Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011  (Read 741318 times)

alexandre

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #135 on: March 19, 2011, 06:55:10 PM »
Thank you Rosemary, I have been reading and writing english for a long time.

Hopefully there will be replications and similar experiments seeking these COP>1 results. We need validation. This to me is a very worthwhile pursuit, I plan to engage in as well.

Best,
Alex

Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #136 on: March 19, 2011, 07:01:47 PM »
Thank you Rosemary, I have been reading and writing english for a long time.

Hopefully there will be replications and similar experiments pursuing these COP>1 results. So far I am not aware of easily repeatable, proven experimental results of COP>1. This to me is a very worthwhile pursuit, I hope to engage as well.

Best,
Alex

How come? You've probably missed these easily repeatable and proven experimental results for Pout/Pin>1 (COP is not a scientific term): http://actascientiae.org/v/comments.php?DiscussionID=9&page=1#Item_4 . These are the only results categorically demonstrating OU in electric circuits that I'm aware of.

alexandre

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #137 on: March 19, 2011, 07:09:39 PM »
Thanks Omnibus, I am looking at it.
Best,
Alex

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #138 on: March 19, 2011, 07:11:21 PM »
(COP is not a scientific term): http://actascientiae.org/v/comments.php?DiscussionID=9&page=1#Item_4 . These are the only results categorically demonstrating OU in electric circuits that I'm aware of.

What a load of nonsense.  Here's wiki's definition of COP.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coefficient_of_performance

And from where I stand it's ENTIRELY appropriate to our references.  Not sure how more scientific one can get.  And there's absolutely NO definition of Pin/Pout.  It's just a voguish reference to power used on some forums.  And DO NOT state that we have not shown OU Omnibus - unless you are first prepared to argue where there are measurement errors.  It seems that you will stoop to endless depths to try and bluster some kind of pretended authority.

Rosemary

MrMag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 754
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #139 on: March 19, 2011, 07:52:06 PM »


She is taking actual measurements on the circuit isn't she. That means a lot more then a simulation. Just because no one cares about your claims you try to put others down. And you think you are an open minded person? Grow up.
« Last Edit: March 20, 2011, 03:57:37 AM by hartiberlin »

neptune

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1127
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #140 on: March 19, 2011, 07:58:45 PM »
@Omnibus .You are falling into the old trap of thinking that just because an effect cant be simulated that it does not exist . In the words of the Amazing Randi ,absence of evidence is not evidence of absence . If we had to choose between you and Rosemary on this thread , I know where my vote would go . If you disagree with Rosemary , why not just leave her alone .

MrMag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 754
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #141 on: March 19, 2011, 08:56:22 PM »
@Omni,

We know. Everyone who disagrees with you is incompetent. Have you ever thought that maybe it's just you.

@Burger

Why have you been following for 10 years if you don't think there is anything to it. You should find something better to do with your time.


Feynman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 620
    • Feynman's Lab
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #142 on: March 19, 2011, 09:24:46 PM »
@rosemary

I've read the postings on your blog with great interest.  Could you please provide higher-resolution versions of your scope shots?

That is, higher resolution versions of the images found in this article:
http://newlightondarkenergy.blogspot.com/2011/03/report.html

I am interested in replication.

All the best,
Feynman

infringer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 800
    • mopowah
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #143 on: March 19, 2011, 09:30:22 PM »
Mr. Mag excellent point "why follow something for 10years if you believe there is nothing to it ?"

Let us answer that question with some reasonable answers:

Confined to a wheel chair with limited movement. While life may suck indeed why do you not check out what Stephen Hawking has been able to do or watch the Documentary "Murderball" for inspiration in something you can really focus your efforts on instead of wasting your time on something you do not believe in.

Use forums as stress relief from the brutal mind bashing of daily life activities and work.  AKA Troll Why not use appropriate website like start your own blog or annoyances.org or something on that note why come here?

Educated and wish to share what I was taught to help make the world smarter. Why not start a website and give out free information in the form of lessons like justin guitar does and accept donations to help pay for your schooling.

Cause in the back of my mind lurking I truly believe it may provide a possible solution though I don't say that for fear of carrying a common label such as "crackpot". Why worry about a superficial thing like a label if anything that would be a push to prove the many wrong.

Because I am not really interested in the so called impossible overunity but instead am interested in real working alternative energy progress, even so why would I read overunity claims .


Any point that one could make would be moot in my eyes you have to have some childish belief in this type of thing to follow it for so many years or a belief in the possibility of this to follow it for 10 years you must be at least a hopeful of some sort.

