Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 84088
  • *Latest: Oversize

  • *Total Posts: 895635
  • *Total Topics: 15755
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 2
  • *Guests: 10
  • *Total: 12

Author Topic: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011  (Read 618309 times)

Offline MrMag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 754
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1755 on: July 02, 2011, 12:31:47 AM »
An expensive scope?  I thought all you needed to see was the batteries charging while the circuit was running.
Is that not what you have been asking of Rose?

If you are going to comment, maybe you should go back a bit and see exactly what I asked her and what she said it
would take to do. To just drop by and start making presumptions, shows your understanding of my request.

Rose apologized to you?  Where, here in her last post before my last post??? 

Who said it was in the last post. So again you make comments when you haven't read previous posts. Either you
are too lazy or too incompetent to go back and read the thread

One down Rose.  ;]  Think you can handle the 's and the "not quite human yet" guy?   ;]

Golly rose, you have some solid followers don't you. I was going to stop posting here but this idiot drops by
and tries to start something again.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1756 on: July 02, 2011, 03:38:51 AM »
Hi guys,

Can I impose on someone here to ask Glen a simple question? Here it is.  Did he replicate that
circuit widely, and possibly incorrectly, referenced as 'the Ainslie Circuit'? It's a question that can
 be answered very simply but confined to two options - 'yes' or 'no'.   

IF ANSWER IS NO - then - the next question is this.  Why is he clinging on for dear life to a
publication in his SCRIBD FILE that claims that he HAS replicated the Ainslie circuit?  The
PRIMARY AUTHOR OF THAT PAPER is Rosemary Ainslie.  His own name is down there as an
experimentalist.  The preamble, introduction and discussions related to that paper unequivocally
 state that it is a REPLICATION.  Therefore when he says NO he is lying.

IF THE ANSWER IS YES - then I rest my case.

It's that simple.

Regards,
Rosemary

Modified to FIT THE PAGE.  Glen is trying YET AGAIN to render this thread unreadable.
« Last Edit: July 02, 2011, 04:26:53 AM by Rosemary Ainslie »

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1757 on: July 02, 2011, 04:35:39 AM »
Magsy Hi.

MaNag - as we all know - has a PROBLEM.  'Problem' is here used as a euphemism for what is
politely referred to as being 'intellectually challenged'.  I don't want to come straight out with it
and use the word 'stupid' because that may be construed as being insensitive and unnecessarily
hurtful.  So.  Back to the point.  His 'problem' leaves him in a general state of mental confusion.
He 'misread' your 'nickname' - Magsy - as being roughly approximate to 'Mag' which, as we also
all know is just a single consonant away from his own name 'Nag'.

So when I wrote to you to thank you and when I then also listed your general excellence he chose
to consider that I was flattering him.  I rather encouraged him to try and emulate you and
suggested he 'think what he liked'.  And.  Being subject to those many 'confusions' as a result of
his 'problem' he then decided I must have forgiven him.  I was anxious to let it go - ON
CONDITION THAT HE STOPPED POSTING HERE.  But there it is.  His 'problems' also leave him
with a short attention span.  He's already forgotten his undertakings. 

Which may or may not explain anything at all.  Golly.  This thread really needs some fresh air. 

 ;D
Rosie.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1757 on: July 02, 2011, 04:35:39 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1758 on: July 02, 2011, 05:01:51 AM »
You really are a politician you twist everything that is said, you do anything to distract from the
main point, you have more spin than a washing machine,

The SPIN cycle that you reference is ENTIRELY YOUR OWN.  It's a freewheeling oscillation that
competes with the our own circuit efficiencies.

Can you tell me which person here has reproduced your circuit and achieved excess energy please
show me their post for which ever circuit this one or the previous one, that has been shown on this
forum to produce excess energy,

I  propose you ask this question of Glen.  I also want a straight answer.  AS DO WE ALL

R

Here AGAIN is the question you need to ask.  Then it'll answer your own question and OURS.
Hi guys,

Can I impose on someone here to ask Glen a simple question? Here it is.  Did he replicate that
circuit widely, and possibly incorrectly, referenced as 'the Ainslie Circuit'? It's a question that can
be answered very simply but confined to two options - 'yes' or 'no'.   

