Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011  (Read 741449 times)

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1245 on: May 13, 2011, 09:44:59 AM »
page margins fixed... ;)

until he does it again... ::)

Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1246 on: May 13, 2011, 09:49:07 AM »
page margins fixed... ;)

until he does it again... ::)

Nice work around Wilby.  I could have downsized the photo but I have no Moderator powers over here.

Bill

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1247 on: May 13, 2011, 09:55:00 AM »
Nice work around Wilby.  I could have downsized the photo but I have no Moderator powers over here.

Bill
thanks. more than one way to skin a cat... ;) yes, stephan really should address the picture thing. i cannot understand his refusal to.

fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1248 on: May 13, 2011, 10:13:24 AM »
Glen:

I have a wide screen monitor and it still goes way off the page.  I was not speaking to you specifically, only to those that consistently post photos over 800 X 600. Yes it IS a size issue and not what you say.

As a Moderator on many topics here, I spend most of my time re-sizing photos to preserve the page readability.  So, trust me on this, I know of what i speak.

800 x 600 will not cause any problems at all.

The software should have a feature that says "Please size your photo to no larger than 800 x 600, thank you." when someone tries to upload a larger photo, but it does not do this.  I wish it did.

Bill

Well Bill for resizing the image that is posted http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=10407.msg286011#msg286011 resizing that screen capture image for a complete posting history in my data repository or here is now unimportant.

I will next time make my internet browser window narrower which moves the posted type setting around so I don't have to shrink down anything for posting here.

I do think the reply now that eighty (80) people have downloaded that image has a real epic effect on the open source community in which Stephan was attacked and needs to be noted here on a reasonable six (6) part request he made.

Fuzzy

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1249 on: May 13, 2011, 10:17:25 AM »
Wilby - as ever.  I'm indebted.  One day I'll discharge that debt - I hope.

And guys - one new member will be posting a replication on line.  He's starting with the 1 MOSFET configuration and will then move on from there.  There may possibly be a second member who'll be doing this or something similar.  It seems that when the trolls 'come out' then there's also some incentives to keep focus on this technology.  Great news - and thanks to you both.  Actually there's also a third.  But I'm not sure that he wants to work on line.

What is most urgently needed though is that some of you who can - please try and simulate that circuit.  If you have difficulties PM Poynty.  I'm reasonably certain that he'll be able to assist - if he can.  Which is NOT to say that Poynty endorses these or any results.  Just that he knows exactly what to do.  He also feels that the simulation will point at some 'problem' with the computations.  But I'm sure that a wide assessment of this will all help to get to the bottom of things.

Now. For that report.  I'll be downloading it when I've got a corrected schematic.  I'm hoping to get hold of that during the weekend.  Sorry all.  I'm not equal to drawing it - and, right now, I can't even post a scribble.  I don't think I need to repeat why. I'll hear later today when it'll FINALLY be returned. 

Take care all.
Kindest regards,
Rosie

ADDED

And Wilby and/or Bill, I would be SO GRATEFUL if you could be given moderator status on this thread.  I entirely trust your impartiality.  Perhaps Stefan could consider this.  Clearly he doesn't have the time or the interest to do this himself.

PLEASE APPLY on behalf of us all.

And Wilby  Please check your PMs
« Last Edit: May 13, 2011, 10:43:31 AM by Rosemary Ainslie »

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1250 on: May 13, 2011, 10:40:19 AM »

I do think the reply now that eighty (80) people have downloaded that image has a real epic effect on the open source community in which Stephan was attacked and needs to be noted here on a reasonable six (6) part request he made.

Fuzzy
80 people have not 'downloaded' your picture... the count increases every time someone views that page. go look at your post and hit refresh on your browser a couple of times... look, it's over a hundred now!!! in less than 5 minutes.  yeah, real epic effect isn't it?

hoptoad

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1009

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1252 on: May 13, 2011, 01:01:00 PM »
Definitely a FRIDAY 13TH that I'll remember.

I posted across our 'water to boil' test results onto my blog.  A series of 4 posts in all.  All 4 were removed.  They were my tests.  The evidence COPIOUS except that I'm still waiting to upload the video shots.  I CANNOT UNDERSTAND THIS.  Nor can I understand why they've removed my access to any further posting.  Strange things afoot.  One could almost think that they don't want this information out there :o  ;D

And then the question is 'who are THEY?'  LOL.  I took the trouble to mention that this was NOT a discovery but more of an 'unfolding' of hidden potentials.  Golly.  I hope no-one's thinking of either patenting this or even suppressing it.  Those energy barriers are dead in the water.  And it's WAY too late to try and put a lid on all this.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

Added.  All's good.  Apparently there are problems on Google's blog site.  I have NOT been banned - and I believe that there's an outside chance they may yet recover those posts of mine.  A couple of days of lost posts.  Golly.  That's probably numbering in the millions.  Not the best Friday 13th for them either. 
« Last Edit: May 13, 2011, 01:42:24 PM by Rosemary Ainslie »