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #144 on: March 19, 2011, 10:48:13 PM »
No, there's no clear cut evidence you've shown anything unusual. One way to demonstrate it is to show a PSpice simulation proving it. @poyn99 tells me he has seen no OU in your schematic in a PSpice sim but I'm still open minded. Also, try not to foist on the public here Wikipedia definitions. Show a paper from a peer-reviewed physics or chemistry journal where COP is used at all.
pspice is not proof of anything... ::) for the love of zeus omni, you blather about science all the time yet have no idea what constitutes a proof. one person simulating a circuit is NOT proof ::)

hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8154
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #145 on: March 20, 2011, 02:58:51 AM »
@evolvinggape
"Erm... no, the replacement of Batteries with Caps is not irrelevant at all. Batteries have a stored potential, Caps have an applied potential. Caps would very quickly show whether your circuit is running down or not and consuming power. 6 car Batteries would hide this extremely well even over lengthy testing periods."

So well put. This has been the failing of many experiments. I have even seen others even fool themselves when using a power supply. That's why many people I know prefer to use caps.
Mark

Yes, but sometimes these things just only work when using lead acid or NiMh batteries
as is the case with pulsed battery boosters like Bedini or Newman or Joule Thief style circuits.

Caps just don´t work here cause they don´t have the right electrons-ions in them...

Regards, Stefan.

markdansie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #146 on: March 20, 2011, 03:51:25 AM »
O dear
for the first time ever I have been out under the moderators control.
Well I guess thats the way it has to go
Bye everyone
Kind Regards
'Mark

markdansie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #147 on: March 20, 2011, 04:02:48 AM »
One thing I always admired about this forum was even when under fire from the zealots (remember Mylow punch up) free speech and the right to allow reason to have a voice was supported. Other forums (especially Sterling's) relied on heavy censorship.
And now we have by far the majority of contributors challenging methodologies used by Rosie and next thing before we know it censorship. There is no room for censorship in scientific debate.
I have tried to use some subtle humor, but was never abusive which is more than I can say for Rosie. Anyone who questions anything gets a spray.
I respect and value all opinions but may not always agree with them.
It is highly unlikely this will get through...the new world order is here already. LOL
Well in the scheme of things WTF.
I guess my real concern is "who else is being sensored?"
Kind Regards
Mark

hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8154
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #148 on: March 20, 2011, 04:19:10 AM »
Okay, I just read the whole thread now and looked deeper into the
new Rosemary circuit.

As I did see already the picture of her setup about a month ago
I also still have some issues with it.

The issues I see are missing notes:
1. Rosemary,
was the ciurcuit  also run without connecting the scope
and just connecting the function generator ?

I earlier pointed out that ground loop
currents of the scopes and the function generator can add up
and extract some power via the grounding of the different devices.

As the circuit goes into selfrunning oscillation at around 1.5 Mhz
due to the parasitric LC components of the circuits, it could
be that it also extracts power via the groundloop currents, if these
exist there simular to the Kapanadze devices.

So please disconnect the scopes and also disconnect the ground
connector from your function generator and see, if you still
have this high 40 Watts heat output in the load resistor.


2. The circuit just oscillates when it has a negative bias at the gates,
so it would be easy just to use a battery with a voltge divider pot to
control the necessary voltage for it.
Then you would not need anymore the function generator and can see,
if it will also oscillate with the right negative bias voltage at the gates
and have this high 40 Watts heat output at the load heating resistor.

3. Rosemary, please post a PDF File or
at least higher Res screen shots of the scope shots,
otherwise we can not analyze the waveforms.

4. A simulation is just wasted time as it would not include
anomalous effects, so just forget it.

5.  Battery operated could be the only way it could work,
cause battery chemistry behaves totally different than normal power
supplies as is also seen in Bedini devices, where the OU energy seems
to come inside the batteries as the ions just move so slow...

6. Was the scope set to DC or AC in the input as you scoped
the voltage  on the batteries  ?

This is pretty important.

7. Was the scope set to DC or AC in the input as you scoped
the voltage  on the gates  ?


This circuit is simular to a Newman coil circuit running just at higher frequencies
and at lower inductances.
The MOSFETs with their included zener diodes can just
feed the BackEMF spikes back to the battery.

Now and the difference between 6 and 40 Watts heat should be easily measureable just by using
heated water calorimetrically.

Regards, Stefan.

P.S: I cleaned this thread up and deleted some offtopic messages and flame war messages...
Please stay ontopic. Thanks.
« Last Edit: March 20, 2011, 04:39:46 AM by hartiberlin »

hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8154
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #149 on: March 20, 2011, 04:35:54 AM »
Here is the picture of the setup that she already posted in a small size.

Regards, Stefan.