I think Rosemary's whole reason for doing these various circuits and measurements is to help validate her thesis which is based on unorthodox physics not commonly believed to exist. I fail to understand why anyone would expect tests run on a simulation based on the current physics that Rose is trying to contradict to show her new concepts? Of course the simulation is going to show a different results than Her team gets, what would be the point in doing any of this if it could just be run on a simulation?
    Oh well I had to ask, Rose I haven't said hello for a while good luck.
Pete 

vonwolf,

You should aim to follow along more closely.

1) Rosemary and her team have in fact performed simulations of a variation of what I just did above (config. 1 rather than config. 2) which she posted on her blog yesterday. If they added in 2uH of inductance on each side of the battery as I have, their results would be a lot closer to those obtained from the real apparatus.

2) Rather than flat out stating that the results can't be correct because they are a simulation, kindly point out exactly what is not correct? I was able to show a net negative CSR voltage (have you examined the posts?), and that in itself goes against "unorthodox physics" as you put it. The results using the same measurement points also show a net power going back to the battery. Do you actually understand this and can you explain why the simulation shows this?

I wouldn't say the simulation has showed results that are all that different than what her team has obtained. Please provide some detail as to what you mean exactly. btw, you also missed the fact that Rose is very interested in seeing that this can be achieved in a simulation. That is why she has been asking me for details on my previous simulations and why she has been running them herself (or her team has).

I trust that should catch you up somewhat.

.99

That point has been made more than once - ie. no simulation software can simulate scalar waves etc. whether by accident or design.  Yet they keep being put forward as 'proof' that the real circuit must be wrong!  That said, I think Rosemary actually asked for some of these simulations to be done, so she can't complain too loudly...

What exactly are scalar waves sprocket, and what do they have to do with the Ainslie circuit and this thread topic?

.99

What exactly are scalar waves sprocket, and what do they have to do with the Ainslie circuit and this thread topic?

.99

Longitudinal waves as opposed to the Hertzian wave "FE is impossible" club you obviously belong to! As to its relevancy, I think I'm right in saying that Rosemary has stated already that in her opinion, the alleged 'artifact' cannot be modelled with simulation software - so let me direct the same question to you, what are you doing here flooding her thread with simulations, and what has it got to do with the thread topic?     

LOL @ the Pontiff
 
i shall continue to post whatever i believe to be most apposite at the time

...and so shall I.

I know you're a big fan and can't help yourself, but kindly refrain from the lame 'poynt' references. I certainly have not ever made them myself using your moniker (up until your lesson that is).

i'm not drawing any conclusions as to whether Rosemary's current experiment is valid or invalid until i see relevant data from her (or her team)

You will be waiting a very long time then my friend.

members of OU.com will gauge you by your treatment of her - and beating on Rosemary with a big stick is unlikely to convince her to comply with your demands

Perhaps. The only thing that IS important however, is that one be truthful, forthcoming, and willing to learn and accept when they've made an error. IMO, we've not seen much of that from Rose.

If I'm wrong in any of my assertions, or my analysis, please clearly point it out. There is much emotional flak being thrown at it all, but no one can seem to muster any kind of technical argument one way or the other. Why don't you start nul?

I'm interested in the truth. Why aren't you?

.99

What exactly is a Longitudinal wave, sprocket? How is it related to the Ainslie device and this thread?

I'm performing simulations (similar to those done by Rose) at this time to address some real issues with the current status quo. I'm examining the circuit at a level necessary to scope out unseen pitfalls in the measurements being taken by her and her team.

What are you doing here that is constructive in any way?

.99

Longitudinal waves is where Tesla said the magic lies and that is good enough for me!  If you are looking for me to get all technical then you are going to be disappointed - or not as is probably the case.  Or are you suggesting that they do not exist?  If that's not the case, does current simulation software model them - that's a question, since you apparently specialise in this area? This I already asked in the form of a question, but you ignored that!

Are you suggesting that I do not have a right to post on a public forum, whereas its permissible for you to hound Rosemary Ainslie from forum to forum, trash her threads, all the while denying her a venue on you own forum?  Come to think of it, what are you even doing here at OU?  If you think your piss-poor attitude is somwhow going to scare me off, you are sadly mistaken.

LOL, I figured I'd get a response like that - "look everybody, I'm smarter than he is!!!"  Sigh, you really are that childishly pathetic.

I also like the way you avoided a direct question - Tesla's too big a game for you!  You and your motives really are transparent.

If you were at all interested in proving/disproving this thesis you'd open a thread of your own and stop trashing others.  The reason you don't is that you know quite well that it would fizzle out in no time, with you being the only one posting there - a bit like your crappy forum.  Why?  'cos anyone with more than a passing interest FE is familiar with your tactics and knows what a prick you are!!!