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1253 on: May 13, 2011, 05:57:34 PM »
Guys - for those who are doing replications as a simulation - here's the required layout.  Hope it helps.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary 

1  Negative terminal >
2 ground of the battery scope probe >
3 wire >
4 ground of the CSR scope probe >
5 CSR >
6 CSR scope probe >
7 wire >
8 ground of the functions generator to gate of Q2 >
9 Q2 - 3 legs source drain gate >
10 wire >
11 To Q1 - 3 legs gate drain source  (respectively) >
12 input from functions generator at Q1 >
13 wire >
14 resistor element  >
15 wire >
16 scope probe on the positive terminal of the battery. >
17 batteries

I'm going to try and download a schematic but note that there's a minor amendment at 8 - 13 that needs to be applied.


fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1254 on: May 13, 2011, 07:48:47 PM »
The attached circuit diagram was established to be Protoboard_schema_added.png for the COP> INFINITY device.

Now using the N Mosfets standard (G) Gate (S) Source and (D) Drain nomenclature and pin positions there is a discrepancy from the Simulation Schematic.

Please notice that the Mosfet (G) Gate and (S) Source connections on Q2 through Q5 are different on the Simulation Schematic.jpg posted here now http://newlightondarkenergy.blogspot.com/2011/04/109-simulated-circuit.html#links on your blog and posted here http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=10407.msg286194#msg286194



Which circuit diagram was not used and is false and inaccurate ??

Which circuit diagram was used for Rosemary's FINDING and claim of COP> INFINITY ??



Fuzzy
 ???

poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3582
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1255 on: May 13, 2011, 08:17:34 PM »
Rose,

It seems to read as if the CSR is connected properly and scoped properly, but until I see an actual fully-updated schematic (not a description of connections which can be misinterpreted) along with the simulation wave forms and measurements thereof, I am not ready to accept that you have a net negative voltage across the CSR. Why can Donny not post his sim results here?

.99

poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3582
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1256 on: May 13, 2011, 08:36:30 PM »
Poynty - OUR RESULTS - as shown.  OUR CLAIM related to the results - as shown.  The circuit excluded the eccentric MOSFET config.  The Ground of the functions generator - which I KNOW is what you're asking - IS AS SHOWN. 

The water to boil test - we PUT THE FG's GROUND as I explained earlier. 

Regards
Rosie

I surmise then from your response, that you will not commit to a "yes" or "no" answer to that question.

.99

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1257 on: May 13, 2011, 08:49:33 PM »
I surmise then from your response, that you will not commit to a "yes" or "no" answer to that question.

.99

LOL.  I have NO idea how to answer it more fully.  But nice to see you're happy with the positioning of the CSR and sundry.  I'm going to redo this test when I've got my PC back so that I can video - at least ten minutes - of the 'water to boil' number.  I plan to 'knock your socks off'.  lol

And Poynty,  Donny works 18 hours a day - earning a living.  He hardly has time to sleep.  You don't get idle when you've got that much talent.  And frankly none of the team care to work on forum as I do.  And I only do this because I appreciate the value of all that negative comment.  You have no idea how valuable the dialogue is.  The more negative the better.  When people line up on two or more sides of an argument then they're also asking questions.  And it's those questions that matter most.  To me anyway. 

So.  If that 'layout' is right - and since everyone is calling for it - and since I cannot draw it - then Poynty Point?  Perhaps if you have a spare minute or two - perhaps you could oblige us all?  It would be MOST appreciated. 

Kindest regards,
Rosie   ;D

neptune

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1127
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1258 on: May 13, 2011, 09:05:56 PM »
Hi Rosemary . I understand you are going to repeat the water boiling test . Last time , you expressed surprise that the water reached 100 degrees Celsius without appearing to boil . I have come across this before , in my international truck driving days . We use a 12 volt immersion heater [120 watts] which you put in your tea or coffee cup . The water never boiled like it would in a pan on a stove , it just steamed and you could see tiny bubbles rising . Apparently you need a lot of power to promote vigorous boiling .

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1259 on: May 13, 2011, 09:10:29 PM »
Hi Rosemary . I understand you are going to repeat the water boiling test . Last time , you expressed surprise that the water reached 100 degrees Celsius without appearing to boil . I have come across this before , in my international truck driving days . We use a 12 volt immersion heater [120 watts] which you put in your tea or coffee cup . The water never boiled like it would in a pan on a stove , it just steamed and you could see tiny bubbles rising . Apparently you need a lot of power to promote vigorous boiling .

Quite possibly Neptune.  But the lack of noise I think was the result of the vacuum flask - and we're at sea level.  Not sure how that effects the 'boil' temperature.  It's a question that I'll leave for the boffins here.

Take care Neptune.
Kindest regards,
Rosie