Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011  (Read 669704 times)

Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3582
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1350 on: May 22, 2011, 12:18:45 PM »
Poynty - I am happy to discuss this with you OFF forum - until such time as this thread has been scrubbed and disinfected.

Until then I will ONLY report on our continuing results.  And - as required - complain about the need of some URGENT INTERVENTIONS.

Regards,
Rosemary

This all needs to remain in public view.

Perhaps if Glen would allow us some time to cover what's required, we might make some progress towards a common understanding, but it is his decision.

In terms of the circuit, no problem I can replace the diode with a MOSFET. It makes very little difference to the results actually. Give me about 8 hours.

.99

Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3582
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1351 on: May 22, 2011, 09:16:09 PM »
Back to my previous circuit with the 2 MOSFETs and "FG", the results are as follows.

Does this measurement appear to be correct?

.99

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1352 on: May 23, 2011, 03:41:46 AM »
Hello Pointy. 

As ever I'm blown away by your work.  I will be taking the liberty of posting it on my blog - if you don't mind.  Then I need to know that Fuzzy will stay off this thread until our PAPER IS PUBLISHED which will be when this subject will be done. I will then ask that this thread be locked.  On that undertaking by all concerned parties we can debate things here.  Otherwise the most I'm prepared to do on this subject is to discuss this with you on my blog by posting over our emails - in real time.  In fact a discussion may all be better enabled on your own forum - on the understanding that there are no interruptions by MileHigh - Pickle - or anyone who's sole purpose it is to derail the topic.  BTW - I'm intrigued to see that they've both gone.  I must admit to missing MileHigh's contributions.

Kindest regards,
Rosie   

ADDED - Actually Poynty - I'd much prefer it to discuss this on your own forum as I am prepared to trust you to keep that thread reasonably sanitised.

LET ME KNOW YOUR PREFERENCE


http://newlightondarkenergy.blogspot.com/2011/05/121-simulations.html
« Last Edit: May 23, 2011, 07:36:19 AM by Rosemary Ainslie »

Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3582
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1353 on: May 23, 2011, 06:07:58 AM »
Rose,

As I've mentioned, I think this discussion should be in an open forum, and since OU is the one that seems to hold the most support for your work, I prefer that it remain here. I have contacted Glen in hopes he will allow the space required here to discuss the issues at hand. I have a feeling he will capitulate.

.99

Offline vonwolf

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 144
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1354 on: May 23, 2011, 06:13:06 AM »
Hello Pointy. 

As ever I'm blown away by your work.  I will be taking the liberty of posting it on my blog - if you don't mind.  Then I need to know that Fuzzy will stay off this thread until our PAPER IS PUBLISHED which will be when this subject will be done. I will then ask that this thread be locked.  On that undertaking by all concerned parties we can debate things here.  Otherwise the most I'm prepared to do on this subject is to discuss this with you on my blog by posting over our emails - in real time.  In fact a discussion may all be better enabled on your own forum - on the understanding that there are no interruptions by MileHigh - Pickle - or anyone who's sole purpose it is to derail the topic.  BTW - I'm intrigued to see that they've both gone.  I must admit to missing MileHigh's contributions.

Kindest regards,
Rosie   

ADDED - Actually Poynty - I'd much prefer it to discuss this on your own forum as I am prepared to trust you to keep that thread reasonably sanitised.

LET ME KNOW YOUR PREFERENCE




  If this takes place Rose I guess I'm out of it because I was banned at OUR too bad I guess all I'll be able to do is read unless poynt99 reinstates me don't be in too much of a hurry to lock this thread
    Good Luck Pete

Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3582
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1355 on: May 23, 2011, 06:59:43 AM »
  If this takes place Rose I guess I'm out of it because I was banned at OUR too bad I guess all I'll be able to do is read unless poynt99 reinstates me don't be in too much of a hurry to lock this thread
    Good Luck Pete

Pete,

Check your PM; you're re-registered.

.99

PS. Glen has assured me that should he post, he is going to keep things strictly technical.

Offline vonwolf

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 144
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1356 on: May 23, 2011, 07:02:08 AM »
Pete,

Check your PM; you're re-registered.