IF THE ANSWER IS NO - then - the next question is this.  Why is he clinging on for dear life to a
publication in his SCRIBD FILE that claims that he HAS replicated the Ainslie circuit?  The
PRIMARY AUTHOR OF THAT PAPER is Rosemary Ainslie.  His own name is down there as an
experimentalist.  The preamble, introduction and discussions related to that paper unequivocally
state that it is a REPLICATION.  Therefore when he says NO he is lying.

IF THE ANSWER IS YES - then I rest my case.

It's that simple.

Regards,
Rosemary



Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1759 on: July 02, 2011, 05:16:02 AM »
Guys,

The BLOGSPOT THAT GLEN REFERENCES IS, unfortunately, NO LONGER ACCESSIBLE.  IT WAS PUT
THERE BY MY SON WHO OMITTED TO STATE THE WORDS PATENT APPLICATION.  AND WE
NEITHER OF US HAVE THE PASSWORDS TO ACCESS IT. 

MEANWHILE IF YOU REFERENCE THIS BLOGSPOT - YOU WILL SEE THE REQUIRED AMENDMENTS.

KINDEST REGARDS,
ROSEMARY

http://newlightondarkenergy.blogspot.com/

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1759 on: July 02, 2011, 05:16:02 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1760 on: July 02, 2011, 05:23:12 AM »
Guys,

it seems that Glen is in a PANIC.  He is trying very hard to distract you all from a rather PERTINENT
QUESTION which he is entirely reluctant to answer.  He's damned if he does and he's damned if he
doesn't.  So.  One can understand his dilemma - but that hardly excuses it.

Since you're there Glen.  May we all impose on you to answer this question.  Here it is again.  You
see the problem is that unless this is answered then none of us knows how to answer Cat's claim
that there have been NO REPLICATIONS of that early rather OUTMODED - and somewhat
OBSOLETE circuit that you reference with such tedious repetition.

Here's that question AGAIN

Can I impose on someone here to ask Glen a simple question? Here it is.  Did he replicate that
circuit widely, and possibly incorrectly, referenced as 'the Ainslie Circuit'? It's a question that can
be answered very simply but confined to two options - 'yes' or 'no'.   

IF THE ANSWER IS NO - then - the next question is this.  Why is he clinging on for dear life to a
publication in his SCRIBD FILE that claims that he HAS replicated the Ainslie circuit?  The
PRIMARY AUTHOR OF THAT PAPER is Rosemary Ainslie.  His own name is down there as an
experimentalist.  The preamble, introduction and discussions related to that paper unequivocally
state that it is a REPLICATION.  Therefore when he says NO he is lying.

IF THE ANSWER IS YES - then I rest my case.

It's that simple.


It's a very pertinent question.  It's dominated the subject of this thread for the last 20 pages or so.

Regards, again,
Rosemary


Offline Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5880
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1761 on: July 02, 2011, 05:55:23 AM »
Golly rosy, just because Fuzzy has proved you as the liar that you are, Why are you taking it out on me?

Mental confusion? Looking at what Fuzzy is saying and Cat has said all along, do you think that it may be you who is
mentally confused?

At least I'm not delusional and I don't flat out lie to people.

I really don't think it matters how many people tell you that 1+1=2. You will always say that 1+1=3, we just don't understand the new math.
Maybe you should try to get that waitress job back.

Hmm Rose, these are some very valid points here in this quote above that seem to truly show that your circuit does not work.  Astounding evidence! 

lol

Mags   ;]

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1761 on: July 02, 2011, 05:55:23 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1762 on: July 02, 2011, 06:02:01 AM »
Hmm Rose, these are some very valid points here in this quote above that seem to truly show that your circuit does not work.  Astounding evidence! 

lol

Mags   ;]

 ;D

Take care Magsy - and let me know if Fuzzy ever answers that question of ours.  I really want to
see that!  I am now going to get back to some work.

Kindest as ever,
Rosie

Offline MrMag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 754
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1763 on: July 02, 2011, 07:09:25 AM »
Hmm Rose, these are some very valid points here in this quote above that seem to truly show that your circuit does not work.  Astounding evidence! 

lol

Mags   ;]

Not really, I think your reading more into it. That post was regarding rosy getting caught in her lies. She just isn't very smooth getting out of this one.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1763 on: July 02, 2011, 07:09:25 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline powercat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1091
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1764 on: July 02, 2011, 09:18:37 AM »


THERE HAVE ONLY BEEN REPLICATIONS OF OUR PREVIOUS CIRCUIT. 


