To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

Storing Cookies (See : ) help us to bring you our services at . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: does vibration count, as solid state ?  (Read 3107 times)

Offline 11:11

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 78
does vibration count, as solid state ?
« on: February 11, 2011, 11:08:26 PM »

thomas throeagers pyramid,
was likely creating electrostatic movement.

like a wimhurst machine,
uses electrostatic movement.

or like lord kelvins thunderstorm,
used electrostatic movement.

thomas troeager had vibration moving through his entire pyramid device.

but the central capacitor,
and copper loop,
were shaking in different directions,
relative to how the copper band with the magnet attached to one end,
was shaking.

thomas troeagers device,
was as "solid state",
as a wimhurst machine,
is soluid state!

the 2 biggest differences, is that his device physically shook,
instead of spun.

and the positively ionized metal,
stayed positively ionized only.

just like the negatively ionized metal,
likely stayed negatively ionized only.

which allowed electrons to move one way only, as amperage.

without constantly moving back and forth between ionized metals,
instead of moving one way only through the load,
as amperage.

TT's pyramid, did not switch ionizations.
which is the only reason that a lightning bolt,
is able to have any amperage at all.