.99

   Thanks poynt99

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1357 on: May 23, 2011, 07:04:50 AM »
  If this takes place Rose I guess I'm out of it because I was banned at OUR too bad I guess all I'll be able to do is read unless poynt99 reinstates me don't be in too much of a hurry to lock this thread
    Good Luck Pete

Petes - I'd forgotten this.  It would have to be a required condition that we're both reinstated.  I assure you that I would not post there otherwise.  And don't worry which forum this is advanced on.  They're all much of a muchness.  Each forum owner tries to select which technology is closest to their particular interest - and then they plug it.  And ours - thank God - is entirely refuted just about everywhere except by the readers here.  It's really a bit of a joke.  Science determined by preference.  I sincerely believe that all engineers have their own preferred 'beliefs' related to the thinking behind any technology.  It will be wonderful when they finally realise that science and it's models are either right or they're wrong.  Which also means that my own eccentric thesis may be found to be very badly flawed.  Frankly - thus far I think its on the money.  But only time will tell.  lol.

Take care Petes.  If we move across it's understood that my very few friends - including you - also be allowed a voice.  Golly.

Kindest regards,
Rosie

 

Offline vonwolf

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 144
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1358 on: May 23, 2011, 07:12:38 AM »
Petes - I'd forgotten this.  It would have to be a required condition that we're both reinstated.  I assure you that I would not post there otherwise.  And don't worry which forum this is advanced on.  They're all much of a muchness.  Each forum owner tries to select which technology is closest to their particular interest - and then they plug it.  And ours - thank God - is entirely refuted just about everywhere except by the readers here.  It's really a bit of a joke.  Science determined by preference.  I sincerely believe that all engineers have their own preferred 'beliefs' related to the thinking behind any technology.  It will be wonderful when they finally realise that science and it's models are either right or they're wrong.  Which also means that my own eccentric thesis may be found to be very badly flawed.  Frankly - thus far I think its on the money.  But only time will tell.  lol.

Take care Petes.  If we move across it's understood that my very few friends - including you - also be allowed a voice.  Golly.

Kindest regards,
Rosie

 

   Thanks Rose, poynt99 and I have reconciled so all is well lets just try to keep moving forward
  Pete

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1359 on: May 23, 2011, 07:21:45 AM »
Rose,

As I've mentioned, I think this discussion should be in an open forum, and since OU is the one that seems to hold the most support for your work, I prefer that it remain here. I have contacted Glen in hopes he will allow the space required here to discuss the issues at hand. I have a feeling he will capitulate.

.99


Is this a joke?  What support?  Your's or Glen's.  There is only 1 entirely outstanding feature of this work of ours and that is that is has ABSOLUTELY NO SUPPORT ANYWHERE.  That's the joke.  It's the ONLY technology that is repeatedly able to breach every barrier required by mainstream physics.  It is the only technology that was required to predict a thesis.  And it is also the ONLY technology that is entirely discounted. AND it's the only technolgy that is correctly and accurately measured.  And the real joke is that its rejection is NOT based on the science - but on my involvement with that science.  LOL.   

I'm very happy to debate things Poynty.   But DO NOT try and give me any assurances related to Glen.  The only way this would be managed is on your own forum.  And I say this because I'm inclined to trust to your new intentions here to get to the bottom of things.  Which means you'll moderate.  Actively.  Glen, however, is entirely incapable of contributing to any debate on this subject.  He cannot even find his way around the math function on a Tektronix TDS3054C.  And the only comments he can make is to copy and paste.  He is incapable of anything else.  He can hardly manage a structured sentence.  But what he can do is distract and interrupt by an excessive display of these his only talents - that and a REALLY good build on COPIED technologies.

Regards,
Rosemary

Added

and added again.
I'm happy to debate things here Poynty.  But I need some far better assurance that Glen STAYS OUT OF THIS THREAD.

Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3582
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1360 on: May 23, 2011, 07:36:56 AM »
I am being sincere Rose.

Here there are members that are undecided about your work and claims, and once in a while they ask questions regarding what I present. Most members here, albeit silent, I would guess are open-minded to your claims.

Regarding Glen, I really do feel he is/was going to refrain from any derogatory postings, but after your last post, I can't say that will still be the case. I thought we had just established a clean slate.

.99

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1361 on: May 23, 2011, 07:47:54 AM »
I am being sincere Rose.

