Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 897288
  • *Total Topics: 15811
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 2
  • *Guests: 11
  • *Total: 13

Author Topic: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011  (Read 631318 times)

Offline vonwolf

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 144
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1155 on: May 06, 2011, 10:52:02 PM »
   Rose don't sell you're work short if it can boil water then all the current infrastructure can still be used hopefully with no fuel or much less anyway. Boiling water is what its all about on a large scale well you know what I mean anyways no need to go over it all again.
  It figures I'd get banned over there and miss the show, they're going to be doing some real tap dancing and I'm going to miss it. This is going to be really interesting for a while.

  Pete

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1156 on: May 06, 2011, 11:14:22 PM »
   Rose don't sell you're work short if it can boil water then all the current infrastructure can still be used hopefully with no fuel or much less anyway. Boiling water is what its all about on a large scale well you know what I mean anyways no need to go over it all again.
  It figures I'd get banned over there and miss the show, they're going to be doing some real tap dancing and I'm going to miss the show. This is going to be really interesting for a while.

  Pete

Hi Peter Petes,  This is amazing news.  But don't get me wrong.  I'm really not selling myself short.  Far from it.  I really need our evidence for my thesis.  But it's nowhere near as useable as Romero's.  But of course it'll play some part in things.  One can always make use of what nature gives us.  And I agree.  It won't be long now and poor Poynty et al will have to argue with the entire world and all that evidence that's now going to bubble up all over the place.  That will be so nice.  And so INTERESTING to see how he'll tackle this.  It's likely to catch him on the back foot - standing on the crumbling pillars of Thermodynamic Laws.  What fun.  I just wonder what MileHigh will have left to live for.   lol.  At the moment his raison d'etre is as he put's it 'flying by the seat of his pants' in those explanations for HOW THINGS WORK.  Very clear expositions of entirely meaningless science.  And as for FuzzyWuzzy.  Moral destitution to intellectual suicide in one fell swoop.  They'll have to change their theme topics because they've shown themselves somewhat underqualified to comment on New Age Physics.  And that's ALL OF THEM.  Just so nice. 

But Ron is right.  This new development will take the focus off this thread - I trust - and then I can rabbit on - at ease and out of focus.  And, God willing, we'll be able to take this to explanation - even if applications are somewhat obsolete - ALREADY?  Golly. Where will all this end?

Anyway.  I can't stop smiling. 
Take good care.
Kindest as ever,
Rosie

Offline i_ron

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1160
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1157 on: May 07, 2011, 03:13:03 AM »

  It figures I'd get banned over there and miss the show, they're going to be doing some real tap dancing and I'm going to miss it. This is going to be really interesting for a while.

  Pete

LOL, just checked out OUR and I am banned too!!! The poor dears are having a wake over there I guess, and don't want us to see the tears!!!

All the best

Ron


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1157 on: May 07, 2011, 03:13:03 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1158 on: May 07, 2011, 03:39:22 AM »
LOL, just checked out OUR and I am banned too!!! The poor dears are having a wake over there I guess, and don't want us to see the tears!!!

All the best

Ron

Golly.  No end to Poynty's punishments.  You and Pete banned from seeing their latest discussion on - wait for it - POLITICS.  lol.  It's hilarious.  They've given up on science and are now assuaging their bruised intellects by talking philosophy.  With all the pretensions that they used to give to science.  Anyway.  I better not gloat.  It's bad manners.  But IRRESISTIBLE.  Just so NICE to see a RARE victory for COP INFINITY. 

But I assure you both.  You're missing NOTHING. 

Kindest regards,
Rosie

Offline vonwolf

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 144
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1159 on: May 07, 2011, 04:01:45 AM »
yep I saw that too,its not hard to get around a ban.  oh well

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1159 on: May 07, 2011, 04:01:45 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1160 on: May 07, 2011, 04:26:15 PM »
Well guys - it seems that Romerouk's device is now getting all the attention it deserves.  That is so nice.  And PRECISELY because it's a self runner it'll be impossible to explain this away as a measurements error.  Not that they're not trying this.  I must hand it to MH that he's engrossed in a tangled monologue about RMS values.  Never one to  entirely abandon the classical approach.  He's committing a minor heresy at OUR by claiming that one cannot determine power measurements through averaging.  Poynty will no doubt rap him over the knuckles and poynt him to his own interminable efforts here - at misdirection and obfuscation.  He needs the world and it's wife to IGNORE RMS and just concentrate on AVERAGE.  But the idiocy of all this is now so overwhelming that I think we can safely assume that from here on in - Poynty will NOT be demanding average values anywhere, ever again.  They could still claim that it's fraud.  But I think that will be laughed out of court in no time at all. 

Also of relative comfort is that there is NO further mention of our own fraudulent or deluded claim - take your pick.  Which means that Romero is now centre stage.  And unlike me - he has them FLUMMOXED.  Very nice indeed.

