it clearly because the light is still bad and my eyes are rather weak.  I should be able to view it CLEARLY by about 9.00 am.  By then you'll be asleep.  It's now 6.25 am or thereby.  BUT.  If you can't get it to oscillate and I do  then we're overlooking something.  And those who are working on this absolutely HAVE NOT informed me as to whether or not they've got an oscillation.  If they do then it will be a 'replication' of a simulation.  The first is significant.  The second will be equally so.  The first 5 should be conclusive.  Right now I only have the one early indication that this is possible at all. 

My own thoughts are this.  Either the sim is possible.  Or it's not.  Either way it requires reference.   Because CERTAINLY the experimental evidence is that - not only is it possible - but it is repeatedly so. 

Hold fire there Poynty.  I'm doing my best.
Kindest regards,
Rosie

added.
What I can't see are the junctions around the switch on that schematic.  But I assure you that if you've configured it that it conforms to my 16 point list - then it's PERFECT.

Another point.  DOES YOUR FG GROUND GO DIRECTLY TO THE GATE AT Q2?  Nowhere else? That's what I'm trying to establish.

poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3582
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1273 on: May 14, 2011, 06:42:53 AM »
Rose,

The FG ground goes to the Q2 Gate, which is also connected to the Q1 Source.

.99

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1274 on: May 14, 2011, 06:54:21 AM »
Rose,

The FG ground goes to the Q2 Gate, which is also connected to the Q1 Source.

.99

Yes.  I've just checked.  There is that link.  But I think the negative current signal bypasses Q1's source entirely.  What happens if you take the ground ONLY to Q2 gate?  Maybe the sim is factoring in something that's actually not happening.  As I see it - in my mind's eye - the negative signal is 'positive' relative to the new positioning of Q2's gate.  Therefore it's just getting triggered in the usual way but reading the circuit's actual circuit DRAIN as the SOURCE.  Maybe worth trying?

Regards,
Rosie   
ADDED