Here there are members that are undecided about your work and claims, and once in a while they ask questions regarding what I present. Most members here, albeit silent, I would guess are open-minded to your claims.

Regarding Glen, I really do feel he is/was going to refrain from any derogatory postings, but after your last post, I can't say that will still be the case. I thought we had just established a clean slate.

.99

I am unable to stomach Glen's involvement in any part of this technology as he has betrayed my most earnest need to advance this using a lack of constraint and principle that is outstanding in its excess.  If you really think that I can seriously consider imparting of 'my best' with the realisation that all that unfettered hatred lurks in the waiting and in the background - then you, together with those many members on your forum - have also grossly underestimated my sanity.

Poynty - the choice is yours.  But I will NOT discuss anything at all with you except off forum - if Glen is entitled to contribute. That's final.  Take the trouble - if you will - to look at those MANY unmoderated comments on your forum.  And then ask me how reasonable is this my condition.

Regards,
Rosemary

Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1362 on: May 23, 2011, 07:51:15 AM »
In fact a discussion may all be better enabled on your own forum - on the understanding that there are no interruptions by MileHigh - Pickle - or anyone who's sole purpose it is to derail the topic.  BTW - I'm intrigued to see that they've both gone.  I must admit to missing MileHigh's contributions.

it only took half a dozen pm's to brian (humbugger, pickle, cheeseburger, etc.) reminding him of his statement @ our.com about 'being done with it' (he followed that statement with 4 more posts) and reminding him about integrity. of course he responded mostly with ad hominem, but i think he got the point. milehigh hasn't a shred of integrity, but he is losing popularity @ our.com even amongst the 'axis powers'. perhaps that is why he has fallen silent... personally i would find that surprising, i didn't think they guy could take a hint. ;D

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1363 on: May 23, 2011, 08:05:44 AM »
it only took half a dozen pm's to brian (humbugger, pickle, cheeseburger, etc.) reminding him of his statement @ our.com about 'being done with it' (he followed that statement with 4 more posts) and reminding him about integrity. of course he responded mostly with ad hominem, but i think he got the point. milehigh hasn't a shred of integrity, but he is losing popularity @ our.com even amongst the 'axis powers'. perhaps that is why he has fallen silent... personally i would find that surprising, i didn't think they guy could take a hint. ;D

Hi Wilby.  I never realised there was all that off forum communication.  How interesting is that?  LOL.  I think that 'truth' has a way of surviving most attacks - is my take on things.  It just first gets so hopelessly abused. 

Well done.  Yet again.  It seems you're always there.  And among many good things this is very likely the 'goodest'.  lol.

kindest regards,
Rosie

Added.  (I've tried to invent a new superlative here)

Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1364 on: May 23, 2011, 08:41:56 AM »
ahhh, how fickle the winds of "open source" contributors are...

a blast from the past...

quote taken from "the strange case of the rosemary ainslie circuit by steve windisch". full text can be found here: http://dandelionsalad.wordpress.com/2009/12/24/the-strange-case-of-the-rosemary-ainslie-circuit-by-steve-windisch/
Quote
"The gifted and skilled Open Source Researcher, Internet name “Fuzzytomcat” (Glen Lettenmaier), one of the first to Replicate the Ainslie Circuit successfully in 2009, has built several configurations of the special inductors/resistors for test… And his fine work in building, tuning, measuring, documenting, and analyzing test results… Extremely well recorded and presented using the Tektronix Digital Phosper Oscilloscope stored data, still photos, and “You Tube” videos… Conclusivly prove using accepted industry-standard methods that this circuit has definite anamalous qualities in energy efficiency, and that the Rosemary Ainslie Circuit and effect deserves very close scrutiny from our scientific mainstream community."
(emphasis added by me)

the interesting thing is... not so long ago, these "players" were lauding this circuit and placing heaps of praise upon rosemary (and themselves of course ;) ) and talking about success and "several replications"... but now, what are they doing? yes, a strange case indeed.

perhaps steve (jibbguy), glen (fuzzytomcat) or aaron murakami could clarify for us which case they have stated (since they now have made several different OPPOSING AND CONFLICTING STATEMENTS) is the correct one, and perhaps give the rest of the readers here an explanation or reason for the flip-flop...