Rosemary

Are you finally admitting that your PREVIOUS CIRCUIT didn't work as you claim, you had no excess energy at all.

You attack anyone who disagrees with you, you refuse to do any long-term tests that might prove your circuit works as you claim.

It's a big conspiracy, it would appear that anyone that says your circut doesn't workor or indicate's a measuring error, is then part of a conspiracy.

Your understanding of how you should conduct yourself on this forum is ridiculous, and you wonder why the scientific community won't recognise your work as valid.

Many members have made reasonable requests that you ignore including Stefan,Mr Mag amongst others,but you ignore them and carry on regurgitating your same old arguments.

Go on Rosie proof that 99 is wrong in his analysis and makes something that runs and runs and put it on the Internet after all,
 (Quote from Rosemary)
"All one needs are the the measurements and some reasonable account of the apparatus that produces those measurements".

If you are going to claim excess energy on this forum you are expected to interact with reasonable requests for new tests, I think that it's only reasonable when making such claims.


Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1765 on: July 02, 2011, 08:33:51 PM »
Groundloop, if you're still reading here - and guys,

We've just finished those tests using capacitors.  Unfortunately it does not work.  The oscillation
holds for less than a minute and then collapses to zero. 

Here are the waveforms

Kindest regards,
Rosemary
« Last Edit: July 03, 2011, 05:14:09 AM by Rosemary Ainslie »

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1765 on: July 02, 2011, 08:33:51 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3585
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1766 on: July 03, 2011, 02:09:14 AM »
We've just finished those tests using capacitors.  Unfortunately it does not work.  The oscillation holds for less than a minute and then collapses to zero. 

Here are the waveforms

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

Capacitor start voltage = 37.6V @ 17:47:47
Capacitor end voltage = 32.0V @ 17:48:32
Voltage drop over the 45 seconds = 5.6V

Evidently the circuit functioned normally for a short period, and there was no recharge.

The capacitor value was not given, but for interest sake assume 1000uF:

The energy used then is 1/2 x 1000uF x (37.62 - 322)
= 194.88mJ, and the average power supplied over the 45 seconds = 4.33mW.

.99

Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3585
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1767 on: July 03, 2011, 02:34:07 AM »
btw,

Power = Energy / Time =>
P = E/t =>
W = J/s => therefore
J = W x s

.99

Offline Groundloop

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1736
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1768 on: July 03, 2011, 04:10:56 AM »
Groundloop, if you're still reading here - and guys,

We've just finished those tests using capacitors.  Unfortunately it does not work.  The oscillation holds for less than a minute and then collapses to zero. 

Here are the waveforms

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

Rosemary,

Thanks for taking time to test capacitor(s) on your new circuit.
May I ask the size and type of the capacitor(s) you tested?

GL.

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1769 on: July 03, 2011, 04:50:29 AM »
Capacitor start voltage = 37.6V @ 17:47:47
Capacitor end voltage = 32.0V @ 17:48:32
Voltage drop over the 45 seconds = 5.6V

Evidently the circuit functioned normally for a short period, and there was no recharge.

The capacitor value was not given, but for interest sake assume 1000uF:

The energy used then is 1/2 x 1000uF x (37.62 - 322)
= 194.88mJ, and the average power supplied over the 45 seconds = 4.33mW.

I can't comment.  Just don't know anything about capacitors.  I'm not sure that it took 45 seconds
to collapse.  I think it was rather quicker than this.  It takes a while for each screenshot to
download. 

Groundloop - I'll check on that capacitor number.  I forgot to make a note.  I'll tell you during the
course of today.

But guys - before anyone gets too carried away here - in retrospect I think we had open circuit
conditions.  From memory the circuit was still connected to the battery terminals.  Surely that
wouldn't work?  I'll need to check on this as well.  Actually I think I've made a mistake.  Sorry.  I'll
get back here.

Kindest again,
Rosemary


 

OneLink