I think you know what I am getting at. If not then I'll certainly try my best to help you understand.

.99

Yes, all too well. But what you may have missed here is it is all right if you post one circuit and talk about another, I'm supposed to understand. Yet if Rosemary where to post similarly, then it is the end of the world.

Ron

Yes, all too well. But what you may have missed here is it is all right if you post one circuit and talk about another, I'm supposed to understand. Yet if Rosemary where to post similarly, then it is the end of the world.

Ron

Noted. I will try to do better in the future.

However, you DID understand, and I suspect most everyone did also. I think you made a mountain from a molehill, and really didn't establish the point you had intended.

Now, if you would see fit to afford Rose the same scrutiny you just did to my post, it might help move this topic in a forward direction.

.99

Well Poynty Point.  I’m not sure that anyone’s holding a knife to your throat.  If you don’t like me and you don’t approve of this technology – then there’s a simple solution.  Just go away.  I believe you’ve got your own forum where you and your cronies can rabbit on about the stupidity of over unity claims - for as long as like.  And then you can bore yourselves to tears and feel very superior while you’re at it.

For some reason there’s an ardent over commitment to protect us from our own interests.  And I think that the most members on this forum can tolerate the fact that I am an amateur because the most of them are only really interested in the facts of this experiment.  And while I’m an amateur – those who have assisted me in this development  – most certainly are not.  And even as an amateur it seems that I have MUCH to teach you.   Let me remind you about your undersampling claims, among many other rather deliberate obfuscations.

Just go away Poynty Point.  And leave us all with our freedoms to decide what we want to discuss – or not.  It seems that the only people dedicated to stopping this discussion is you and Pickle.  Others who don’t care enough just don’t bother to ‘dip in’ here.  That’s how it should be any democratic forum.  Unless of course, you’re trying to turn this into a tyranny – where only you have a voice.  Where only your opinion matters.  Unless you’re trying to derail this thread because you JUST really need to keep a lid on things.

I would have thought – in general – that if this is all nonsense – then it will all just ‘die a natural death’.  Truth, on the other hand, seems to survive all kinds of attack.  So.  Let the story unfold – as indeed it will.  Just stop trying to tell us what that truth is.  You clearly ignore even the truth of your own simulation results.  I’m not sure that you’re equal to this particular truth.  So.  Just exercise your own democratic freedoms of choice and GO AWAY.  It’s simple.

Rosie.

@All,

I have made a new drawing of the RA switch based on email information from Rosemary.
The function generator signal input is on the gate at Q1 and the reference of the function generator
is on the gate on Q2 etc. The shunt resistors are in series with the minus rail on the batteries.

GL.

I poynted out that the poll topic started by Poynt has 7 questions...one of which is positive, one is neutral, and the other five are negative.  Sounds a little biased to me.  Pollsters frequently do this when they want the results to match their prior beliefs so they can justify them.

Bill

I stated that I would add any selections that are required. I am giving you license to influence the poll as you wish, as long as the selection is not a repeat of what is already there.

.99

The "results" I have shown in the simulation using the same measurement as yours, are no more "overunity" (or COP>1) than they would be if you were to place one scope probe on the Vbat 60V (or 72V) battery feed as before, but for the second probe you placed it across one of the batteries in reverse (with an isolated probe so as not to ground-short the system). If you now multiplied these two probe voltages together (60V x -12V), then applied a MEAN function, you would have a "result" equating to approximately -720W appearing to go back into the battery!

Guys - what Poynty is trying to say here is that the positive of the probe across the CSR is directly on the NEGATIVE RAIL of the battery and that the ground is between the CSR and the Gate of Q2.  I ASSURE YOU THIS IS ABSOLUTE NONSENSE.  The positive of the probe from the Scope is on the Far side of the CSR - near the gate and the GROUND of the SCOPE is up against the negative terminal.  I will photograph this if required.  But will only be able to upload all tomorrow.  THIS BECAUSE I'VE BEEN HACKED TO DEATH.

Groundloop I see your post but not the schematic.  If you can email this I'll be glad.  But I'm ABSOLUTELY SATISFIED that it'll now be correct.  Many thanks indeed for your input.

Kindest as ever,
Rosie

And what in Heaven's name is all this nonsense about a poll?  Are you trying to determine my rights to post here on this forum.  Good heavens.  I don't think that's in dispute.  And, in any event, Harti is the one who decides that. 

It just beggars belief.  I'm a well meaning - in fact an 'ardent' - promoter or some really required technology - and instead of being welcomed and protected Poynty's now subjecting me to the embarrassment and indignity of an opinion poll.  I wonder if his excesses are now getting grossly out of hand.  I'm not sure that my efforts are deserving of so much flagrant disrespect.  Come on guys.  Is this a forum for discussion or an arena for assassination?  This is absolutely untenable.

Rosemary

And what in Heaven's name is all this nonsense about a poll?  Are you trying to determine my rights to post here on this forum.  Good heavens.  I don't think that's in dispute.  And, in any event, Harti is the one who decides that. 

It just beggars belief.  I'm a well meaning - in fact an 'ardent' - promoter or some really required technology - and instead of being welcomed and protected Poynty's now subjecting me to the embarrassment and indignity of an opinion poll.  I wonder if his excesses are now getting grossly out of hand.  I'm not sure that my efforts are deserving of so much flagrant disrespect.  Come on guys.  Is this a forum for discussion or an arena for assassination?  This is absolutely untenable.

Rosemary

The poll is not about stopping you posting or getting you band, it is about whether the members here believe your circuit does what you claim.