Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011  (Read 739635 times)

hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8154
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Rosemary Ainslie's team are preparing a demonstration to be held on Saturday March 12th 2011. 

They are inviting academics from South African universities to attend. 

They're hoping for accreditation of an anomaly on the switching circuit.  More on this is available on her blog at:

http://newlightondarkenergy.blogspot.com/


Please spread the word. 

They are hoping for widespread interest of this event from internet supporters of Over Unity concepts.   

A full report of the circuit and the components will be available after that demonstration.


Regards, Stefan.

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1 on: February 21, 2011, 03:59:45 AM »
Rosemary, if you are reading here, please PLEASE learn to set your scope's timebase to display 3 or 4 full cycles ONLY. The "comb" that you are showing might look nice to you, but it is not very informative in any sense but to illustrate sampling artifacts and aliasing. If you display 3 or 4 full cycles, one may much more easily see phase relationships and other information from the displayed signal, and pixelization and aliasing won't show up as much.

Of course, if your intent is to obscure information, and if you still think Moire patterns caused by aliasing are showing you something significant, you have accomplished that in spades.

The parameter values displayed (the meaningless integral and the averages) will not be affected by the choice of a more appropriate horizontal  timebase setting. Also, the bottom trace isn't giving you a frequency parameter because your vertical scale on that trace is not set appropriately: there should be more amplification so the scope can latch onto the peaks to give a frequency parameter.

Good luck on your demonstration. I will be eagerly awaiting a report on how it went.

infringer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 800
    • mopowah
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #2 on: February 21, 2011, 06:14:49 AM »
Rosie it takes a lot of determination to do what you are attempting go for it.

Women or not this ladies got balls!

We need more people to come up in opposition to our current laws and theories because with them we seem to be stuck from finding new energy sources. We have to be missing a whole hell of a lot cause there is much that we still do not understand.

powercat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1091
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #3 on: February 21, 2011, 04:01:57 PM »
Rosie coming back, Wow  :o  ;D  :D  :-*  ;)

Bob Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 733
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #4 on: February 22, 2011, 12:49:37 AM »
Great news!
All the best, Rosie :)

Bob

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #5 on: February 22, 2011, 03:06:57 AM »
Many thanks guys.  Much appreciated. 

I would be very glad if you could just spread the word.  I'm hoping that this will generate some widespread interest on the internet - mainly to ensure that this event doesn't get lost for want of attention.

Great to be back here - but I have very little time to post.

Kindest regards,
Rosie

vonwolf

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 144
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #6 on: February 22, 2011, 07:39:38 PM »
Hi Rose;
  Its hard to keep up with you, I'm looking forward to seeing you Demo. I refused to join the other forum poynt started because I knew it would be just more of the same but I finally broke down and joined because it was the only place I could find you.
   Then Boom you quit and I don't blame you one bit, now I have your blog so I guess thats the best we can do for now. Its got to be hard with all the negativity every one throws at you its so predictable it's almost a new form of entertainment.
   I hope you are now working with open minded people and the demo will finally quiet your detractors but I'm sure they will find a flaw in how your results are obtained, they can't help them self's. Then you have the other's who will try to claim the technology as there own if they can't find fault in you measurements its so predictable its almost funny.
   Well keep up the good fight and let me know if you find a non hostile forum not every one wants to see you fail you can count me a one.
    Good luck Pete

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #7 on: February 22, 2011, 09:40:17 PM »
Hi Rose;
  Its hard to keep up with you, I'm looking forward to seeing you Demo. I refused to join the other forum poynt started because I knew it would be just more of the same but I finally broke down and joined because it was the only place I could find you.
   Then Boom you quit and I don't blame you one bit, now I have your blog so I guess thats the best we can do for now. Its got to be hard with all the negativity every one throws at you its so predictable it's almost a new form of entertainment.
   I hope you are now working with open minded people and the demo will finally quiet your detractors but I'm sure they will find a flaw in how your results are obtained, they can't help them self's. Then you have the other's who will try to claim the technology as there own if they can't find fault in you measurements its so predictable its almost funny.
   Well keep up the good fight and let me know if you find a non hostile forum not every one wants to see you fail you can count me a one.
    Good luck Pete

Thanks very much Pete.  Your support means a lot.  I have considerably more faith in our academics.  They're more inclined to give an unbiased assessement.  Poynty's forum is only there to deny new physics.  And EF.com promotes flimflam.  Our academics - thank God - are simply trying to establish the facts from the experimental evidence.  And no-one's going to argue that evidence.  But it certainly needs to be carefully evaluated.  And they're well able to do this.  I cannot tell you how much in love I am with our own academy.  I just hope that when the 'facts are out that they'll be given due tribute for their impeccable adherence to science - whichever way the results fall.  They at least are looking at the experimental evidence.  But it's all so scarey.  And this subject is just so contentious.  I can assure you of one thing.  Academics are an entirely different animal to our forum researchers.  They may attack the science.  But they don't presume to attack the scientist.  Such a pleasure. And they're just so clever.  It's been an enormous learning curve for me.

