Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 84097
  • *Latest: moskol69

  • *Total Posts: 895794
  • *Total Topics: 15760
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 3
  • *Guests: 12
  • *Total: 15

Author Topic: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011  (Read 619085 times)

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1125 on: May 05, 2011, 09:05:32 AM »
Guys - I'm risking my only working computer to post this.  I've finally seen that poll.  I have no objections to it.  It's just a generalised attempt at finding out what the public think of me.  And that's not really the issue here.  So.  It's of some kind of dubious relevance - and it will only help to progress the knowledge.  Strange but true.  All publicity is good publicity.  Even BAD publicity.  lol.

MrMag.  I read your comment.  I'm sorry you've not seen my argument related to battery draw downs.  Your opinion is shared by many. And - indeed you're right.  On record everyone.  I'll do those battery draw downs with PLEASURE - if I also get the outright endorsement that those results will be accepted as ABSOLUTE PROOF of breaching those infernal energy barriers.  At issue is the requirement to prove that it can exceed its watt hour rating.  And that test is most certainly DOABLE.  Expensive to monitor - but it can, indeed, be done.  But I'm not foolhardy enough to simply invest time and money in all those tests - without the certain and written assurance that our academics will then accept this as conclusive proof.  Else, yet again I'll be wasting my time.

Regards
Rosemary

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline powercat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1091
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1126 on: May 05, 2011, 10:02:46 AM »
An interesting comment PC, gotoluc worked with Thane just before I did, yet I have never heard him speak one way or another on Thane. I quite like gotoluc's channel and subscribe. I think he does a lot to further interest in this fascinating field.

If you look at my video's you will see my first love is still Veljko's pendulum, followed by Flynn/Hildendrand motors, with a wee bit of coil shorting thrown in.

BUT, I am not really interested in OU, I just like building things. It leads to all sorts of specialized knowledge, keeps the grey matter active! Yes, I am still learning things at my age, plus I get to try out some totally new chips, it is fascinating.

I have followed Rosie's device for years. I have read all the forums, I know people who have tried this... with no success, so what is it you are trying to tell me? Only experiment with known proven devices like the wheel or kleenex? Never ever venture into unknown territory? Stay inside the box, do not have any thoughts of your own that are contrary to you peers?

I do this because its fun. I will form my own conclusions when I am ready to. I enjoy meeting and working with these kind of people, who like to contribute to society with their original ideas. I learn things.

Ron

Edit: 13,000 hits on my pendulum build and 10,000 on my coil winder, I find that incredible... but notice TK was the only one to seriously question my mentality... now I will be able to add you guys to the list also

Nice post Ron
I'm trying to tell you that no one on this forum has been able to match that claim of OU,
clearly this is not a concern of yours and I wish you all the best

Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3585
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1127 on: May 05, 2011, 02:22:15 PM »
But I grant that there are ongoing confusions.  If there are any related to how we've positioned those MOSFETs - then please just do this.  Put the one to the other  Q1 and Q2 - Gate to source, drain to drain, Source to Gate.  That way you'll have configured it as required.  When it comes to an illustration of this - then, convention mitigates against a clear presentation.  This because the 'gate' is conventionally shown as being between the source and the gate legs.
Is there anyone here that understands this para? If so, could I impose on you to kindly elucidate on it? Thank you. I believe I have connected the Source and Gate pins as described. No one yet has commented if my diagram is correct. 

Quote
Then - it is more than likely that I'm describing this wrongly.  I'll ask my team how I should describe it.  But here's what I mean.  There are two leads off the functions generator.  The one 'positive' goes to the gate of Q1 - the second whether it's properly described as 'ground' or 'negative' or whatever, - that one goes to the gate of Q2.  Sorry guys.  It's the best I can do.
Again, I believe I've shown the connections as described. Corrections?

Quote
What we need to do is move away from any more discussion with Poynty - as it relates to those simulations.  If he could oblige us here then that would be appreciated.  Unfortunately it's what he knows and what he does best.  What would be far more to the desirable is if he takes the trouble to build a replication or even a variation. I confidently predict that he will NOT find benefit because that conforms to his agenda.  But it would be nice to be proved wrong.  If he sees no value in doing this - then, as I've said, move away that we can move on.  Otherwise we'll be spending another 2 years discussing the correct diagrammatic illustration of the FETs when we should be discussing how to apply this.
Indeed, I am wanting to build it, but again, I do not have a diagram to do so. Could someone kindly provide a link to a diagram OK'd by Rose?