What rather raises the smile is that one of their members is concerned that notwithstanding the excess of expertise and professionalism and even academic accreditation available on their side, or specifically OUR side - that none of them were able to manage the required magic ingredients.  lol.  This I think is the real poser there.  It rather disinclines them to offer the required tribute.  Hopefully there's a way of controlling some of that competitive 'testosterone' and allowing good manners to 'shine through'.  Chivalry is not exactly their thing.  I recall a rather extended exercise in 'old lady bashing' which speaks to this lack.  But it would be really nice to see that they can raise the bar to the extent that they can also admit Romero's remarkable intuition.  That's surely a big factor in his impeccable experimental skills. 

Anyway - this has been a delicious diversion.  It's not off topic guys.  I'll get to the relevance in due course.  And meanwhile - I'm rooting for Romero.  Just so strongly.

Kindest regards,
Rosie

Offline fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1161 on: May 07, 2011, 08:27:58 PM »
So .... is this the Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011 thread it appears to be pages of way off topic subjects.

There has been a major claim in these many pages of a COP > INFINITY on a device or devices to the open source community.

There is from what I see in this thread five (5) or more circuit diagrams shown .... many of them have major problems in the IRFPG50  N Mosfet connections and CRS location which is already well known in the entire open source community.

Exactly which device is verified having the required information as being the correct circuit diagram including complete information on all parts used for a replication to reproduce the COP > INFINITY. This would include all Oscilloscope and Function Generator ( DC offset ) settings also .... everything nothing left out, and all in one place or posting.

So far I have not seen a complete package of information on a COP > INFINITY experimental device that anyone could effectively reproduce results.

A claim of COP > INFINITY takes the experimental bar to the highest position known, and requires the best accurate information available to electronics engineers and academics in order to back up that claim.

Fuzzy

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1161 on: May 07, 2011, 08:27:58 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline iflewmyown

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 130
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1162 on: May 07, 2011, 08:57:43 PM »
Rosemary. Thanks for all your patience in presenting this free energy device. I would guess most people that replicate it will not shout it from the roof tops. The New York Times refused to send a reporter to the Wright brothers to see a heavier than air airplane for a full five years after the first flight because they were assured by the most learned men in the field that such a thing was impossible. At that point it was the Wright brothers who were the most learned men in the field. Somethings never change.  ;)    Good luck in the future.
Garry

Offline fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1163 on: May 07, 2011, 09:02:08 PM »
There seem to be some confusion so here is some manufactures information on the inner portion of the IRFPG50 N MOSFET and the operation of the substrate .....

Figure 6, 7 and 8 Images from the attached (PDF) International Rectifier - Application Note AN-1005 - Power MOSFET Avalanche Design Guidelines


Fuzzy

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1163 on: May 07, 2011, 09:02:08 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1164 on: May 07, 2011, 11:19:03 PM »
Rosemary. Thanks for all your patience in presenting this free energy device. I would guess most people that replicate it will not shout it from the roof tops. The New York Times refused to send a reporter to the Wright brothers to see a heavier than air airplane for a full five years after the first flight because they were assured by the most learned men in the field that such a thing was impossible. At that point it was the Wright brothers who were the most learned men in the field. Somethings never change.  ;)    Good luck in the future.
Garry

Hi iflewmyown.  I'm not so sure that it'll be that difficult to advance the news of all this COP infinitiy.  We have, ourselves, been making systematic headway - albeit rather slow.  And I'm learning how it is that more and more really discerning members of our public are actually dipping into our forums to find out for themselves what all the 'buzz' is about.  What they're not doing 'yet' is to acknowledge their preferred reading matter.  Not yet anyway. 

But motors speak to you guys - on a really deep level.  And I'm reasonably sure that there will be replications happening all over the place  What's held us up are questions related to mesurement.  No-one in their right mind will question a self runner.  It's as elegant and eloquent as is needed. 

Kindest regards and thanks for the well wishes
Rosemary


 

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1165 on: May 07, 2011, 11:32:08 PM »
Guys, it seems that Poynty's flaming has now stopped and Stefan has given license to a new pretender.  Please just concentrate on Groundloops presentations here.  These last contributions are utterly irrelevant.  But I suspect we're going to need to ignore an awful lot of posts if history is about to repeat itself. 

If, for whatever reason this lastest contributor actually manages to lock this thread and get me banned - then look for me on my blog.  I'll just continue posting there. 

kindest regards,
Rosie

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1165 on: May 07, 2011, 11:32:08 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1166 on: May 07, 2011, 11:34:33 PM »
May I remind everyone about a replication in the scientific method ....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_%28scientific_method%29
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote -

Reproducibility is one of the main principles of the scientific method, and refers to the ability of a test or experiment to be accurately reproduced, or replicated, by someone else working independently.

The results of an experiment performed by a particular researcher or group of researchers are generally evaluated by other independent researchers who repeat the same experiment themselves, based on the original experimental description (see independent review). Then they see if their experiment gives similar results to those reported by the original group.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________


This would mean a duplicate, same as, clone or exactly the same device.