Kindest and best as ever,
Rosie

jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #8 on: March 01, 2011, 07:55:33 PM »
Thanks very much Pete.  Your support means a lot.  I have considerably more faith in our academics.  They're more inclined to give an unbiased assessement.  Poynty's forum is only there to deny new physics.  And EF.com promotes flimflam.  Our academics - thank God - are simply trying to establish the facts from the experimental evidence.  And no-one's going to argue that evidence.  But it certainly needs to be carefully evaluated.  And they're well able to do this.  I cannot tell you how much in love I am with our own academy.  I just hope that when the 'facts are out that they'll be given due tribute for their impeccable adherence to science - whichever way the results fall.  They at least are looking at the experimental evidence.  But it's all so scarey.  And this subject is just so contentious.  I can assure you of one thing.  Academics are an entirely different animal to our forum researchers.  They may attack the science.  But they don't presume to attack the scientist.  Such a pleasure. And they're just so clever.  It's been an enormous learning curve for me.

Kindest and best as ever,
Rosie

 I know we have bucked heads before Rosemary but I would like to extend the olive branch and say good luck.

 I to know exactly what you are talking about in the EF.com reference. I agree with you. After checking on the owner of the forum I found out some pretty amazing stuff about him and why he does what he does on that supposed public forum. He is after all a school taught salesman and nothing more. He is more an agent for a few guys selling products that they leech from that community. Everything else is a lie.

 I am glad you came here to spread your wings and fly. At least here there is little to hold you back from what you are doing in your area. Again good luck to you on your showing.

 P.S. After getting several of my post deleted about the proof of the lies he banned my account and IP. It was nothing more then the proof of his deceits and was further pushed from another user who is a founder of an organization which utilizes that forum as well. Those posts were deleted as well in an earlier incident.. Go figure...

happyfunball

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 405
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #9 on: March 12, 2011, 07:03:12 PM »
It's 8 PM Sat in S Africa, assuming the demo is underway and/or concluded.

Poit

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 295
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #10 on: March 12, 2011, 10:56:59 PM »
Many thanks guys.  Much appreciated. 

I would be very glad if you could just spread the word.  I'm hoping that this will generate some widespread interest on the internet - mainly to ensure that this event doesn't get lost for want of attention.

Great to be back here - but I have very little time to post.

Kindest regards,
Rosie

If you truly have a over unity device then your problem isn't trying to get people interested, it would be quite the opposite. Any genuine over unity device would also be a guaranteed crowd gather device too lol

happyfunball

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 405

ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #12 on: March 13, 2011, 12:55:18 AM »
Congratulation to Rosie and team on a successful demonstration.

Academics will now ask: Is the Rosie Circuit an OPEN system bringing-in energy from the environment?  In Aaron’s words: OPEN system in non-equilibrium thermodynamics?

Or would they look at my classical explanation of “energy is brought-in” at resonance via the ordered pulsing?

happyfunball

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 405
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #13 on: March 13, 2011, 03:25:53 AM »
Congratulation to Rosie and team on a successful demonstration.

Academics will now ask: Is the Rosie Circuit an OPEN system bringing-in energy from the environment?  In Aaron’s words: OPEN system in non-equilibrium thermodynamics?

Or would they look at my classical explanation of “energy is brought-in” at resonance via the ordered pulsing?

Whatever happened to your lead-out wheel? Powering any light bulbs these days?

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #14 on: March 13, 2011, 04:48:58 AM »
Well... congratulations on getting such a comprehensive report out so very quickly. One almost wonders whether the report had been prepared in advance of the actual demonstration.

There are many problems with this report, but I'll just point out one serious one. The "Control Experiment" where DC power at various power levels was applied, and stable temperatures plotted, is a proper control experiment. But it wasn't used properly, unfortunately.
In an EXPERIMENT, a researcher varies one or more "independent variables" and measures the effect of this variation on "dependent variables". In the present case the Independent variable of interest is the POWER SUPPLY, whether DC or the Ainslie circuit, and one dependent variable of interest is the time-temperature curve that results from each supply. We are presented with data from the DC circuit supplying power at various levels, and we should be supplied with a graph from the Ainslie circuit supplying power at the same levels... but we aren't. Nor are we shown anything like a graph of supply voltage versus time for the Ainslie circuit, nor are we shown any evidence AT ALL that the batteries are actually being recharged. Get two sets of batteries, use one set to heat up the load at DC power to a certain temperature and hold it. Use the second set of batteries to power the Ainslie circuit to achieve the SAME time-temp profile as in the DC case. Run both circuits for a given time. Then disconnect the batteries and run a load test... not a "Voltage" test, but a real battery load test, putting a constant load on them and timing how long it takes to run down.

These tests are easy, obvious, and are ACTUAL tests of the Ainslie conjectures. However, you don't see them being performed. At least, not since I did them, nearly two years ago now.

As a paper reporting an experiment, there are some major areas that need revision. As an experiment itself, it needs to be severely redesigned in order ACTUALLY to test any well-formed hypothesis that might be constructed from Rosemary's conjectures.