From the above though, any results I may offer have been pre-disqualified by Rose.

.99

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1127 on: May 05, 2011, 02:22:15 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Groundloop

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1736
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1128 on: May 05, 2011, 02:31:24 PM »
Is there anyone here that understands this para? If so, could I impose on you to kindly elucidate on it? Thank you. I believe I have connected the Source and Gate pins as described. No one yet has commented if my diagram is correct. 
Again, I believe I've shown the connections as described. Corrections?
Indeed, I am wanting to build it, but again, I do not have a diagram to do so. Could someone kindly provide a link to a diagram OK'd by Rose?

From the above though, any results I may offer have been pre-disqualified by Rose.

.99

.99

Here: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=10407.1095
Post: Reply #1101 * RAmCirc3a.gif (20.26 KB, 823x775 - viewed 84 times.)

GL.

Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3585
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1129 on: May 05, 2011, 03:04:56 PM »
.99

Here: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=10407.1095
Post: Reply #1101 * RAmCirc3a.gif (20.26 KB, 823x775 - viewed 84 times.)

GL.

Hi GL.

I've seen your diagram, but I've not seen Rose's "OK" of it afterward. I know it was based on a drawing she emailed you, but I think it is wise to wait for her approval first.

Moreover, if that is indeed the new circuit, I'll need to see a photo of the new setup (top and bottom) before I build that version.

I am more inclined at the moment to build the version demonstrated in the video because we know the circuit, and there is a lot of data posted about it. At present time, Rose's claims of overunity made in reference to that demonstration still stand. She has not retracted those claims reference the demo, and therefore it stands as a valid circuit to build and test.

.99

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1129 on: May 05, 2011, 03:04:56 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Groundloop

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1736
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1130 on: May 05, 2011, 03:32:49 PM »
Hi GL.

I've seen your diagram, but I've not seen Rose's "OK" of it afterward. I know it was based on a drawing she emailed you, but I think it is wise to wait for her approval first.

Moreover, if that is indeed the new circuit, I'll need to see a photo of the new setup (top and bottom) before I build that version.

I am more inclined at the moment to build the version demonstrated in the video because we know the circuit, and there is a lot of data posted about it. At present time, Rose's claims of overunity made in reference to that demonstration still stand. She has not retracted those claims reference the demo, and therefore it stands as a valid circuit to build and test.

.99

.99

Rosemary has "OK" of it to me by email.

GL.

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1131 on: May 05, 2011, 03:41:14 PM »
.99

Rosemary has "OK" of it to me by email.

GL.

Sorry Groundloop.  I was in the process of posting this 'good to go' notice,  and got sidetracked.  For the record guys - I am absolutely happy with Groundloop's representations.  And frankly Groundloop - I'd very much welcome any technical support and advices that you can offer.  I entirely trust your interests here and your representations.  Perhaps you could guide anyone with enquiries that I can't deal with.  I'm only good at measuring those energy values guys.  That's just about it.  Unless you'd like me to bore you all to tears on a dissertation of zipons.  Be happy to oblige.  lol.

I've had the smallest of small glimmers of hope here guys.  It seems we may find some really appropriate interest in all this VERY SOON.  I do hope so.  It certainly looks as if things can, pray God, be moved forward.

Anyway - I'll tell you all more when I, myself, know more.  A 10 day wait.  But that's already 10 days better than I've had yet.

Kindest and best,
Rosie

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1131 on: May 05, 2011, 03:41:14 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1132 on: May 05, 2011, 03:54:35 PM »
I have a very real problem in being denied access to Poynty's forum.  It seems that this is public to the world. But not to me.  I am entirely satisfied that this is immoral - if not illegal.  I would earnesly propose that while there is all this level of duplicity in Poynt's dealings with me that he really also disqualifies himself from comment here.  It's one thing to hold up everything with his endless and spurious comments and objections - still to be listed by the way - but am getting there.  It's an entirely different thing to pose as a 'replicator' when this much antagonism is flaunted and quite this publicly.

Rosemary


Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3585
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1133 on: May 05, 2011, 04:10:22 PM »
.99

Rosemary has "OK" of it to me by email.