This would also mean no substitutions on any components.

The above stipulations exist for a scientific replication to verify the claimed results of any electronic circuit no exceptions.

.

Offline The Boss

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 52
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1167 on: May 08, 2011, 03:49:24 AM »
Quote
Kindest regards and thanks for the well wishes.
 Rosemary


Thank you Rosemary ..you too.

The Boss

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1168 on: May 08, 2011, 09:42:25 AM »
Guys - another quick comment about Romero's work.  I see an in depth discussion on this on Poynty's forum and some very appropriate analyses by some of those members.  This is where I needs must pay tribute to the disciplines of the forum.  Indeed open source advances ones learning and secures knowledge that it never becomes secreted by an exploitive few. 

Very nice Poynty Point.  It shows what you're capable of on either side of a preferred argument.  All that's lacking is consistency.  But it's good to see what your members are capable of when their interest is finally piqued.

Regards,
Rosemary 

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1169 on: May 08, 2011, 10:45:52 AM »
And Guys, I think, round about now, I should try and explain the relevance of Romero's work to our own - albeit less dramatic evidence.  It has nothing to do with the results and everything to do with the measurements.

You guys are captivated by the motor.  With good reason.  It's sexier to see those moving parts.  You're all of you skilled experimentalists - and the 'holy grail' of all this research is to get rid of any overt dependency on an energy supply source.  Therein lies 'true freedom' so to speak.  Certainly it extends one's potential for true self reliance away from a direct geographic reliance on our supply monopolists.  But - by the same token, it has been impossibly difficult to prove a motor's efficiencies.  One just needs to look at the work of Bedini et al - and their efforts in this regard.

Now, while those numbers could be contended - while the actual level of efficiency was subject to any kind of debate - then there was also no reason to consider any such work to be any real threat to our jealous energy suppliers.  Therefore was there also no real reason to mount a campaign of objection.  And even where the efficiencies were debated and contended - it was never enough justification to halt progress, so to speak.  That motor configuration was going to be studied - no matter what.  It's where your hearts lie.  With good reason.  Back to the 'sexiness' of moving parts and to the compelling and compulsive interests of all you engineers.

Our own experimental evidence was always compelling.  Coupled with which there was a pesky prediction required for those results in an eccentric thesis.  And that thesis represented an entire departure from conventional phyiscs.  Field theory reduced to a digital analysis and requiring consideration of nothing more than a positive - a negative and a neutral.  In effect, it was nothing more than a philosophical reach into dialectic exercise in logic.  But it had some rather compelling parallels to known physics.  No overt contradictions to what was classical and what was quantum and even what was not.  It conformed.

What was not arguable was the repeatability of the experimental proof of that thesis.  And so it was absolutely required to attack - not so much the results - but the person advancing those results.  Not the message so much as the messenger.  I don't think I need remind you all.  Threads flamed, threads locked, threads dedicated to maligning me, and on and on. Certainly I was widely painted as a deluded incompetent and there was even a time where I was accused of the fraudulent attempt to somehow capitalise on this knowledge which I'd plagiarised from Open Source.  But it's painful to remember it all let alone to reference it here. And it's inappropriate to moralise.  So.  I'll try and get to the point.

Which is this.  There is no earthly way that you can get a self runner without accessing an energy supply that has heretofore been 'outlawed' by our scientific community.  This is now 'in the bag'.  What must follow on from this is a sincere revision of those concepts related to energy.  And most especially this needs a radical revision of the actual properties of energy itself.  This will now need some real attention from our brightest and best academicians.  And here we can all rest easy.  Theoreticians have been somewhat adventurous in pointing to explanations.  But to the best of my knowledge there is no theoretician that has presumed to propose, let alone to analyse, the actual properties of energy.  And as that is now required - I am reaonably certain that they'll come to the table to address this.  And physics is absolutely NOT determined by speculation.  A line of argument is either right or it's wrong.  And in the unlikely event that my own exercise is even half-way right - or even if it's entirely wrong - then the fact is that the explanation will STILL BE NEEDED.  And thus far they've been able to avoid the question at all. 

I hope that goes some way to explaining my relief in seeing the good work that Romero's doing - and indeed that all are doing in their efforts to protect this knowledge and keep it open source.  And I trust it will explain the relevance to this thread topic - circuitously (lol) related as it is to our own work.  If I am even 'half way right' then what I'm seeing is the potential, not only of defeating those prescribed constraints in the transfer of energy - but of defeating even the gravitational forces.  It's all good news.  I see a bright beacon of light - where I am only used to pointing to a small 'glimmer'.   And that glimmer was shrouded by the most concerted attack that has ever been advanced on these forums.  And, by the looks of our latest contributor here, is likely to continue. 

Anyway.  It's all good news everyone.  Really, really good news.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

 

OneLink