What's really sad is that Stephan allows vermin like you to do this.  He and this forum have obviously sold out long ago.

That said, I realise that I'm just adding to the noise here, which contrary to what you post, is exactly your intent.  So you're on IGNORE from now on.

Guys - especially Sprocket, Mags and Pete

This is very important.  Please read it carefully.

I have a very real concern that I think needs an answer.  I'm not sure what 'time' is applicable to any one of you - and since we're scattered around various time zones then it's possible that our computers either conform to our own time zones or to something preset here.  I have never myself 'joined up' as a member.  Harti always did this for me - just to accommodate my own idiocy.  I have grave diffculties doing this.  So I'm not sure what 'settings' were applied here.  But what I KNOW is this.

I posted my schematic on my blogspot - because I still find it relatively easy to do that there.  Within a heartbeat Poynty copied this to his post

« Reply #741 on: April 21, 2011, 02:43:47 PM

Within 10 minutes of posting that schematic on my blogspot I posted this.

« Reply #747 on: April 21, 2011, 07:35:47 PM »

IN EFFECT what has happened here is this.  REGARDLESS of the time zones - what this shows is that Poynty was able to INSERT a post - set to a time that PRECEDED MY OWN PUBLIC POST AND MY NOTIFICATION OF THAT BLOG POST HERE - BY A COOL 5 HOURS.

He absolutely COULD NOT HAVE DONE THIS without being a moderator on this forum and on this thread.  And that gives some considerable pause for thought. 

You will then notice that he has also been given permission by Harti - to say pretty well as much as he needs to or wants to - and you will notice that Harti himself SAYS NOTHING.  One assumes he is too busy.  I wonder if I could impose on either Harti OR Poynty - to explain how they managed that post.

And Mags - it's true that we have 10 minutes or thereby to  edit.  I MARK my edits REGARDLESS - because I've been widely accused of 'going back' and changing my posts.  I OFTEN DO.  But it's because I'm relatively blind.  I can only really read them once they're posted.  And then I edit them.  I've now learned about the 'preview' function and am doing a bit better.  But neither you nor I can insert posts and we CERTAINLY can't change that time. 

I am now of the opinion that I am about to be booted off this forum.  Let me explain why.  TK was given carte blanche and full license to say what he wanted to get rid of me or the technolgy.  At the time I carried the dubious distinction of being banned from the forum without even joining.  More often than not my view of the thread was blocked via my IP address.  Then Glen was given license to flame my threads to death and certain closure.  And RIGHT NOW Poynty has clearly been given the same license. 

Then.  There is absolutely NOTHING WRONG with my emails.  Usually I am given 'due notice' via email of anyone posting.  I have RECEIVED NO NOTIFICATION OF THESE LATEST POSTS.  It happens EVERY TIME there's a sequence of postings that REALLY need an answer.  AGAIN.  That can only happen with the active co-operation of Harti. 

So.  I'm alerting you to the fact that I am possibly about to be kicked off here.  And secondly that Poynty is 'flaming' this thread with the full knowledge and approval of Harti - IF NOT WITH HIS ACTUAL STATUS AS A MODERATOR HERE.

WHAT GIVES??

ALSO.  I'll answer Poynty's POINTS.  God help us all.  Why do you guys not see the absolute NONSENSE he's applied to those measurements?  That troubles me more than anything.  Clearly he can get away with saying anything he wants IF he can also get away with such ASBURD NONSENSE on power measurements.  It's an ABSOLUTE TRAVESTY.  It is ERRONEOUS.  In fact it's LAUGHABLY incorrect.  It's ENTIRELY UNSCIENTIFIC.  What Poynty has done is FUDGED JUST ABOUT EVERYTHING.  But I have a problem.  We've got our 'gathering of the clans' as it's EASTER SUNDAY.  I wont be able to get back here before 3.00 this afternoon. But I see how REQUIRED this is.

If I've been banned before then - PLEASE CHECK OUT MY BLOG.  In fact, if I disappear from here GO TO THAT BLOG.  Perhaps I can impose on Pete or someone here to link to the blog if I get banned.  Otherwise I'll have absolutely NO VOICE to answer this absolute nonsense.
 
Kindest regards,
Rosemary

AND HAPPY EASTER TO those of us who celebrate.  In fact it's a festive time for just about all our religions.  So.  To everyone - HAVE A WONDERFUL HOLIDAY. 

Rose,

I honestly don't have any idea how you got the idea that I am somehow pre-empting your posts or that I have moderator rights here or some such.    That is absolutely false. It is also false that you are going to be banned here. That is all pure nonsense and tale-spinning.

Regarding the posts, what is it that is wrong with the results I've posted?

.99