GL.

That's a good first step GL.

However, as I mentioned, I will not be building that version until I see an updated photo (top and bottom) of the apparatus. It would also be quite beneficial to see scope shots (close-ups) and probe positions both on the apparatus and on an approved diagram.

In the mean time, I'll be building and testing the circuit from the demonstration video, as this is the only one actually verified at this time.

Also, pending a retraction of her claims with reference to the demonstration video and all the results associated with it, it still stands as the de facto proof of COP>1 according to Rose.

.99

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1133 on: May 05, 2011, 04:10:22 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline vonwolf

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 144
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1134 on: May 05, 2011, 04:38:23 PM »
  Well sorry Rose I deregistered from there yesterday when the Poynted one PM'd me over there to threaten me about a post I made over here, now it seems I too am banned, Not to worry  everyone knows how it goes at our. They just seem to like to hear each other drone on and on about denying any claim of OU regardless of thier merits. I know I won't miss that forum.
  As allways good luck Rose Pete

oops wrong "hear"
« Last Edit: May 05, 2011, 06:44:41 PM by vonwolf »

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1135 on: May 05, 2011, 04:46:03 PM »
  Well sorry Rose I deregistered from there yesterday when the Poynted one PM'd me over there to threaten me about a post I made over here, now it seems I too am banned, Not to worry  everyone knows how it goes at our. They just seem to like to here each other drone on and on about denying any claim of OU regardless of there merits. I know I won't miss that forum.
  As allways good luck Rose Pete

Pete?  Sorry to hear you're also being victimised.  There's no QUESTION that pressure is put to everyone to conform to the 'poynted viewpoynt'.  The overarching reach of the overbearing tyrant.  It will brook no argument.  But my endless concern is just that he doesn't effectively derail things here. 

There's good news in the offing Pete.  I'll PM you later.

Take great care of yourself,
Kindest as ever,
Rosie

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1135 on: May 05, 2011, 04:46:03 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3143
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1136 on: May 05, 2011, 04:46:21 PM »
Then would you agree Stefan that it is imperative to obtain an accurate measurement of INPUT power from the battery?

Here is a method that appears to work well, without the need for an oscilloscope:

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=10564.msg280282#msg280282

.99
any more news on this? sorry for posting here, but you had stephan lock that thread after telling us you were going to work on it that weekend. last post was almost a month ago...

Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3585
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1137 on: May 05, 2011, 05:50:55 PM »
  Well sorry Rose I deregistered from there yesterday when the Poynted one PM'd me over there to threaten me about a post I made over here, now it seems I too am banned, Not to worry  everyone knows how it goes at our. They just seem to like to here each other drone on and on about denying any claim of OU regardless of thier merits. I know I won't miss that forum.
  As allways good luck Rose Pete
Actually Pete, the truth is you left on your own after I questioned you on your comment. I don't believe I threatened you in any way. As you left on your own accord, I deleted your account.

Public viewing at OUR is back up, except of course for those that have had their IP's banned for one reason or another.

.99

Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3585
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1138 on: May 05, 2011, 05:58:00 PM »
any more news on this? sorry for posting here, but you had stephan lock that thread after telling us you were going to work on it that weekend. last post was almost a month ago...
Good question.

I have been working very hard to get a commitment as to the working circuit connections so that I (and others) may replicate and test. This circuit will be the one used to test the proposed INPUT power measurement, as well as showing a few other pertinent measurements relative to the claims. As per my recent posts, I'll be building the circuit as per the video demonstration.

The purpose for using this circuit, is that it operates at over 1MHz frequency, which is one of the questionable issues of the proposed method. One other very good reason, is that it represents a circuit that presently has claims of COP>1 associated with it.

.99

Offline vonwolf

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 144
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1139 on: May 05, 2011, 06:25:49 PM »
Actually Pete, the truth is you left on your own after I questioned you on your comment. I don't believe I threatened you in any way. As you left on your own accord, I deleted your account.

Public viewing at OUR is back up, except of course for those that have had their IP's banned for one reason or another.

.99


  I deleted my account you then banned me, no reason to ban my ip I was respectful but ban you did, I even wished you good luck. Your right no threat just your usual bullying that you so often try to do, only problem was your forum holds no interest to me anymore.
   Pete

 

OneLink